Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/TheCommunity.com: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:34, 3 October 2016 editOhnoitsjamie (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators261,609 edits fix← Previous edit Revision as of 16:45, 3 October 2016 edit undoLight2021 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,473 edits TheCommunity.comNext edit →
Line 17: Line 17:
: Once in a lifetime coverage, nothing Encyclopedic genuine. Only thing written about website in NYTimes is " he joint letter was organized by two of the laureates, Archbishop Desmond Tutu of South Africa and former President José Ramos-Horta of East Timor, and is part of a broader online petition campaign at TheCommunity.com, whose chairman is Mr. Ramos-Horta. An advance copy was provided to The New York Times." Something is associated with something does not make it significant itself. ] (]) 07:02, 3 October 2016 (UTC) : Once in a lifetime coverage, nothing Encyclopedic genuine. Only thing written about website in NYTimes is " he joint letter was organized by two of the laureates, Archbishop Desmond Tutu of South Africa and former President José Ramos-Horta of East Timor, and is part of a broader online petition campaign at TheCommunity.com, whose chairman is Mr. Ramos-Horta. An advance copy was provided to The New York Times." Something is associated with something does not make it significant itself. ] (]) 07:02, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
*'''Weak delete''' Not seeing any ]; having Nobel prize winners on an advisory board is laudable but not enough to satisfy ]. <b>] ]</b> 14:31, 3 October 2016 (UTC) *'''Weak delete''' Not seeing any ]; having Nobel prize winners on an advisory board is laudable but not enough to satisfy ]. <b>] ]</b> 14:31, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
:: I am understanding your concern here, Every comment or AfD selection I made either its a "week delete" or "week keep" (in majority)? How helping is it? this logic will make Misplaced Pages, PR channel, or either newspaper. Which it is definitely not. I am analyzing your vote mechanism, as mentioned earlier. Its biased in nature even being an administrators. You want to contribute Misplaced Pages or simply want to prove me wrong or just trying to dispute my selections? I do not know. Apologies if I said something wrong here. Thanks for your analysis anyway. ] (]) 16:44, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:45, 3 October 2016

TheCommunity.com

TheCommunity.com (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional in nature. References are given to coverage not related to the article. Nothing significant or notable so far about the website to be here. Article goes on writing about coverage. Not notable. Light21 07:27, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America 09:44, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. North America 09:45, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. North America 09:45, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 01:05, 26 September 2016 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:20, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
Once in a lifetime coverage, nothing Encyclopedic genuine. Only thing written about website in NYTimes is " he joint letter was organized by two of the laureates, Archbishop Desmond Tutu of South Africa and former President José Ramos-Horta of East Timor, and is part of a broader online petition campaign at TheCommunity.com, whose chairman is Mr. Ramos-Horta. An advance copy was provided to The New York Times." Something is associated with something does not make it significant itself. Light2021 (talk) 07:02, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
I am understanding your concern here, Every comment or AfD selection I made either its a "week delete" or "week keep" (in majority)? How helping is it? this logic will make Misplaced Pages, PR channel, or either newspaper. Which it is definitely not. I am analyzing your vote mechanism, as mentioned earlier. Its biased in nature even being an administrators. You want to contribute Misplaced Pages or simply want to prove me wrong or just trying to dispute my selections? I do not know. Apologies if I said something wrong here. Thanks for your analysis anyway. Light2021 (talk) 16:44, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
Categories:
Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/TheCommunity.com: Difference between revisions Add topic