Revision as of 06:09, 30 November 2021 editFull Shunyata (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,107 editsm →Potential Commercial Prospects← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 15:22, 13 January 2025 edit undoArch dude (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers29,200 edits →List of flights: add relevant quote. | ||
(729 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description| |
{{Short description|Class of partially reusable crew capsules}} | ||
{{Use American English|date=June 2020}} | {{Use American English|date=June 2020}} | ||
{{Use |
{{Use mdy dates|date=September 2024}} | ||
{{Infobox spacecraft class | {{Infobox spacecraft class | ||
| name |
| name = Boeing Starliner | ||
| names_list |
| names_list = Boeing CST-100 | ||
| image |
| image = Boeing's Starliner crew ship approaches the space station (iss067e066735) (cropped).jpg | ||
| image_caption |
| image_caption = {{ComV|CST-100 Starliner|2|full=nolink}} approaching the ISS in May 2022, during ] | ||
| manufacturer = ] | |||
| image_size = 300px | |||
| website = {{URL|boeing.com/starliner}} | |||
| country = United States | |||
| operator = Boeing Defense, Space & Security | |||
| applications = ] crew transport | |||
| spacecraft_type = ] | |||
| launch_mass = | |||
| dry_mass = | |||
| payload_capacity = To ]: 4 crew and {{cvt|100|kg}} cargo<ref name="CCpresskit2">{{Cite news |date=October 1, 2015 |title=Commercial Crew Program Press it |url=https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/commercial_crew_press_kit_2.pdf?emrc=d5924a |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240326185648/https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/commercial_crew_press_kit_2.pdf?emrc=d5924a |archive-date=March 26, 2024 |access-date=March 28, 2024 |publisher=NASA}}</ref>{{efn|The first piloted ] mission carries 2 crew plus {{cvt|344|kg}} of cargo.<ref name="PackingStarline">{{Cite news |date=February 28, 2024 |title=Packing Starliner cargo is a balancing act |url=https://www.boeing.com/features/2024/02/packing-starliner-cargo-is-a-balancing-act |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240328140136/https://www.boeing.com/features/2024/02/packing-starliner-cargo-is-a-balancing-act |archive-date=March 28, 2024 |access-date=March 28, 2024 |publisher=Boeing}}</ref>}} | |||
| crew_capacity = Up to 7 | |||
| volume = {{cvt|11|m3}}<ref name="gunther">{{Cite web |last=Krebs |first=Gunther |date=April 2017 |title=Starliner (CST-100) |url=http://space.skyrocket.de/doc_sdat/cst-100.htm |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170503060306/http://space.skyrocket.de/doc_sdat/cst-100.htm |archive-date=May 3, 2017 |access-date=April 11, 2017 |publisher=Gunther's Space Page}}</ref> | |||
| orbits = ] | |||
| design_life = {{plainlist| | |||
* 60 hours (free flight)<ref name="Jonsey211">{{Cite conference |last1=Reiley |first1=Keith |last2=Burghardt |first2=Michael |last3=Wood |first3=Michael |last4=Ingham |first4=Jay |last5=Lembeck |first5=Michael |year=2011 |title=AIAA SPACE 2011 Conference & Exposition |conference=AIAA SPACE 2011 Conference & Exposition. September 27–29, 2011. Long Beach, California |doi=10.2514/6.2011-7101 |isbn=978-1-60086-953-2 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130501135247/http://www.boeing.com/assets/pdf/defense-space/space/ccts/docs/Space_2011_Boeing.pdf |archive-date=May 1, 2013 |access-date=May 9, 2014 |chapter-url=http://www.boeing.com/assets/pdf/defense-space/space/ccts/docs/Space_2011_Boeing.pdf |chapter=Design Considerations for a Commercial Crew Transportation System |url-status=dead}}</ref> | |||
* 7 months (docked)<ref name="avweek20130724">{{Cite news |last=Carreau |first=Mark |date=July 24, 2013 |title=Boeing Refines {{nowrap|CST-100}} Commercial Crew Capsule Approach |url=http://aviationweek.com/awin/boeing-refines-cst-100-commercial-crew-capsule-approach |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140512224455/http://aviationweek.com/awin/boeing-refines-cst-100-commercial-crew-capsule-approach |archive-date=May 12, 2014 |access-date=May 8, 2014 |publisher=Aviation Week}}</ref> | |||
}} | |||
| length = {{cvt|5.03|m}} (Capsule and {{Abbr|SM|service module}})<ref name="boeing201108" /> | |||
| diameter = {{cvt|4.56|m|0}}<ref name="boeing201108">{{Cite web |last=Burghardt |first=Mike |date=August 2011 |title=Boeing CST-100: Commercial Crew Transportation System |url=http://www.boeing.com/assets/pdf/defense-space/space/ccts/docs/CCDev2%20Boeing%20CST-100%20Overview.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130501134630/http://www.boeing.com/assets/pdf/defense-space/space/ccts/docs/CCDev2%20Boeing%20CST-100%20Overview.pdf |archive-date=May 1, 2013 |access-date=May 8, 2014 |publisher=Boeing}}</ref> | |||
| status = Active | |||
| built = 3 | |||
| operational = 2 | |||
| retired = 1 | |||
| first = Uncrewed: December 20, 2019<br>Crewed: June 5, 2024 | |||
| launch_vehicle = ] N22{{Efn|N22 designates that the Atlas V has no payload fairing, two solid rocket boosters, and two Centaur second-stage engines.|name=N22}} | |||
| insignia = ] | |||
| configuration_image = Diagram-of-CST-100-Starliner with labels.png | |||
| configuration_image_size = 300px | |||
| configuration_image_caption = Exploded view of the Starliner<br>A: Crew capsule, B: Service module<br>1: Nosecone, 2: Parachute compartment cover, 3: Crew access hatch, 4: {{Abbr|RCS|reaction control system}} thrusters for re-entry, 5: Airbags, 6: ], 7: ], 8: Parachutes, 9: Window, 10: ], 11: Radiators, 12: "Doghouse" with {{Abbr|RCS|reaction control system}} and {{Abbr|OMAC|orbital maneuvering and attitude control}} thrusters, 13: Propellant tanks, 14: Roll control thruster, 15: ] engines for ], 16: Solar panels | |||
}} | |||
The '''Boeing Starliner''' (or '''CST-100'''){{efn|CST is an initialism for Crew Space Transportation.}} is a spacecraft designed to transport crew to and from the ] (ISS) and other low-Earth-orbit destinations. Developed by ] under ]'s ] (CCP), it consists of a ] crew ] and an expendable ]. | |||
| manufacturer = ] | |||
| country = ] | |||
| operator = ] | |||
| applications = ] crew and cargo transport | |||
Slightly larger than the ] or ], but smaller than the ], the Starliner can accommodate a crew of up to seven, though NASA plans to fly no more than four. It can remain docked to the ISS for up to seven months and is launched on an ] rocket from ] in Florida. | |||
| spacecraft_type = Crewed capsule | |||
| design_life = {{plainlist| | |||
* 60 hours {{small|(free flight)}}<ref name="Reiley2011">{{cite conference|url=http://www.boeing.com/assets/pdf/defense-space/space/ccts/docs/Space_2011_Boeing.pdf|title=Design Considerations for a Commercial Crew Transportation System|conference=AIAA SPACE 2011 Conference & Exposition. September 27–29, 2011. Long Beach, California.|first1=Keith|last1=Reiley|first2=Michael|last2=Burghardt|first3=Michael|last3=Wood |first4=Jay|last4=Ingham|first5=Michael|last5=Lembeck|year=2011|doi=10.2514/6.2011-7101|access-date=9 May 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130501135247/http://www.boeing.com/assets/pdf/defense-space/space/ccts/docs/Space_2011_Boeing.pdf|archive-date=1 May 2013|url-status=dead}}</ref> | |||
* 210 days {{small|(docked)}}<ref name="Reiley2011"/><ref name="avweek20130724">{{cite news|url=http://aviationweek.com/awin/boeing-refines-cst-100-commercial-crew-capsule-approach|title=Boeing Refines {{nowrap|CST-100}} Commercial Crew Capsule Approach|publisher=Aviation Week|first=Mark|last=Carreau|date=July 24, 2013|access-date=May 8, 2014}}</ref> | |||
}} | |||
| launch_mass = 13000 kg | |||
| dry_mass = | |||
| payload_capacity = | |||
| crew_capacity = Up to 7 | |||
| dimensions = {{plainlist| | |||
* Diameter (CM): 4.56 m<ref name="boeing201108">{{cite web|url=http://www.boeing.com/assets/pdf/defense-space/space/ccts/docs/CCDev2%20Boeing%20CST-100%20Overview.pdf|title=Boeing CST-100: Commercial Crew Transportation System|publisher=Boeing|first=Mike|last=Burghardt|date=August 2011|access-date=8 May 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130501134630/http://www.boeing.com/assets/pdf/defense-space/space/ccts/docs/CCDev2%20Boeing%20CST-100%20Overview.pdf|archive-date=1 May 2013|url-status=dead}}</ref> | |||
* Length (CM and SM): 5.03 m<ref name="boeing201108"/>}} | |||
| volume = {{cvt|11|m3}}<ref name="gunther">{{cite web|url=http://space.skyrocket.de/doc_sdat/cst-100.htm|title=Starliner (CST-100)|publisher=Gunther's Space Page|first=Gunther|last=Krebs|date=April 2017|access-date=April 11, 2017}}</ref> | |||
| power = | |||
