Revision as of 18:36, 22 February 2017 view sourceAnomieBOT (talk | contribs)Bots6,589,714 edits Rescuing orphaned refs ("bahrain" from rev 764921176)← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:56, 23 February 2017 view source 186.138.132.18 (talk) Try to gain consensus in the talk page before deleting such a massive amount of content. Some of this information is important and supported by secondary sources.Next edit → | ||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
'''UN Watch''' is a Geneva-based ] whose stated mission is "to monitor the performance of the ] by the yardstick of ]".<ref name=AboutUs>{{cite web|url=http://www.unwatch.org/site/c.bdKKISNqEmG/b.1313591/k.954F/Mission__History.htm |title=Mission and History |work=UN Watch |accessdate=7 December 2011}}</ref> It is an accredited NGO in Special Consultative Status to the UN ] and an Associate NGO to the UN ].<ref>, UN Watch</ref> | '''UN Watch''' is a Geneva-based ] whose stated mission is "to monitor the performance of the ] by the yardstick of ]".<ref name=AboutUs>{{cite web|url=http://www.unwatch.org/site/c.bdKKISNqEmG/b.1313591/k.954F/Mission__History.htm |title=Mission and History |work=UN Watch |accessdate=7 December 2011}}</ref> It is an accredited NGO in Special Consultative Status to the UN ] and an Associate NGO to the UN ].<ref>, UN Watch</ref> | ||
UN Watch has been active in combating ] abuses in ] and ], and has been vocal against abuses in regimes such as China, Venezuela, Cuba and Russia, often using its allotted time at the UNHRC to allow for ] and ] to speak. UN Watch is frequently critical of what it views as ] and ] sentiment at the UN and UN-sponsored events.<ref name="jewishtimes.com">{{cite web|url=http://www.jta.org/2009/04/06/news-opinion/world/pro-israel-activists-set-to-do-battle-at-durban-ii |title=Pro-Israel Activists Set To Do Battle At Durban II |work=Jewish Times |date=18 April 2009 |accessdate=7 December 2011}}</ref><ref name="jta.org">{{cite web|url=http://www.jta.org/2008/09/08/life-religion/features/u-n-rights-chief-praises-durban-ii |work=Jewish Telegraphic Agency |title=U.N. rights chief praises Durban II |date=8 September 2008 |accessdate=7 December 2011}}</ref> | UN Watch has been active in combating ] abuses in ] and ], and has been vocal against abuses in regimes such as China, Venezuela, Cuba and Russia, often using its allotted time at the UNHRC to allow for ] and ] to speak. UN Watch is frequently critical of what it views as ] and ] sentiment at the UN and UN-sponsored events.<ref name="jewishtimes.com">{{cite web|url=http://www.jta.org/2009/04/06/news-opinion/world/pro-israel-activists-set-to-do-battle-at-durban-ii |title=Pro-Israel Activists Set To Do Battle At Durban II |work=Jewish Times |date=18 April 2009 |accessdate=7 December 2011}}</ref><ref name="jta.org">{{cite web|url=http://www.jta.org/2008/09/08/life-religion/features/u-n-rights-chief-praises-durban-ii |work=Jewish Telegraphic Agency |title=U.N. rights chief praises Durban II |date=8 September 2008 |accessdate=7 December 2011}}</ref> It has been a strong critic of the UNHRC, asserting that many of its members have poor human rights records themselves. UN Watch has described the council as equally bad as or worse than its forerunner, the defunct<ref>, BBC 15 March 2006</ref> ].<ref name=angola/> | ||
The group has been praised by former ] ],<ref name=kofi1/><ref name=kofi2/> and the Director General of the UN Office in Geneva ] has acknowledged "the valuable work of UN Watch in support of the just application of values and principles of the United Nations Charter and support for human rights for all."<ref name=sergei/> ] has described UN Watch both as "a lobby group with strong ties to Israel"<ref name=GazaAFP /> and as a group which "champion human rights worldwide". | The group has been praised by former ] ],<ref name=kofi1/><ref name=kofi2/> and the Director General of the UN Office in Geneva ] has acknowledged "the valuable work of UN Watch in support of the just application of values and principles of the United Nations Charter and support for human rights for all."<ref name=sergei/> ] has described UN Watch both as "a lobby group with strong ties to Israel"<ref name=GazaAFP /> and as a group which "champion human rights worldwide". | ||
Line 72: | Line 72: | ||
===UNHRC Elections=== | ===UNHRC Elections=== | ||
Along with ], UN Watch has opposed the candidacies of states with poor human rights records for the United Nations Human Rights Council. The 2006 UN resolution establishing the council requires that, in electing states to the panel, UN member states "shall take into account the contribution of candidates to the promotion and protection of human rights."<ref name=bahrain |
Along with ], UN Watch has opposed the candidacies of states with poor human rights records for the United Nations Human Rights Council. The 2006 UN resolution establishing the council requires that, in electing states to the panel, UN member states "shall take into account the contribution of candidates to the promotion and protection of human rights."<ref name=bahrain> | ||
====2007==== | ====2007==== | ||
In May 2007, UN Watch and Freedom House submitted a joint report on an election to the United Nations Human Rights Council, stating that candidates ], Belarus, ] and ] were unfit to sit on the human rights body, because they themselves violated rights. The report said that the four countries "are authoritarian regimes with negative UN voting records (on rights issues) and are not qualified to be Council members". The report further described candidates ], Denmark, Italy and the ] as "well qualified" for the Council, and called candidates Bolivia, India, Indonesia, Madagascar, ], the ] and South Africa as "questionable".<ref name=angola>, Reuters 7 May 2007</ref> | In May 2007, UN Watch and Freedom House submitted a joint report on an election to the United Nations Human Rights Council, stating that candidates ], Belarus, ] and ] were unfit to sit on the human rights body, because they themselves violated rights. The report said that the four countries "are authoritarian regimes with negative UN voting records (on rights issues) and are not qualified to be Council members". The report further described candidates ], Denmark, Italy and the ] as "well qualified" for the Council, and called candidates Bolivia, India, Indonesia, Madagascar, ], the ] and South Africa as "questionable".<ref name=angola>, Reuters 7 May 2007</ref> | ||
