| Revision as of 18:15, 3 December 2017 editTxantimedia (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,412 edits →Your edit on Roy Moore← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:21, 3 December 2017 edit undoSignedzzz (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users20,559 edits Undid revision 813433332 by Txantimedia (talk)fuck offNext edit → | ||
| Line 67: | Line 67: | ||
| Why did you remove "older" from teenagers? That is accurate per RS. If you can't provide a reason, I'm going to revert. ] (]) 01:14, 2 December 2017 (UTC) | Why did you remove "older" from teenagers? That is accurate per RS. If you can't provide a reason, I'm going to revert. ] (]) 01:14, 2 December 2017 (UTC) | ||
| :It's not used in the cited sorce; and it's unclear what the word is intended to mean. ] (]) 01:36, 2 December 2017 (UTC) | :It's not used in the cited sorce; and it's unclear what the word is intended to mean. ] (]) 01:36, 2 December 2017 (UTC) | ||
| ::This is twice now you've reverted. Older was entered into the text after extensive discussion in talk and was arrived at by consensus. By definition, an older teenager is one in the upper age range of teenagers. Teenager refers to a child from the age of 13 to the age of 19. Older teenagers would be those in the range of 16 to 19, which is the age range of the women claiming that Moore approached them for dates. Furthermore, Moore has claimed, rather forcefully, that he never dated a teenager under the age of consent. A lengthy discussion in talk (]) arrived at a consensus of using older rather than the more awkward "above the age of consent". This is supported by numerous RS, all of which state clearly that the only women accusing Moore who was below the age of consent is Leigh Corfman. Moore has denied even knowing her and states that her claim is false. Please do not revert this again without first discussing it in talk so that all editors may have input. ] (]) 18:15, 3 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:21, 3 December 2017
AN/I
As you participated in Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive957#Godsy back to Wikihounding - how to stop it?, you may be interested in Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Proposing IBAN between Godsy and Legacypac. — GodsyCONT) 03:49, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
July 2017
Your recent editing history at Joseph Smith shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. FyzixFighter (talk) 03:10, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
- About this 👆 Would you would be willing to participate in some form of dispute resolution, like WP:3O, WP:RFC, or WP:DRN? ~Awilley (talk) 16:37, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
 | |
| Operation Onymous | |
|---|---|
| ... you were recipient no. 1438 of Precious, a prize of QAI! |
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:22, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
August 2017
Your recent editing history at Gerald Nye shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Suite1408 (talk) 04:10, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
Could you provide a direct link to article talk please?Suite1408 (talk) 07:40, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
Aktion T4
Pls discuss your reverts on the talk page to gain consensus, rather than reverting later edits, you're on 3RR already. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 11:43, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
AT4
It was a serious question but I can see that I'm wasting my time. Keith-264 (talk) 08:36, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
Why
Why are you taking out a whole paragraph without discussion?
Why do you claim it is undue? Only one sentence per country is used. They are also unusual, not the usual "President of the Republic of X expresses condolences to the people of the USA". Vanguard10 (talk) 05:03, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
- per WP:BRD, discuss on article talk page, please zzz (talk) 05:04, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
Requested move to: Joshua Wong
I thought you might like to know that I have requested that Joshua Wong (activist) be (effectively) renamed 'Joshua Wong', by eliminating the existing redirect page, featuring one other, low-interest article of the same name.Cossaxx (talk) 21:52, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
October 2017
Your recent editing history at 2017 Las Vegas Shooting shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. –dlthewave ☎ 12:22, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Richard Spencer page
Why did you remove my section on Progressivism and Healthcare. An admin said the problem was that I didn't provide reliable sources. But I did that time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nickboy000 (talk • contribs) 05:11, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- It's repeated from the section Richard_B._Spencer#Race_and_ethnicity. zzz (talk) 05:13, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
November 2017
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. User:Mclovin'tosh (talk) 13:28, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Your edit on Roy Moore
Why did you remove "older" from teenagers? That is accurate per RS. If you can't provide a reason, I'm going to revert. Txantimedia (talk) 01:14, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
- It's not used in the cited sorce; and it's unclear what the word is intended to mean. zzz (talk) 01:36, 2 December 2017 (UTC)