| Revision as of 14:58, 27 April 2016 editKnowledgekid87 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers96,794 edits I want this dispute to end so I brought it up at a place where things can be hammered out.← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:07, 27 April 2016 edit undoKrakatoaKatie (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators34,324 edits Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Strike the Blood. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| ] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. ] (]) 14:57, 27 April 2016 (UTC) | ] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. ] (]) 14:57, 27 April 2016 (UTC) | ||
| == April 2016 == | |||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> <span style="color: #9932CC">]<sup>]</sup></span> 16:07, 27 April 2016 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:07, 27 April 2016
January 2016
Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Thank you! DawgDeputy (talk) 03:34, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
February 2016
Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Thank you! DawgDeputy (talk) 04:45, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
April 2016
Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edits because I believe the articles were better before you made those changes. Thank you! DawgDeputy (talk) 16:57, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at List of Date A Live characters. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 14:27, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
ANI
There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Knowledgekid87 (talk) 14:57, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
April 2016
Your recent editing history at Strike the Blood shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Katie 16:07, 27 April 2016 (UTC)