Misplaced Pages

User talk:Gogo Dodo: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 07:07, 3 October 2006 editGogo Dodo (talk | contribs)Administrators197,922 editsm Archive 2 creation, TOC shift← Previous edit Revision as of 09:21, 3 October 2006 edit undoPeter Eisenburger (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,239 edits NetObjects, Inc.Next edit →
Line 22: Line 22:


: Considerating your advice I did some further editing. However I wanted to keep the numbers because that's what people want to know about a company.--] 07:35, 2 October 2006 (UTC) : Considerating your advice I did some further editing. However I wanted to keep the numbers because that's what people want to know about a company.--] 07:35, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

:: Thank you for your help. So, I can go on writing more articles ;) --] 09:21, 3 October 2006 (UTC)


== RE: Your Message To Me == == RE: Your Message To Me ==

Revision as of 09:21, 3 October 2006

Archive
Archives
  1. April 2006 – June 2006
  2. July 2006 – September 2006


NetObjects, Inc.

Can you visit the NetObjects, Inc. article again? It was tagged as advertising. I made some changes to meet the complaints. What is your opinion? --Peter Eisenburger 11:18, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Who is able to place an advert-tag? --Peter Eisenburger 06:20, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
Considerating your advice I did some further editing. However I wanted to keep the numbers because that's what people want to know about a company.--Peter Eisenburger 07:35, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for your help. So, I can go on writing more articles ;) --Peter Eisenburger 09:21, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

RE: Your Message To Me

You wrote:

Exact how are links to photo galleries of the subjects in question considered "commercial links or links to your own private websites"? There is no "advertising" involved, as you claim, as the links indeed point to photo galleries of the subjects involved. None of these galleries are my own personal websites. In fact, I am being very generous with my free time in even adding these links in the first place. I am doing this for the sake of helping out other people who may be interested in seeing more photos on the subjects in question. I gain absolutely no benefit from the work that I'm doing, other then the "good feeling" of knowing that I'm helping others. I am not hurting Misplaced Pages, or anyone else. Quite the contrary, I'm trying to make Misplaced Pages better. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.161.184.226 (talkcontribs)

While I appreciate your enthusiasm for adding to Misplaced Pages, I don't think the links were proper as they were to a file upload service who account owner was a commercial website. The photos themselves are of questionable legal standing. You adding it to the top of the External links sections didn't help matters either. -- Gogo Dodo 06:57, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
User talk:Gogo Dodo: Difference between revisions Add topic