| Revision as of 21:52, 17 January 2015 editOccultZone (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers224,089 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit |
Revision as of 23:11, 17 January 2015 edit undoXharm (talk | contribs)156 edits Reverted 3 edits by OccultZone (talk): Not copying, especially since you haven't offered any rebuttal. (TW)Next edit → |
| Line 11: |
Line 11: |
|
|} |
|
|} |
|
]<!-- Template:Teahouse_HostBot_Invitation --> |
|
]<!-- Template:Teahouse_HostBot_Invitation --> |
|
|
|
|
== Commenting on AfD == |
|
|
|
|
|
Stop copying comment of others. It is not a personal attack if someone is making the comment on your conduct. Neither you should continue to make baseless conversation through copy-pasting others comment. Read ]: |
|
|
|
|
|
*It is not necessary or desirable to reply to every comment in a discussion. |
|
|
*The more often you use the same reason in a given discussion, the weaker it becomes. |
|
|
|
|
|
You have already repeated the same point for about 3 times now, that "most of the sources don't mention the subject", and you were answered by at least 2 editors that ]. Your continued repitition of same point is only making the argument look more boring and clearly seems like you ]. Unless you can prove that the article is not notable, mentioned nowhere in any of the reliable sources, you can still continue to argue. But at this stage and for this kind of AfD I really don't see reason that why you have to continue arguing anymore. ] <small>(] • ] • ])</small> 21:49, 17 January 2015 (UTC) |
|