====2008==== | |||
In May 2008, UN Watch and Freedom House called on the UN General Assembly to vote against candidates ], Gabon, ], Sri Lanka and ] for poor human rights records. According to ], Sri Lanka's candidacy was also opposed by a coalition of more than 20 nongovernmental organizations around the world, as well as three ] laureates, former U.S. President ], ] of South Africa, and ] of Argentina.<ref name=bahrain>, Reuters 21 May 2008</ref> | |||
====2009==== | ====2009==== | ||
Line 93: | Line 96: | ||
===Other UN activities=== | ===Other UN activities=== | ||
====Durban Review Conference==== | |||
{{Main|Durban Review Conference}} | |||
On 19 April 2009, the day before the UN ], UN Watch and other non-governmental organizations hosted the "Geneva Summit for Human Rights, Tolerance and Democracy," in order to raise public awareness to the issues of discrimination and racially motivated torture. Invited speakers included survivors of the ] and former dissidents from ], Cuba and ].<ref>Yitzhak Benhorin, , Ynet 13 April 2009</ref><ref>, JTA 19 April 2009</ref> UN Watch also hosted a "Conference Against Racism, Discrimination, and Persecution" in Geneva. Speakers at the latter conference included former Canadian Justice Minister ], French philosopher ] and former ] and President of ] ].<ref>Tovah Lazaroff, , ''Jerusalem Post''. 23 April 2009</ref><ref>Michael J. Jordan, , ''Christian Science Monitor'' 19 April 2009</ref><ref>Adena Philips, , ''National Post''. 24 April 2009</ref> | |||
====Goldstone Report==== | ====Goldstone Report==== | ||
Line 99: | Line 105: | ||
The UN Watch request was covered by the Deutsche Presse Agentur and the ''Khaleej Times''<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.khaleejtimes.com/DisplayArticle.asp?xfile=data/international/2009/July/international_July613.xml§ion=international&col= |title=UN's Goldstone completes public hearings on Gaza conflict |work=Khaleej Times |date=8 July 2009 |accessdate=7 December 2011}}</ref> and Agence France Presse.<ref name=GazaAFP>{{cite web|first1=Peter |last1=Capella|url=https://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5gEMY5NvupmG2iAyQwg6C6ehzeWzA |title=''Agence France Presse'': UN Gaza probe chief underlines balanced approach |newspaper=Agence France Presse |date=7 July 2009 |accessdate=11 November 2015 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20111222162658/https://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5gEMY5NvupmG2iAyQwg6C6ehzeWzA |archivedate=22 December 2011 |deadurl=y}}</ref> UN Watch further noted that in a May 2009 meeting with Geneva NGOs, Chinkin denied that her impartiality was compromised, saying that her statement only addressed ], and not ]; however, according to UN Watch, the statement not only determined that "Israel’s actions amount to aggression, not self-defence," but additionally charged that they were "contrary to international humanitarian and human rights law," and constituted "prima facie war crimes."<ref name="LSE Law Professor Urged to Step Down from U.N Gaza Inquiry over Bias">, UN Watch, 20 August 2009.</ref> | The UN Watch request was covered by the Deutsche Presse Agentur and the ''Khaleej Times''<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.khaleejtimes.com/DisplayArticle.asp?xfile=data/international/2009/July/international_July613.xml§ion=international&col= |title=UN's Goldstone completes public hearings on Gaza conflict |work=Khaleej Times |date=8 July 2009 |accessdate=7 December 2011}}</ref> and Agence France Presse.<ref name=GazaAFP>{{cite web|first1=Peter |last1=Capella|url=https://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5gEMY5NvupmG2iAyQwg6C6ehzeWzA |title=''Agence France Presse'': UN Gaza probe chief underlines balanced approach |newspaper=Agence France Presse |date=7 July 2009 |accessdate=11 November 2015 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20111222162658/https://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5gEMY5NvupmG2iAyQwg6C6ehzeWzA |archivedate=22 December 2011 |deadurl=y}}</ref> UN Watch further noted that in a May 2009 meeting with Geneva NGOs, Chinkin denied that her impartiality was compromised, saying that her statement only addressed ], and not ]; however, according to UN Watch, the statement not only determined that "Israel’s actions amount to aggression, not self-defence," but additionally charged that they were "contrary to international humanitarian and human rights law," and constituted "prima facie war crimes."<ref name="LSE Law Professor Urged to Step Down from U.N Gaza Inquiry over Bias">, UN Watch, 20 August 2009.</ref> | ||
The inquiry members rejected the petition and said that the mission investigated whether Israel, Hamas or the Palestinian Authority had unnecessarily caused death or injury to innocent civilians by specific acts of armed conflict that violated international humanitarian law and international human rights law stating "On those issues the letter co-signed by Professor Chinkin expressed no view at all."<ref name="Dispute over 'biased' Gaza inquiry professor">, TheJC.com, 27 August 2009.</ref><ref name="U.N. Goldstone inquiry rejects ’so-called petition of UN Watch’; denies mission is quasi-judicial" /> The members further wrote in their reply that the fact-finding mission cannot be considered a judicial or even a quasi-judicial proceeding.<ref name="U.N. Goldstone inquiry rejects ’so-called petition of UN Watch’; denies mission is quasi-judicial">, UN Watch, 30 August 2009</ref> ], director of UN Watch, said that the arguments raised by the mission ignored the well-established set of standards to international fact-finding missions.<ref name="Gold vs Goldstone">, ''Jerusalem Post''. 11 November 2009</ref> Goldstone said that the letter signed by Chinkin could have been the grounds for disqualification, had the mission been a judicial inquiry.<ref name="Goldstone walks a fine line in an ancient war zone">, BusinessDay, 4 August 2009.