| batteries = | |||
| equipment = | |||
| orbits = ] | |||
In 2014, NASA awarded Boeing a US$4.2 billion ] to develop and operate Starliner, while SpaceX received $2.6 billion to develop and operate ]. By October 2024, Boeing's effort had exceeded its budget by at least $1.85{{Nbsp}}billion. | |||
| status = In development and testing | |||
| built = 3 | |||
| orders = | |||
| launched = 1 | |||
| operational = | |||
| retired = 1 | |||
| failed = | |||
| lost = | |||
| first = 20 December 2019, 11:36:43 ] (uncrewed) | |||
| lastretired = | |||
Originally planned to be operational in 2017, Starliner has been repeatedly delayed by problems in management and engineering. The first uncrewed ] in December 2019 was deemed a partial failure, leading to a ] in May 2022. During the ], launched in June 2024, the Starliner's thrusters malfunctioned on approach to the ISS and NASA concluded that it was too risky to return its astronauts to Earth aboard the spacecraft, which landed uncrewed in September 2024. | |||
| insignia = | |||
| insignia_caption = | |||
| insignia_size = 200px | |||
}} | |||
== Background == | |||
The '''Boeing CST-100{{efn|CST is an acronym for Crew Space Transportation}}''' '''Starliner'''<ref name="CCP - Press Kit"> {{PD-notice}}</ref> is a class of two partially ] spacecraft designed to transport crew to the ] (ISS) and other low-Earth orbit destinations.<ref>{{cite press release |url=http://boeing.mediaroom.com/index.php?s=20295&item=849|title=Boeing Submits Proposal for NASA Commercial Crew Transport System|publisher=Boeing|first1=Edmund G.|last1=Memi|first2=Adam K.|last2=Morgan |date=September 23, 2009}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.americaspace.com/2015/09/04/boeings-new-cst-100-starliner-processing-facility-taking-shape-at-ksc/ |title=Boeing's New CST-100 'Starliner' Processing Facility Taking Shape at KSC|date=4 September 2015}}</ref> It is manufactured by ] for its participation in ]'s ] (CCP). The spacecraft consists of a reusable ] and an expendable service module. {{asof|November 2021}} Starliner has not flown a crewed mission. | |||
{{further|Development of the Commercial Crew Program}} | |||
]As the Space Shuttle program drew to a close, NASA sought to foster the development of new spaceflight capabilities. Departing from the traditional model of government-owned and operated spacecraft, NASA proposed a revolutionary approach: companies would own and operate spacecraft, while NASA would act as a customer, purchasing flights as needed. To incentivize innovation, NASA offered funding to support the development of these new vehicles. However, unlike previous ], these new contracts would be ], placing the financial risk of cost overruns on the companies themselves. | |||
Boeing has an extensive history of developing vehicles for space exploration, having built the first stage (]) of the ] rockets, assembling the ], and serving as the prime contractor for the ] of the ISS since 1993. With its proven track record and deep expertise, Boeing was seen as well-positioned to compete for the commercial spaceflight contracts.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Adam Mann |date=October 25, 2021 |title=The Boeing Company: From rockets to commercial crew |url=https://www.space.com/the-boeing-company |access-date=August 24, 2024 |work=] |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Weiss |first=Stanley I. |date=May 31, 2019 |title=Boeing Company |url=https://www.britannica.com/explore/space/boeing/ |access-date=August 24, 2024 |website=SpaceNext50 {{!}} Encyclopedia Britannica |language=en}}</ref> | |||
The capsule has a diameter of {{cvt|4.56|m}},<ref name="boeing201108"/> which is slightly larger than the ] and ], and smaller than the ].<ref name="sfn_21_7_10">{{cite news|url=http://www.spaceflightnow.com/news/n1007/21boeing/|title=Boeing space capsule could be operational by 2015|publisher=Spaceflight Now |first=Stephen|last=Clark|date=July 21, 2010|access-date=September 18, 2011}}</ref> The Boeing Starliner holds a crew of up to seven people and is designed to be able to remain docked to ISS for up to seven months with reusability of up to ten missions.<ref name=boeing20160125>{{cite web|url=http://www.boeing.com/space/crew-space-transportation-100-vehicle|title=Boeing: Crew Space Transportation (CST) System |publisher=Boeing|access-date=January 25, 2016}}</ref> It is designed to be compatible with the ], ], ], and ] launch vehicles.<ref name=lindermoyer201002/> | |||
In 2010, Boeing unveiled its entry into NASA's Commercial Crew Program competition: the CST-100. The company received initial funding of $18 million in the first round of the Commercial Crew Development (CCDev 1) program to support Starliner's development.<ref name="Bnasa20100201">{{Cite press release |title=NASA Selects Commercial Firms to Begin Development of Crew Transportation Concepts and Technology Demonstrations for Human Spaceflight Using Recovery Act Funds |date=February 1, 2010 |publisher=NASA |url=http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2010/feb/HQ_C10-004_Commercia_Crew_Dev.html |access-date=June 9, 2012 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100203061828/http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2010/feb/HQ_C10-004_Commercia_Crew_Dev.html |archive-date=February 3, 2010 |work=press release}}</ref> Additionally, United Launch Alliance, a joint venture between Boeing and Lockheed Martin, secured $6.7 million to develop the ] to allow its ] rocket to be ] to launch Starliner.<ref name="Bnasa20100201" /> At the time, Boeing expressed optimism that the Starliner could be operational as early as 2015, contingent upon timely approvals and funding.<ref name="sfn20100721">{{Cite news |last=Clark |first=Stephen |date=July 21, 2010 |title=Boeing space capsule could be operational by 2015 |url=http://www.spaceflightnow.com/news/n1007/21boeing/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180622192837/https://spaceflightnow.com/news/n1007/21boeing/ |archive-date=June 22, 2018 |access-date=September 18, 2011 |work=Spaceflight Now}}</ref> | |||
After several rounds of competitive development contracts within the ] starting in 2010, NASA selected the Boeing Starliner, along with ] ], for the Commercial Crew Transportation Capability (CCtCap) contract round, with an award of US$4.2 billion in 2014.<ref>{{cite press release |url=http://boeing.mediaroom.com/index.php?s=20295&item=1054|title=NASA Selects Boeing for American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Award to Study Crew Capsule-based Design|publisher=Boeing|first1=Edmund G. |last1=Memi|first2=Michael N.|last2=Gold|date=February 2, 2010}}</ref><ref name="aw20110422">{{cite news|url=http://aviationweek.com/awin/five-vehicles-vie-future-us-human-spaceflight|title=Five Vehicles Vie For Future Of U.S. Human Spaceflight|publisher=Aviation Week|first=Frank|last=Morring, Jr.|date=April 25, 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140509041748/http://aviationweek.com/awin/five-vehicles-vie-future-us-human-spaceflight|archive-date=May 9, 2014|url-status=live|quote="the CCDev-2 awards... went to Blue Origin, Boeing, Sierra Nevada Corp. and Space Exploration Technologies Inc. (SpaceX)}}</ref><ref name="spacenews.com">{{cite news|url=http://spacenews.com/civil/120803-boeing-spacex-sierra-ccicap.html|archive-url=https://archive.today/20130104234510/http://spacenews.com/civil/120803-boeing-spacex-sierra-ccicap.html|url-status=dead|archive-date=January 4, 2013|title=Boeing, SpaceX and Sierra Nevada Win CCiCAP Awards |publisher=SpaceNews|date=August 3, 2012}}</ref><ref name="nasa.gov">{{cite news|url=https://blogs.nasa.gov/commercialcrew/2014/09/16/boeing-and-spacex-selected-to-build-americas-new-crew-space-transportation-system/|title=Boeing and SpaceX Selected to Build America's New Crew Space Transportation System|publisher=NASA|date=September 16, 2014|access-date=April 6, 2015}} {{PD-notice}}</ref> | |||
In October 2011, NASA announced that the ]-3 at ] would be leased to Boeing for manufacture and test of Starliner, through a partnership with ].<ref>{{Cite press release |title=NASA Signs Agreement with Space Florida to Reuse Kennedy Facilities |date=October 31, 2011 |publisher=NASA |url=http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2011/oct/HQ_11-349_KSC_Agreement.html |last1=Weaver |first1=David |last2=Curie |first2=Michael |last3=Philman |first3=Amber |access-date=November 1, 2011 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200813001910/https://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2011/oct/HQ_11-349_KSC_Agreement.html |archive-date=August 13, 2020 |first4=Tina |last4=Lange |first5=Paula |last5=Korn}} {{PD-notice}}</ref> | |||
