Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
:****What do you mean? <span style="color:#000080">'''Wykx'''</span> 20:50, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
:****What do you mean? <span style="color:#000080">'''Wykx'''</span> 20:50, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
:*****That US politician infoboxes typically have: "city, state, US". ] (]) 20:56, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
:*****That US politician infoboxes typically have: "city, state, US". ] (]) 20:56, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
:******I'm fine with "city, England, U.K." since U.K. is included. <span style="color:#000080">'''Wykx'''</span> 20:59, 13 January 2016 (UTC)</small>
:******I'm fine with "city, England, U.K." since U.K. is included. <span style="color:#000080">'''Wykx'''</span> 20:59, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
:*******But, I'm not so keen. As England is at least a country. And we also have counties, of course. I also now see that <nowiki>{{Infobox officeholder}}</nowiki> doesn't even mention UK - it's all US centric. So not much point looking for any advice there! ] (]) 21:06, 13 January 2016 (UTC) </small>
*'''England''', since ]'s bio {{diff2|699680058|says that}} --] <sup>]</sup> 20:05, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
*'''England''', since ]'s bio {{diff2|699680058|says that}} --] <sup>]</sup> 20:05, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
*:<small>Ah, consistency at last. ] (]) 20:29, 13 January 2016 (UTC) </small>
*:<small>Ah, consistency at last. ] (]) 20:29, 13 January 2016 (UTC) </small>
Revision as of 21:06, 13 January 2016
Before you edit this page:
This page relates to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, which is a contentious topic. Your behaviour on this page is subject to special rules. You must follow:
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, which has been designated as a contentious topic.
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jeremy Corbyn article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Per the consensus reached on this discussion thread, I have included Corbyn's comments on Hamas and Hezbollah, and on British policy towards the former, which were previously missing from the section on Middle East foreign policy. The comments were initially included in September, but were later removed due to objections over the source. Therefore, I have reincorporated the comments with another source, though my edits were just reverted by Nomoskedasticity. I would appreciate a clarification as to why this cited text was removed-- is there an objection to using Foreign Policy magazine as a source? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sammy1857 (talk • contribs) 19:38, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
I removed 'United Kingdom' in the infobox, replacing it with the more specific and equally correct 'England'. Two users, Nomoskedasticity and Nonsenseferret, have now removed any reference to a country at all, claiming that it should be 'UK or nothing'. Why? Zacwill (talk) 22:48, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Why did you remove UK? "More specific" wasn't a good reason, imo. Is it an ideological thing? (For me it isn't -- I didn't replace UK, I just left out the country until something could be agreed.) Nomoskedasticity (talk) 22:56, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
This is simply to do with the geographical location of Wiltshire - it is not to do with his nationality or the guidance at WP:UKNATIONALS. Wiltshire is in England. His nationality is British (or UK), but what this concerns is his birthplace - which is, as a matter of simple and undeniable fact, within England. Ghmyrtle (talk) 23:07, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
There's nothing wrong with either UK or England, but it's nonsensical to have neither. England is more specific, and before he became Leader his infobox said England. There is no good (that is, non-political) reason to depart from that now. Ghmyrtle (talk) 23:30, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
England is a political choice here. It should clearly neutrally describe the state as UK just like David Cameron and many many other articles do. --ℕℱ23:51, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
If anything, 'UK' is the political choice. England is a geographical region, whereas the United Kingdom is a political nation state. Zacwill (talk) 00:21, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Agree with Ghmyrtle. Don't see why it has to be cast as "a political choice". In fact, as I'm pretty sure Ghmyrtle had no intention to make a political choice, how exactly can this be misconstrued as a political choice? Martinevans123 (talk) 00:02, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
I strongly favour having the country as UK, especially for a UK-wide politician. Wiltshire is undeniably in the UK. It's also clear that a lot of nationalistic and activist editors are seeking to remove all references to the UK from Misplaced Pages and replace everything with "England" and "English". AusLondonder (talk) 00:09, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
