Misplaced Pages

Talk:Prince Miguel, Duke of Braganza: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:11, 21 June 2016 editCristiano Tomás (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users38,420 edits POV + False royal titles + Pure vandalism← Previous edit Revision as of 00:34, 22 June 2016 edit undoAnjo-sozinho (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,009 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 17: Line 17:
:Consensus? False information don't have consensus. ''Miguel Januário de Bragança'' was just a pretender (King ] is alive at the time of Miguel's opportunistic claims!) ] (]) 15:33, 21 June 2016 (UTC) :Consensus? False information don't have consensus. ''Miguel Januário de Bragança'' was just a pretender (King ] is alive at the time of Miguel's opportunistic claims!) ] (]) 15:33, 21 June 2016 (UTC)


== On-going dispute == == On-going dispute about titles of fantasy ==
To participate and view an ongoing dispute concerning various aspects of articles pertaining to the Miguelist dukes, Maria Pia of Braganza, and the Braganza-Coburg articles, and an ongoing dispute between editors ], ], and myself, . To participate and view an ongoing dispute concerning various aspects of articles pertaining to the ] pretenders and foreign false "dukes" (], ] and ]), also about ], and other ] articles, in an ongoing dispute between editors ] and ] against me, ''''''. Those users are combining in their personal discussion pages a way to block me just to silence the truth that I'm being reported. Thank you, ] (]) 00:34, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
Thank you, ] (]) 23:11, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:34, 22 June 2016

WikiProject iconBiography: Royalty and Nobility Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.
WikiProject iconPortugal Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Portugal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Portugal on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PortugalWikipedia:WikiProject PortugalTemplate:WikiProject PortugalPortugal
???This article has not yet received a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Portugal To-do:

Find correct name The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere. The airport's own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João Paulo.

Improve key articles to Good article

Improve

Review

  • Category:History of Portugal: lots to remove there
  • Template:Regions of Portugal: statistical (NUTS3) subregions and intercommunal entities are confused; they are not the same in all regions, and should be sublisted separately in each region: intermunicipal entities are sometimes larger and split by subregions (e.g. the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon has two subregions), some intercommunal entities are containing only parts of subregions. All subregions should be listed explicitly and not assume they are only intermunicipal entities (which accessorily are not statistic subdivisions but real administrative entities, so they should be listed below, probably using a smaller font: we can safely eliminate the subgrouping by type of intermunicipal entity from this box).

Requests

Assess

Need images

Translate from Portuguese Misplaced Pages

Wikify

Vote:

Watch this listEdit this list

Miguel as Duke of Braganza?

Just to remember everyone one of the most relevant fact from the History of Portugal: the Portuguese Monarchic Constitution promulgated in 1838 and never revoked, in article 98 categorically states as follows: "The collateral line of the ex-infant Dom Miguel and all his descendants are perpetually excluded from the succession". Also Queen Maria II of Portugal and Portuguese Cortes declared King Miguel without his royal status and also declared him, and all of his descendants, forever ineligible to succeed to the Portuguese crown and forbade them, under death pennalty, to return to Portugal. This decision was supported by the Portuguese Republic. It's important everyone in Misplaced Pages remember this fact. 84.90.92.195 (talk) 18:22, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Miguel was never Duke of Braganza, but merely a claiment. GoodDay (talk) 01:38, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
You are right, GoodDay. But there are here in Misplaced Pages several users promoting false information and impartial points of view in an attempt to legitimize Miguelist pretenders. They are just pretenders to the Portuguese extinct throne. Anjo-sozinho (talk) 22:51, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Infobox/Pretender

His real name was Miguel Januário de Bragança and he was just a pretender to the Portuguese extinct trone. When several users deleted the Infobox/Pretender they are showing to everyone how they promote here false information and an impartial point of viwe about this person and subject. Anjo-sozinho (talk) 22:51, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Consensus? False information don't have consensus. Miguel Januário de Bragança was just a pretender (King Manuel II of Portugal is alive at the time of Miguel's opportunistic claims!) Anjo-sozinho (talk) 15:33, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

On-going dispute about titles of fantasy

To participate and view an ongoing dispute concerning various aspects of articles pertaining to the Miguelist pretenders and foreign false "dukes" (Miguel Januário, Duarte Nuno and Duarte Pio), also about Maria Pia of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha Braganza, and other Royal House of Braganza-Saxe-Coburg-Gotha articles, in an ongoing dispute between editors Cristiano Tomás and Gerard von Hebel against me, here. Those users are combining in their personal discussion pages a way to block me just to silence the truth that I'm being reported. Thank you, Anjo-sozinho (talk) 00:34, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Categories:
Talk:Prince Miguel, Duke of Braganza: Difference between revisions Add topic