| Revision as of 00:48, 31 December 2015 editScjessey (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers29,034 editsm Reverted 1 edit by Mouse001 (talk): Rv bullshit by SPA agressively pushing agenda. using TW← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:17, 7 January 2016 edit undoMouse001 (talk | contribs)152 edits →January 6 2016: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
| There is a discussion at ] about the article title. — Cheers, ] (]) 10:33, 22 December 2015 (UTC) | There is a discussion at ] about the article title. — Cheers, ] (]) 10:33, 22 December 2015 (UTC) | ||
| == January 6 2016 == | |||
| Hi, I am bringing to your attention an arbitration case that I have raised against you.--] (]) 02:17, 7 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:17, 7 January 2016
|
Please sign your comments using four tildes ( |
Please respect etiquette and assume good faith. Also be nice and remain civil. |
Arbitration motion regarding Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Climate change
Resolved by motion at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Amendment that: The Climate change case is supplemented as follows:
The editing restriction described in remedy 16.1 ("Scjessey's voluntary editing restriction") of the Climate change decision is terminated, effective on the passage of this motion.
For the Arbitration Committee, Alexandr Dmitri (talk) 12:52, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
ANI
There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Jeppiz (talk) 13:31, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
You have a long history here and know that personal attacks are not acceptable. You have not had a personal attack block since 2009, please stop engaging in personal attacks or it will happen again. HighInBC 13:46, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
- Roger that. I have already expressed my outrage and got it out of my system. -- Scjessey (talk) 13:51, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Hillary Clinton email controversy is covered by discretionary sanctions under WP:ARBAP2
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Template:Z33 Alerting you of the sanctions in view of a complaint about your edits at WP:AN3 (permanent link). Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 15:32, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Randazza
Hi, thank you for your feedback. But the edits made were sourced to even the same article that sources already allowed. If Ars Technica can not be a source, then it can not be a source, its ok. but Ars Technica is a source for what I post too. I think you should be balanced. Not allowing public relations from Liberty Media to own page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 177.237.78.14 (talk) 21:44, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
AN/I discussion
There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an editor for whom you left a talk page caution. The thread is Professor JR on political articles. Thank you. - Wikidemon (talk) 10:36, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
Rotor wing
There is a discussion at Talk:Rotor wing about the article title. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 10:33, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
January 6 2016
Hi, I am bringing to your attention an arbitration case that I have raised against you.--Mouse001 (talk) 02:17, 7 January 2016 (UTC)