Revision as of 04:46, 4 January 2015 view sourceWikipedian 2 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users667 edits Requesting full protection of Template:Uw-block. (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:50, 4 January 2015 view source CambridgeBayWeather (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators253,469 edits →{{la|Douchebag}}Next edit → | ||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
:{{RFPP|done}} (for the bot) <span style="font-family: Palatino;"> ] • ]</span> 04:03, 4 January 2015 (UTC) | :{{RFPP|done}} (for the bot) <span style="font-family: Palatino;"> ] • ]</span> 04:03, 4 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
==== {{la|Douchebag}} ==== | ==== {{la|Douchebag}} ==== | ||
{{archive top|result= Three administrators have now indicated that the article is not going to get indefinite full protection. There is no way that the problems on the page meet the criteria laid out at ]. If you still feel like stiring this up then takeit to ANI. ], ], ] 04:50, 4 January 2015 (UTC)}} | |||
'''Indefinite full protection:''' Persistent vandalism – On 14 May 2012 this article was suggested as a target for a specific type of vandalism on ], a high-traffic website. Once the page protection ceaced, we got editors pushing the same type of vandalism. We're coming up on 3 years since the original article and we still have drive by vandalism making the same opposed arguments. If someone wants to make a suggestion for an edit, the talk page is open to suggestions that don't involve this joke or BLP violations. Pinging {{Ping group|Admins|Joe Decker|CharlieEchoTango|Kudpung|Runningonbrains|Bongwarrior|Reaper Eternal|The Wordsmith}} for additional advice as each one of these Admins has adjusted the protection level of this page since the joke went live. ] (]) 16:38, 2 January 2015 (UTC) | '''Indefinite full protection:''' Persistent vandalism – On 14 May 2012 this article was suggested as a target for a specific type of vandalism on ], a high-traffic website. Once the page protection ceaced, we got editors pushing the same type of vandalism. We're coming up on 3 years since the original article and we still have drive by vandalism making the same opposed arguments. If someone wants to make a suggestion for an edit, the talk page is open to suggestions that don't involve this joke or BLP violations. Pinging {{Ping group|Admins|Joe Decker|CharlieEchoTango|Kudpung|Runningonbrains|Bongwarrior|Reaper Eternal|The Wordsmith}} for additional advice as each one of these Admins has adjusted the protection level of this page since the joke went live. ] (]) 16:38, 2 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
:{{tlx|RFPP|s}} for one year (again), ] got there a while before this requests and no edits since but I imagine we'll be back here again next year as these things won't go away for as long as ]'s strip keeps circulating which might as well be forever. ] (]) 16:53, 2 January 2015 (UTC) | :{{tlx|RFPP|s}} for one year (again), ] got there a while before this requests and no edits since but I imagine we'll be back here again next year as these things won't go away for as long as ]'s strip keeps circulating which might as well be forever. ] (]) 16:53, 2 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
Line 48: | Line 51: | ||
:{{tlx|RFPP|ap|Joe Decker}} If you want it to be semi indef'd please ask the protecting admin. <b>]</b> (] • ] • ]) 02:49, 4 January 2015 (UTC) | :{{tlx|RFPP|ap|Joe Decker}} If you want it to be semi indef'd please ask the protecting admin. <b>]</b> (] • ] • ]) 02:49, 4 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
::{{U|Callanecc}} What part of '''Indefinite full protection''' don't you understand? ] (]) 04:17, 4 January 2015 (UTC) | ::{{U|Callanecc}} What part of '''Indefinite full protection''' don't you understand? ] (]) 04:17, 4 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
*{{RFPP|ap|Joe Decker}} ], ], ] 04:50, 4 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
{{archivebottom}} | |||
==== {{la|Madleets}} ==== | ==== {{la|Madleets}} ==== |
Revision as of 04:50, 4 January 2015
"WP:RFP" and "WP:RPP" redirect here. You may also be looking for Misplaced Pages:Requests for permissions, Misplaced Pages:Requesting copyright permission, or Misplaced Pages:Random page patrol.