</ref> | The inquiry members rejected the petition and said that the mission investigated whether Israel, Hamas or the Palestinian Authority had unnecessarily caused death or injury to innocent civilians by specific acts of armed conflict that violated international humanitarian law and international human rights law stating "On those issues the letter co-signed by Professor Chinkin expressed no view at all."<ref name="Dispute over 'biased' Gaza inquiry professor">, TheJC.com, 27 August 2009.</ref><ref name="U.N. Goldstone inquiry rejects ’so-called petition of UN Watch’; denies mission is quasi-judicial" /> The members further wrote in their reply that the fact-finding mission cannot be considered a judicial or even a quasi-judicial proceeding.<ref name="U.N. Goldstone inquiry rejects ’so-called petition of UN Watch’; denies mission is quasi-judicial">, UN Watch, 30 August 2009</ref> ], director of UN Watch, said that the arguments raised by the mission ignored the well-established set of standards to international fact-finding missions.<ref name="Gold vs Goldstone">, ''Jerusalem Post''. 11 November 2009</ref> Goldstone said that the letter signed by Chinkin could have been the grounds for disqualification, had the mission been a judicial inquiry.<ref name="Goldstone walks a fine line in an ancient war zone">, BusinessDay, 4 August 2009.</ref> Two groups, a group of UK lawyers and academics and a group of Canadian lawyers from prominent law firms and human rights organizations, pronounced separately their support for the UN Watch request that Prof. Chinkin be disqualified from the United Nations Human Rights Council’s fact-finding mission on the Gaza conflict and expressed their disappointment that the well-founded request was rejected by the mission.<ref name="Lawyers, watchdog allege Goldstone bias">, ''Jerusalem Post''. 14 September 2009</ref><ref>, CFP, 16 September 2009</ref><ref name="blog.unwatch.org">, UN Watch, 13 September 2009</ref> Chinkin's prior statements, the lawyers wrote, "necessarily compromises the integrity of this inquiry and its report".<ref name="blog.unwatch.org" /> | ||
====UN anti-Israel bias and antisemitism==== | ====UN anti-Israel bias and antisemitism==== | ||
{{further|Israel, Palestine, and the United Nations|UNESCO#Israel}} | {{further|Israel, Palestine, and the United Nations|UNESCO#Israel}} | ||
UN Watch is active at the UN in combating anti-Israel and anti-Semitism, and what it dubs the selective and politicized treatment of Israel by many UN bodies.<ref name=unwatch-mission-history>{{cite web|title=UN Watch – Mission & History|url=http://www.unwatch.org/site/c.bdKKISNqEmG/b.1313591/k.954F/Mission__History.htm?sid=393986035|accessdate=14 March 2014}}</ref> The group supported former Secretary General ]'s declared goal of ending the UN's imbalanced treatment of Israel<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.forward.com/articles/9702/ |title=Annan Made the Nations a Little Less United Against Israel |work=Forward |accessdate=7 December 2011}}</ref> and has been highly critical of the ],<ref name="jewishtimes.com" /><ref name="jta.org" /><ref name="npr.org">{{cite web|url=http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=101794922&ft=1&f=1001 |title=''National Public Radio'': Zionism Debate Clouds U.N. Racism Forum |publisher=Npr.org |date=12 March 2009 |accessdate=7 December 2011}}</ref> The Jewish Telegraphic Agency has described U.N. Watch as a pro-Israel organization.<ref>{{cite web|author=Abraham H. Foxman |url=http://jta.org/news/article/2008/09/08/110272/pillaydurban |title=''JTA'': U.N. rights chief praises Durban II |publisher=Jta.org |date=8 September 2008 |accessdate=7 December 2011}}</ref> | UN Watch is active at the UN in combating anti-Israel and anti-Semitism, and what it dubs the selective and politicized treatment of Israel by many UN bodies.<ref name=unwatch-mission-history>{{cite web|title=UN Watch – Mission & History|url=http://www.unwatch.org/site/c.bdKKISNqEmG/b.1313591/k.954F/Mission__History.htm?sid=393986035|accessdate=14 March 2014}}</ref> The group supported former Secretary General ]'s declared goal of ending the UN's imbalanced treatment of Israel<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.forward.com/articles/9702/ |title=Annan Made the Nations a Little Less United Against Israel |work=Forward |accessdate=7 December 2011}}</ref> and has been highly critical of the ],<ref name="jewishtimes.com" /><ref name="jta.org" /><ref name="npr.org">{{cite web|url=http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=101794922&ft=1&f=1001 |title=''National Public Radio'': Zionism Debate Clouds U.N. Racism Forum |publisher=Npr.org |date=12 March 2009 |accessdate=7 December 2011}}</ref> The Jewish Telegraphic Agency has described U.N. Watch as a pro-Israel organization.<ref>{{cite web|author=Abraham H. Foxman |url=http://jta.org/news/article/2008/09/08/110272/pillaydurban |title=''JTA'': U.N. rights chief praises Durban II |publisher=Jta.org |date=8 September 2008 |accessdate=7 December 2011}}</ref> | ||
] quoted UN Watch's director Hillel Neuer who said that since the UN Human Rights Council was launched in mid-2006 and until the beginning of 2010, it issued 33 condemnatory resolutions; of these, half a dozen have concerned Burma and North Korea, while the other 27 have focused on condemning Israel, while absolving its attackers, including the Iranian-backed militant groups Hamas and Hezbollah.<ref>, ''Forbes-Asia'', 11 February 2010</ref> | |||
=====March 2007 UNHRC speech===== | =====March 2007 UNHRC speech===== |
Revision as of 04:56, 23 February 2017
File:UN Watch logo.JPG | |
Founded | 1993 |
---|---|
Type | Non-governmental organization |
Location |
|
Fields | United Nations, Human rights and struggle against anti-Semitism |
Key people | Alfred H. Moses, Chair; Per Ahlmark, David A. Harris, Co-Chairs; Hillel Neuer, Executive Director |
Website | UN Watch Homepage |
UN Watch is a Geneva-based non-governmental organization whose stated mission is "to monitor the performance of the United Nations by the yardstick of its own Charter". It is an accredited NGO in Special Consultative Status to the UN Economic and Social Council and an Associate NGO to the UN Department of Public Information.
