| Revision as of 01:08, 9 February 2016 edit2601:188:0:abe6:65f5:930c:b0b2:cd63 (talk) re: vandalism to Wallingford article | Revision as of 01:35, 9 February 2016 edit undoLiz1800 (talk | contribs)6 edits New talk section: Unauthorized ChangesTags: Mobile edit Mobile web editNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| Hi Liz1800, I notice you attempted to remove protection templates from ]. I asked for administrative intervention because the article has suffered a history of promotional edits regarding property value, falsifying of statistics to inflate economic standing, and copyright violations. I've also asked other objective editors to watchlist the article, as will I, so that if such vandalism recurs it will be removed, and the article may be protected for longer periods, if necessary. Thank you, ] (]) 01:08, 9 February 2016 (UTC) | Hi Liz1800, I notice you attempted to remove protection templates from ]. I asked for administrative intervention because the article has suffered a history of promotional edits regarding property value, falsifying of statistics to inflate economic standing, and copyright violations. I've also asked other objective editors to watchlist the article, as will I, so that if such vandalism recurs it will be removed, and the article may be protected for longer periods, if necessary. Thank you, ] (]) 01:08, 9 February 2016 (UTC) | ||
| == Unauthorized Changes == | |||
| The changes on that page were factual changes. All statistics and numerical data was confirmed by our town and state records. The only aspect of the page that needed remember were the pictures of the Wallingford Properties. You have no value ration in knowing that these statistics were correct and accurate, Therefore you have no right under legal status to alter these records. As mentioned before the pictures of homes are a clear violation of WikiPedia's policies but the statistical data and information is not subject to altercation or deletion of any kind unless authorized by the Town of Wallingford and/or the State of Connecticut. My department and attorneys will be looking into your altercation of this data, and will take further legal action if we verify that the information was improperly removed without authorization. We simply can not verify if you altered these records in order to negatively Impact our town's economic standing or to positively correct incorrect information. We believe that the change of records was not in the best interest of our town but rather it was in the best interest for you. We are asking that all changes made by you and your affiliates be reverted back to its original state, effective immediately. If you deny or refuse to respond to our request, legal action will be taken against you and[REDACTED] Inc. | |||
| Thank You. | |||
| ] (]) 01:35, 9 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:35, 9 February 2016
Hi Liz1800, I notice you attempted to remove protection templates from Wallingford, Connecticut. I asked for administrative intervention because the article has suffered a history of promotional edits regarding property value, falsifying of statistics to inflate economic standing, and copyright violations. I've also asked other objective editors to watchlist the article, as will I, so that if such vandalism recurs it will be removed, and the article may be protected for longer periods, if necessary. Thank you, 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 01:08, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Unauthorized Changes
The changes on that page were factual changes. All statistics and numerical data was confirmed by our town and state records. The only aspect of the page that needed remember were the pictures of the Wallingford Properties. You have no value ration in knowing that these statistics were correct and accurate, Therefore you have no right under legal status to alter these records. As mentioned before the pictures of homes are a clear violation of WikiPedia's policies but the statistical data and information is not subject to altercation or deletion of any kind unless authorized by the Town of Wallingford and/or the State of Connecticut. My department and attorneys will be looking into your altercation of this data, and will take further legal action if we verify that the information was improperly removed without authorization. We simply can not verify if you altered these records in order to negatively Impact our town's economic standing or to positively correct incorrect information. We believe that the change of records was not in the best interest of our town but rather it was in the best interest for you. We are asking that all changes made by you and your affiliates be reverted back to its original state, effective immediately. If you deny or refuse to respond to our request, legal action will be taken against you and[REDACTED] Inc.
Thank You.
Elizabeth (talk) 01:35, 9 February 2016 (UTC)