Noticeboards | |
---|---|
Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes. | |
General | |
Articles, content | |
Page handling | |
User conduct | |
Other | |
Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards |
Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here. | ||
---|---|---|
Shortcuts
Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection) After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level Request unprotection Request a specific edit to a protected page Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here Request edit |
Archives |
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 |
Current requests for increase in protection level
Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Template:Uw-block (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite full protection: This template is important to WP and should not be modified. Wikipedian 2 04:46, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
Gopala Gopala (2015 film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated Test edits by IP users affecting the article's stability and reliability. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 03:36, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
Noe Garcia (model) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Create protection Request WP:SALTing of this article and variation Noe Garcia. Obvious WP:HOAX article about an 11 year old who made sex tapes with various real celebrities has been created and recreated 3 times in the last week. Creating account deletes speedy deletion tags as soon as they're applied. DOCUMENT★ERROR 03:20, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This page appears to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot I Online 03:29, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
- Creation protected by Bbb23. Mike V • Talk 04:03, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
List of South Korean idol groups (2010s) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Edit-warring by IPs and new accounts adding non-notable bands. Δρ.Κ. 02:57, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
Stephen Yagman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Indefinite semi-protection - relentless recurrent vandalism by same IP editor (current IP address: 76.175.73.87), who is clearly too close to the subject of the article, over long periods of time, removing sourced material he/she deems derogatory; insulting other editors in edit summaries. Quis separabit? 02:56, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
Terrell Suggs (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Dspradau → talk 01:58, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Steven Walling • talk 02:17, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
Eric Burdett (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Has been deleted 6 times. Boleyn (talk) 00:36, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
- Declined, the article that was deleted five times in 2006 was about a different person. — east718 | talk | 00:42, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
Hetherington (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Temporary semi-protection: Ongoing IP vandalism concerning the 'Englishness' of this surname. The stub had been protected a couple times last year but the IP is back again.Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 23:19, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
- Declined Consider asking the IP to engage on the talk page. Protection is not applied in the case of good faith content disputes. Steven Walling • talk 00:35, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
Shawn Oakman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There seems to have been a vandalism attack on this page by multiple editors over the past few days. Squinge (talk) 19:34, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This page appears to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot I Online 21:42, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: Page has been A7ed. Miniapolis 01:28, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
- Done (for the bot) Mike V • Talk 04:03, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
Douchebag (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Three administrators have now indicated that the article is not going to get indefinite full protection. There is no way that the problems on the page meet the criteria laid out at Misplaced Pages:Protection policy#Full protection. If you still feel like stiring this up then takeit to ANI. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:50, 4 January 2015 (UTC)The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – On 14 May 2012 this article was suggested as a target for a specific type of vandalism on The Oatmeal, a high-traffic website. Once the page protection ceaced, we got editors pushing the same type of vandalism. We're coming up on 3 years since the original article and we still have drive by vandalism making the same opposed arguments. If someone wants to make a suggestion for an edit, the talk page is open to suggestions that don't involve this joke or BLP violations. Pinging Admins (Joe Decker—CharlieEchoTango—Kudpung—Runningonbrains—Bongwarrior—Reaper Eternal—The Wordsmith) for additional advice as each one of these Admins has adjusted the protection level of this page since the joke went live. Hasteur (talk) 16:38, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
{{RFPP|s}}
for one year (again), User:Joe Decker got there a while before this requests and no edits since but I imagine we'll be back here again next year as these things won't go away for as long as The Oatmeal's strip keeps circulating which might as well be forever. tutterMouse (talk) 16:53, 2 January 2015 (UTC)- TutterMouse Please reconsider. I didn't ask for a one year, I asked for indefinite. There's no reason for us to kick the problem down the road a year only to have to solve it again. Hasteur (talk) 17:02, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
- You'll want to take it up with @Joe Decker: as protecting admin, He protected ahead of your request and I'm not even an admin or I'd have asked Joe myself to prevent a wheel war. tutterMouse (talk) 17:11, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
