| Revision as of 16:57, 31 December 2006 editElnurso (talk | contribs)32 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:50, 4 January 2007 edit undoHajji Piruz (talk | contribs)7,045 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| Elnur | Elnur | ||
| ==3rr violation== | |||
| {{3rr}}] 19:50, 4 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:50, 4 January 2007
regarding your edit to the Azerbaijan article, please, I am an Iranian Azeri, and the facts speak for themselves ok?Azerbaijani 21:52, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
Being an Azeri doesn't mean anything. One does not have to have a high level of IQ to see how selective you are in your choices of information from the pages of history and how you paraphrase them to fit the ultimate goal of yours: that the Republic of Azerbaijan is a fake entity. I really do not care even if we got the name 50 years ago, Resulzade was aplogizing for it, etc. What matters for us, people living in that land, is the well being of the people there, that is it. I am extremely amused by the fact that, Iranians, forgetting about putting their house into order, failing to create a decent society in such a culturally and economically area, ending up with one of the most ridiculously heart-breaking societal and political institutions in the entire world, still spend time and money to spoil other people's day by attacking their identity. Every identity emerged at one point in time. Every name emerged at one point in time. America? France? Turkey? Coming to the fore 1000 years ago or 100 years ago; why should that matter?
And after all,
1. today's Republic of Azerbaijan was called Azerbaijan before. I will enter the information with the reference soon.
2. Resulzade was politician and to get relationships into order could have said what you cite, but this does not refute his lifetime endeavor revolving around the Republic of Azerbaijan, norminally and substantively.
3. The only reason Bolsheviks keep the name Azerbaijan was not their amibition towards Iran. The name was already there. The bureaucracy working with the name was already there. People, students, army living under the name were already there. Why bother to change an already established name if it was not fundamentally against communist principles and strategy?
4. Stop referring to obscure web sites where pan-iranians hang out, like that of Iranian Chamber...
5. Write down your true name please, because I probably do know who you are. That will make the discussion more intersting.
Elnur
3rr violation
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Azerbaijani 19:50, 4 January 2007 (UTC)