| Revision as of 01:20, 9 January 2007 editFrozenPurpleCube (talk | contribs)9,603 edits b5 Afd Comments← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:33, 9 January 2007 edit undoGiorgioOrsini (talk | contribs)548 edits →Avoid dropping baseless accusations: Forgot to signNext edit → | ||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 108: | Line 108: | ||
| I reverted your removal of the comments, I'd rather they not be moved without asking, and at the least, you should have included a link to wherever you moved them to. ] 01:20, 9 January 2007 (UTC) | I reverted your removal of the comments, I'd rather they not be moved without asking, and at the least, you should have included a link to wherever you moved them to. ] 01:20, 9 January 2007 (UTC) | ||
| == Avoid dropping baseless accusations == | |||
| After reading your note on my talk page | |||
| ''Hello, I would like to offer you some advice. I recently made a few minor corrections to the Andrea Meldolla article, and as is my habit I kept the article on my watchlist for a bit after doing so. I noticed that you'd blanked a section, and figured the edit for mistaken and reverted it. After noting that you had reversed this edit again, I had a look at the talk page. It appears that you have been reverting without any form of discussion for quite some time, which is generally frowned upon. You haven't technically violated WP:3RR, but you have been edit-warring (at least eight of those same reverts from an offhand count!) I would like to suggest you discuss changes rather than engaging in an edit war.'' | |||
| I would advise you to read completely the discussion related to the ] and the ] articles. My point of view (in both cases) is clearly given there. Any message (coming from you) of the type above will be treated only as a grave insult next time.--] 23:33, 9 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:33, 9 January 2007
| This is a Misplaced Pages user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Misplaced Pages, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Misplaced Pages. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Seraphimblade. |
==New section==
Thanks: Now we are getting somewhere. So you did not delete but another person did. I followed all the rules so far and have made an attempt to post properly.
Reply to your question
So - the removal of famous is not difficult to do - however, if you would like more source material that is better than a. Wilkepedia on her Mother, and NY Times on her Father, what would you like? There are hundreds of links to her publications. Do you want these? There are links to her work but these are commercial so I thought better not to post these. When you say reliable sources, I ask - what is more reliable than the NY Times? Please be more specific. Because of her geniology, I could list hundreds of source and I just don't want to waste my time or yours.
Thanks Archiet ~~~~
Archiemartin 23:31, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
Please feel free to post suggestions/comments/flames/whatever.
If you haven't posted a comment already, please put it under a new section, using markup:
Your comment ~~~~
If you have, please post it under the section you started. Responses will be made on your talk page unless you request otherwise.
This page will be archived regularly, but that doesn't mean I consider the discussion closed if you have more to say. If your old comments are archived please start a new section on this page for further comment. Please remember to sign your comments using ~~~~. Seraphimblade 10:46, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
If I contacted you on your talk page, I'll keep it on watch. Please feel free to reply either there or on this page, whichever's easier for you. Seraphimblade 03:23, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
Please refrain from personal attacks. Personal attacks made against me made on this page will be left on it, but this in no way indicates that I approve of them or will not report them if they are severe or continuous. Personal attacks against other editors will be removed or reverted. Seraphimblade 04:40, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
Old page archives
Thanks
Can you also extend a note to WGee as he has made in my opinion inflamatory remarks towards me.--Lucy-marie 23:50, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
This is not the place to justify your unverifiable original research. Your personal views count for nothing.
These were a couple i could find.--Lucy-marie 00:54, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
I would like to clarify my comments I only made them after being provoked.--Lucy-marie 01:18, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
Thank you I will use your words exactly, as It Is what I would have said.--Lucy-marie 01:28, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
Lukas zpira
why lukas zpira's entry is inapropriate ?! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lavoice (talk • contribs).
New section
Talk: Suz Andreasen
Why on earth are you deleting a legitimately verifiable piece of data? I would like to know so that I can re-post and correct whatever error you were finding. I am totally against advertisement but you have not provided me with any information and did not check the references because if you had - you would know this is a real deal.
Thanks A
Archie Martin —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Archiemartin (talk • contribs).
Thanks: Now we are getting somewhere. So you did not delete but another person did. I followed all the rules so far and have made an attempt to post properly. Reply to your question So - the removal of famous is not difficult to do - however, if you would like more source material that is better than a. Wilkepedia on her Mother, and NY Times on her Father, what would you like? There are hundreds of links to her publications. Do you want these? There are links to her work but these are commercial so I thought better not to post these. When you say reliable sources, I ask - what is more reliable than the NY Times? Please be more specific. Because of her geniology, I could list hundreds of source and I just don't want to waste my time or yours. Thanks Archiet Archiemartin 23:35, 7 January 2007 (UTC) Archiemartin 23:31, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- Discussion continued at other user's talk page. Seraphimblade 23:43, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
RfM/Jesus for Jews 2
Your case for Mediation from the Mediation Committee has been accepted. Your re-agreement is required at the case page under Request for Mediation; prompt action on your behalf would be appreciated in order to commence the mediation as soon as possible.
If you have any questions about my contributions, personal mediation style or otherwise, please contact me at my talk page, or email me at anthony (dot) cfc (at) gmail (dot) com - all email communication is private unless stated otherwise.
Cheers and regards,
Anthonycfc 03:19, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
Re: Comments from Babylon 5 AfD
Replied on the journal page, it's on my watch list now. Re: talk page clutter - thanks for being considerate :-) Quack 688 04:40, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
Princess Diana Institute of Peace
Hi,
I kindly request you to have a look on the Princess Diana Institute of Peace whether the details I have submitted are meeting the criteria for citation. Thanks Rajsingam 11:16, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
Oden
RaveenS
Bakasuprman
SiobhanHansa
Wackymacs
User talk:Seraphimblade
User talk:Freedom skies
User talk:Rumpelstiltskin223
User talk:Dangerous-Boy
User talk:Ccscott
User talk:Dennisthe2
User talk:DoDoBirds
User talk:Mariano Anto Bruno Mascarenhas
User talk:Tarinth
B5 AfD comments
I reverted your removal of the comments, I'd rather they not be moved without asking, and at the least, you should have included a link to wherever you moved them to. Mister.Manticore 01:20, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
Avoid dropping baseless accusations
After reading your note on my talk page
Hello, I would like to offer you some advice. I recently made a few minor corrections to the Andrea Meldolla article, and as is my habit I kept the article on my watchlist for a bit after doing so. I noticed that you'd blanked a section, and figured the edit for mistaken and reverted it. After noting that you had reversed this edit again, I had a look at the talk page. It appears that you have been reverting without any form of discussion for quite some time, which is generally frowned upon. You haven't technically violated WP:3RR, but you have been edit-warring (at least eight of those same reverts from an offhand count!) I would like to suggest you discuss changes rather than engaging in an edit war.
I would advise you to read completely the discussion related to the Andrea Meldolla and the Giulio Clovio articles. My point of view (in both cases) is clearly given there. Any message (coming from you) of the type above will be treated only as a grave insult next time.--Giorgio Orsini 23:33, 9 January 2007 (UTC)