Revision as of 19:42, 4 June 2020 editSlugger O'Toole (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users34,259 edits →I am indifferent to your opinion on my edditing: Replying to AlmostFrancis (using reply-link)← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:50, 4 June 2020 edit undoAlmostFrancis (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users902 edits replyTag: 2017 wikitext editorNext edit → | ||
Line 85: | Line 85: | ||
Please don't edit my talk page anymore unless it involves article content. I will not be involving myself in you ABF offering anymore. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 19:23, 4 June 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | Please don't edit my talk page anymore unless it involves article content. I will not be involving myself in you ABF offering anymore. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 19:23, 4 June 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | ||
:{{u|AlmostFrancis}}, I'm sorry you feel that way. It was a question, not an accusation. -- ] (]) 19:42, 4 June 2020 (UTC) | :{{u|AlmostFrancis}}, I'm sorry you feel that way. It was a question, not an accusation. -- ] (]) 19:42, 4 June 2020 (UTC) | ||
:: Of course it was a backwards accusation, no one is going to fall for this Slugger. To be clear, I commented on your TBAN because you talked about me without pinging me and made it seem like we have been working together as opposed to me just trying to keep your pro catholic editing inline with NPOV. Not wanting to make a diffless claim I looked through your contribs to find an example on an article I had not touched so as to be fair. Finding puffery I then edited the article. You can of course have the last word on you page but I please only ping me about article content. ] (]) 19:50, 4 June 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:50, 4 June 2020
Archives |
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
hint
Please be cautious about including "philanthropist" in the lede, unless there's really something major. A number of NPP editors have begun to use it as an indication of likely promotionalism. DGG ( talk ) 22:26, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
- DGG, Thanks for the hint. That's how most of the sources described him. --Slugger O'Toole (talk) 23:21, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
- of course they do. Most of the sources for a businessman are PR, at least to some extent, and most sources of any sort describe any one they are writing an article about in the most expansive way possible. That's why encyclopedias are different. DGG ( talk ) 06:31, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
A beer for you!
For your clean up on Marvin Heermeyer. Funny, from your editing you don't seem drunk as a rule. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 17:16, 29 January 2020 (UTC) |
Women in Red
Hi there, Slugger O'Toole, and thanks for creating 14 articles about women as noted on the new WiR box on your user page. In order to be an "official" member, you should now register on the main Women in Red page. Keep up the good work!--Ipigott (talk) 08:09, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
- Good to see you are now a full member and that you have already contributed 14 articles about women. I hope you'll be adding many more. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 07:48, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
Some baklava for you!
Thanks for editing WP and creating marvelous articles. WikiAviator (talk) 04:10, 4 March 2020 (UTC) |
- Thanks, WikiAviator! I don't do it for the recognition, but it's nice to receive anyway. --Slugger O'Toole (talk) 04:01, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Category:Members of the Massachusetts House of Representatives from Dedham has been nominated for merging
Category:Members of the Massachusetts House of Representatives from Dedham has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 15:52, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Aaron Hernandez
The article Aaron Hernandez you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Aaron Hernandez for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Harrias -- Harrias (talk) 10:40, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
Admin board
There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.
Category:Jurists from Dedham, Massachusetts has been nominated for deletion
Category:Jurists from Dedham, Massachusetts has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 21:54, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Aaron Hernandez
The article Aaron Hernandez you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Aaron Hernandez for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Harrias -- Harrias (talk) 20:01, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
June 2020 at Women in Red
Women in Red June 2020, Volume 6, Issue 6, Numbers 150, 151, 167, 168, 169
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 17:11, 25 May 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
File:Sacco vanzetti dedham courthouse.gif listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sacco vanzetti dedham courthouse.gif, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Wikiacc (¶) 02:55, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
I am indifferent to your opinion on my edditing
Please don't edit my talk page anymore unless it involves article content. I will not be involving myself in you ABF offering anymore. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlmostFrancis (talk • contribs) 19:23, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
- AlmostFrancis, I'm sorry you feel that way. It was a question, not an accusation. -- Slugger O'Toole (talk) 19:42, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
- Of course it was a backwards accusation, no one is going to fall for this Slugger. To be clear, I commented on your TBAN because you talked about me without pinging me and made it seem like we have been working together as opposed to me just trying to keep your pro catholic editing inline with NPOV. Not wanting to make a diffless claim I looked through your contribs to find an example on an article I had not touched so as to be fair. Finding puffery I then edited the article. You can of course have the last word on you page but I please only ping me about article content. AlmostFrancis (talk) 19:50, 4 June 2020 (UTC)