In late 2019 the uncrewed ] (Boe-OFT) launched with the Atlas V N22 and reached orbit but was not successful.<ref name="boeing20110804">{{cite press release |url=http://boeing.mediaroom.com/index.php?s=20295&item=1869|title=Boeing Selects Atlas V Rocket for Initial Commercial Crew Launches|publisher=Boeing|first1=Edmund G.|last1=Memi|first2=Jessica F.|last2=Rye |date=August 4, 2011|access-date=October 29, 2011}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.space.com/boeing-starliner-capsule-oft-landing-success.html|title=Boeing's 1st Starliner Spacecraft Lands in New Mexico After Shortened Test Flight|last=Malik|first=Tariq |website=space.com|publisher=SPACE.com|access-date=2019-12-29}}</ref> NASA allowed Boeing a repeat test flight, ], which was to launch in August 2021 but was scrubbed before launch due to inoperable valves in the propulsion system. {{update after|2022|01|text=As of October 2021, the problem remains under investigation and the flight has not been rescheduled.}} | |||
== Spacecraft characteristics == | |||
] | |||
Over the next three years, NASA would hold three more rounds of development funding, awarding Boeing $92.3 million under CCDev{{Nbsp}}2 in 2011,<ref>{{Cite press release |title=NASA Awards Next Set Of Commercial Crew Development Agreements |date=April 18, 2011 |publisher=NASA |url=http://www.nasa.gov/offices/c3po/home/agreementsfeature.html |access-date=June 9, 2012 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181110083048/https://www.nasa.gov/offices/c3po/home/agreementsfeature.html |archive-date=November 10, 2018}}</ref> $460 million under the Commercial Crew integrated Capability (CCiCap) program in 2012,<ref name="nasa20120803">{{Cite press release |title=NASA Announces Next Steps in Effort to Launch Americans from U.S. Soil |date=August 3, 2012 |publisher=NASA |url=http://www.nasa.gov/centers/kennedy/news/releases/2012/release-20120803.html |access-date=August 3, 2012 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120805185336/https://www.nasa.gov/centers/kennedy/news/releases/2012/release-20120803.htm |archive-date=August 5, 2012}}</ref> and $9.9 million under the Certification Products Contract (CPC) in 2013.<ref name="CPC1">{{Cite press release |title=NASA Awards Contracts In Next Step Toward Safely Launching American Astronauts From U.S. Soil |date=December 10, 2012 |publisher=NASA |url=http://www.nasa.gov/centers/kennedy/news/releases/2012/release-20121210.html |access-date=December 11, 2012 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201021001939/https://www.nasa.gov/centers/kennedy/news/releases/2012/release-20121210.html |archive-date=October 21, 2020}}</ref> | |||
Boeing's Starliner spacecraft was designed to accommodate seven passengers, or a mix of crew and cargo, for missions to low Earth orbit. For the NASA service missions to the International Space Station, it will carry four passengers and small cargo. Starliner uses a weldless structure and is reusable up to 10 times with a six-month turnaround time. Boeing plans to alternate between two reusable crew modules for all planned Starliner missions. Each flight will use a new service module, which provides propulsion and power generation capacity for the spacecraft. It features wireless Internet and tablet technology for crew interfaces.<ref name="Boeing20200708">{{cite web|url=http://www.boeing.com/space/starliner/|title=A 21st Century Space Capsule|publisher=Boeing|access-date=29 August 2020}}</ref> | |||
NASA was expected to announce its selection for the lucrative Commercial Crew Transportation Capability (CCtCap) contract in September 2014. Boeing had lobbied NASA for a sole-source contract, arguing that it needed the program's full budget for the successful development of Starliner. Within NASA, there was considerable support for this approach, with many decision-makers expressing confidence in Boeing's capabilities and safety record. In fact, NASA officials had even drafted a justification for selecting Boeing as the sole provider.<ref name="Berger Reentry">{{Cite book |last=Berger |first=Eric |author-link=Eric Berger (journalist) |title=Reentry: SpaceX, Elon Musk, and the Reusable Rockets that Launched a Second Space Age |publisher=BenBella Books |year=2024 |isbn=978-1637745274 |pages=270–275}}</ref> | |||
Starliner will use the ] for docking.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2013/08/nasa-outlines-plans-commercial-crew-certification/|title=NASA Outlines its Plans for Commercial Crew Certification|publisher=NASASpaceFlight.com|first=Yves-A.|last=Grondin|date=August 5, 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite AV media|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yGZWIR0Prhk&t=26m57s|title=Commercial Space Flight Panel|website=youtube.com|publisher=SpaceUp Houston|year=2011}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.parabolicarc.com/2011/03/23/22339/|title=Update on Boeing CST-100 Crew program |publisher=Parabolic Arc|first=Doug|last=Messier|date=March 23, 2011}}</ref> Boeing modified the design of the Starliner docking system prior to OFT-2 to add a re-entry cover for additional protection during the capsule's fiery descent through the atmosphere. This re-entry cover is hinged, like the SpaceX design.<ref name="SFN20200825"/><ref name="sfn20210118"/><ref name="space20210121"/> The capsule uses the ] for its ].<ref name="sfin20150728">{{cite news|url=http://www.spaceflightinsider.com/missions/commercial/boeings-cst-100-takes-shape-at-former-nasa-facility/ |title=Boeing's CST-100 takes shape at former NASA facility|publisher=Spaceflight Insider|first=Joe|last=Latrell|date=July 28, 2015|access-date=August 3, 2018}}</ref> The Starliner's ] will provide more than 2.9 ] of electricity, and are incorporated into the micro-meteoroid debris shield on the after surface of the spacecraft's service module.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.compoundsemi.com/spectrolab-solar-cells-power-boeings-starliner-spacecraft/|title=Spectrolab Solar Cells to Power Boeing's Starliner Spacecraft|date=November 17, 2016|access-date=5 August 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180805083305/http://www.compoundsemi.com/spectrolab-solar-cells-power-boeings-starliner-spacecraft/|archive-date=5 August 2018|url-status=dead}}</ref> | |||
While ], NASA's human exploration lead, had considered the Starliner proposal as stronger,<ref name="avweek20141013">{{Cite news |last=Norris |first=Guy |date=October 11, 2014 |title=Why NASA Rejected Sierra Nevada's Commercial Crew Vehicle |url=http://aviationweek.com/space/why-nasa-rejected-sierra-nevadas-commercial-crew-vehicle |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141013135535/http://aviationweek.com/space/why-nasa-rejected-sierra-nevadas-commercial-crew-vehicle |archive-date=October 13, 2014 |access-date=October 13, 2014 |work=]}}</ref> he was hesitant to award a sole-source contract. The multi-year Commercial Crew Program had been designed to foster competition and redundancy, and Gerstenmaier believed that selecting just one company would undermine these goals.<ref name="Gerstenmaier 2014">{{Cite web |last=Gerstenmaier |first=William H. |author-link=William H. Gerstenmaier |date=September 15, 2014 |title=Source Selection Statement for Commercial Crew Transportation Capability Contract |url=https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/CCtCap-Source-Selection-Statement-5083.pdf |access-date=August 24, 2024 |website=]}}</ref> Through his efforts, he successfully convinced NASA to delay the CCtCap announcement and secure additional funding to support two competing efforts.<ref name="Berger Reentry" /> | |||
It is designed to be compatible with multiple launch vehicles, including the ], ], and ], as well as the planned ].<ref name=lindermoyer201002>{{cite conference |url=http://www.aiaa.org/pdf/industry/presentations/Lindenmoyer_C3PO.pdf|title=Commercial Crew and Cargo Program|conference=13th Annual FAA Commercial Space Transportation Conference February 10–11, 2010 Arlington, Virginia|first=Alan|last=Lindenmoyer|year=2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100305034240/http://www.aiaa.org/pdf/industry/presentations/Lindenmoyer_C3PO.pdf|archive-date=March 5, 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.space.com/41367-commercial-crew-spacecraft-starliner-dragon.html|title=Crew Dragon and Starliner: A Look at the Upcoming Astronaut Taxis|author=Wall, Mike |publisher=SPACE.com|date=August 3, 2018|access-date=29 August 2020}}</ref> The Rocketdyne ] engine is used for its ].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.space.com/launch-abort-systems-of-spacex-boeing.html|title=The Emergency Launch Abort Systems of SpaceX and Boeing Explained|last1=Weitering|first1=Hanneke|publisher=SPACE.com|date=April 24, 2019|access-date=February 6, 2020}}</ref> | |||