- De archiving because no ADMIN did anything about this. Re-pinging Joe Decker to deal with this or to indicate that they're yeilding. I ask that any lookey-loos please refrain from using the signaling templates. Hasteur (talk) 18:56, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
- You'll want to take it up with @Joe Decker: as protecting admin, He protected ahead of your request and I'm not even an admin or I'd have asked Joe myself to prevent a wheel war. tutterMouse (talk) 17:11, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
- TutterMouse Please reconsider. I didn't ask for a one year, I asked for indefinite. There's no reason for us to kick the problem down the road a year only to have to solve it again. Hasteur (talk) 17:02, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
{{RFPP|n|Indefinitely semi'd by Joe Decker}}
Steven Walling • talk 00:24, 4 January 2015 (UTC)- Steven Walling WRONG! 14:27, 2 January 2015 Joe Decker (talk | contribs) changed protection level of Douchebag (expires 14:27, 2 January 2016 (UTC)) (indefinite) (Persistent vandalism: Well, that didn't take long) (hist). Why is it so hard to read instructions and make sure you're speaking from facts before you embarass yourself Hasteur (talk) 02:08, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
{{RFPP|ap|Joe Decker}}
If you want it to be semi indef'd please ask the protecting admin. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:49, 4 January 2015 (UTC)- Callanecc What part of Indefinite full protection don't you understand? Hasteur (talk) 04:17, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Joe Decker. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:50, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
Madleets (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This is an article about a Pakistani hacking group. It makes sense that it will be abused as the edit history indicates. — {{U|Technical 13}} 14:23, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
- @Technical 13: The content looks potentially legit. Is the problem that the sources are bogus (i.e. self-published bragging sheets)? Steven Walling • talk 23:55, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
- Declined, not vandalism, protecting would lock out one side of the content dispute. — east718 | talk | 00:26, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
Wilayats of ISIL (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
We are seeking the SALTing of all articles on the list linked. Secondly, requesting Blacklisting of all article titles containing any element in Group 1: (wilayat/wilayah/province including both capital and lower case) combined with any element in Group 2: (Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant/ISIL/ISIS/IS/Islamic State). Hopefully this is the right place to request, if not tell us where. See this link], the links to the deletion discussions below it that resulted in all titles and redirects being deleted (lots of policy based comments), and editor discussion above it for support for this action. The continued disruptive efforts to recreate deleted articles with the same or very similar titles necessitates this. Request supported by User:Spirit_of_Eagle, User:Mhhossein, and I expect User:Gregkaye Legacypac (talk) 07:06, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
- Legacypac, rather than protect these one at a time I've asked at MediaWiki talk:Titleblacklist# Wilayats of ISIL if they can be added. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:30, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
- Support protection, a declaration of Wilayat with untranslated content and/or with the use of Misplaced Pages's voice is a violation of NPOV. Other people's describe the territory as something different. A very similar problem was raised when Daesh proclaimed themselves as "Islamic State" but, fortunately, in this case we had designations such as "Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant" to fall back on. GregKaye 11:37, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Almost similar discussions for deletion of over 30 article and redirects. Why not avoid them being created? Mhhossein (talk) 12:08, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
- I went to go ask Technical 13 and ended up being distracted by another template. Anyway I've asked them now. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:27, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
- I've setup a page to track this issue where it will not be bot archived. We've deleted 27 similar articles plus 5 related ones so far in 10 different closed deletion discussions. These are akin an American terrorist group calling themselves New York State. Hence the request here. Legacypac (talk) 02:29, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
ShortcutsBefore posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
2020 Summer Olympics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Unprotection: Protected due to an edit war in September 2013, but given that the article has hardly been edited on in the past few months it's safe to say the dispute has ended. . Aerospeed (Talk) 15:54, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This page appears to have already been unprotected. Please confirm.—cyberbot I Online 15:56, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
- There's still a padlock on the top right page... I don't know what the bot is trying to say Aerospeed (Talk) 16:09, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
- @Casliber: was the protecting admin. Sam Walton (talk) 17:56, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
- Unprotected now - let's see what happens. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 19:32, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
- Unprotected for the bot. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:51, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Further information: Misplaced Pages:Edit requests ShortcutIdeally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}}
,{{Edit template-protected}}
,{{Edit extended-protected}}
, or{{Edit semi-protected}}
to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Misplaced Pages:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}
template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Misplaced Pages:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Fulfilled/denied requests
A rolling archive of the last seven days of protection requests can be found at Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/Rolling archive.