| Revision as of 02:00, 31 August 2020 editTimothyBlue (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users38,395 edits questions← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:14, 31 August 2020 edit undoTenPoundHammer (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers279,077 edits rNext edit → | ||
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
| : re: ] states, ''"may be notable as a result of their '''historic, social, economic, or architectural importance''', but they require significant coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability."'' What significant coverage is there that show its historic, social, economic, or architectural importance? | : re: ] states, ''"may be notable as a result of their '''historic, social, economic, or architectural importance''', but they require significant coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability."'' What significant coverage is there that show its historic, social, economic, or architectural importance? | ||
| : I look forward to your answers; if you have new sources, I'll gladly add them to the table above so the closer can evaluate everything easily. <span style="font-family:Courier New, Courier, monospace;"><strong> // ] :: </strong>] </span> 02:00, 31 August 2020 (UTC) | : I look forward to your answers; if you have new sources, I'll gladly add them to the table above so the closer can evaluate everything easily. <span style="font-family:Courier New, Courier, monospace;"><strong> // ] :: </strong>] </span> 02:00, 31 August 2020 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Speedy keep''', yet another faulty nomination by TimothyBlue. His breakneck pace here and failure to explain how any of the coverage in question is ] even when other editors are clearly arguing in favor of keeping, and proving without question that the coverage is ], smacks of ] intended to make a point. <span style="color:green">'''Ten Pound Hammer'''</span> • <sup>(])</sup> 04:14, 31 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:14, 31 August 2020
Capital Mall
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- Capital Mall (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Delete: The article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NBUILD: "Buildings, including private residences and commercial developments, may be notable as a result of their historic, social, economic, or architectural importance, but they require significant coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability." Subject does not have coverage that meets significant coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability. WP:BEFORE revealed advertising, annoucements, events, promos which any mall would have and directory style listings.
- Here is a source table. None of the sources is about the mall.
| Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| "Bottom Of The 9Th -- But Frederick & Nelson Owner David Sabey Vows Game Isn't Over Yet". Seattle Times. | 
|
|
 This iis not an article about the mall. It is an article about Frederick & Nelson
|
✘ No |
| "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2013-11-15. |  Dead link with no indication of where it went or what it was about
|
Dead link with no indication of where it went or what it was about
|
Dead link with no indication of where it went or what it was about
|
✘ No |
| Dick's Sporting Goods sets date for Olympia store grand opening". The Olympian. |
|
|
This is an article about Dick's Sporting Goods. It is not an article about the mall.
|
✘ No |
| This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}. | ||||
- BEFORE showed no other sources that would establish WP:GNG or WP:NBUILD. // Timothy :: talk 19:49, 30 August 2020 (UTC) // Timothy :: talk 19:49, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 19:49, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 19:49, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 19:49, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep 106 store regional shopping mall in Washington State. Passes WP:GEOFEAT. There is much RS available. Lightburst (talk) 20:35, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep for reasons cited by User:Lightburst. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 01:19, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
- Question @Lightburst:,
- re: it is stated above "There is much RS available." but you didn't list any. Please list the RS you found so everyone (including the closer) can evaluate them. ISimply stating something exists is not enough. See WP:DISCUSSAFD.
- re: WP:GEOFEAT states, "may be notable as a result of their historic, social, economic, or architectural importance, but they require significant coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability." What significant coverage is there that show its historic, social, economic, or architectural importance?
- I look forward to your answers; if you have new sources, I'll gladly add them to the table above so the closer can evaluate everything easily. // Timothy :: talk 02:00, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, yet another faulty nomination by TimothyBlue. His breakneck pace here and failure to explain how any of the coverage in question is WP:ROUTINE even when other editors are clearly arguing in favor of keeping, and proving without question that the coverage is WP:NOTROUTINE, smacks of clearly disruptive behavior intended to make a point. Ten Pound Hammer • 04:14, 31 August 2020 (UTC)