Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 16:40, 22 September 2020

Archives

Index Archive 1 Archive 2

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present.

Your GA nomination of Zara Aronson

you nominated as a good article has failed ; see talk:Zara Aronson for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Eddie891 -- Eddie891 (talk) 00:01, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Eddie891 I think there has been a mistake... - Chris.sherlock (talk) 02:42, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

• Huh, sorry about that. I've manually redone it- wishing all the best for you in the future. Eddie891 _Work 12:57, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

July 2020 at Women in Red

--Rosiestep (talk) 16:10, 28 June 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Ways to improve Australian Indigenous Ministries

Hello, Chris.sherlock,

Thank you for creating Australian Indigenous Ministries.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please add more independent sources to establish notability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Elliot321}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 23:21, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

@Elliot321: oh man, what on earth is wrong with you? The ATSIS link alone establishes notability. Absolutely ridiculous. And if you look at how many significant articles link to it, you can see notability. I don’t have time to improve it right now, but it is ridiculous to tag it as insignificant. And I hate being templated, incidentally. But if you can see where it should be merged, go right ahead. Curious where you would redirect it to... If you delete it, I’d consider that rather racist and an attempt to whitewash Australian history. - Chris.sherlock (talk) 14:07, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi, I was unaware of this organization in general. The page you created has only one source other than the Ministry itself. I have no intention of whitewashing history - I just want to make sure encyclopedia entries are notable. I did not mean to come off as rude to "template you". Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 15:38, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

August 2020 at Women in Red

--Rosiestep (talk) 18:50, 26 July 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Category:Environmental activism has been nominated for merging

Category:Environmental activism has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 10:42, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

Not interested. Categorisations are completely flawed. I vowed to never touch them again. Do what you want, you can’t make it better or worse. Categories are managed by the very petty. - Chris.sherlock (talk) 19:42, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Elliot Connor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conservationist.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Fixed! - Chris.sherlock (talk) 08:28, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Swatis(Pashtun tribe)

Hi, if you can please help us with this guy who wants to become Pashtun per se while his tribe has been recorded as Pashtunized tajiks of Dehqan race. 3O through USaamo didn't work. He wants certain books not available online verifiable also in sources apart from what we could understand after long debate with him his ID is Haider khan10.

Regards Azmarai76 (talk) 10:02, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

I’m not sure what this is about, sorry! - Chris.sherlock (talk) 10:03, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

September Women in Red edithons

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:54, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Disambiguation link notification for September 20

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

1846

added a link pointing to St Margaret's Hospital

1934

added a link pointing to St Margaret's Hospital

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:12, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Fixed! - Chris.sherlock (talk) 15:17, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

October editathons from Women in Red

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:09, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Good revert

Chris, I am glad to see that you self-reverted your comment at WT:WIR. Otherwise, it might have been ANI time.

The comments by you to which had been replied were devoid of any substance. They identified no specifics of either SADiN's editing or of mine, and without those specifics your decision to call most of my work "ridiculous" is just valueless abuse.

I am glad that you recognised the folly of your comment, and removed it. But it's now months on from the episode where you bypassed process and emptied a valid category, and then launched a vendetta against Duncan Hill who challenged that. You were very angry that you didn't get away with that massively disruptive stunt, and pledged to avoid me. So it's ironic that the next time I encounter you is when you ping me to a discussion, and above all to a discussion about categorising women. Our previous encounter was when you fundamentally misunderstood the issue at stake (see e.g. User talk:BrownHairedGirl/Archive/Archive 058#Category_fixes amidst any treads at that time) about categorisation of women ... so I am unsurprised that your latest intervention on the topic is similarly devoid of substance.

And yes, I am aware that you have asked me not to post on your talk. But your stated reason for that is that you wish to limit your interactions with me. However, you chose on this occasion to start an interaction with you, me and you chose to post the smear which you have now retracted.

You did a similar thing last month when you posted at WP:AN to offer no substantive contribution to the discussion, just a personal attack on me.

You can choose non-interaction if you want, but you don't get to repeatedly troll and insult me, and then smear me ... and also demand non-interaction. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 16:40, 22 September 2020 (UTC)