Revision as of 22:32, 25 November 2017 editNadirAli (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users16,436 edits →To create and improve← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:53, 28 November 2017 edit undoKautilya3 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers86,860 edits →Arbitration Enforcement Request: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 146: | Line 146: | ||
::{{to|Mar4d}}, I replaced it with another file, almost identical, but this pic is slightly brighter and not in use anywhere else. Have a look when you can to see if it's okay.--] (]) 20:58, 13 November 2017 (UTC) | ::{{to|Mar4d}}, I replaced it with another file, almost identical, but this pic is slightly brighter and not in use anywhere else. Have a look when you can to see if it's okay.--] (]) 20:58, 13 November 2017 (UTC) | ||
::: It is perfect, thanks! ''']''' (]) 09:03, 15 November 2017 (UTC) | ::: It is perfect, thanks! ''']''' (]) 09:03, 15 November 2017 (UTC) | ||
== Arbitration Enforcement Request == | |||
An arbitration enforcement request has been filed that involves you at ]. -- ] (]) 10:53, 28 November 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 10:53, 28 November 2017
NadirAli is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Archives | |||||||
|
|||||||
Articles/pages I created since I re-joined Misplaced Pages
User:Nadirali/articles and other pages I created since I re-joined Wiki
Articles I significantly improved since I re-joined Misplaced Pages
User:NadirAli/Articles I significantly improved
Misplaced Pages articles for my own reading interest
For ST vs SW
Refs for physics and SW for a later time
Articles to improve with
For Technology in Star Wars
For my own reading interest
Manuals, charts and tutorials
Useful templates for article improvements
- {Friendly search suggestions}
- {clear}
- {notelist}
- {reflist-talk}
- {efn|Text of footnote}
- {not in citation given}
- Misplaced Pages:List of infoboxes
- {merge from|article title}
- {reflist-talk}
Moves
User:Nadirali/Star Wars - Science Fair. This is not ready. DS (talk) 13:24, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
User:NadirAli/Scientific and parascientific perspectives on The Force
Articles to create and improve
Create
- Arab-Israeli relations
- Starkiller base
- Star Wars Feel The Force
- Star Wars: The Power of Myth
- Sheheri
- Science and Star Wars (webseries)
- Niagara Comic Con
- Daraz PK
- Star Wars Adventures: Luke Skywalker and the Treasure of the Dragonsnakes (January 20, 2010)
- Real life Supervillain
- The Outer Limits (comics)
Improve
- The Force (Star Wars)
- Draft:ZippCast
- Outline of South Asian history
- Muhammad Ali Jinnah
- List of languages by number of native speakers records the number of first language speakers
- List of languages by total number of speakers records the number of first and second language speakers
- Abu Dhabi
- CAS School
- Emirates (airline)
- Virgin Atlantic
- Douglas DC-8
- Philippines and weapons of mass destruction
The Force is not magic
- Just because someone uses the word "energy" doesn't mean they aren't talking about magic. Most people who use the word "energy" don't know what energy is. Just look at how New Agers use it. Serendious 13:14, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
- To editor Serendipodous: Telekinesis is a common theme in science fiction. See X-Men or the Outer Limits as examples. Also check the commentaries on Ewoks: Caravan of Courage or Ewoks: Battle for Endor. These sci-fi fantasy films where their supernatural elements are distinguished from the force.--NadirAli نادر علی (talk) 16:56, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
- The boundary between scifi and fantasy is blurry; superhero stories in particular owe more to Samson and Hercules than they do to HG Wells or Jules Verne. Serendious 17:38, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
- To editor Serendipodous:, I'm not sure I agree about the boundary, but I agree more or less on the superhero part taking inspirations from fantasy. Thor is right out of that era. As in Thor (Marvel comics).--NadirAli نادر علی (talk) 05:01, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
- To editor Serendipodous: Telekinesis is a common theme in science fiction. See X-Men or the Outer Limits as examples. Also check the commentaries on Ewoks: Caravan of Courage or Ewoks: Battle for Endor. These sci-fi fantasy films where their supernatural elements are distinguished from the force.--NadirAli نادر علی (talk) 16:56, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
Can I ask a favour?
Before you make another edit to Harry Potter influences and analogues, please watch this short Youtube video.