UN Watch has been active in combating human rights abuses in Democratic Republic of the Congo and Darfur, and has been vocal against abuses in regimes such as China, Venezuela, Cuba and Russia, often using its allotted time at the UNHRC to allow for dissidents and human rights activists to speak. UN Watch is frequently critical of what it views as anti-Israel and antisemitic sentiment at the UN and UN-sponsored events. It has been a strong critic of the UNHRC, asserting that many of its members have poor human rights records themselves. UN Watch has described the council as equally bad as or worse than its forerunner, the defunct United Nations Commission on Human Rights.
The group has been praised by former UN Secretary General Kofi Annan, and the Director General of the UN Office in Geneva Sergei Ordzhonikidze has acknowledged "the valuable work of UN Watch in support of the just application of values and principles of the United Nations Charter and support for human rights for all." Agence France-Presse has described UN Watch both as "a lobby group with strong ties to Israel" and as a group which "champion human rights worldwide".
Founding
UN Watch was founded in 1993 under the chairmanship of Morris Berthold Abram. Abram served as the Chairman of the United Negro College Fund and President of Brandeis University. Abram was active in community affairs as President of the American Jewish Committee (1963–1968); Chairman of the National Coalition Supporting Soviet Jewry (1983–1988); and Chairman of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations (1986–1989).
Abram supported the UN as an institution. In 1999, Abram delivered a speech to the U.S. Congress on the subject of the treatment of Israel by the United Nations in which he said "UN Watch categorically supports the UN as an indispensable institution. The US should pay its past dues to the UN as a matter of national honor and in recognition of the UN's importance. In spite of the UN's flaws, it is inconceivable that the US withhold support from the only truly global organization in such an interdependent world."
After Abram died in 2000, David A. Harris, Executive Director of the American Jewish Committee, was elected Chairman of UN Watch.
In 2001, Harris announced that UN Watch had become a wholly owned subsidiary of the American Jewish Committee. According to a press release at the time, “UN Watch was established with the generous assistance of Edgar Bronfman, President of the World Jewish Congress. Eighteen months ago, the American Jewish Committee and the World Jewish Congress reached an agreement, approved by the international board of UN Watch, to transfer full control of the organization to AJC, an agreement that went into effect on January 1, 2001.”
Structure and status
UN Watch participates at the UN as an accredited NGO in Special Consultative Status to the UN Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) and as an Associate NGO to the UN Department of Public Information (DPI). It is affiliated with the American Jewish Committee, a NGO established in 1906, which was a pioneer advocate of the UN Charter's inclusion of international human rights guarantees, and the creation of the post of a High Commissioner of Human Rights.
UN Watch has participated in the following UN activities: the Commission on Human Rights, a Panel Discussion on the United Nations and the Middle East, a Panel Discussion on Proposals to Reform the Commission on Human Rights, the Sub-Commission for the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights, the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, and the Working Group on Minorities. A UN Watch seminar in Geneva featured a tour of the Palais des Nations, a visit to the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Museum, and attendance at a meeting of the Committee Against Torture (CAT) with briefings from the Committee's Vice Chair.
In October 2008, UNHCR listed the organization as having a staff of six. UN Watch had 110 members in 2007, geographically distributed as follows: 56% from Europe, 38% from North America, and 4% from Oceania. UN Watch’s newsletter on UN issues now reaches nearly 5,000 subscribers around the world.
Commentary from the group has appeared in BBC, Al Jazeera, Reuters, Washington Post, Agence France-Presse, Voice of America, The Jerusalem Post, Fox News, JTA, and others.
Board and funding
Current board members include:
- Alfred H. Moses, Attorney, former United States Ambassador to Romania and Presidential Emissary for the Cyprus Conflict, Special Counsel to President Jimmy Carter. Former American Jewish Committee president.
- Per Ahlmark, former Deputy Prime Minister of Sweden
- Irwin Cotler, international human rights advocate, Canadian Member of Parliament since 1993, former Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada, known as "Counsel for the Oppressed"
- David A. Harris, Executive Director of the American Jewish Committee
- Max Jakobson, former Finnish Ambassador to the United Nations
- Ruth Wedgwood, Professor of International Law and Diplomacy, Johns Hopkins University
UN Watch is funded by private individual donations and charitable foundations.
Positions and activities
Regions
Congo
In 2008, the post of United Nations special rapporteur for the Congo was eliminated by the United Nations Human Rights Council. The elimination was done with the support of Egypt, Algeria, Tunisia, Russia and other countries, following a request by the Congolese administration of President Joseph Kabila. According to a subsequent report prepared by the office of UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, both government and rebel forces proceeded to carry out mass killings, rape and torture. In November of that year, UN Watch called on the UNHRC to apologize for abolishing the post, and stated that the UNHRC should be held to account for the move, given the atrocities people there were enduring. UN Watch Executive Director Hillel Neuer said in a statement, "Morally, those countries (on the Council) who were behind the elimination of the monitoring mandate in March ought now to apologise to the victims of Congo... We will never know how many lives could have been saved if the Council, deferring to Congo's government, had not caused this unconscionable protection gap which slashed an early-warning mechanism just when the victims needed it most." Other rights groups called for the reestablishment of the post.
