Revision as of 02:06, 9 November 2019 editDeathlibrarian (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users18,796 edits →Results of Battle← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:07, 9 November 2019 edit undoDeathlibrarian (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users18,796 edits →Results of BattleNext edit → | ||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
== Results of Battle == | == Results of Battle == | ||
There is current debate going on over whether this was a stalemate or a victory for Turkish allied forces. Please discuss here. SDF forces withdrew because of the ceasefire, however, They were under a lot of pressure from the Turkish forces. | There is current debate going on over whether this was a stalemate or a victory for Turkish allied forces. Please discuss here. SDF forces withdrew because of the ceasefire, however, They were under a lot of pressure from the Turkish forces. Personally I think the result "SDF Withdrawal" is a fitting result, as to indicate that they were defeated militarily is not correct. ] (]) 02:07, 9 November 2019 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:07, 9 November 2019
The word invasion being used not in the main article but in the copy article. Despite being unsourced by 3rd party sources.
Looks like we got the issue here. KasimMejia (talk) 11:25, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
- Well all these articles call it an invasion ... how is it not an invasion?
- "The Turkish Invasion of Syria Shows the U.N. Is Struggling to Keep Up With Humanitarian Crises"
https://time.com/5699596/turkey-syria-offensive-un-humanitarian-crisis/
- "Trump dismisses Turkey's invasion of Syria: 'It's not our border'"
- "Putin: Turkish invasion of Syria could release thousands of Isis"
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/oct/11/putin-turkish-invasion-of-syria-could-release-hundreds-of-isis-fighters Deathlibrarian (talk) 12:11, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
- "Turkey's invasion of Syria puts Islamic State fight on hold at a"
https://www.washingtonpost.com › world › middle_east › 2019/10/11 Deathlibrarian (talk) 12:13, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
- 4th link is dead - Looks like editorialized titles in some articles and US and Russian Presidents calling it an invasion does not make it such. The term invasion was discussed in the original article ultimately opposing its inclusion. KasimMejia (talk) 12:18, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Please desist from working on this article
KasimMejia You appear to not be editing this article in good faith. Please desist from working on it. You have nominated it for deletion, have problem banner tags on it, numerous citation tags, and are now removing various bits of text for various reasons. You are clearly not editing in good faith.Deathlibrarian (talk) 11:36, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Deathlibrarian: Please read better yourself WP:GF because you are violating it yourself when you falsely accuse other of violating it. KasimMejia (talk) 12:32, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
- KasimMejiaOk, I would normally assume WP:GF, but you appear to have a history of edit warring and you have removed various parts of this page without discussion. I ask you again, will you please desist from editing this article? Deathlibrarian (talk) 20:22, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
Results of Battle
There is current debate going on over whether this was a stalemate or a victory for Turkish allied forces. Please discuss here. SDF forces withdrew because of the ceasefire, however, They were under a lot of pressure from the Turkish forces. Personally I think the result "SDF Withdrawal" is a fitting result, as to indicate that they were defeated militarily is not correct. Deathlibrarian (talk) 02:07, 9 November 2019 (UTC)