Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 14:46, 11 December 2016

Replaceable fair use File:Murdabeatz.png

Thanks for uploading File:Murdabeatz.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Misplaced Pages. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 19:01, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 1017 vs. The World

The article 1017 vs. The World has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

See WP:TOOSOON. No evidence of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:14, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Hibachi for Lunch

Is Hibachi for Lunch a mixtape or an EP?? JustDoItFettyg (talk) 16:36, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

@JustDoItFettyg: It was first released as a mixtape, and it is considered by many outlets that it was a mixtape so I think it's a mixtape. It was just rereleased as an EP JayPe (talk) 17:24, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of 1017 vs. The World for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1017 vs. The World is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/1017 vs. The World until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:16, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Starboy

If you want the Starboy article to be protected, you had to request for protection at the Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 10:44, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

:)

I really like what you have created bro, keep it up! BDMA Beats (talk) 15:11, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

@BDMA Beats: Appreciate the love man. JayPe (talk) 16:14, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

6LACK

I was actually gonna undo my edit and say my bad but you made the edit before me. Sorry JustDoItFettyg (talk) 02:06, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

@JustDoItFettyg: It's fine. BTW, Magnolia just mentioned us both on someone else's talk page, are you planning on responding? JayPe (talk) 2:12, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Yes, after Lazer Brain's responses i will respond back. JustDoItFettyg (talk) 02:33, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

@JustDoItFettyg: Right there with you on that. JayPe (talk) 2:54, 1 December, 2016 (UTC)

Yo I was thinking on creating that new J. Cole album "4 Your Eyez Only". Wanna help create the page? JustDoItFettyg (talk) 21:44, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

@JustDoItFettyg: I'll gladly help out with the article, but I think we should wait a day or two to do it as it might be taken down for the lack of information it has (see discussion below). JayPe (talk) 21:50, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

I know that is why i will add information to it. I already made it 4 Your Eyez Only you can help with it too. JustDoItFettyg (talk) 21:56, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

The Return of East Atlanta Santa

This article should have been created at The Return of East Atlanta Santa, which already existed as a redirect. The article is not currently notable, so I've redirected it. Please wait until there are more sources, then recreate the content at the proper namespace. I think you are aware that an article with a capital O for "of" is not correct. Please do not create alternate namespaces just because the proper redirect you did not create already exists. Ss112 04:35, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

@Ss112: I had more sources and information piled up, but I'll gladly wait for a better time to put it back up (probably later in the week). Some sources I read also had the capital O in Of for the title so I went with it. JayPe (talk) 4:41, 1 December, 2016 (UTC)

Fair enough, but please recreate it later in the week at the correct namespace per MOS:CAPS. Ss112 04:44, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Welcome back

Hey, welcome back. JustDoItFettyg (talk) 00:32, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

@JustDoItFettyg: I realized now that the points I made earlier were uncalled for (and I got pissed off just like this editor), and I should cite my edit's from now on like you said. Feels good to be back. JayPe (talk) 00:41, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Glad to have you back, just be careful with your edits and cite your sources. :) JustDoItFettyg (talk) 02:28, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Why WP:V is important

Welcome back Jaype. I know you might find it tedious to source edits, but let's have a look at your this edit. Here, I have absolutely no idea which one is correct - your version or the version prior to it. Now consider this scenario. You have put in a lot of hard work to add the content (but neglected to add sources). Another editor comes along and changes the name of the producers. Since none of you have provided any citations, I have no idea whose version to trust. I might as well remove all the unsourced data just so that readers do not get to read factually incorrect information. What does this achieve ultimately though? You put in so much time and effort to add the info - and it is removed because it is unsourced. However, if you had put in citations, I would have been able to quickly verify the content and restore the correct info. What I want you to understand is that WP:V is compulsory. Edits must be sourced. I don't want you to be blocked because you are a productive editor and do great content work otherwise. Why don't you just put in sources? --Lemongirl942 (talk) 03:16, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

@Lemongirl942: I was in a rush when I made this edit here, so my bad for that. I found all of my information from here, and I will add the missing information at a later time. Since you are here though, I want to apologize for telling you to "get a life" a couple weeks back. You have been very kind to me since I've came back and I feel bad for what I said earlier. I will continue to cite my sources in my edits from now on. JayPe (talk) 3:29, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

You don't seem to be getting it

After returning from your block, you again began adding unsourced content to articles. I left 3 warnings on your talk page yesterday, which you quickly deleted with the edit summary "removing unsourced content". Following that, User:Lemongirl942 attempted to explain the importance of accurately sourcing all your edits. You responded by explaining that you were "in a rush" and "will continue to cite my sources in my edits from now on". Following that, you made this edit to Elephant Eyes and moved Ron Gilmore from a producer of the song Same Jezebel, to being a writer of the song. The entire section is without sources. You have done these sorts of small unsourced edits to hundreds of articles, and have been doing it again--after 4 warnings--since returning from your block (for adding unsourced content). When you make these small, unsourced edits to hundreds of articles, it makes all of those articles unreliable to the readers of Misplaced Pages. It also undermines the hard work of other editors who take the time to add sources. You are clearly not here to work collaboratively, have little regard for Misplaced Pages policy, and have made no effort to change your editing style since returning from being blocked. Magnolia677 (talk) 14:46, 11 December 2016 (UTC)