On 1 December 2009, following atrocities in the eastern Congolese province of North Kivu, the UNHRC condemned abuses against civilians in Congo. UN Watch said it was hoping to see a reassignment of a UN rights expert to the region, and said abuses "making eastern Congo a living hell" needed to be properly investigated. UN Watch said a total of 50 groupings had signed the appeal to UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon and human rights chief Navi Pillay, asking to restore the post of UN rights monitor there.
Darfur
UN Watch chaired the NGO Activist Summit For Darfur in 2007.
On 27 April 2008, UN Watch joined human rights organizations around the world in launching a "Justice for Darfur" campaign. The organizations behind the campaign included Amnesty International, Human Rights First and Human Rights Watch. The campaign called on the United Nations Security Council, regional organizations and national governments to pressure Sudan to cooperate with the International Criminal Court, and to arrest suspected war criminals Ali Kushayb and Ahmad Harun. The Sudanese government had refused to surrender either suspect to the Court, and had in fact promoted Harun to the position of State Minister for Humanitarian Affairs.
Iran
UN Watch commended the US, France and other democracies for their “forceful criticism” of Iran’s human rights record at a UN hearing in Geneva's UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) in February 2010. At the same time, UN Watch executive director Hillel Neuer cautioned that the outcome of the council session could be limited to a “toothless” report to be adopted.
Haiti
In the wake of the January 2010 Haiti earthquake, the UN Human Rights Council's 47 members unanimously passed a resolution that expressed concern about rights abuses in the wake of the quake and urged the government and aid groups to protect children from violence and exploitation. UN Watch slammed the UN Human Rights Council's two-day special session on Haiti as "a harmful waste of the organization's precious time, resources, and moral capital," adding that the council "has no budget, authority or expertise on humanitarian aid" and "ignores more pressing human rights problems".
Switzerland
Following Switzerland’s 2009 vote to ban minarets, UN Watch stated that it was particularly embarrassed by the fact and that it will work toward its repeal. The NGO's director Hillel Neuer said that banning of Muslim structures by a government is wrongful discrimination.
UNHRC Elections
Along with Freedom House, UN Watch has opposed the candidacies of states with poor human rights records for the United Nations Human Rights Council. The 2006 UN resolution establishing the council requires that, in electing states to the panel, UN member states "shall take into account the contribution of candidates to the promotion and protection of human rights."Cite error: A <ref>
tag is missing the closing </ref>
(see the help page).
2008
In May 2008, UN Watch and Freedom House called on the UN General Assembly to vote against candidates Bahrain, Gabon, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Zambia for poor human rights records. According to Human Rights Watch, Sri Lanka's candidacy was also opposed by a coalition of more than 20 nongovernmental organizations around the world, as well as three Nobel Peace Prize laureates, former U.S. President Jimmy Carter, Desmond Tutu of South Africa, and Adolfo Perez Esquivel of Argentina.
2009
In May 2009, UN Watch and Freedom House again submitted a joint report on a UNHRC election. The report described candidates China, Cuba and Saudi Arabia as "the worst of the worst" in terms of human rights. The report also described candidates Azerbaijan, Cameroon, Djibouti and Russia as "not qualified", and Bangladesh, Jordan, Kenya, Kyrgyzstan, Nigeria and Senegal as "questionable". UN Watch and Freedom House described the council's record for its first three years as poor. They stated that Islamic countries with Cuban support rewrote rules for a freedom of expression monitor in a manner that limits expression, and that an "alliance of regressive regimes" succeeded in having the Council cancel human rights investigators for trouble spots such as Belarus, Cuba, Liberia, the Democratic Republic of Congo and Darfur. In contrast, they said, the alliance led to the council appointing an investigator who was involved in founding a controversial human rights prize in honor of Muammar al-Gaddafi and another who believes that the 9/11 attacks were an inside job. Hillel Neuer said, "The vision had been that the council would be a voice for victims, but it is now in a state of crisis."
2010
UN Watch expressed alarm over a report that Asian countries might facilitate Iran’s election in May 2010 to the 47-member UNHRC.
2011
UN Watch is credited with leading the campaign to deny Syria's bid for a seat.
2014
UN Watch strongly condemned the 2014 elections of Saudi Arabia, China, Cuba, and Russia to the Human Rights Council. In an interview by France 24, executive director Hillel Neuer called this a “black day for human rights.” A campaign to remove these countries from the body, "Dictator-free HRC" is ongoing along with a petition on the organization's website.
Other UN activities
Durban Review Conference
Main article: Durban Review ConferenceOn 19 April 2009, the day before the UN Durban Review Conference, UN Watch and other non-governmental organizations hosted the "Geneva Summit for Human Rights, Tolerance and Democracy," in order to raise public awareness to the issues of discrimination and racially motivated torture. Invited speakers included survivors of the genocide in Rwanda and former dissidents from Iran, Cuba and Myanmar. UN Watch also hosted a "Conference Against Racism, Discrimination, and Persecution" in Geneva. Speakers at the latter conference included former Canadian Justice Minister Irwin Cotler, French philosopher Bernard-Henri Lévy and former Miss Canada and President of Stop Child Executions Nazanin Afshin Jam.
