Revision as of 22:44, 4 July 2019 editMartinevans123 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers235,018 edits →LGBT rights in the United Arab Emirates: add← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:01, 4 July 2019 edit undoAdamPrideTN (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,110 editsNo edit summaryTags: Mobile edit Mobile web editNext edit → | ||
Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
::] has edited there only once in the last 24 hours. If you think that editor is a vandal, you need to report it at ]. Thanks. ] (]) 22:42, 4 July 2019 (UTC) | ::] has edited there only once in the last 24 hours. If you think that editor is a vandal, you need to report it at ]. Thanks. ] (]) 22:42, 4 July 2019 (UTC) | ||
::] Dude, wtf!!! Again? Will u just chillax please? | |||
U are the one who is biased and vandalising | |||
Its been a year that i'm in wiki i have more than 3000 edit majority are accepted in each lgbt rights page | |||
Ok so u are biased islamophobic arabophobic because u are somehow convinced that just bcos uae or qatar apply sgaria law this means excution for gays | |||
We established and said that unlike iran saudi | |||
Mauretania uae qatar and some others although they have death penalty for gays in the books not spcefic towards them but just cause of sharia law. | |||
ILGA yearly review is the best plus it is clear and i'm speaking as an ex muslim gay Arab who know and able to read Arabic living in a country where being a crime, i assure both countries are a secret heaven for gays compared to others, the govs doesnt monitor the beds or phones or secret meetings just public or tgose advocating or politivising issues or "parties" | |||
And also that the uae and qatar never excuted anyone for being gay whether muslim or not whether national or a foreigner | |||
Some incidents occur yes but none and i say again none | |||
Surprise me and i dare you to provide me a source that stated there have been an excution in uae or qatar just cos one is gay i dare u | |||
Plus the edit shows that yes the death penalty is possible | |||
I dream that these laws will change and be abolished but unfortunately its not anytime soon | |||
Also i added that some face deportation if they are foreigners u reverted that too? Wtf? Will a country deport its nationals or foreigners? | |||
Oh and all wiki pages use ilga so? | |||
Hope its clear? ] (]) 23:01, 4 July 2019 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:01, 4 July 2019
Welcome!
Hello, Moneyspender, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Americans living in Saudi Arabia, may not conform to some of Misplaced Pages's guidelines, and may not be retained.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Your first article
- Contributing to Misplaced Pages
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! reddogsix (talk) 20:49, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Americans living in Saudi Arabia
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Americans living in Saudi Arabia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Misplaced Pages:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. reddogsix (talk) 20:49, 1 November 2015 (UTC) Hi as mentioned when I contested the article being erased, I am slowly adding content so please be patient with me. But I would appreciate help formatting it properly. Any little bit of assistance will be appreciated.21:07, 1 November 2015 (UTC)Moneyspender (talk)
Speedy deletion nomination of LGBT rights in Antarctica
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on LGBT rights in Antarctica requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Daiyusha (talk) 02:40, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of LGBT rights in Antarctica
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on LGBT rights in Antarctica, requesting that it be deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at articles for deletion. (See section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
- It appears to be about something made up, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Daiyusha (talk) 03:24, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
June 2019
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Daiyusha (talk) 03:24, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
LGBT rights in Singapore
Hi User:moneyspender. The edit summary for your edit here was: "removed unsourced claims and added that lesbians can be charged under modesty laws"? But you seem to have removed material that was fully sourced to this publication. And I did't see anything about lesbians being charged under modesty laws. I also think your edit here may have been based on a misunderstanding. Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 17:51, 4 July 2019 (UTC) p.s. also, at LGBT in the Middle East you seem to be arguing that The Atlantic is not a reliable source? Hello, first off my username is moneyspender. Secondly, that source does not back your claim that female same sex activity is legal. I read it. Thirdly, even if it was which I don't think it is, modesty laws could be used to charge lesbians with a crime so therefore it could be illegal under a technicality. There is no misunderstanding. Thank you though for the concern. Moneyspender (talk) 21:01, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
- Apologies for the spelling error. I have corrected your username. The source I quoted says: "Wong said the public prosecutor did not pursue cases between consenting adults and in private places as it was not in the public interest." But your edit removed that? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:09, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
No problem. See wp:1source about that article if it can't be verified with more than one article it doesn't belong unless other sources can be added. Thanks again. Moneyspender (talk) 21:18, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
- You're saying that www.gaystarnews.com is not WP:RS? Martinevans123 (talk) 21:19, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
yeah I don't think it's reliable plus wp:bias for that too.Moneyspender (talk) 22:11, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
- You might like to ask about that at Misplaced Pages:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Then we'd all know for sure? It has its own article at Gay Star News, which raises no concerns about reliability at all. It obviously has an area of advocacy, but one might interpret that as a "specialist perspective" not just "bias." Martinevans123 (talk) 22:16, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
It would fall under wp:SPSMoneyspender (talk) 22:28, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
- Can you please provide your evidence for that appraisal, or a link to consensus for this amongst editors, or a record of a decision at the appropriate noticeboard(s)? Many thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 22:31, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
LGBT rights in the United Arab Emirates
Hello. You appear to have made some reverts lately on LGBT rights in the United Arab Emirates. Please be aware that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reverts on a single page within a 24 hour period. Rather than reverting edits, please consider using the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. The dispute resolution processes may also help. Excessive reverting may result in a loss of editing privileges. Martinevans123 (talk) 22:33, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
- Did you give adampridetn that message. I was just reverting his vandalism. His edits are a typical case of WP:IDONTLIKEIT Moneyspender (talk) 22:37, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
- User:AdamPrideTN has edited there only once in the last 24 hours. If you think that editor is a vandal, you need to report it at WP:AIV. Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 22:42, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
- User:Martinevans123 Dude, wtf!!! Again? Will u just chillax please?
U are the one who is biased and vandalising Its been a year that i'm in wiki i have more than 3000 edit majority are accepted in each lgbt rights page Ok so u are biased islamophobic arabophobic because u are somehow convinced that just bcos uae or qatar apply sgaria law this means excution for gays We established and said that unlike iran saudi Mauretania uae qatar and some others although they have death penalty for gays in the books not spcefic towards them but just cause of sharia law. ILGA yearly review is the best plus it is clear and i'm speaking as an ex muslim gay Arab who know and able to read Arabic living in a country where being a crime, i assure both countries are a secret heaven for gays compared to others, the govs doesnt monitor the beds or phones or secret meetings just public or tgose advocating or politivising issues or "parties" And also that the uae and qatar never excuted anyone for being gay whether muslim or not whether national or a foreigner Some incidents occur yes but none and i say again none Surprise me and i dare you to provide me a source that stated there have been an excution in uae or qatar just cos one is gay i dare u Plus the edit shows that yes the death penalty is possible I dream that these laws will change and be abolished but unfortunately its not anytime soon
Also i added that some face deportation if they are foreigners u reverted that too? Wtf? Will a country deport its nationals or foreigners?
Oh and all wiki pages use ilga so? Hope its clear? AdamPrideTN (talk) 23:01, 4 July 2019 (UTC)