On September 16, 2014, NASA announced that both Boeing and ] would be awarded CCtCap contracts to develop crewed spacecraft. Boeing received a US$4.2 billion to complete and certify the Starliner, while SpaceX received a US$2.6 billion to complete and certify ].<ref name="Gerstenmaier 2014" /> To receive the full contract amount, each company would need to successfully complete ], an uncrewed orbital flight test, a crewed orbital flight test, and six crewed missions to the ISS. However, NASA would not need to pay for any failed tests and was only required to purchase two crewed missions to the ISS from each company.<ref name="September2014">{{Cite web |last1=Schierholz |first1=Stephanie |last2=Martin |first2=Stephanie |date=September 16, 2014 |title=NASA Chooses American Companies to Transport U.S. Astronauts to International Space Station |url=http://www.nasa.gov/press/2014/september/nasa-chooses-american-companies-to-transport-us-astronauts-to-international |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160609184223/http://www.nasa.gov/press/2014/september/nasa-chooses-american-companies-to-transport-us-astronauts-to-international/ |archive-date=June 9, 2016 |access-date=September 18, 2014 |publisher=NASA}} {{PD-notice}}</ref> Following the initial guaranteed missions, the companies would compete for launch contracts on an ongoing basis. | |||
Unlike earlier United States space capsules, the Starliner capsule will make airbag-cushioned landings on the ground rather ]. Five landing areas are planned in the ], which will give the Starliner about 450 landing opportunities every year.<ref name=sfn-20150922>{{cite news|url=https://spaceflightnow.com/2015/09/22/boeing-identifies-cst-100-prime-landing-sites/|title=Boeing identifies CST-100 prime landing sites|last=Clark|first=Stephen|publisher=Spaceflight Now|date=September 22, 2015|access-date=August 5, 2018}}</ref> | |||
The Boeing contract with NASA calls for up to four crew per mission and allows Boeing to price and sell passage for one additional ] crew member.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/boeing-space-taxi-has-tourist-seat-1.2770088|title=Boeing space taxi has tourist seat|publisher=Canadian Broadcasting Company|agency=Thomson Reuters|date=September 18, 2014|access-date=January 7, 2017}}</ref> | |||
In November 2015, NASA announced that it had dropped Boeing from consideration in the multibillion-dollar ] competition to fly cargo to the International Space Station.<ref name="sfinside20151106">{{Cite news |last=Rhian |first=Jason |date=November 6, 2015 |title=NASA delays CRS 2 awards again, drops Boeing from consideration |url=http://www.spaceflightinsider.com/missions/commercial/nasa-delays-crs-2-awards-again-drops-boeing-from-consideration/ |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151122184847/http://www.spaceflightinsider.com/missions/commercial/nasa-delays-crs-2-awards-again-drops-boeing-from-consideration/ |archive-date=November 22, 2015 |access-date=November 21, 2015 |publisher=Spaceflight Insider}}</ref> | |||
== Development == | == Development == | ||
{{stack| | |||
] in October 2011 showing its ] construction.]] | |||
]], showing its ] construction, October 2011]] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
The CST-100 (Crew Space Transportation-100) name was first used when the capsule was revealed to the public by ] CEO ] in June 2010.<ref>{{cite press release|url=http://www.commercialspaceflight.org/2010/06/bigelow-aerospace-joins-the-commercial-spaceflight-federation/|title=Bigelow Aerospace Joins the Commercial Spaceflight Federation|publisher=Commercial Spaceflight Federation|first1=John|last1=Gedmark|first2=Mike|last2=Gold|date=June 16, 2010}}</ref> The letters CST stand for Crew Space Transportation.<ref name=boeing20110912/> It was often reported that the number 100 in the name stands for {{cvt|100|km}}, the height of the ] which is one of several definitions of the boundary of space.<ref>{{cite press release |url=http://boeing.mediaroom.com/index.php?s=20295&item=1323|title=Boeing CST-100 Spacecraft to Provide Commercial Crew Transportation Services|publisher=Boeing|first1=Edmund G.|last1=Memi|first2=Adam K. |last2=Morgan|date=July 19, 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.space.com/8785-spaceship-fly-people-private-space-stations.html|title=New Spaceship Could Fly People to Private Space Stations |publisher=SPACE.com|first=Denise|last=Chow|date=July 19, 2010}}</ref> The design draws upon Boeing's experience with NASA's ], ] and ] programs as well as the ] project sponsored by the ].<ref name=sfn_21_7_10/> (] has no ] heritage, but it is sometimes confused with the earlier and similar Orion-derived ] proposal that ] was reportedly working on with technical assistance from ].<ref name="MSNBCspace200908">{{cite news|url=http://www.nbcnews.com/id/32418057/ns/technology_and_science-space/|title=Company pitches 'lite' spaceship to NASA|publisher=NBC News|first=Amy|last=Klamper|date=August 14, 2009|access-date=September 7, 2009}}</ref>) | |||
}} | |||
The name CST-100 was first used when the capsule was unveiled to the public in June 2010.<ref name="bigelow">{{Cite press release |title=Bigelow Aerospace Joins the Commercial Spaceflight Federation |date=June 16, 2010 |publisher=Commercial Spaceflight Federation |url=http://www.commercialspaceflight.org/2010/06/bigelow-aerospace-joins-the-commercial-spaceflight-federation/ |last1=Gedmark |first1=John |last2=Gold |first2=Mike |access-date=May 9, 2014 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170925132658/http://www.commercialspaceflight.org/2010/06/bigelow-aerospace-joins-the-commercial-spaceflight-federation/ |archive-date=September 25, 2017}}</ref> The acronym "CST" stands for Crew Space Transportation, while the number "100" represents to the ], the unofficial boundary of space located at an altitude of {{Convert|100|km|sp=us}} above Earth.<ref>{{Cite web |date=July 28, 2023 |title=Commercial Crew Spacecraft |url=https://www.nasa.gov/humans-in-space/spaceships-and-rockets/commercial-crew-spacecraft/ |access-date=2024-12-25 |website=NASA |language=en-US}}</ref> The design draws upon Boeing's experience with NASA's Apollo, Space Shuttle, and ISS programs, as well as the ] project.<ref name="sfn20100721" /> | |||
Receiving the full fixed-price payments for the Commercial Crew Program Phase 1 ] required a set of specific milestones to be met during 2010:<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.nasa.gov/centers/johnson/pdf/444144main_NNJ10TA03S_boeing_saa.pdf|title=Space Act Agreement Between NASA and The Boeing Company for Commercial Crew Development (CCDev)|author=CCDev |publisher=NASA|date=February 2010}} {{PD-notice}}</ref> | |||
] | |||
* Trade study and down-select between pusher-type and tractor-style ] | |||
The spacecraft consists of a reusable capsule and an expendable service module and is designed for missions to ]. The capsule accommodates seven passengers, or a mix of crew and cargo. For ] missions to the ISS it will carry four passengers and a small amount of cargo. The Starliner capsule uses a weldless, spun-formed structure and is reusable up to ten times with a six-month turnaround time. ] plans to alternate between two reusable crew modules for all planned Starliner missions. Each flight uses a new service module, which provides propulsion and power-generation capacity for the spacecraft. Starliner features wireless Internet and tablet technology for crew interfaces.<ref name="Boeing20200708">{{Cite web |title=A 21st Century Space Capsule |url=http://www.boeing.com/space/starliner/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111215110455/http://www.boeing.com/defense-space/space/ccts/index.html |archive-date=December 15, 2011 |access-date=August 29, 2020 |publisher=Boeing}}</ref> | |||
* System definition review | |||
* Abort System Hardware Demonstration Test | |||
* Base Heat Shield Fabrication Demonstration | |||
* Avionics Systems Integration Facility demonstration | |||
* CM Pressure Shell Fabrication Demonstration | |||
* Landing System Demonstration (] and water uprighting test) | |||
* Life Support Air Revitalization demonstration | |||
* Autonomous Rendezvous and Docking (AR&D) hardware/software demonstration | |||
