Misplaced Pages

User talk:Locke Cole: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 08:48, 15 February 2019 editLocke Cole (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers18,922 editsm Reverted edits by 2601:282:8300:B761:3831:22AE:543E:FD1D (talk) to last version by Locke ColeTags: Blanking Rollback← Previous edit Revision as of 17:16, 17 February 2019 edit undoTropicAces (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers99,135 edits Luciusfoxx on ''Glass'': new sectionTags: Mobile edit Mobile web editNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
== Luciusfoxx on ''Glass'' ==

Hello, saw you also get into it with user Luciusfoxx on the '']'' Talk Page, so wanted your thoughts on the subject. His ignorance is baffling (for a five day old account, especially) which makes me wonder if he’s not a SockPuppet, and he left a (almost nonsensical) message on my personal talk ending in “first warning” (I actually laughed out loud). It’s long-established that while you don’t use Metacritic as gospel but you still indicate it’s summary in the Reception section, and you also don’t put a lead-in line, just let RT, Meta and the cited reviews speak for themselves. Just seems like a bit of an odd situation to me... Anyways, cheers. ] (]) 17:16, 17 February 2019 (UTC)tropicAces

Revision as of 17:16, 17 February 2019

Luciusfoxx on Glass

Hello, saw you also get into it with user Luciusfoxx on the Glass Talk Page, so wanted your thoughts on the subject. His ignorance is baffling (for a five day old account, especially) which makes me wonder if he’s not a SockPuppet, and he left a (almost nonsensical) message on my personal talk ending in “first warning” (I actually laughed out loud). It’s long-established that while you don’t use Metacritic as gospel but you still indicate it’s summary in the Reception section, and you also don’t put a lead-in line, just let RT, Meta and the cited reviews speak for themselves. Just seems like a bit of an odd situation to me... Anyways, cheers. TropicAces (talk) 17:16, 17 February 2019 (UTC)tropicAces

User talk:Locke Cole: Difference between revisions Add topic