| Revision as of 14:41, 15 October 2018 editJake Brockman (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers13,701 edits re← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:43, 15 October 2018 edit undoSerols (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers477,504 edits →Daniel KüblböckNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| :{{reply to|Jake Brockman}} If she called herself Dana, dresses as a woman, and called herself a woman, then what is she? A woman. Personally, I would err on the side of caution. I'd rather be respectful and potentially wrong than disrespectful and completely wrong. Also, just a heads up, it's better form to use transgender rather than transsexual. ] (]) 14:32, 15 October 2018 (UTC) | :{{reply to|Jake Brockman}} If she called herself Dana, dresses as a woman, and called herself a woman, then what is she? A woman. Personally, I would err on the side of caution. I'd rather be respectful and potentially wrong than disrespectful and completely wrong. Also, just a heads up, it's better form to use transgender rather than transsexual. ] (]) 14:32, 15 October 2018 (UTC) | ||
| ::I see where you are coming from, however two of the core principles of Misplaced Pages are ] and ]. In this context, is worth reading the essay about ]. Based on hearsay and speculation, we cannot know what his or her wishes are and how he or she may want to be remembered. Jumping to conclusions may in hindsight be as harmful as not respecting wishes in the absence of firm evidence. <sub>pseudonym</sub> ] <sup>]</sup> 14:41, 15 October 2018 (UTC) | ::I see where you are coming from, however two of the core principles of Misplaced Pages are ] and ]. In this context, is worth reading the essay about ]. Based on hearsay and speculation, we cannot know what his or her wishes are and how he or she may want to be remembered. Jumping to conclusions may in hindsight be as harmful as not respecting wishes in the absence of firm evidence. <sub>pseudonym</sub> ] <sup>]</sup> 14:41, 15 October 2018 (UTC) | ||
| :::Hello, he was not operated. Please stop edit-war. Regards --] (]) 14:43, 15 October 2018 (UTC) | |||
| == October 2018 == | == October 2018 == | ||
Revision as of 14:43, 15 October 2018
Daniel Küblböck
Dear An actual biological woman, I am going to revert your previous reversion again and restore the origial article. The reason is as follows: while the sources the IP editor referred to indicate some ambiguity about the sexuality and name, we cannot be certain that the reasons are and how reliable they are. For one, the name "Dana" is from an unverifiable statement of the room neighbour and this is therefore not reliable. Küblböck apparently uploaded pictures dressed like a woman, however there is no indication whatsoever if this was due to a beginning transsexual transformation or some kind of transvestiate act or simply a play-form, an alter ego or such. The article also indicates that the ownership of that social media account is unconfirmed. As those sources are unclear, the Misplaced Pages article should not jump to conclusions, participate in speculations or turn speculation into fact. pseudonym Jake Brockman 14:21, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Jake Brockman: If she called herself Dana, dresses as a woman, and called herself a woman, then what is she? A woman. Personally, I would err on the side of caution. I'd rather be respectful and potentially wrong than disrespectful and completely wrong. Also, just a heads up, it's better form to use transgender rather than transsexual. An actual biological woman (talk) 14:32, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- I see where you are coming from, however two of the core principles of Misplaced Pages are verifiability and reliability. In this context, is worth reading the essay about verifiability, not truth. Based on hearsay and speculation, we cannot know what his or her wishes are and how he or she may want to be remembered. Jumping to conclusions may in hindsight be as harmful as not respecting wishes in the absence of firm evidence. pseudonym Jake Brockman 14:41, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- Hello, he was not operated. Please stop edit-war. Regards --Serols (talk) 14:43, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
- I see where you are coming from, however two of the core principles of Misplaced Pages are verifiability and reliability. In this context, is worth reading the essay about verifiability, not truth. Based on hearsay and speculation, we cannot know what his or her wishes are and how he or she may want to be remembered. Jumping to conclusions may in hindsight be as harmful as not respecting wishes in the absence of firm evidence. pseudonym Jake Brockman 14:41, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
October 2018
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Daniel Küblböck— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 14:36, 15 October 2018 (UTC)