* Crew Module Mockup demonstration. | |||
Starliner uses the ].<ref>{{Cite news |last=Grondin |first=Yves-A. |date=August 5, 2013 |title=NASA Outlines its Plans for Commercial Crew Certification |url=http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2013/08/nasa-outlines-plans-commercial-crew-certification/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171005005229/https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2013/08/nasa-outlines-plans-commercial-crew-certification/ |archive-date=October 5, 2017 |access-date=January 9, 2014 |publisher=NASASpaceFlight.com}}</ref><ref>{{Cite AV media |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yGZWIR0Prhk&t=26m57s |title=Commercial Space Flight Panel |publisher=SpaceUp Houston |year=2011 |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/varchive/youtube/20211221/yGZWIR0Prhk |archive-date=December 21, 2021 |url-status=live |website=youtube.com}}{{cbignore}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Messier |first=Doug |date=March 23, 2011 |title=Update on Boeing CST-100 Crew program |url=http://www.parabolicarc.com/2011/03/23/22339/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170925132648/http://www.parabolicarc.com/2011/03/23/22339/ |archive-date=September 25, 2017 |access-date=March 27, 2011 |publisher=Parabolic Arc}}</ref> Boeing modified the Starliner design prior to OFT-2, adding a hinged re-entry cover below its expendable nosecone for additional protection of the docking port during ]. This was tested on the OFT-2 mission. By contrast, the reusable ] nosecone is hinged and protects its docking port during both launch and reentry.<ref name="SFN20200825" /><ref name="sfn20210118" /><ref name="space20210121" /> | |||
In July 2010, Boeing stated that the capsule could be operational in 2015 with sufficient near-term approvals and funding, but also indicated they would proceed with the development of the Starliner only if ] implemented the commercial crew transport initiative that was announced by the ] in its FY2011 budget request. Boeing executive Roger Krone stated that NASA investment would allow Boeing to close the business case, while this would be very difficult without NASA. In addition, a second destination besides the ISS would be needed to close the business case and Krone said that cooperation with Bigelow was crucial for this.<ref name=sfn_21_7_10/> | |||
The capsule uses the Boeing Lightweight Ablator for its re-entry ].<ref name="sfin20150728">{{Cite news |last=Latrell |first=Joe |date=July 28, 2015 |title=Boeing's CST-100 takes shape at former NASA facility |url=http://www.spaceflightinsider.com/missions/commercial/boeings-cst-100-takes-shape-at-former-nasa-facility/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230430144633/https://www.spaceflightinsider.com/missions/commercial/boeings-cst-100-takes-shape-at-former-nasa-facility/ |archive-date=April 30, 2023 |access-date=August 3, 2018 |publisher=Spaceflight Insider}}</ref> | |||
Boeing was awarded a US$92.3 million contract by NASA in April 2011 to continue to develop the CST-100 under ].<ref name="ft20110418">{{cite news |url=http://space.flatoday.net/2011/04/nasa-awards-270-million-for-commercial.html|title=NASA awards US$270 million for commercial crew efforts|newspaper=Florida Today|series=The Flame Trench|first=James |last=Dean|date=April 18, 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110419234227/http://space.flatoday.net/2011/04/nasa-awards-270-million-for-commercial.html|archive-date=April 19, 2011}}</ref> On 3 August 2012, NASA announced the award of US$460 million to Boeing to continue work on the CST-100 under the ] (CCiCap) program.<ref name="spacenews.com"/> | |||
]s provided by Boeing subsidiary ] are installed onto the aft face of the service module, providing 2.9 kW of electricity.<ref>{{Cite web |date=November 17, 2016 |title=Spectrolab Solar Cells to Power Boeing's Starliner Spacecraft |url=http://www.compoundsemi.com/spectrolab-solar-cells-power-boeings-starliner-spacecraft/ |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180805083305/http://www.compoundsemi.com/spectrolab-solar-cells-power-boeings-starliner-spacecraft/ |archive-date=August 5, 2018 |access-date=August 5, 2018}}</ref> | |||
On 31 October 2011, NASA announced that through a partnership with ], the ] at ] would be leased to Boeing for manufacture and test of Starliner.<ref>{{cite press release|url=http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2011/oct/HQ_11-349_KSC_Agreement.html|title=NASA Signs Agreement with Space Florida to Reuse Kennedy Facilities |publisher=NASA|first1=David|last1=Weaver|first2=Michael|last2=Curie|first3=Amber|last3=Philman|first4=Tina|last4=Lange|first5=Paula|last5=Korn|date=October 31, 2011}} {{PD-notice}}</ref> | |||
In addition to the capsule and service module, a {{cvt|1.78|m|ft|order=flip|adj=on}} structure called an aeroskirt is integrated into the launch vehicle adapter of Atlas V. The aeroskirt provides aerodynamic stability and dampens the shock waves that come from the front of the rocket.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Mike Wall |date=December 19, 2019 |title=Boeing's Starliner Atlas V Rocket Ride Is Wearing a 'Skirt' for Launch. Here's Why. |url=https://www.space.com/boeing-starliner-atlas-v-rocket-aeroskirt-explained.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230403045725/https://www.space.com/boeing-starliner-atlas-v-rocket-aeroskirt-explained.html |archive-date=April 3, 2023 |access-date=April 2, 2023 |work=]}}</ref> | |||
On 16 September 2014, NASA chose Boeing (Starliner) and ] (]) as the two companies to be funded to develop systems to transport U.S. government crews to and from the International Space Station. Boeing won a US$4.2 billion contract to complete and certify the Starliner by 2017, while SpaceX won a US$2.6 billion contract to complete and certify their crewed Dragon spacecraft. The contracts include at least one crewed flight test with at least one NASA astronaut aboard. Once the Starliner achieves NASA certification, the contract requires Boeing to conduct at least two, and as many as six, crewed missions to the space station.<ref name="September2014">{{cite web|url=http://www.nasa.gov/press/2014/september/nasa-chooses-american-companies-to-transport-us-astronauts-to-international|title=NASA Chooses American Companies to Transport U.S. Astronauts to International Space Station|publisher=NASA|first1=Stephanie|last1=Schierholz|first2=Stephanie|last2=Martin|date=September 16, 2014|access-date=September 18, 2014}} {{PD-notice}}</ref> NASA's ] had considered the Starliner proposal as stronger than the Crew Dragon and ]'s ] spacecraft.<ref name="avweek20141013">{{cite news|url=http://aviationweek.com/space/why-nasa-rejected-sierra-nevadas-commercial-crew-vehicle|title=Why NASA Rejected Sierra Nevada's Commercial Crew Vehicle|publisher=Aviation Week|first=Guy|last=Norris|date=October 11, 2014|access-date=October 13, 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141013135535/http://aviationweek.com/space/why-nasa-rejected-sierra-nevadas-commercial-crew-vehicle|archive-date=October 13, 2014|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
The spacecraft's propulsion system is produced by ] and consists of 64 engines: | |||
Part of the agreement with NASA allows Boeing to sell seats for space tourists on CCP flights to the ISS. Boeing proposed including one seat per flight for a space flight participant at a price that would be competitive with what ] charges tourists.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/boeing-space-idUSL1N0RI2XY20140917|title=Boeing's 'space taxi' includes seat for a tourist|work=Reuters|first=Irene |last=Klotz|date=September 17, 2014|access-date=August 6, 2015|archive-date=24 September 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150924204556/http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/09/17/boeing-space-idUSL1N0RI2XY20140917|url-status=live}}</ref> Under the contract the Starliners are owned and operated by Boeing, not NASA, and Boeing is free to offer non-CCP commercial flights if they do not interfere with the contracted CCP flights. | |||
* 12 × {{cvt|100|lbf|N}} MR-104J RCS (]) thrusters on the capsule, using hydrazine ] and reserved for orienting the capsule during ]<ref>{{Cite press release |title=Aerojet Rocketdyne Ships Starliner Re-entry Thrusters |date=March 15, 2018 |publisher=Aerojet Rocketdyne |url=https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2018/03/15/1438434/0/en/Aerojet-Rocketdyne-Ships-Starliner-Re-entry-Thrusters.html |access-date=August 26, 2024}}</ref> | |||