Goldstone Report
UN Watch submitted a 29-page legal petition to the United Nations Fact Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict requesting the recusal of member Christine Chinkin because she was one of 31 academics and lawyers who had co-signed a letter published in the Sunday Times before being selected for the mission that accused Israel of not complying with international humanitarian and human rights law. The letter described Israel's military offensive in Gaza as "an act of aggression", stating that "invasion and bombardment of Gaza amounts to collective punishment of Gaza's 1.5m inhabitants contrary to international humanitarian and human rights law", and adding that "the blockade of humanitarian relief, the destruction of civilian infrastructure, and preventing access to basic necessities such as food and fuel, are prima facie war crimes". UN Watch stated that, since Chinkin had already formed and expressed a judgment on the very issues the Mission was meant to investigate, she could not fulfill the impartiality requirement for fact-finding missions. The petition cites authorities of international law, including a 2004 precedent of the international tribunal for Sierra Leone, in which Justice Geoffrey Robertson was disqualified by his fellow judges over the appearance of bias.
The UN Watch request was covered by the Deutsche Presse Agentur and the Khaleej Times and Agence France Presse. UN Watch further noted that in a May 2009 meeting with Geneva NGOs, Chinkin denied that her impartiality was compromised, saying that her statement only addressed jus ad bellum, and not jus in bello; however, according to UN Watch, the statement not only determined that "Israel’s actions amount to aggression, not self-defence," but additionally charged that they were "contrary to international humanitarian and human rights law," and constituted "prima facie war crimes."
The inquiry members rejected the petition and said that the mission investigated whether Israel, Hamas or the Palestinian Authority had unnecessarily caused death or injury to innocent civilians by specific acts of armed conflict that violated international humanitarian law and international human rights law stating "On those issues the letter co-signed by Professor Chinkin expressed no view at all." The members further wrote in their reply that the fact-finding mission cannot be considered a judicial or even a quasi-judicial proceeding. Hillel Neuer, director of UN Watch, said that the arguments raised by the mission ignored the well-established set of standards to international fact-finding missions. Goldstone said that the letter signed by Chinkin could have been the grounds for disqualification, had the mission been a judicial inquiry. Two groups, a group of UK lawyers and academics and a group of Canadian lawyers from prominent law firms and human rights organizations, pronounced separately their support for the UN Watch request that Prof. Chinkin be disqualified from the United Nations Human Rights Council’s fact-finding mission on the Gaza conflict and expressed their disappointment that the well-founded request was rejected by the mission. Chinkin's prior statements, the lawyers wrote, "necessarily compromises the integrity of this inquiry and its report".
UN anti-Israel bias and antisemitism
Further information: Israel, Palestine, and the United Nations and UNESCO § IsraelUN Watch is active at the UN in combating anti-Israel and anti-Semitism, and what it dubs the selective and politicized treatment of Israel by many UN bodies. The group supported former Secretary General Kofi Annan's declared goal of ending the UN's imbalanced treatment of Israel and has been highly critical of the United Nations Human Rights Council, The Jewish Telegraphic Agency has described U.N. Watch as a pro-Israel organization.
Claudia Rosett quoted UN Watch's director Hillel Neuer who said that since the UN Human Rights Council was launched in mid-2006 and until the beginning of 2010, it issued 33 condemnatory resolutions; of these, half a dozen have concerned Burma and North Korea, while the other 27 have focused on condemning Israel, while absolving its attackers, including the Iranian-backed militant groups Hamas and Hezbollah.
March 2007 UNHRC speech
On 23 March 2007, UN Watch's Hillel Neuer delivered a harshly critical speech to the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC), stating that the Council had betrayed the dreams of its founders and become "a nightmare". Neuer charged that the Council ignores human rights abuses worldwide, opting instead to enact "one resolution after another condemning one single state: Israel". He further argued that the Council's stated concern for Palestinian human rights is deceptive, and provided examples where it ignored atrocities against Palestinians "because Israel could not be blamed. … The despots who run this Council couldn’t care less about Palestinians, or about any human rights. They seek to demonize Israeli democracy, to delegitimize the Jewish state, to scapegoat the Jewish people."
Neuer's speech was praised in a number of editorials and op-ed's. The Wall Street Journal opined that Neuer's candor disrupted the Council's "obfuscation" and "fraudulence". An op-ed writer in The National Post stated that the speech became "a major hit on YouTube". In its editorial, The New York Sun called it a rare "diplomatic moment to remember", and published the full text of his remarks. Alan Gold, an Australian human rights activist, opined Neuer's speech was "a non-government organisation laying bare the mendacity and prejudice of a key UN body."
Other
Sexual exploitation
UN Watch, the World YWCA, and the World Alliance of YMCAs published a statement against sexual exploitation and child pornography. "Today far too many children are sexually exploited and abused causing lifelong damage. More than two million children are exploited in the multibillion-dollar sex industry each year and 1.2 million children are trafficked annually", the statement said.
Reception history
Former UN Secretary General Kofi Annan has said "I deeply appreciate the valuable work performed by UN Watch. I believe that informed and independent evaluation of the United Nations' activities will prove a vital source as we seek to adapt the Organization to the needs of a changing world." At the 2006 Centennial Anniversary of the American Jewish Committee, the Director-General of the UN Office in Geneva, Mr. Sergei Ordzhonikidze, praised the work of UN Watch by saying "allow me to also pay tribute to the valuable work of UN Watch in support of the just application of values and principles of the United Nations Charter and support for human rights for all."
Ian Williams, former president of the United Nations Correspondents Association and author of The UN For Beginners, wrote in an opinion piece in The Guardian in 2007 that the main objective of UN Watch "is to attack the United Nations in general, and its human rights council in particular, for alleged bias against Israel". Williams supported UN Watch's condemnation of the UN Human Rights Council as a hypocritical organization, but also accused UN Watch itself of hypocrisy for failing to denounce what he called "manifest Israeli transgressions against the human rights of Palestinians."
