| Revision as of 14:12, 6 June 2018 editBallenaBlanca (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,901 edits →Behavioural issues: Adjusted← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:47, 1 July 2018 edit undoIñaki LL (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users11,820 edits →Behavioural issuesNext edit → | ||
| Line 123: | Line 123: | ||
| ::::Iñaki, with all due respect, I'm going to make a comment. If you are not comfortable, you do not respect and do not want to comply with the English Misplaced Pages policies and the decisions of the administrators, nobody forces you to keep here, Misplaced Pages is a volunteer service ]. | ::::Iñaki, with all due respect, I'm going to make a comment. If you are not comfortable, you do not respect and do not want to comply with the English Misplaced Pages policies and the decisions of the administrators, nobody forces you to keep here, Misplaced Pages is a volunteer service ]. | ||
| ::::Best regards. --] 🐳 ♂ ] 13:37, 6 June 2018 (UTC) | ::::Best regards. --] 🐳 ♂ ] 13:37, 6 June 2018 (UTC) | ||
| ==Removal of information, litigation style== | |||
| :::::::::::Hi, I brought this here ], since this is a behavioural issue. I do not need wasting time, we do not need litigational or walls looking like personal investigations, do you understand that? That does not help the smooth editing process, it just adds confusion and extenuation, so '''be calm in your edit drive'''. '''You removed verified information'''' in your information re-arrangement, and I had to come back to restore it. was not in any previous informations, still you decided single-handedly that you could get rid of it. | |||
| :::::::::::Plus reactively you added an information that links the victim to hurling a fence (is it really something relevant?). What we see is a against unarmed people sitting down, when a moment later someone or two throw in the heat of the moment a fence; still . You decided to add reactively Ok Diario's adjectivally charged statement ('''this is not a minimally credited source, I repeat it''', but will not engage now in removal and a foreseeable edit warring, '''just for the sake of smooth editing'''), I do not have as much time as you do. Also read this: ]. | |||
| :::::::::::Also please do read ], this is the second time I brought this up to you, to not much avail from what I can see. '''Be concise''', Ok? Regards ] (]) 11:47, 1 July 2018 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 11:47, 1 July 2018
 Archives |
Welcome!
Hello, BallenaBlanca, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Misplaced Pages
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
You may also want to take the Misplaced Pages Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Misplaced Pages. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — Cirt (talk) 06:17, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
Question: Fibromyalgia prognosis
Hi, I appreciate the help with my edit on the fibromyalgia entry. By secondary source does Misplaced Pages only consider publications such as the British Medical Journal for example or would an online journal, staffed by journalists, doctors, pharmacists and TV news director, such as National Pain Report be adequate? (http://nationalpainreport.com/staff) Thanks Leeraven172 (talk) 14:20, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Question
Thanks for your comments at WP:MED. I think you make some good points. I'm not sure your expressed opinion fits with Option 5. This, to me, reads that we can keep all the videos provided the promotional start/end sections are removed. You can see Doc James supports this as he already has plans to remove those parts of the videos. So you will end up entirely with the same problems you describe, just with a bit less promotion. Since you appear to favour "short videos on specific aspects", which is close to what I suggest at WP:NOTYOUTUBE, that doesn't fit with the current Osmosis model of producing videos on entire topics. It seems to me your comments fit more with Option 3 (remove all) with of course the option to consider "another approach" to videos.
I haven't read all your discussion with OsmoseIt wrt your claim they are "proud and arrogant". In my experience, newbies need some time to orient themselves to WP practice, and OsmoseIt has made fewer than 50 edits to WP, and none to any article body text, so even though they've been here since 2015, they are still clueless and some allowances might be justified. Outsiders do not naturally understand our concerns. Mind you, there are one or two long-term editors that don't seem to understand our concerns either :-(.
Not trying to pressure you to change your vote. Just FYI. -- Colin° 09:21, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
What does Osmosis plan to do with the inaccurate videos
. :-) -- Colin° 12:41, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Small thing
Hello, BallenaBlanca,
This is just a small thing: When people add blank lines in talk page replies, it screws up things for some of our blind editors. You can read more about the problem at WP:LISTGAP if you're curious, but the basic story is that it's helpful to remove blank lines between all paragraphs that start with : before saving. A lot of people don't know about this problem, but I thought that you'd want to know. WhatamIdoing (talk) 15:44, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Chromium deficiency - talk
I have created new content about chromium dietary supplements. Because I have a declared COI, I placed it as New section in Chromium deficiency Talk. I am asking you and several other editors with an interest in nutrition/supplements to look at it and comment, perhaps making changes and/or stating that it is appropriate to move into the article, or not. A separate question is whether it belongs in Chromium deficiency, Chromium, or both. Thank you for the consideration. David notMD (talk) 11:50, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
- One of the other editors I asked moved the content into the article, so if you plan to get to it, it's there now. ] (talk) 11:20, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Irregular editing in Catalan referendum
I suggest you give up reactive edits like this in the article Catalan independence referendum, 2017 when informations that contradict Spanish official versions are added. The article is presently hermetic, and your attitude seems to not be helping a lot. Your edit revert is also confusing ("Leaving aside other considerations, trim this content per WP:SPA. Before reinserting again, please reach consensus in the PD"). "Trim this content per WP:SPA"? PD?