* 52 on the service module using ] and ] bipropellant: | |||
** 28 × {{cvt|85|lbf|N}} <!--]?--> RCS thrusters on the service module for ] during the majority of the flight | |||
** 20 × {{cvt|1500|lbf|N}} <!--AR-40?--> OMAC (orbital maneuvering and attitude control) thrusters for altering orbits | |||
** 4 × {{cvt|40000|lbf|N}} ] engines for ] in the event of an abort<ref>{{Cite news |last=Weitering |first=Hanneke |date=April 24, 2019 |title=The Emergency Launch Abort Systems of SpaceX and Boeing Explained |url=https://www.space.com/launch-abort-systems-of-spacex-boeing.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200525090718/https://www.space.com/launch-abort-systems-of-spacex-boeing.html |archive-date=May 25, 2020 |access-date=February 6, 2020 |work=]}}</ref> | |||
The RCS and OMAC thrusters on the service module are grouped into four "doghouses" equally spaced around the perimeter of the service module, each containing five OMAC thrusters (three aft-facing and two forward-facing{{disputed inline|OMAC thruster arrangement|date=August 2024}}), and seven RCS thrusters:<ref>{{Cite web |date=December 19, 2023 |title=Starliner Crew Flight Test: Reporter's Notebook |url=https://www.boeing.com/space/starliner/launch/documents/Starliner_Notebook.pdf#page=3 |publisher=Boeing |page=3}}</ref><ref>{{Cite AV media |url=https://media.wired.com/photos/6284ee8db6cfd378a30c4748/master/w_2560,c_limit/Science_Boeing_SM2-Lift1.jpg |title=Starliner doghouse, cover removed |type=Photograph |publisher=]}}</ref> two aft-facing, two forward-facing, and one each in the radial and two tangential directions. The latter three are in a plane which is very close to the spacecraft's center of mass. | |||
To translate the spacecraft, thrusters are used in balanced pairs so that the center of force goes through the spacecraft's center of mass. To rotate the spacecraft, thrusters are used in unbalanced pairs so there is no net force and the net torque is centered within the spacecraft. The RCS thrusters are used for rotation (attitude control) and very fine docking maneuvers, while the OMAC thrusters are used for significant orbital adjustments. The RCS thrusters are also used to compensate for slight imbalances in the OMAC thrusters. | |||
On 4 September 2015, Boeing announced that the spacecraft would officially be called the CST-100 Starliner, a name that follows the conventions of the ] produced by ].<ref name="sfn20150904">{{cite news|url=http://spaceflightnow.com/2015/09/04/boeing-names-its-commercial-spaceship-the-starliner/|title=Enter the Starliner: Boeing names its commercial spaceship|publisher=Spaceflight Now|first=Stephen|last=Clark|date=September 4, 2015|access-date=September 4, 2015}}</ref> In November 2015, NASA announced it had dropped Boeing from consideration in the multibillion-dollar ] second-phase competition to fly cargo to the International Space Station.<ref name="sfinside20151106">{{cite news |url=http://www.spaceflightinsider.com/missions/commercial/nasa-delays-crs-2-awards-again-drops-boeing-from-consideration/|title=NASA delays CRS 2 awards again, drops Boeing from consideration |publisher=Spaceflight Insider|first=Jason|last=Rhian|date=November 6, 2015|access-date=November 21, 2015}}</ref> | |||
Boeing designed the capsule to make ground landings instead of a ], a first for a crewed capsule mission launched from the United States. After reentering the atmosphere, three parachutes will be deployed, slowing the capsule to approximately {{convert|4|mph|ft/min m/s}}. Before reaching the ground, six airbags will deploy to cushion the landing. There are four primary landing locations, including two sites inside the ] in New Mexico, the ] in Arizona and the ] in Utah. ] in California serves as a contingency landing location.<ref>{{Cite web |title=NASA's Boeing Crew Flight Test Mission Overview |url=https://www.nasa.gov/nasas-boeing-crew-flight-test-mission-overview/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240601175516/https://www.nasa.gov/nasas-boeing-crew-flight-test-mission-overview/ |archive-date=June 1, 2024 |access-date=June 1, 2024 |website=NASA |language=en-US}}</ref> All of the landing sites are in the Western United States, allowing the service module to be ] for a ] over the Pacific Ocean. Boeing says that between all five landing sites, there will be around 450 landing opportunities each year.<ref name="sfn20150922">{{Cite news |last=Clark |first=Stephen |date=September 22, 2015 |title=Boeing identifies CST-100 prime landing sites |url=https://spaceflightnow.com/2015/09/22/boeing-identifies-cst-100-prime-landing-sites/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180805203514/https://spaceflightnow.com/2015/09/22/boeing-identifies-cst-100-prime-landing-sites/ |archive-date=August 5, 2018 |access-date=August 5, 2018 |publisher=Spaceflight Now}}</ref> | |||
In May 2016, Boeing delayed its first scheduled Starliner launch from 2017 to early 2018.<ref name=ars20161011/><ref>{{cite news|url=https://arstechnica.com/science/2016/05/boeings-first-flight-slips-its-now-up-to-spacex-to-wean-nasa-off-russia/|title=Boeing's first crewed Starliner launch slips to 2018|publisher=Ars Technica|first=Eric|last=Berger|date=May 11, 2016|access-date=April 6, 2018}}</ref> Then in October 2016, Boeing delayed its program by six months, from early 2018 to late 2018, following supplier holdups and a production problem on the Spacecraft 2. By 2016, they were hoping to fly NASA astronauts to the ISS by December 2018.<ref name=ars20161011>{{cite news|url=https://arstechnica.com/science/2016/10/boeing-delays-starliner-again-casting-doubt-on-commercial-flights-in-2018/|title=Boeing delays Starliner again, casting doubt on commercial flights in 2018|publisher=Ars Technica|first=Eric|last=Berger|date=October 11, 2016|access-date=April 6, 2018}}</ref><ref name="avweek20161010">{{cite news |url=http://aviationweek.com/new-space/boeing-delays-cst-100-still-targets-2018-iss-mission|title=Boeing Delays CST-100, Still Targets 2018 ISS Mission|publisher=Aviation Week & Space Technology|first=Guy |last=Norris|date=October 10, 2016|access-date=October 11, 2016}}</ref> | |||
Following the award of the Commercial Crew Transportation Capability (CCtCap) contract in 2014, NASA assigned a team of four experienced astronauts, ], ], ] and ], to serve as consultants to engineers at both Boeing and SpaceX.<ref>{{Cite web |date=July 9, 2015 |title=NASA assigns 4 astronauts to commercial Boeing, SpaceX test flights |url=http://www.collectspace.com/news/news-070915a-commercial-crew-astronauts.html |access-date=August 24, 2024 |website=]}}</ref> These astronauts were also slated to be the test pilots on the inaugural missions. Hurley recounted a stark contrast in the working relationships between the astronauts and the engineers at the two companies. While the SpaceX engineers were receptive to feedback, enthusiastic about collaborating, and attentive to suggestions, Hurley found the Boeing engineers to be indifferent, arrogant, and overconfident. He also said the Boeing team failed to inform the astronauts about the propellant leak that occurred during the ]. Ultimately, Hurley told the ] that he would not fly on Starliner. Hurley and Behnken would later go on to command the Crew Dragon's historic ] mission, the first crewed flight of the spacecraft.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Berger |first=Eric |author-link=Eric Berger (journalist) |title=Reentry: SpaceX, Elon Musk, and the Reusable Rockets that Launched a Second Space Age |publisher=BenBella Books |year=2024 |isbn=978-1637745274 |pages=293–296}}</ref> Williams would fly into space on the Boeing Crew Flight Test, but would return to Earth on a Crew Dragon, after thrusters malfunctioned on the Starliner. | |||
In April 2018, NASA suggested the first planned two-person flight of the Starliner, slated for November 2018, was now likely to occur in 2019 or 2020. If there are no further delays it would be expected to carry one additional crew member and extra supplies. Instead of staying for two weeks as originally planned, NASA said the expanded crew could stay at the station for as long as six months as a normal rotational flight.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://spacenews.com/nasa-inspector-general-criticizes-additional-boeing-commercial-crew-payments/|title=NASA, Boeing Signal Regular Missions to Space Station to Be Delayed |newspaper=The Wall Street Journal|first=Andy|last=Pasztor|date=April 5, 2018|access-date=April 6, 2018}}</ref> | |||