I think it's the other way round actually. Fifty years ago, it wouldn't have been remotely controversial to describe English things as English, but now everything has to be 'British'. Zacwill (talk) 00:21, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
The issue may be simply a matter of choosing either "normal postal usage" for address of birth, or "nation where nation may not be a normal postal usage". More to the point, most people speak of "London, England" than speak of "London, UK" it would appear. I do know that telling someone they were born in "Glasgow, UK" might well result in an impact being felt upon your nose. There is a quite noticeable amount in pride of individual country within the UK. To that end, I suggest we use "England" (or "Scotland" or "Ireland" or "Wales" or "Man") where the person specifically refers to himself or herself as "English" (etc.) and "UK" where they evince no such national identification personally. Collect (talk) 00:57, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
FWIW, concerning this topic, there's inconsistency across the infoboxes of the UK opposition leaders, who've never been prime minister. GoodDay (talk) 19:01, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
The inconsistency is enshrined and is well summed up in the essay I already mentioned, which specifically cautions against well-meaning attempts to enforce "consistency". Nothing good will come of it. --John (talk) 19:12, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
I've no intentions of changing this infobox's birth-country entry. That'll be up to other editors here to decide. I do recommend that the United Kingdom be added to all the infoboxes of UK opposition leaders, however. GoodDay (talk) 19:30, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
I agree with John that trying to enforce uniformity or consistency always ends in tears. Whatever it originally said, leave it at that. If I had a preference, it would be UK per GoodDay. Bretonbanquet (talk) 22:31, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
To be helpful I to some extent agree with both User:Collect and GoodDay (I personally use the UK not England, as my birth nation), However David Cameron's page says ... Born David William Donald Cameron ... (snip) ...Marylebone, London, United Kingdom ... surely Corbyn as the Opposition leader in the of the same UK Parliament... it should be the same. -- BOD --13:58, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
… and Winston Churchill's page has his pob as Blenheim Palace, Woodstock, Oxfordshire, England. As has been noted above, there is no standard format. Also, the notion that infoboxes of politicians in the UK Parliament should have United Kingdom in their place of birth because it is the UK Parliament is a false analogy. Firstly, the articles are about the person, not the office. Secondly, the offices of head of government in many sovereign states have eligibility criteria that include a requirement to have been born in that state. The office of UK Prime Minister is not limited to those born in the UK. Daicaregos (talk) 15:12, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
We should also use United Kingdom for all the Prime Ministers aswell. Of course, this is a decision to be made by others. GoodDay (talk) 17:55, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
I'm fine with "city, England, U.K." since U.K. is included. Wykx 20:59, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
But, I'm not so keen. As England is at least a country. And we also have counties, of course. I also now see that {{Infobox officeholder}} doesn't even mention UK - it's all US centric. So not much point looking for any advice there! Martinevans123 (talk) 21:06, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
I tend to be of the opinion that whatever country the article stated originally is the one that should stand. I note that David Cameron's birthplace is in the United Kingdom, but Ed Miliband's is in England. We need to develop a consensus on how to present the information as the argument about the UK and her constituent countries is one oft visited. This is Paul (talk) 19:18, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
I've been around long enough to know, we'll never get a consensus to use United Kingdom across all British bio articles infoboxes. It's likely that these things will need to be handled article-by-article. IMHO, we should use 'United Kingdom' here. GoodDay (talk) 19:25, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
You have a good point, particularly when it comes to Scotland and Northern Ireland. I am tempted to suggest we could use UK since we're talking about a politician at UK level, but again that couldn't be applied to everyone in the Commons, Alex Salmond for example, who is a member of the UK's third largest parliamentary party, but who would regard himself as having been born in Scotland rather than the UK. This is Paul (talk) 19:34, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
If it were up to me, I'd have Salmond's birthplace changed to 'United Kingdom', aswell. Now that he's a member of the British Parliament. But, that's a discussion for that bio article. GoodDay (talk) 19:37, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
.svg){kind=small}