Adding confusing edit summaries or forcing repeated discussions to extenuation with complete disregard to the WP general principles may be regarded as disruptive editing, and/or WP:GAME. Thanks Iñaki LL (talk) 21:36, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
sorry?
The content you deleted was backed up with a secondary source, what are you talking about?ApolloCarmb (talk) 17:05, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
- My user talk page is not the place for this conversation. Use the specific talk page. Thanks. --BallenaBlanca 🐳 ♂ (Talk) 17:32, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
Spanish politicians
Hi! I noticed you're currently restoring the nationalities of several Spanish nationalities edited by Apollo. I thought you might want be interested in a list of some of the articles:
- Álvaro González de Galdeano
- Antoni Comín
- Antonio Baños Boncompain
- Arnaldo Otegi
- Carlos Garaikoetxea
- Federico Krutwig
- Fernando Buesa
- Idoia Mendia
- Iñigo Urkullu
- Jaume Collboni
- Jaume Padrós i Selma
- Joan Oró
- Joaquín Bau Nolla
- Jon Aberasturi
- Jon Juaristi
- Jon Larrinaga
- Jordi Pujol
- Josep Tarradellas
- Juan Huarte de San Juan
- Juan José Ibarretxe
- Léopold Eyharts
- Lluís Rabell
- Lluís Recoder
- Marta Madrenas i Mir
- Meritxell Serret
- Mikel Aristi
- Miquel Iceta
- Patxi López
- Pello Bilbao
- Ramón Cabrera y Griñó
- Ramon Espadaler Parcerisas
- Raül Romeva
- Sabino Arana
- Tomàs Caylà i Grau
- Tomás de Zumalacárregui
- Valentí Almirall i Llozer
- Víctor Balaguer i Cirera
- Xavier Domènech i Sampere
- Xavier García Albiol
- Xavier Zubiri
Cheers! --Jamez42 (talk) 17:27, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
Behavioural issues
There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Iñaki LL (talk) 21:59, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Declined
"I'm closing this now before it escalates any further. Inaki, please keep it on the talk page, quit making personal attacks, address specific points of contention or do not revert at all, and employ dispute resolution measures if and when they are needed. Getting your opponent blocked is not an option. User:Swarm 22:38, 5 June 2018 (UTC)"
- --BallenaBlanca 🐳 ♂ (Talk) 08:11, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
- It is all about attitude with clear POV overtones, and an ANI is a privileged place to expose all the matters relevant to the dispute. Of course I added specific diffs about unacceptable behaviour, all the same they have gone unaccounted for. Where is going the EN WP? Who knows. WP:BUREAUCRACY Very sad really. Iñaki LL (talk) 11:01, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
- Iñaki, with all due respect, I'm going to make a comment. If you are not comfortable, you do not respect and do not want to comply with the English Misplaced Pages policies and the decisions of the administrators, nobody forces you to keep here, Misplaced Pages is a volunteer service WP:VOLUNTEER.
- Best regards. --BallenaBlanca 🐳 ♂ (Talk) 13:37, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
- It is all about attitude with clear POV overtones, and an ANI is a privileged place to expose all the matters relevant to the dispute. Of course I added specific diffs about unacceptable behaviour, all the same they have gone unaccounted for. Where is going the EN WP? Who knows. WP:BUREAUCRACY Very sad really. Iñaki LL (talk) 11:01, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
- --BallenaBlanca 🐳 ♂ (Talk) 08:11, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
Removal of information, litigation style
- Hi, I brought this here from here, since this is a behavioural issue. I do not need wasting time, we do not need litigational or walls looking like personal investigations, do you understand that? That does not help the smooth editing process, it just adds confusion and extenuation, so be calm in your edit drive. You removed verified information' in your information re-arrangement, and I had to come back to restore it. My verified statement was not in any previous informations, still you decided single-handedly that you could get rid of it.
- Plus reactively you added an information that links the victim to hurling a fence (is it really something relevant?). What we see is a shocking violent police charge against unarmed people sitting down, when a moment later someone or two throw in the heat of the moment a fence; still this is your edit summary. You decided to add reactively Ok Diario's adjectivally charged statement (this is not a minimally credited source, I repeat it, but will not engage now in removal and a foreseeable edit warring, just for the sake of smooth editing), I do not have as much time as you do. Also read this: WP:BATTLEGROUND.
- Also please do read this on edit summary, this is the second time I brought this up to you, to not much avail from what I can see. Be concise, Ok? Regards Iñaki LL (talk) 11:47, 1 July 2018 (UTC)