Despite being initially awarded significantly more funding, Boeing has faced substantial budget overruns for the Starliner program, exceeding $1.85{{Nbsp}}billion {{As of|2024|10|lc=y}}.<ref name="Johnsson 2024">{{Cite news |last=Johnsson |first=Julie |date=August 25, 2024 |title=New Boeing CEO Faces Hard Choices After NASA Snubs Starliner for SpaceX |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-08-25/boeing-ceo-faces-hard-decisions-after-nasa-s-starliner-rejection |access-date=August 27, 2024 |work=Bloomberg |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Foust |first=Jeff |date=2024-10-24 |title=Boeing losses on Starliner increase by $250 million |url=https://spacenews.com/boeing-losses-on-starliner-increase-by-250-million/ |access-date=2024-10-25 |website=SpaceNews |language=en-US}}</ref> | |||
In November 2019, NASA's Office of Inspector General released a report revealing a change to Boeing's contract had occurred, stating "For Boeing’s third through sixth crewed missions, we found that NASA agreed to pay an additional $287.2 million above Boeing’s fixed prices to mitigate a perceived 18-month gap in ISS flights anticipated in 2019 and to ensure the contractor continued as a second commercial crew provider".<ref name=sn20191114>{{cite news|url=https://spacenews.com/nasa-inspector-general-criticizes-additional-boeing-commercial-crew-payments/|title=NASA inspector general criticizes additional Boeing commercial crew payments|publisher=SpaceNews.com|first=Jeff|last=Foust|date=November 14, 2019|access-date=28 Oct 2021}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=NASA's Management of Crew Transportation to the International Space Station |url=https://oig.nasa.gov/docs/IG-20-005.pdf |website=OIG.NASA.gov |date=November 14, 2019|access-date=28 Oct 2021}}</ref> | |||
In November 2019, NASA's Office of Inspector General released a report revealing that a change to Boeing's contract had occurred in 2016,<ref name="sn20191114">{{Cite news |last=Foust |first=Jeff |author-link=Jeff Foust |date=November 14, 2019 |title=NASA inspector general criticizes additional Boeing commercial crew payments |url=https://spacenews.com/nasa-inspector-general-criticizes-additional-boeing-commercial-crew-payments/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240606021212/https://spacenews.com/nasa-inspector-general-criticizes-additional-boeing-commercial-crew-payments/ |archive-date=June 6, 2024 |access-date=October 28, 2021 |work=]}}</ref> stating: "For Boeing's third through sixth crewed missions, we found that NASA agreed to pay an additional $287.2 million above Boeing's fixed prices to mitigate a perceived 18-month gap in ISS flights anticipated in 2019 and to ensure the contractor continued as a second commercial crew provider", and NASA and Boeing committed to six missions instead of the last four being optional.<ref>{{Cite web |date=November 14, 2019 |title=NASA's Management of Crew Transportation to the International Space Station |url=https://oig.nasa.gov/docs/IG-20-005.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211023035809/https://oig.nasa.gov/docs/IG-20-005.pdf |archive-date=October 23, 2021 |access-date=October 28, 2021 |website=OIG.NASA.gov}}</ref> | |||
After the failure of its first uncrewed orbital test flight in late 2019, NASA agreed that Boeing would fund another uncrewed orbital test in August 2021. That launch was stopped late in the countdown due to valve problems. By late September 2021, Boeing had not determined the root cause of the problem, and the flight was delayed indefinitely.<ref name=WP20210924/> The first crewed test will be deferred until after this uncrewed test.<ref name=SFN20211007/> | |||
Boeing took a $185 million charge in it's Q3 2021 earnings report for recent Starliner delays and rework, totaling $595 million since 2019.<ref name=sfn-20211028>{{cite news |url=https://spaceflightnow.com/2021/10/28/boeing-reports-185-million-charge-to-pay-for-starliner-delays/ |title=Boeing reports $185 million charge to pay for Starliner delays |last=Clark |first=Stephen |publisher=Spaceflight Now |date=28 October 2021 |access-date=29 October 2021}}</ref> | |||
In August 2024, after the setbacks experienced during the Crew Flight Test, NASA Administrator ] stated that Boeing CEO ] committed to continuing the Starliner program.<ref name="Roulette 2024" /> However, financial analysts expressed skepticism that Boeing would continue to invest in a money-losing program<ref name="Johnsson 2024" /> and in October ] reported that Boeing was exploring a sale of some of its space division programs, including Starliner.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Terlep |first=Sharon |last2=Maidenberg |first2=Micah |date=October 25, 2024 |title=Boeing Explores Sale of Space Business |url=https://www.wsj.com/science/space-astronomy/boeing-explores-sale-of-space-business-fa7fa3a9 |access-date=October 25, 2024 |work=] |quote=The beleaguered company is exploring a sale of its storied NASA business, including the troubled Starliner space vehicle and operations that support the International Space Station, according to people familiar with the matter.}}</ref> {{As of|2025|01}} NASA and Boeing have not announced plans for the next flight.<ref name="CCP 2025 plan"/> | |||
== Testing == | == Testing == | ||
Various validation tests began on test articles in 2011 and continued on actual spacecraft starting in 2019. | |||
{{multiple images | |||
| direction = vertical | |||
| align = right | |||
| total_width = 270 | |||
| image1 = CST-100 at Delamar, 2012.jpg | |||
| caption1 = Test of Starliner's airbags in April 2012. | |||
| image2 = CST-100 Starliner - Pad Abort Test,49013402052 f3852e9b3d o.jpg | |||
| caption2 = Starliner pad abort test in November 2019. | |||
}} | |||
=== Abort and drop tests === | |||
A variety of validation tests have been underway on ]s since 2011. | |||
{{Main|Boeing Pad Abort Test}} | |||
] (foreground) frames the Starliner (background) in 2012. During testing, the helicopter dropped the capsule from about {{convert|7000|ft|m|sigfig=1}} to test its parachutes and airbags.]] | |||
] | |||
In September 2011, Boeing announced the completion of a set of ground ]s to validate the design of the airbag cushioning system. The airbags are located underneath the heat shield of the Starliner, which is designed to be separated from the capsule while under parachute descent at about {{cvt|1500|m}} altitude. The airbags, manufactured by ILC |
In September 2011, Boeing announced the completion of a set of ground ]s to validate the design of the airbag cushioning system. The airbags are located underneath the heat shield of the Starliner, which is designed to be separated from the capsule while under parachute descent at about {{cvt|1500|m|ft|order=flip|sigfig=1}} altitude. The airbags, manufactured by ILC Dover, are deployed by filling with a mixture of compressed nitrogen and oxygen gas, not with the pyro-explosive mixture sometimes used in automotive ]. The tests were carried out in the ] of southeast California, at ground speeds between {{cvt|10|and|30|mph}} in order to simulate crosswind conditions at the time of landing. Bigelow Aerospace built the mobile test rig and conducted the tests.<ref name="boeing20110912">{{Cite news |last=Memi |first=Edmund G. |date=September 12, 2011 |title=Space capsule tests aim to ensure safe landings |url=http://www.boeing.com/Features/2011/09/bds_cst_100_airbag_09_12_11.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110924163725/http://www.boeing.com/Features/2011/09/bds_cst_100_airbag_09_12_11.html |archive-date=September 24, 2011 |access-date=September 18, 2011 |publisher=Boeing}}</ref> | ||
In April 2012, Boeing dropped a mock-up of its Starliner over the ] at the ], ], successfully testing the craft's three main landing parachutes from {{cvt|3400|m}}.<ref>{{ |
In April 2012, Boeing dropped a mock-up of its Starliner over the ] at the ], ], successfully testing the craft's three main landing parachutes from {{cvt|3400|m|ft|order=flip}}.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Clark |first=Stephen |date=April 3, 2012 |title=Parachutes for Boeing crew capsule tested over Nevada |url=http://www.spaceflightnow.com/news/n1204/03cst100drop/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120406185621/http://www.spaceflightnow.com/news/n1204/03cst100drop/ |archive-date=April 6, 2012 |access-date=April 3, 2012 |publisher=Spaceflight Now}}</ref> | ||
