| Revision as of 08:09, 2 April 2016 editHmlarson (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Mass message senders, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers35,282 editsm sp← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:42, 2 April 2016 edit undoThe Rambling Man (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors286,429 edits kNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| Contested PROD with no reason given. Subject fails ] as has not played senior international football nor played in a ]. This is irrelevant however, as there is no indication whatsoever that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage in third party sources for any other achievements to satisfy ]. ] (]) 07:44, 2 April 2016 (UTC) | Contested PROD with no reason given. Subject fails ] as has not played senior international football nor played in a ]. This is irrelevant however, as there is no indication whatsoever that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage in third party sources for any other achievements to satisfy ]. ] (]) 07:44, 2 April 2016 (UTC) | ||
| * '''Keep''' - ] criteria clearly met. ] and its perpetually incomplete ] essay (as noted clearly at the top of the page) is largely irrelevant to women's top-division leagues around the world. Adequate references provided for ] criteria. ] (]) 08:04, 2 April 2016 (UTC) | * '''Keep''' - ] criteria clearly met. ] and its perpetually incomplete ] essay (as noted clearly at the top of the page) is largely irrelevant to women's top-division leagues around the world. Adequate references provided for ] criteria. ] (]) 08:04, 2 April 2016 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''' unless a viable solution for the top-division of women's football has been resolved and the conclusion declares that women playing in the top-level league in their country still aren't notable. ] (]) 08:42, 2 April 2016 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 08:42, 2 April 2016
Brogan Hay
- Brogan Hay (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD with no reason given. Subject fails NFOOTY as has not played senior international football nor played in a fully professional league. This is irrelevant however, as there is no indication whatsoever that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage in third party sources for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. Fenix down (talk) 07:44, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep - WP:GNG criteria clearly met. WP:NFOOTY and its perpetually incomplete WP:FPL essay (as noted clearly at the top of the page) is largely irrelevant to women's top-division leagues around the world. Adequate references provided for WP:GNG criteria. Hmlarson (talk) 08:04, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep unless a viable solution for the top-division of women's football has been resolved and the conclusion declares that women playing in the top-level league in their country still aren't notable. The Rambling Man (talk) 08:42, 2 April 2016 (UTC)