| Revision as of 19:10, 17 October 2015 editClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,385,862 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:Serialjoepsycho/Archive 1. (BOT)← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:49, 18 October 2015 edit undoPoint by point (talk | contribs)371 edits →Disagreement: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
| The ] is asking for participation in ]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 34425 --> ] (]) 00:02, 14 October 2015 (UTC) | The ] is asking for participation in ]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 34425 --> ] (]) 00:02, 14 October 2015 (UTC) | ||
| == Disagreement == | |||
| I have already exposed the reason of my modification on the talk page. I have also proposed you a consensus, that you rejected with no apparent reasons. You shall refrain from reverting blindly. You will have to provide evidence to support your claim. I find your behaviour offensive and somehow inappropriate. Even if you believe that my arguments do not deserve your attention, perhaps you shoud however make an effort to try to be less provocative and more respective. For example, Saying that somthing is false without an explaination, is counterproductive. --] (]) 02:49, 18 October 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:49, 18 October 2015
 | |
| Misplaced Pages ads | file info – show another – #139 |
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 15 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III. |
en:User:Serialjoepsycho/sunshine/message
Please comment on Talk:Metapolitefsi
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Metapolitefsi. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:United Nations
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:United Nations. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
Disagreement
I have already exposed the reason of my modification on the talk page. I have also proposed you a consensus, that you rejected with no apparent reasons. You shall refrain from reverting blindly. You will have to provide evidence to support your claim. I find your behaviour offensive and somehow inappropriate. Even if you believe that my arguments do not deserve your attention, perhaps you shoud however make an effort to try to be less provocative and more respective. For example, Saying that somthing is false without an explaination, is counterproductive. --... Point by point ... (talk) 02:49, 18 October 2015 (UTC)