| Revision as of 03:54, 29 August 2020 editTimothyBlue (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users38,395 edits →Tri City Mall: comment← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:02, 29 August 2020 edit undoTenPoundHammer (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers279,077 edits rNext edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| * '''Keep''' per my improvements, multiple reliable sources added with assertations of long-term notability. <span style="color:green">'''Ten Pound Hammer'''</span> • <sup>(])</sup> 03:13, 29 August 2020 (UTC) | * '''Keep''' per my improvements, multiple reliable sources added with assertations of long-term notability. <span style="color:green">'''Ten Pound Hammer'''</span> • <sup>(])</sup> 03:13, 29 August 2020 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Comment''': The news citations are all routine news coverage that '''any''' mall would receive; it does not demonstrate notability. ] says that ''""Buildings, including private residences and commercial developments, may be notable as a result of their '''historic, social, economic, or architectural importance''', but they require significant coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability." Nothing above touches on historic, social, or architectural importance (and significant coverage means addressing the subject directly and in depth). Which sources show historic, social, economic, or architectural '''notability'''. <span style="font-family:Courier New, Courier, monospace;"><strong> // ] :: </strong>] </span> 03:54, 29 August 2020 (UTC) | *'''Comment''': The news citations are all routine news coverage that '''any''' mall would receive; it does not demonstrate notability. ] says that ''""Buildings, including private residences and commercial developments, may be notable as a result of their '''historic, social, economic, or architectural importance''', but they require significant coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability." Nothing above touches on historic, social, or architectural importance (and significant coverage means addressing the subject directly and in depth). Which sources show historic, social, economic, or architectural '''notability'''. <span style="font-family:Courier New, Courier, monospace;"><strong> // ] :: </strong>] </span> 03:54, 29 August 2020 (UTC) | ||
| :*So by your standards, articles like ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], etc. is just "routine coverage" too, huh? By your standards, every single one of those articles that I just named -- all of which, by the way, are ] -- should be deleted because they have "no historic, social, economic, or architectural notability" and are just "routine coverage". <span style="color:green">'''Ten Pound Hammer'''</span> • <sup>(])</sup> 04:02, 29 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:02, 29 August 2020
Tri City Mall
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- Tri City Mall (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NBUILD: "Buildings, including private residences and commercial developments, may be notable as a result of their historic, social, economic, or architectural importance, but they require significant coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability." WP:BEFORE showed WP:ROUTINE coverage, but not significant coverage that addressed the subject directly and in-depth or that established it meets NBUILD. // Timothy :: talk 12:08, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 12:08, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 12:08, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 12:08, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep per my improvements, multiple reliable sources added with assertations of long-term notability. Ten Pound Hammer • 03:13, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: The news citations are all routine news coverage that any mall would receive; it does not demonstrate notability. WP:NBUILD says that ""Buildings, including private residences and commercial developments, may be notable as a result of their historic, social, economic, or architectural importance, but they require significant coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability." Nothing above touches on historic, social, or architectural importance (and significant coverage means addressing the subject directly and in depth). Which sources show historic, social, economic, or architectural notability. // Timothy :: talk 03:54, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- So by your standards, articles like Swifton Center, Colonial Plaza, Castleton Square, Great Lakes Crossing Outlets, Rolling Acres Mall, Tri-County Mall, Forest Fair Village, Meridian Mall, Lansing Mall, etc. is just "routine coverage" too, huh? By your standards, every single one of those articles that I just named -- all of which, by the way, are Good Articles -- should be deleted because they have "no historic, social, economic, or architectural notability" and are just "routine coverage". Ten Pound Hammer • 04:02, 29 August 2020 (UTC)