Revision as of 17:27, 18 March 2016 view sourceCassianto (talk | contribs)37,404 edits →Social Work: it's rude to talk behind someone's back← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:41, 19 March 2016 view source Calvin999 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users43,643 edits General note: Not assuming good faith on Talk:Frank Sinatra. (TW)Next edit → | ||
Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
Meaning http://www.thefreedictionary.com/rogue, better put as independent otherwise its misrepresentation. Above that the word IP-hopper and even adding the IP I used by a certain editor {{u|Jim1138}} shows rogue nature and it seems to be intended for ]. Moreover that same editor seems to add IP's as it goes under the heading, when IP's are already shown. It would be more accurate if the editors attempts are read along with http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-trending-35787730 If such activities are validated for some certain sakes. This sort of anti-social attempts will continue to mask under policies and so on.] (]) 17:01, 18 March 2016 (UTC) | Meaning http://www.thefreedictionary.com/rogue, better put as independent otherwise its misrepresentation. Above that the word IP-hopper and even adding the IP I used by a certain editor {{u|Jim1138}} shows rogue nature and it seems to be intended for ]. Moreover that same editor seems to add IP's as it goes under the heading, when IP's are already shown. It would be more accurate if the editors attempts are read along with http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-trending-35787730 If such activities are validated for some certain sakes. This sort of anti-social attempts will continue to mask under policies and so on.] (]) 17:01, 18 March 2016 (UTC) | ||
:You cannot harass a group of people. If you decide to counter that by saying that this isn't a group and is in fact you alone, then please bear in mind ]. A breach of of this will almost certainly see you blocked. '''<span style="text-shadow:7px 7px 8px Black;">]<sup>]</sup></span>''' 17:24, 18 March 2016 (UTC) | :You cannot harass a group of people. If you decide to counter that by saying that this isn't a group and is in fact you alone, then please bear in mind ]. A breach of of this will almost certainly see you blocked. '''<span style="text-shadow:7px 7px 8px Black;">]<sup>]</sup></span>''' 17:24, 18 March 2016 (UTC) | ||
== March 2016 == | |||
] Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would ask that you ] while interacting with other editors, which you did not on ]. Take a look at the ] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. ''For saying: "Well, you've had your say, now shut up and face the fact that the collapsed infobox is here to stay."''<!-- Template:uw-agf1 --> — ] 21:41, 19 March 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:41, 19 March 2016
Please leave a message; I'll reply here.
Congrats!!Many many congratulations C for this. Usually the time zone I am in means that I miss all the fun so I am happy to be the first to say Well done. Cheers. MarnetteD|Talk 23:17, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
George Bernard ShawGreetings! Can Brian B. and I interest you in the peer review of GBS's article? All comments gratefully received if you have time and inclination. Tim riley talk 15:53, 24 February 2016 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for February 29Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dagenham Civic Centre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ITV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 29 February 2016 (UTC) Kalki KoechlinHey, I just re-nominated Kalki Koechlin's article for WP:FA. If you find spare time, would you mind taking a look? Thank you! NumerounovedantTalk 18:10, 11 March 2016 (UTC) Your helpful reviewPrecious again, your detailed constructive comments which helped to improve Christ lag in Todes Banden, BWV 4 to FA! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:58, 12 March 2016 (UTC)Social WorkReply for "No reason to hide rogue ip's. Or do you you have something to hide?" Meaning http://www.thefreedictionary.com/rogue, better put as independent otherwise its misrepresentation. Above that the word IP-hopper and even adding the IP I used by a certain editor Jim1138 shows rogue nature and it seems to be intended for Misplaced Pages:Harassment. Moreover that same editor seems to add IP's as it goes under the heading, when IP's are already shown. It would be more accurate if the editors attempts are read along with http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-trending-35787730 If such activities are validated for some certain sakes. This sort of anti-social attempts will continue to mask under policies and so on.59.98.249.148 (talk) 17:01, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
March 2016Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would ask that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not on Talk:Frank Sinatra. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. For saying: "Well, you've had your say, now shut up and face the fact that the collapsed infobox is here to stay." — Calvin999 21:41, 19 March 2016 (UTC) |