The New Republic's Martin Peretz, in a 2007 blog piece, described the organization as "a truth-telling organization." Claudia Rosett, a journalist-in-residence with the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, praised UN Watch as "stalwart and invaluable".
The American journalist and political commentator Phyllis Bennis described UN Watch as a "small Geneva-based right-wing organisation" that is "hardly known outside of UN headquarters". She stressed that "undermining and delegitimising" Richard Falk through "scurrilous accusations" has been an "obsession of UN Watch" when he became Special Rapporteur.
Agence France-Presse has described UN Watch both as "a lobby group with strong ties to Israel" and as a group which "champion human rights worldwide".
See also
- Alfred H. Moses
- American Jewish Committee
- Civil Rights
- Human Rights
- Non-governmental organization
- Morris Berthold Abram
- United Nations
- United Nations Human Rights Council
References
- ^ "Mission and History". UN Watch. Retrieved 7 December 2011.
- "The United nations and Anti-Semitism – 2004–2007 Report Card" (PDF). Retrieved 19 October 2013.
{{cite journal}}
: Cite journal requires|journal=
(help) - "''UN Watch'': Executive Director Hillel Neuer". Unwatch.org. 16 December 2006. Retrieved 7 December 2011.
- UN Watch: Letter to His Excellency Mr. Ban Ki-moon, The Secretary-General of The United Nations. 2 November 2007.
- Mission & History, UN Watch
- ^ "Pro-Israel Activists Set To Do Battle At Durban II". Jewish Times. 18 April 2009. Retrieved 7 December 2011.
- ^ "U.N. rights chief praises Durban II". Jewish Telegraphic Agency. 8 September 2008. Retrieved 7 December 2011.
- "UN creates new human rights body", BBC 15 March 2006
- Cite error: The named reference
angola
was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ "UN Watch, AJC Seal Partnership". Charitywire.com. Archived from the original on 26 October 2011. Retrieved 7 December 2011.
{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help) - ^ "''Central Tibetan Administration'': UN Watch urges UN to discuss human rights violations in Tibet". Tibet.net. Retrieved 7 December 2011.
- ^ "''The United Nations Office at Geneva'': The Centennial Anniversary of the American Jewish Committee". Unog.ch. Retrieved 7 December 2011.
- ^ Capella, Peter (7 July 2009). "''Agence France Presse'': UN Gaza probe chief underlines balanced approach". Agence France Presse. Archived from the original on 22 December 2011. Retrieved 11 November 2015.
{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help) - "''UN Watch'': Founder: Morris B. Abram". Unwatch.org. Retrieved 7 December 2011.
- United States. Congress. House. Committee on International Relations. 1999. The treatment of Israel by the United Nations : hearing before the Committee on International Relations, House of Representatives, One Hundred Sixth Congress, first session, 14 July 1999 U.S. G.P.O. : For sale by the U.S. G.P.O., Supt. of Docs., Congressional Sales Office, Washington : 1999
- THE TREATMENT OF ISRAEL BY THE UNITED NATIONS. PREPARED TESTIMONY OF AMBASSADOR MORRIS B. ABRAM BEFORE THE HOUSE COMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS JULY 14, 1999, UN Watch, 1999-07-14
- "UN Watch, AJC Seal Partnership". American Jewish Committee. 4 January 2001. Retrieved 28 August 2015.
- "UN Watch, AJC Seal Partnership". American Jewish Committee. 4 January 2001. Retrieved 28 August 2015.
- "AJC Office and Departments". AJC. Retrieved 19 March 2012.
- "AJC Activities in Europe". AJC. Retrieved 19 March 2012.
- "Human Rights – American Jewish Committee". Ajc.org. Retrieved 7 December 2011.
- ^ "UN: Quadrennial reports 2002–2005 submitted through the Secretary-General pursuant to Economic and Social Council resolution 1996/31". United Nations. Retrieved 7 December 2011.
- United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees Non-governmental Organization Directory (1 October 2008). "UNHCR – UN Watch / United Nations Watch". United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. Archived from the original on 18 February 2010. Retrieved 3 December 2009.
{{cite web}}
:|author=
has generic name (help); Unknown parameter|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help) - "Human Rights and Wrongs at the UN". BBC. 21 January 2009. Retrieved 7 December 2011.
- Kristen Saloomey in New York. "Debate rages over UN rights council". Al Jazeera. Retrieved 7 December 2011.
- "''Reuters'': UN urges China to protect human rights as state denies charges". Worldbulletin.net. 9 February 2009. Retrieved 7 December 2011.
- Rifkin, Ira (1 April 2009). "Guest Voices: Speaking Truth to the UN Human Rights Council". Washington Post. Retrieved 7 December 2011.
- "UN rights council divided over Sri Lanka". Mg.co.za. AFP. 26 May 2009. Retrieved 7 December 2011.
- Washington D.C (6 May 2009). "UN Human Rights Council Candidates Raise Concerns". Voice of America. Retrieved 7 December 2011.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link) - Gold vs Goldstone Jerusalem Post:
- "U.S. Taxpayers Pay Millions to Keep Despots Safe at U.N". Fox News. Retrieved 7 December 2011.
- "U.N. watchdog slams religious defamation resolution". Jta.org. 12 March 2009. Retrieved 7 December 2011.
- "Missing and History". Unwatch.org. Retrieved 7 December 2011.
- "Covington & Burling LLP | Biographies | Alfred H. Moses". Cov.com. Retrieved 7 December 2011.
- "UN Watch Appoints New Executive Director – American Jewish Committee". Ajc.org. 26 March 2004. Retrieved 7 December 2011.
