Misplaced Pages

User talk:Cassianto: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:35, 19 November 2015 view sourceSteelpillow (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers38,171 edits ANI: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 14:37, 19 November 2015 view source Cassianto (talk | contribs)37,404 edits Undid revision 691390134 by Steelpillow (talk) go awayNext edit →
Line 60: Line 60:
] (]) 02:57, 17 November 2015 (UTC) ] (]) 02:57, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
<br style="clear: both;"/> <br style="clear: both;"/>

== ANI ==

] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. - see &mdash; Cheers, ] (]) 14:35, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:37, 19 November 2015

SEMI-RETIRED This user is no longer very active on Misplaced Pages. Please leave a message; I'll reply here.

    This is Cassianto's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.
    Shortcut
    Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12Auto-archiving period: 10 days 

    Mayabazar

    I've nominated this article for FAC which also happens to be my first attempt. It is also the first Indian Telugu film article to be nominated for such status. If interested, please leave your comments here. All constructive comments are welcomed. Yours sincerely, Pavanjandhyala (talk) 09:09, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

    Mullum Malarum FAC

    Kailash29792 has nominated the article for FAC. Feel free to leave comments at its FAC page.  — Ssven2 09:31, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

    note

    I know that I've disagreed with you in the past. If I've said anything that was offensive to you, I do apologize. I do truly and honestly appreciate all the hard work you do to provide good content to this project. I haven't said it before, so I say it now: Thank you. — Ched :  ?  21:53, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

    I'm scratching my head trying to remember our disagreement but I shan't ask you to elaborate. And there's certainly no need to apologise as any offence (if any) has certainly been forgotten about. I really do support your block wholeheartedly. If I did have one criticism though it would have to be the length, perhaps, but that could've easily been adjusted. I greatly appreciate the note Ched, thanks for popping by and here's to some good future interactions. Cassianto 22:29, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

    GD's crystal ball.

    I've seen this coming. In November 2014, I advised & pleaded with Arbcom, to not ban anybody at the end of the GGTF case. My advice shouldn't have been overlooked. :( GoodDay (talk) 22:16, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

    No, but then we all know the lunatics are running the asylum around here. Cassianto 18:57, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

    RE RO:

    Suggest no longer interacting with Lynn or KG except in regards to RO's behaviour. No point in indulging their activism. Only in death does duty end (talk) 11:02, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

    I agree. Cassianto 11:36, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
    WP:AGENDA really should be strengthed for time to time. This is an encyclopaeda, which seems to have been forgotten by many who prefer to spend their lives on the dramah boards and away from the 'sharp end' of editing and improving articles. - SchroCat (talk) 11:59, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
    Notice how everything these days quickly turns into a gender harassment discussion..♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:09, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

    Kev's page

    Glad you saw it; blink of an eye and you miss it these days. Giano (talk) 20:17, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

    The man is a troublemaker and it beggars belief that he is an admin. He is now reverting me as he is so desperate not to answer my questions to him. Fucking lunacy! Cassianto 20:21, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
    Have patience, I'm quite sure all will be explained here. Giano (talk) 20:24, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
    Oh well, perhaps not. It seems anyone who takes an alternative view or attempts to point out his errors to Kevin is a troll. He should go a long way on the Arbcom. Giano (talk) 07:56, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
    Apologies Cassianto if I excerbated the issue on ANI, however after the latest 'misunderstanding' of KG there (where he takes the complete opposite meaning from what I actually said), coupled with his repeated assertation on his talkpage that (I assume he is referring to you and I) brought up the gender crap, I have come to the conclusion its a waste of time engaging with someone who insists on interpreting everything to take maximum offense. Only in death does duty end (talk) 07:51, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
    I have pondered whether to let rip at Kevin, as we have not exactly been the closest of friends on here, but he's standing for arbcom and I'm not, and I feel my concerns have to be aired. Ritchie333 16:46, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
    I'd err on the side of caution if I were you; Gorman thinks it's ok to play by the rules of poetic licence when it comes to telling the truth. Cassianto 20:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
    You misinterpreted my comments - which never suggested that either of you brought up the gender issue to begin with - but only suggested that you and OIDDE were the first to bring it up after 28 unblocked in sections that should have been about RO's behavior (for any passersby, if you take a look at the "arbitration" subheading, you'll note the truth of this.) Kevin Gorman (talk) 20:08, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
    I'm tempted to revert you, but then that would make me just as bad as you, wouldn't it? Did you notice that I even closed the off-topic discussion with a view to ending the dramah about gender and Eric? I even left a closing note, sating that it was off-topic, which some idiot reverted in order to keep the off-topic discussion alive. It's only because I like Sarah that I didn't revert back to the archived version. Cassianto 20:20, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
    You'll note I didn't start reverting you until you hit a certain point - and bluntly, I would expect you to revert me if I hit the same point. Certainly you can see what I meant with regards to this section? Or did you close that section yourself before Sarah did? If so, I missed it. Kevin Gorman (talk) 20:25, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
    It was a valid point: I honestly didn't know whether you were playing dumb in order to rile me, or if you genuinely didn't get it. I see nothing uncivil in asking that. Matters were of course made worse by Dial running off to the noticeboards in order to get me blocked. It's pretty pathetic really. Cassianto 20:41, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
    OK, so I didn't want to trawl through diffs, but here we go. And here's who reverted. So, through the process of investigation, it appears your ally DD2K kept the discussion alive. What do you have to say about that? Cassianto 20:52, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
    I was referring, quite specifically, to the arbitration subheading not included in that closure or unclosure, which contained a valid suggestion (albeit one I didn't think was a great idea) that arbitration be considered - which instead of discussion of the merits of the idea, had you and Only in death instantly suggesting that any attempt at arbitration would be hijacked by some sort of GGTF-mafia. I've barely ever spoken with Dave by the way - just because two people both disagree with you doesn't mean there's a cabal going on. As slakr and Ed both pointed out to you at the ANEW report, it's not really appropriate to editwar with someone else in their own userspace, let alone with personal attacks thrown in. If they're part of my cabal too, I'm suddenly excited - I have quite a bit of respect for them :) Kevin Gorman (talk) 20:58, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
    If it was warring, I'd have been blocked. Look, I think this has died a death now, so why don't you go your way and I'll go mine. Cassianto 21:23, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

    A kitten for you!

    Jesus loves you!

    Elizium23 (talk) 02:57, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

    User talk:Cassianto: Difference between revisions Add topic