Revision as of 14:35, 19 October 2021 editBlack Kite (talk | contribs)Administrators85,348 edits →Your behaviour at Minaj: new section← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 08:04, 27 December 2024 edit undoPHShanghai (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,804 edits →Greetings of the season: ReplyTag: Reply |
(133 intermediate revisions by 31 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
{{Archives}} |
|
{{Archives}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{clear}} |
|
== Wild Side == |
|
|
|
== Greetings of the season == |
|
|
<div class="center" style="background:darkgreen;border:no;padding:0.2em 0em;{{round corners}}"><br />] <span style="color:white;">~ ~ ~ Greetings of the season ~ ~ ~</span>{{pb}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
''<span style="color:lightyellow;">'''Hello PHShanghai:''' Enjoy the ''']''' and ''']''' if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Misplaced Pages. Cheers, <span style="color:OliveDrab;><small>Spread the love; use {{]:]}} to send this message.</small></span> {{pb}}{{highlight|--] (]) 13:27, 24 December 2024 (UTC)|OliveDrab}}</span>''</div> |
|
] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.<!--Template:Discussion notice--><!--Template:ANI-notice--> ] (]) 13:07, 26 August 2021 (UTC) I have notified the administrators about our disagreement. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:Thank you so much! <3 ] (]) 08:04, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
== September 2021 == |
|
|
|
|
|
You wrote {{tpq|Minaj was revealed to appear}} which is almost gibberish and then quoted Minaj as calling her unreleased album a {{tpq|game changer}}. That is garbage editing and overt POV pushing. Are you trying to get blocked from editing ], because you are very, very close to that outcome? ] ] 05:44, 10 September 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:{{reply to|Cullen328}} ? How is "Minaj was revealed to appear" gibberish when that's literally what the Billboard article said? {{tpq|The Lockdown Sessions will also feature 10 brand new songs, featuring stars such as Lil Nas X, Nicki Minaj, Charlie Puth, Stevie Nicks, Stevie Wonder and many more.}} I wrote that she is going to appear on the album, that is simply it. Also, Minaj didn't say her unreleased album was a game changer, the edit says that '''''she''''' (which is to say, HER words and not an objective view of everyone) said that her ''lead single'' (NOT album) from the upcoming album is going to be a "game changer" (in quotation marks because that's what SHE said.) I included it because it's almost the only details we have of the upcoming album so far (besides that sentence, NO mention of her upcoming confirmed fifth studio album appears on the article, which I find problematic, since it's definitely releasing either this year or the next year if news sources are to be believed. |
|
|
:According to ], it says that it's an ''aggressive'' presentation of a particular point of view from the article. If I had wrote {{tpq|The Queen of Rap Nicki Minaj described her lead single from her probably already critically acclaimed fifth studio album, the most albums for a female rapper from Trinidad a game changer which is completely true and none of the other rappers can compare!!}} ''then'' I'd understand it as aggresive and intense POV pushing. |
|
|
:But all I actually wrote was {{tpq|When asked about the lead single from her upcoming fifth studio album, Minaj called it a "game changer."}} which is just re-telling what HER words are about it. It does not suggest that everyone will think the song will be a game changer or that it will be critically acclaimed. I put it in because in the article does not have any sentence at all about her upcoming fifth studio album or any details despite multiple news sources saying she's been teasing the album since 2019. I don't see how what I wrote either assumes that everyone will like the album or that it will be acclaimed or it will be called the best. ]<sup>]</sup> 08:41, 10 September 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
::Also {{reply to|Cullen328}} English isn't even my first language (I grew up speaking it and consider myself to be native, however I am still learning it in school) so please be more understanding of my grammar issues. I changed "revealed to appear" as "revealed as a feature" which makes more sense. But do be more understanding. ]<sup>]</sup> 08:47, 10 September 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
:::A neutral encyclopedia should not parrot a performer's prediction that their unreleased work will be a "game changer". That violates the ]. This is an encyclopedia, not a fan site. ] ] 14:39, 10 September 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== A cookie for you! == |
|
|
|
|
|
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" |
|
|
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] |
|
|
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | This project is full of its ups and downs - taking a moment to look at the bigger picture, even if that means stepping away, is ''always'' worth it. Your contributions are appreciated and valued {{p}} ~] (she/they • ]) 12:51, 17 September 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
|} |
|
|
|
|
|
:{{reply to|TheresNoTime}} Hey, I really appreciate your kind act and thank you very much; lately I've been having a lot of stressful wikidrama and disagreements with editors; so I'm really happy that you've extended me this act of kindness in a pretty distressing time for me. Thank you sm again <3 🥺💕 ]<sup>]</sup> 15:05, 17 September 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Discretionary sanction alert == |
|
|
|
|
|
{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.'' |
|
|
|
|
|
You have shown interest in ], broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called ] is in effect. Any administrator may impose ] on editors who do not strictly follow ], or the ], when making edits related to the topic. |
|
|
|
|
|
For additional information, please see the ] and the ] decision ]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. |
|
|
}} ~] (she/they • ]) 10:54, 19 September 2021 (UTC)<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> |
|
|
==Orphaned non-free image File:Jesy Nelson - Boyz (Official Single Cover).png== |
|
|
] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). |
|
|
|
|
|
Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --] (]) 17:30, 4 October 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Your behaviour at Minaj == |
|
|
|
|
|
You have more than one editor opposing your edits, so you need to stop making them. I am about to revert your edit again, and basic Misplaced Pages rules suggest you will need consensus to re-insert it. I "haven't engaged on the talk page" because I think my edit summary was pretty obvious (also, a couple of hours is by no means long enough) and even if I do it will still be on the basis that you need to have a very good reason to remove large amounts of sourced material and then blindly revert when someone disagrees, and I don't see one yet. ] 14:35, 19 October 2021 (UTC) |
|