- Rights group calls for U.N. apology over Congo post, Reuters 26 November 2008
- U.N. Human Rights Council condemns abuses in Congo, Reuters 1 December 2009
- Groups call for UN rights monitor for Congo, Reuters, 23 December 2009
- Globe For Darfur: Reports & Briefs
UN Watch hosted a panel of distinguished speakers, including a Darfur survivor and a UN expert, at its Activist Summit on Darfur today at the UN Office in Geneva
- "Justice for Darfur" Campaign Launched, Amnesty International 25 April 2008
- ^ Iran under fire at UNHRC, Jerusalem Post. 16 February 2010
- UN rights body concerned for Haiti's children, AP, 28 January 2010
- A Swiss Ban on Minarets, New York Times, 18 December 2009
- States vie for seats on disputed UN rights body, Reuters 21 May 2008
- Oppressors running for UN rights council: Groups, Montreal Gazette 5 May 2009
- Jordana Horn, "Syria may drop bid for Human Rights Council seat", Jerusalem Post, 10 May 2011.
- 'Black Day for Human Rights': Hillel Neuer on France 24 TV. YouTube. 12 December 2013.
- "Geneva Summit for Human Rights and Democracy". genevasummit.org.
- What if dictatorships judged the world on human rights?. YouTube. 2 March 2014.
- Yitzhak Benhorin, Sharansky, Wiesel to help counter 'Durban II' conference, Ynet 13 April 2009
- Alternate Durban conference held in Geneva, JTA 19 April 2009
- Tovah Lazaroff, 'I'm a Zionist': Activists protest in Geneva, Jerusalem Post. 23 April 2009
- Michael J. Jordan, Why the US will boycott global racism conference, Christian Science Monitor 19 April 2009
- Adena Philips, The other conference on racism – the one the UN should have held, National Post. 24 April 2009
- ^ "Request To Disqualify Prof. Christine Chinkin From Un Fact Finding Mission On The Gaza Conflict" (PDF). Retrieved 7 December 2011.
- Israel’s bombardment of Gaza is not self-defence – it’s a war crime, The Sunday Times, 11 January 2009.
- NGO: Academic should quit Cast Lead inquiry, Jerusalem Post. 23 August 2009
- "UN's Goldstone completes public hearings on Gaza conflict". Khaleej Times. 8 July 2009. Retrieved 7 December 2011.
- LSE Law Professor Urged to Step Down from U.N Gaza Inquiry over Bias, UN Watch, 20 August 2009.
- Dispute over 'biased' Gaza inquiry professor, TheJC.com, 27 August 2009.
- ^ U.N. Goldstone inquiry rejects ’so-called petition of UN Watch’; denies mission is quasi-judicial, UN Watch, 30 August 2009
- Gold vs Goldstone, Jerusalem Post. 11 November 2009
- Goldstone walks a fine line in an ancient war zone, BusinessDay, 4 August 2009.
- Lawyers, watchdog allege Goldstone bias, Jerusalem Post. 14 September 2009
- 30 Canadian lawyers challenge biased UN Goldstone report, CFP, 16 September 2009
- ^ U.N.’s Imminent Gaza Report Challenged by 50 U.K. & Canadian Lawyers for ‘Bias’, UN Watch, 13 September 2009
- "UN Watch – Mission & History". Retrieved 14 March 2014.
- "Annan Made the Nations a Little Less United Against Israel". Forward. Retrieved 7 December 2011.
- "''National Public Radio'': Zionism Debate Clouds U.N. Racism Forum". Npr.org. 12 March 2009. Retrieved 7 December 2011.
- Abraham H. Foxman (8 September 2008). "''JTA'': U.N. rights chief praises Durban II". Jta.org. Retrieved 7 December 2011.
- Don't Let Iran On The Human Rights Council, Forbes-Asia, 11 February 2010
- ^ "'I Will Not Express Thanks'". The New York Sun. 30 March 2007. Retrieved 7 December 2011.
- Your U.N. at Work, Wall Street Journal 30 March 2007
- Degeneration in all but reputation, National Post 23 May 2009
- "New name, but the shame is still the same", The Australian,
- NGO Statement on the Revision of the Council Framework Decision on combating the sexual abuse, sexual exploitation of children and child-pornography, repealing Framework Decision 2004/68/JHA
- "''United Nations'': Remarks Prepared for Delivery at the United Nations Correspondents Association Dinner". United Nations. Retrieved 7 December 2011.
- "Ian Williams". The Nation. Retrieved 16 September 2014.
- Casting the first stone The Guardian, 4 April 2007.
- U.N. Truth Telling The New Republic Online, 18 June 2007.
- Claudia Rosett (20 June 2007). "National Review Online, June 20, 2007". Article.nationalreview.com. Retrieved 7 December 2011.
- Phyllis Bennis (9 January 2013). "Human Rights Watch: Time to stand with human rights defenders, January 9, 2013". Al Jazeera (English). Retrieved 7 September 2015.
- Phyllis Bennis (9 January 2013). "Human Rights Watch: Time to stand with human rights defenders, January 9, 2013". Al Jazeera (English). Retrieved 7 September 2015.
- May 6, 2008, NGOs say five nations unfit to serve on UN rights body, AFP 6 May 2008
Further reading
- Hillel Neuer of UN Watch interviewed on Shire Network News
- The Struggle against Anti-Israel Bias at the UN Commission on Human Rights – Hillel C. Neuer
External links
- UN Watch (official website)
- UN Watch, Institute for Policy Studies – Right Web, Tracking militarists’ efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy.
- Use dmy dates from December 2011
- Human rights organizations
- Organizations established in 1993
- Organisations based in Switzerland
- Non-governmental organizations involved in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict
- Non-governmental organisations of Europe
- United Nations relations
- Zionism
- Organisations based in Geneva
- Criticism of the United Nations