| Revision as of 21:11, 12 May 2017 editKautilya3 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers86,860 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:13, 12 May 2017 edit undoKautilya3 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers86,860 edits →12 May 2017: ReplyNext edit → | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| This is a complicated case, but I am beginning to think that {{noping|Losthistory9}} and {{noping|Problematics}} are the sockpuppets of {{noping|Towns Hill}}, and {{noping|Owais Khursheed}} is their meatpuppet. ] (]) 21:11, 12 May 2017 (UTC) | This is a complicated case, but I am beginning to think that {{noping|Losthistory9}} and {{noping|Problematics}} are the sockpuppets of {{noping|Towns Hill}}, and {{noping|Owais Khursheed}} is their meatpuppet. ] (]) 21:11, 12 May 2017 (UTC) | ||
| ''Circumstantial evidence'': {{noping|Towns Hill}} was indefinitely from the entire ARBIPA topic area on 18 January 2017. His was on 27 March 2017. | |||
| Roughly two days later {{noping|Losthistory9}} was and became active in the Kashmir history topic area, a favourite of Towns Hill's. | |||
| ''Duck evidence'': The very of Losthistory9 is over 4,000 bytes. Then he quickly got to work on ], a major contribution of TownsHill (188 edits, now followed by 106 edits of Losthistory9 ), extending and amending the previous work. Notice the sophistication of this {{tq| taking away ''primary sources'' content and putting similar content from ''secondary source'' instead}}. This is ''one week'' into the career of Losthistory9. Also, this , converting ref-citations into Sfn and Efn-ua footnotes. Three weeks into his career, this on ] magically appears in his sandobox and gets minutes later. Excellent scholarly sources that Towns Hill is well-versed with are used here: ], ], Mridu Rai, Rekha Chowdhary, ] etc. (In fact, Towns Hill is the only editor, other than me, that has studied all these sources.) | |||
| ''The complicated case'': While all this is going on, yet another whiz kid , {{noping|Problematics}}, to take control of the ] article. Within 3 days of his appearance, he can make claims like ''this article is specifically for covering war rape in the present post-1989 conflict in Kashmir Valley. Please add your material to ...'' (ownereship) and ''This article's lead and background specifies the context as the insurgency in Kashmir since 1989/90. The scholarly sources .. particularly discuss rape in Kashmir conflict in the context of the insurgency...'' (intricate knowledge of the article's construction). The ostensible author of this article, {{noping|Owais Khursheed}} is nowhere to be seen, but Problematics is in total control (5 edits by Owais Khurseed, 79 edits by Problematics ). The same lop-sided contributions are seen on the talk page (8 edits by Owais Khurseed, 135 edits by Problematics ). | |||
| ''The mystery'': Who authored ]? This article, like the ] earlier, magically appears highly polished , with citations to scholarly books and journal articles as well as a "Further reading" list. Is Owais Khursheed, who installed this article, its real author? Looking at Khursheed's , we find him struggling to make ] around 19 April, where he can't even write full citations for newspaper articles. He normally does ''mobile web edits''. His new articles look like . There is nothing in Khursheed's edit history that is of this quality. It is more likely that {{noping|Problematics}} wrote ] and gave it to him to install. Then Problematics had to come in himself in order to defend it and improve it. | |||
| Losthistory9 as well as Problematics both create good articles offline and install them. Both of them are focused on Kashmir. Losthistory9 is a purpose-made account to deal with history. Problematics is purpose-made account to deal with violence/human rights issues. {{noping|Towns Hill}} has contributed to both: ] (48.6%), ] (8.7%), ] (51.8%) in history, and ] (6.3%), ] (12.0%), ] (21 edits) for sexual violence. He also engaged in extensive discussion on their talk pages, much of which was highly contentious leading to all kinds of disputes, eventually resulting in his topic ban. So, now, we get this. -- ] (]) 21:12, 12 May 2017 (UTC) | |||
| ====<big>Comments by other users</big>==== | ====<big>Comments by other users</big>==== | ||
Revision as of 21:13, 12 May 2017
Towns Hill
Towns Hill (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
This case was moved to Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Towns Hill from Faizan (talk · contribs). Future cases should be placed there.
12 May 2017
– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.
Suspected sockpuppets
- Losthistory9 (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Problematics (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Owais Khursheed (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
This is a complicated case, but I am beginning to think that Losthistory9 and Problematics are the sockpuppets of Towns Hill, and Owais Khursheed is their meatpuppet. Kautilya3 (talk) 21:11, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
Circumstantial evidence: Towns Hill was indefinitely topic banned from the entire ARBIPA topic area on 18 January 2017. His last edit was on 27 March 2017. Roughly two days later Losthistory9 was created and became active in the Kashmir history topic area, a favourite of Towns Hill's.
Duck evidence: The very first edit of Losthistory9 is over 4,000 bytes. Then he quickly got to work on Kashmiris, a major contribution of TownsHill (188 edits, now followed by 106 edits of Losthistory9 ), extending and amending the previous work. Notice the sophistication of this edit sumary taking away primary sources content and putting similar content from secondary source instead
. This is one week into the career of Losthistory9. Also, this massive edit, converting ref-citations into Sfn and Efn-ua footnotes. Three weeks into his career, this fully formed article on Muslim political movements under Dogra rule magically appears in his sandobox and gets installed minutes later. Excellent scholarly sources that Towns Hill is well-versed with are used here: Christopher Snedden, Sumantra Bose, Mridu Rai, Rekha Chowdhary, Ayesha Jalal etc. (In fact, Towns Hill is the only editor, other than me, that has studied all these sources.)
The complicated case: While all this is going on, yet another whiz kid appears, Problematics, to take control of the Rape in the Kashmir conflict article. Within 3 days of his appearance, he can make claims like this article is specifically for covering war rape in the present post-1989 conflict in Kashmir Valley. Please add your material to ... (ownereship) and This article's lead and background specifies the context as the insurgency in Kashmir since 1989/90. The scholarly sources .. particularly discuss rape in Kashmir conflict in the context of the insurgency... (intricate knowledge of the article's construction). The ostensible author of this article, Owais Khursheed is nowhere to be seen, but Problematics is in total control (5 edits by Owais Khurseed, 79 edits by Problematics ). The same lop-sided contributions are seen on the talk page (8 edits by Owais Khurseed, 135 edits by Problematics ).
The mystery: Who authored Rape in the Kashmir conflict? This article, like the Muslim political movements earlier, magically appears highly polished , with citations to scholarly books and journal articles as well as a "Further reading" list. Is Owais Khursheed, who installed this article, its real author? Looking at Khursheed's edit history, we find him struggling to make Srinagar bypoll election killings 2017 around 19 April, where he can't even write full citations for newspaper articles. He normally does mobile web edits. His new articles look like this. There is nothing in Khursheed's edit history that is of this quality. It is more likely that Problematics wrote Rape in the Kashmir conflict and gave it to him to install. Then Problematics had to come in himself in order to defend it and improve it.
Losthistory9 as well as Problematics both create good articles offline and install them. Both of them are focused on Kashmir. Losthistory9 is a purpose-made account to deal with history. Problematics is purpose-made account to deal with violence/human rights issues. Towns Hill has contributed to both: Kashmiris (48.6%), Kashmir (8.7%), Kashmiri Muslims (51.8%) in history, and 1971 Bangladesh genocide (6.3%), Wartime sexual violence (12.0%), Rape during the Bangladesh Liberation War (21 edits) for sexual violence. He also engaged in extensive discussion on their talk pages, much of which was highly contentious leading to all kinds of disputes, eventually resulting in his topic ban. So, now, we get this. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 21:12, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Categories: