Misplaced Pages:Copyright problems/2018 May 10: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 09:39, 10 May 2018 editSamee (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers25,321 edits cmt← Previous edit		Revision as of 09:58, 10 May 2018 edit undoJosephusOfJerusalem (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users905 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 3:		Line 3:

	* This is not the blatant case of copyright violations. Kautilya3 was kind enough to explain the concern in their edit summary. Urging for a straightway block is likely due to bad blood between them. <span style="border:1px solid #e2a000;padding:1px;"> ]]</span> 09:39, 10 May 2018 (UTC)		* This is not the blatant case of copyright violations. Kautilya3 was kind enough to explain the concern in their edit summary. Urging for a straightway block is likely due to bad blood between them. <span style="border:1px solid #e2a000;padding:1px;"> ]]</span> 09:39, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
			* Agree with Samee. Looks like a retaliatory request because of . I could not find any copyright violations. These are just quotes inside the citations. They are not any more of a copyright violation than ]. This is an article related to a content dispute between these users on ], so the frustration from there is spilling over. ] (]) 09:57, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:58, 10 May 2018

History of Balochistan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Copyright violation started from this diff and it was removed recently with this diff. I am seeing thousands of words were copy pasted from books in form of "quotes" in references that are actually supposed to be short. Capitals00 (talk) 05:23, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Same copyrights violating editor has now restored the copyright violation and provided a misleading edit summary. Given he has been topic banned from uploading files for his copyright violations, I would urge admin to block him for his continued copyright violations. Capitals00 (talk) 06:01, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

This is not the blatant case of copyright violations. Kautilya3 was kind enough to explain the concern in their edit summary. Urging for a straightway block is likely due to bad blood between them. samee converse 09:39, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
Agree with Samee. Looks like a retaliatory request because of this. I could not find any copyright violations. These are just quotes inside the citations. They are not any more of a copyright violation than this. This is an article related to a content dispute between these users on Talk:Princely state, so the frustration from there is spilling over. JosephusOfJerusalem (talk) 09:57, 10 May 2018 (UTC)