Also, your edits are shifting dangerously close to "How JK Rowling ripped off Star Wars," which is a fairly blatant POV. Serendious 13:14, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
- To editor Serendipodous:, I did not change the text of the article, I simply updated the format of the references. All of them are reliably sourced. I'll watch the video. What exactly is your concern?--NadirAli نادر علی (talk) 16:54, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
- Mainly I want you to consider the Hero's Journey. I'm not trying to stand up for Harry Potter here, but if you were to bring up Hero's Journey elements in contrast to Star Wars, you could just as easily argue that Star Wars stole from The Lord of the Rings, or that Lord of the Rings stole from Beowulf, or that Beowulf stole from the Odyssey, or that the Odyssey stole from the Epic of Gilgamesh. Serendious 17:41, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
- To editor Serendipodous:, I looked at the video and learned nothing new. The hero's journey is something I'm familiar with and a hero with a thousand faces too. It's already mentioned that Star Wars is inspired by King Arthur, Bewulf and Lord of the Rings. I'm not familiar with Bewulf and only vaguely familiar with Lord of the Rings, but it's borrowings are listed. As long as everything is reliably sourced, I still don't see what the issue is.--NadirAli نادر علی (talk) 01:30, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
- To editor Serendipodous:, I did not change the text of the article, I simply updated the format of the references. All of them are reliably sourced. I'll watch the video. What exactly is your concern?--NadirAli نادر علی (talk) 16:54, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
You're a really confused person
You just are. First you delete Arabized from Urdu. The YOU say, that "Oh it is Arabized, but it's via the Persianization—well some parts of it". LOL RaviVery (talk) 00:31, 12 August 2017 (UTC) RaviVery (talk) 00:31, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
- Not sure what you are trying to get at. It did come via Persian and is simply a result of Persianization.--NadirAli نادر علی (talk) 02:55, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
It is Arabised. Get that thru your head. RaviVery (talk) 23:51, 13 August 2017 (UTC) RaviVery (talk) 23:51, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Barnstar
The Pakistan Barnstar of National Merit | ||
Thanks, it's always great to receive recognition from veterans like yourself. I'd like to reciprocate likewise, in appreciation of all your efforts to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of Pakistan now and over the past decade! Mar4d (talk) 05:27, 27 August 2017 (UTC) |
Category:Language isolate speakers has been nominated for discussion
Category:Language isolate speakers, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:49, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
Yo
Yo man could you go over to the Al-Khalid tank and talk page and clear up all the confusion over there.
- Thank you for messaging. Although I'm not too big of a military buff (I am interested in paramilitaries & police forces though), I'll have a look later on.--NadirAli نادر علی (talk) 23:54, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
References needing double checking
References
- A Geography of Hindustan, Ancient and Modern, American Ceylon Mission, 1843.
- chambers's encyclopaedia: a dictionary of universal knowledge for the people. 1878. p. 537.
PIA template
I've created a navigation box for PIA at Template:Pakistan International Airlines. I've added the most suitable pic I could find, however feel free to suggest or replace with any better images you might know of. Cheers, Mar4d (talk) 06:08, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
- To editor Mar4d:, thank you for this message. The previous image, while excellent in quality was of the Airbus 310-300, which is no longer in use with PIA. But that's not the reason I replaced it. The image was already in use elsewhere. I tend to avoid recycling images. But because this is a template and not an article, I am okay with replacing the older image. Feel free to add it back in if you wish. It was a great choice by the way.--NadirAli نادر علی (talk) 03:58, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- @NadirAli: Thanks for your input, I appreciate it :) I'm not much of an expert on aviation, so was having a tough time locating good aircraft pics on Commons. I seem to like this image especially as it captures the entire aircraft as opposed to the previous one, which was slightly cropped. However, the one downside I guess is the dark/cloudy backdrop which seems to add too much contrast. If you know of any clear, sky-blue pics, I'd love to see them. What I have in mind are like the ones used on Template:Royal Brunei Airlines, Template:Emirates Group, Template:Garuda Indonesia, Template:Malaysia Airlines etc. Thanks for your help regardless! Mar4d (talk) 04:08, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- I guess I should've looked a little harder. This category has some good ones. Mar4d (talk) 04:17, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- @NadirAli: Thanks for your input, I appreciate it :) I'm not much of an expert on aviation, so was having a tough time locating good aircraft pics on Commons. I seem to like this image especially as it captures the entire aircraft as opposed to the previous one, which was slightly cropped. However, the one downside I guess is the dark/cloudy backdrop which seems to add too much contrast. If you know of any clear, sky-blue pics, I'd love to see them. What I have in mind are like the ones used on Template:Royal Brunei Airlines, Template:Emirates Group, Template:Garuda Indonesia, Template:Malaysia Airlines etc. Thanks for your help regardless! Mar4d (talk) 04:08, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- To editor Mar4d:, darn I was too ignorant. A brighter one was right next to it. I'm replacing it now.--NadirAli نادر علی (talk) 04:19, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- To editor Mar4d:, I replaced it with another file, almost identical, but this pic is slightly brighter and not in use anywhere else. Have a look when you can to see if it's okay.--NadirAli نادر علی (talk) 20:58, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- It is perfect, thanks! Mar4d (talk) 09:03, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- To editor Mar4d:, thank you for this message. The previous image, while excellent in quality was of the Airbus 310-300, which is no longer in use with PIA. But that's not the reason I replaced it. The image was already in use elsewhere. I tend to avoid recycling images. But because this is a template and not an article, I am okay with replacing the older image. Feel free to add it back in if you wish. It was a great choice by the way.--NadirAli نادر علی (talk) 03:58, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Arbitration Enforcement Request
An arbitration enforcement request has been filed that involves you at WP:ARE. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 10:53, 28 November 2017 (UTC)