Revision as of 19:25, 8 April 2016 editMhhossein (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers24,846 edits →Avoid making personal attacks and incivilities: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:26, 8 April 2016 edit undoLugnuts (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers1,509,055 edits Undid revision 714279685 by Mhhossein (talk) revert trollNext edit → | ||
Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
Why? --]</font>] 18:18, 7 April 2016 (UTC) | Why? --]</font>] 18:18, 7 April 2016 (UTC) | ||
== Avoid making personal attacks and incivilities == | |||
You are kindly advised to avoid commenting on editors instead of the content. Some of your recent comments ( and ) contained ] and were against ]. Pleas avoid making similar comments in your future interacting with other editors. Thanks. ] (]) 19:25, 8 April 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:26, 8 April 2016
ATTENTION SCUM. People like you find it easy. Point the finger, blame the other, watch the temple topple over. fuck AWB |
---|
Template:DailyBracketBot Template:Archive box collapsible
Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/DangerousPanda closed
This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. The following remedy has been enacted:
1.1) For his violations of the standards of conduct expected of administrators, DangerousPanda (talk · contribs) is desysopped. He may regain the tools at any time via a successful request for adminship.
For the Arbitration Committee, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:03, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
- Woot Woot! ... oops,sorry, pardon my lack of decorum ... a bit of schadenfreude perhaps ...
- --Kevjonesin (talk) 10:55, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
- It was a great day. Made my Christmas. Lugnuts 10:56, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
- This page is worth a chuckle or two, too! Lugnuts 14:21, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
- It was a great day. Made my Christmas. Lugnuts 10:56, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Kww and The Rambling Man closed
This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:
- Kww (talk · contribs)'s administrator permissions are revoked. He may regain the tools at any time through a successful request for adminship
- Kww (talk · contribs)'s edit filter manager permission is revoked. He may only regain them by appealing this remedy after 12 months to the Arbitration Committee.
- The community is encouraged to establish a policy or guideline for the use of edit filters, and a process by which existing and proposed edit filters may be judged against these.
For the Arbitration Committee, Liz 14:40, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
- Discuss this at: Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard#Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Kww and The Rambling Man
- Related discussion at WT:FILM that got the ball rolling. Lugnuts 18:07, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
Info needed
Is my edit here wrong.--Vin09 (talk) 06:43, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
- Not sure - probably best to ask the editor who reverted the change. Lugnuts 06:46, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
- There are such articles as told by the user on my talk. Thanks for responding.--Vin09 (talk) 07:08, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Order
What order should we follow at ICC_World_Twenty20#Performance of teams. I've explained some points at User_talk:IgnorantArmies#ICC_World_Twenty20.23Performance_of_teams. If you can suggest which order to follow, as the win% or no. of matches first?--Vin09 (talk) 09:04, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Harry Ahlin for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Harry Ahlin is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Harry Ahlin until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 06:06, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Peter Sagan
Just wrote about his HUGE win today, did you watch it??? Nail-biting stuff. Mattsnow81 (Talk) 18:14, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
- Yep, saw the ending while flicking between the cricket final today. Amazing stuff! Hopefully see all of the Pairs-Roubaix next weekend. Lugnuts 18:39, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
Re WP:NCRIC
Hi Lugnuts.
Thanks for the pointer. You learn something everyday. But I do think it streteches the bounds of notability. C'est la vie!
Eno Lirpa (talk) 12:12, 6 April 2016 (UTC)