User talk:Marlo Jonesa: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 18:06, 15 January 2017 editGrandma Gatewood (talk \| contribs)9 edits →Twinkle ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 04:24, 26 January 2017 edit undoSQL (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators28,464 edits d -> Checkuserblock
(9 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{User:Marlo Jonesa/Talk page}}		{{User:Marlo Jonesa/Talk page}}
			{{unblock reviewed \| 1=<span class="template-ping">@]:</span> I have been blocked as I HailesG?? It's not me at all!!! \| decline = I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
			*the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Misplaced Pages, <u>or</u>
			*the block is no longer necessary because you
			*#understand what you have been blocked for,
			*#will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
			*#will make useful contributions instead.

			Please read the ] for more information. ]] 04:24, 26 January 2017 (UTC)}}
	== Twinkle ==

	I'm not sure you should be using ] until you have a better understanding of our policies and guidelines. I just spot-checked three of your reverts and all of them were wrong in some way:
	* was a clear good-faith improvement to the text, adding a paragraph break where appropriate, and removing both a duplicate paragraph and extraneous line break. You and gave the editor a second-level warning for their very first good faith edit.
	* included removing unsourced text (which the editor noted as "added without citations") and an extra space. You rather than the single, questionable edit to the image size.
	* is a clear BLP violation. It was a good revert, but inexplicably marked it as a "good faith" edit.
	As I said, I only checked a few reverts and they were all bad. I would strongly suggest reading ] and familiarizing yourself with our other ] before continuing to use Twinkle. If you have any questions, please ask. Cheers! ] (]) 16:36, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
	:+1, Marlo Jonesa is not ready for Twinkle. ] (]) 16:39, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
	:In addition, was essentially a rewrite of the article. Sources were added, and plenty of red links and unsourced content was removed. These are clearly good faith edits. and and later . They were not in any way vandalism. ] (]) 16:49, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

	Please respond to the problems instead of simply removing our comments. You have removed everyone's comment on your talkpage with the editsummary "Talkheader" (which doesn't make sense). If you continue to use Twinkle you may get blocked. If you remove our comments again we will talk about you elsewhere where you are unable to delete our comments. Please read ]. ] (]) 18:03, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

	Please stop using Twinkle, you are not (yet) able to differentiate between vandalism and goodfaith edits that should be reverted and edits that should be ignored. Maybe it is easier if you revert vandalism on the Misplaced Pages in your native language. ] (]) 18:06, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 04:24, 26 January 2017

This is Marlo Jonesa'stalk page, where you can send messages and comments to Marlo Jonesa.
Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (`~~~~`). New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.	Be polite, and welcoming to new users Assume good faith Avoid personal attacks For disputes, seek dispute resolution

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Marlo Jonesa. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this page. You may wish to ask factual questions about Marlo Jonesa at the Reference desk.

Skip to table of contents

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Marlo Jonesa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

@Bbb23: I have been blocked as I HailesG?? It's not me at all!!!

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Misplaced Pages, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. SQL 04:24, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.