| Revision as of 18:33, 7 November 2006 editAllen3 (talk | contribs)60,397 edits →DYK← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:39, 20 November 2006 edit undoDahn (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers148,225 edits slomr - o rugaminteNext edit → | ||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
| |On ], ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ]. | |On ], ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ]. | ||
| |} <!-- ], ] --> --'']'' <sup>]</sup> 18:33, 7 November 2006 (UTC) | |} <!-- ], ] --> --'']'' <sup>]</sup> 18:33, 7 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ==SLOMR== | |||
| Bună. Cu toate că am avut aceeaşi sursă pentru articol, eu am observat doar acum cât de mult semăna textul cu sursele. Te rog să nu mai preiei ad literam pe viitor, pentru că atragi suspiciunea de plagiat, şi e păcat pentru articolele în cauză. Mulţumesc. (Mă scuzi pentru îndrăzneala de a tutui: o fac în credinţa că nici tu nu te vei formaliza). ] 23:39, 20 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:39, 20 November 2006
Welcome!
Hello, Vintila Barbu, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Vlad 08:21, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
- Salut! Mulţumesc şi eu pentru mesaj şi nu ezitaţi să mă contactaţi dacă aveţi vreo problemă, nedumerire sau întrebare! --Vlad 12:19, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
- Apăi să nu vă faceţi griji din asta, doar sunteţi la Misplaced Pages în limba engleză. Puteţi să fiţi sigur că orice veţi scrie, va fi cineva vorbitor nativ, care va corecta dacă este cazul. Problema este că există vorbitori de engleză britanică, engleză americană, engleză australiană etc. deci fiecare va corecta după cum este obişnuit. Apoi mai există români plecaţi sau care vorbesc engleză la un nivel foarte bun, aproape de vorbitorii nativi sau profesional. Poate îi puteţi scrie lui Dahn, este singurul de până acum pe care să-l "cunosc" care să vorbească engleza la nivel profesiona sau Ronline dar el e destul de ocupat cu treburi administrative (de mediere); altcineva foarte bun este Jmabel un american care a petrecut ceva timp în România şi a prins drag de România: vorbeşte şi scrie româneşte, fiind vorbitor nativ de engleză. --Vlad|-> 12:49, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
- Mulţumesc, asemenea! :) --Vlad|-> 13:10, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
- Apăi să nu vă faceţi griji din asta, doar sunteţi la Misplaced Pages în limba engleză. Puteţi să fiţi sigur că orice veţi scrie, va fi cineva vorbitor nativ, care va corecta dacă este cazul. Problema este că există vorbitori de engleză britanică, engleză americană, engleză australiană etc. deci fiecare va corecta după cum este obişnuit. Apoi mai există români plecaţi sau care vorbesc engleză la un nivel foarte bun, aproape de vorbitorii nativi sau profesional. Poate îi puteţi scrie lui Dahn, este singurul de până acum pe care să-l "cunosc" care să vorbească engleza la nivel profesiona sau Ronline dar el e destul de ocupat cu treburi administrative (de mediere); altcineva foarte bun este Jmabel un american care a petrecut ceva timp în România şi a prins drag de România: vorbeşte şi scrie româneşte, fiind vorbitor nativ de engleză. --Vlad|-> 12:49, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
Vlad, I find "a prins drag de România" a bit strong, but, yes, I'm always glad to help translate.
Vintila, welcome, and thank you for your friendly remarks on my talk page. As you can see, in the article on Tănase, I came about as close as I could to simply reciting your version of the events (and I'll add your recent remarks about the film). As I think you understand, most blogs, forums, and personal web sites cannot be cited the same way we can cite a published book, an official statement, or a peer-reviewed paper. So the most we can do is cite it, indicating where we got it, and say that it "has the ring of truth". (Indeed, some would say that is more than we should do, but in this case I think it was defensible.)
Anyway, I hope you stick around. Do remember that when writing encyclopedia articles, it is strongly recommended to cite one's sources clearly. See Misplaced Pages:Reliable sources and Misplaced Pages:Citing sources. -- Jmabel | Talk 17:12, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
Just so you know: if you add a link to Portal:Romania/New article announcements, your article will be checked. No need do contact a particular individual to do the job. - Jmabel | Talk 16:53, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
Pashaluk issue
Please note that it is not my "deduction" or "educated guess". It is specified in the Stefanescu source I have referenced on precisely that page, and it is also becked by Djuvara in a comment about a later situation (the establishment of Phanariotes as mid-way between the options of letting the countries go by sheer force of the Austrians and Russians and turning them into pashaluks). In fact, this is obvious to anyone vaguely familiar with the topic at hand, and can be found in countless other comments - let me just point out those made by Gheorghe I. Bratianu in his "Sfatul boiresc..." and Petre P. Panaitscu in "De ce nu au cucerit turcii tarile romane?". I don't know what sort of "sensibilities" this comment hurts, and I have little patience to deal with them. Dahn 16:15, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
- I do agree with your point, but you misinterpreted me. The details of the expedition show that this was the plan - I did not want to clog the text with, for example, the name of the pasha charged with military occupation (it is likely to never be an article, and is probably the same one for a hundred altogether different pashas :)). I will see how I could rephrase that, but I need to have references in front of me (I'm not near them at the moment). The question is: if I introduce details that would point out that was the plan (according to at least one historian), would you agree with the text? Dahn 12:48, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
Constantin Tănase
Very interesting; it has been interesting watching this item slowly move toward accuracy. I'm afraid I'm guilty of the original, wrong version; I've never seen the film and made the (incorrect) assumption that a non-Wikipedian Romanian correspondent had given me accurate information. By the way, isn't it also possible that "Caratase" could be a combination of "Cărăbuş" and "Tănase"? - Jmabel | Talk 05:25, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Islam in Romania
Have the curtesy of replying, please. Note that the version you keep reverting to is sub-standard, inaccurate, and POV. Among my objections is a call for evidence to back an edit which only you seem to support: you have not been providing it. Dahn 13:28, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
DYK
|
On 7 November, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ceauşima, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page. |
--Allen3 18:33, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
SLOMR
Bună. Cu toate că am avut aceeaşi sursă pentru articol, eu am observat doar acum cât de mult semăna textul cu sursele. Te rog să nu mai preiei ad literam pe viitor, pentru că atragi suspiciunea de plagiat, şi e păcat pentru articolele în cauză. Mulţumesc. (Mă scuzi pentru îndrăzneala de a tutui: o fac în credinţa că nici tu nu te vei formaliza). Dahn 23:39, 20 November 2006 (UTC)