Boeing reported in May 2016 that its test schedule would slip by eight months in order to reduce the mass of the spacecraft, address aerodynamics issues anticipated during launch and ascent on the Atlas V rocket, and meet new NASA-imposed software requirements.<ref name="spacenews-delay">{{Cite news |last=Foust |first=Jeff |author-link=Jeff Foust |date=May 12, 2016 |title=Boeing delays first crewed CST-100 flight to 2018 |url=http://spacenews.com/boeing-delays-first-crewed-cst-100-flight-to-2018/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240606021254/https://spacenews.com/boeing-delays-first-crewed-cst-100-flight-to-2018/ |archive-date=June 6, 2024 |access-date=May 14, 2016 |publisher=]}}</ref> The ] was scheduled for spring 2019. The booster for this Orbital Flight Test, an ] rocket, was assembled at ]'s (ULA) facility at ] by the end of 2017.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Rhian |first=Jason |date=January 4, 2018 |title=Boeing CST-100 Starliner one step closer to flight with completion of DCR |url=http://www.spaceflightinsider.com/organizations/boeing/boeing-cst-100-starliner-one-step-closer-flight-completion-dcr/ |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180408010251/http://www.spaceflightinsider.com/organizations/boeing/boeing-cst-100-starliner-one-step-closer-flight-completion-dcr/ |archive-date=April 8, 2018 |access-date=April 8, 2018 |publisher=Spaceflight Insider}}</ref> The first crewed flight (]) was scheduled for summer 2019, pending test results from ]. It was planned to last 14 days and carry one NASA astronaut and one Boeing test pilot to the ISS.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Bergin |first=Chris |date=November 27, 2017 |title=Boeing Starliner trio preparing for test flights |url=https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2017/11/boeing-starliner-trio-test-flights/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180209214642/https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2017/11/boeing-starliner-trio-test-flights/ |archive-date=February 9, 2018 |access-date=April 8, 2018 |publisher=NASASpaceFlight.com}}</ref> On April 5, 2018, NASA announced that the first planned two-person flight, originally slated for November 2018, was likely to occur in 2019 or 2020.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Pasztor |first=Andy |date=April 5, 2018 |title=NASA, Boeing Signal Regular Missions to Space Station to Be Delayed |url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/nasa-boeing-signal-regular-missions-to-space-station-to-be-delayed-1522984513 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180406032958/https://www.wsj.com/articles/nasa-boeing-signal-regular-missions-to-space-station-to-be-delayed-1522984513 |archive-date=April 6, 2018 |access-date=April 8, 2018 |work=The Wall Street Journal}}</ref> | |||
In August 2013, Boeing announced that two NASA astronauts evaluated communications, ergonomics, and crew-interface aspects of the Starliner, showing how future astronauts will operate in the spacecraft as it transports them to the International Space Station and other ] destinations.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://nysebigstage.com/articles/boeing-aviationday|title=Boeing Space Capsule One Step Closer to Orbit|publisher=NYSE Big Stage|date=August 19, 2013|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131004212749/http://nysebigstage.com/articles/boeing-aviationday|archive-date=October 4, 2013}}</ref> | |||
A serious incident occurred during a hot-fire test in June 2018. A design flaw in the propellant system left four of eight valves open, leading to the release of over {{Convert|4,000|lb}} of toxic ] propellant, resulting in a fireball that engulfed the equipment. The incident was reportedly exacerbated by animosity with the propulsion system subcontractor, Aerojet Rocketdyne, who Boeing refused to pay for design changes. While it informed NASA of the incident, Boeing attempted to keep the incident quiet, even withholding information from the astronauts involved in the project.<ref name="Berger May 2024">{{Cite web |last=Berger |first=Eric |author-link=Eric Berger (journalist) |date=May 6, 2024 |title=The surprise is not that Boeing lost commercial crew but that it finished at all |url=https://arstechnica.com/space/2024/05/the-surprise-is-not-that-boeing-lost-commercial-crew-but-that-it-finished-at-all/ |access-date=August 26, 2024 |website=Ars Technica |language=en-us}}</ref> | |||
Boeing reported in May 2016 that its test schedule would slip by eight months in order to reduce the mass of the spacecraft, address aerodynamics issues anticipated during launch and ascent on the Atlas V rocket, and meet new NASA-imposed software requirements.<ref name="spacenews-delay">{{cite news|url=http://spacenews.com/boeing-delays-first-crewed-cst-100-flight-to-2018/|title=Boeing delays first crewed CST-100 flight to 2018|publisher=SpaceNews|first=Jeff |last=Foust|date=May 12, 2016}}</ref> The ] was scheduled for spring 2019. The booster for this Orbital Flight Test, an ] rocket, was assembled at ] facility at ] by the end of 2017.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.spaceflightinsider.com/organizations/boeing/boeing-cst-100-starliner-one-step-closer-flight-completion-dcr/|title=Boeing CST-100 Starliner one step closer to flight with completion of DCR|publisher=Spaceflight Insider|first=Jason|last=Rhian|date=January 4, 2018|access-date=April 8, 2018}}</ref> The first crewed flight (]) was scheduled for summer 2019, pending test results from ]. It was planned to last 14 days and carry one NASA astronaut and one Boeing test pilot to the ISS.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2017/11/boeing-starliner-trio-test-flights/|title=Boeing Starliner trio preparing for test flights|publisher=NASASpaceFlight.com|first=Chris|last=Bergin|date=November 27, 2017|access-date=April 8, 2018}}</ref> On 5 April 2018, NASA announced that the first planned two-person flight, originally slated for November 2018, was likely to occur in 2019 or 2020.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/nasa-boeing-signal-regular-missions-to-space-station-to-be-delayed-1522984513|title=NASA, Boeing Signal Regular Missions to Space Station to Be Delayed|newspaper=The Wall Street Journal|first=Andy|last=Pasztor|date=April 5, 2018|access-date=April 8, 2018}}</ref> In July 2018, Boeing announced the assignment of former NASA astronaut ] to the Boe-CFT mission. On 3 August 2018, NASA named its first Commercial Crew astronaut cadre of four veteran astronauts to work with SpaceX and Boeing: ], ], ], and ].<ref name=firstastronauts>{{cite web|url=https://www.nasa.gov/press-release/nasa-assigns-crews-to-first-test-flights-missions-on-commercial-spacecraft|title=NASA Assigns Crews to First Test Flights, Missions on Commercial Spacecraft|publisher=NASA|author=NASA Commercial Crew|date=August 3, 2018|access-date=August 3, 2018}} {{PD-notice}}</ref> | |||
In |
In October 2018, the first unpiloted orbital mission was delayed to April 2019, and the first crew launch was rescheduled to August 2019.<ref name="NASAblogcc">{{Cite web |date=October 4, 2018 |title=NASA's Commercial Crew Program Target Test Flight Dates |url=https://blogs.nasa.gov/commercialcrew/2018/10/04/nasas-commercial-crew-program-target-test-flight-dates-4/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181006060403/https://blogs.nasa.gov/commercialcrew/2018/10/04/nasas-commercial-crew-program-target-test-flight-dates-4/ |archive-date=October 6, 2018 |access-date=October 5, 2018}} {{PD-notice}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=February 6, 2019 |title=Commercial Crew Program – February 6, 2019 |url=https://blogs.nasa.gov/commercialcrew/2019/02/06/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190302204511/https://blogs.nasa.gov/commercialcrew/2019/02/06/ |archive-date=March 2, 2019 |access-date=February 6, 2019 |website=blogs.nasa.gov}} {{PD-notice}}</ref> In March 2019, ] reported that these test flights had been delayed by at least three months,<ref name="reuters-20190320">{{Cite news |last=Eric M. Johnson |date=March 20, 2019 |title=Boeing delays by months test flights for U.S. human space program: sources |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-space-boeing/boeing-delays-by-months-test-flights-for-us-human-space-program-sources-idUSKCN1R12QR |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230602231920/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-space-boeing/boeing-delays-by-months-test-flights-for-us-human-space-program-sources-idUSKCN1R12QR |archive-date=June 2, 2023 |access-date=March 22, 2019 |work=Reuters}}</ref> and in April 2019 Boeing announced that the unpiloted orbital mission was scheduled for August 2019.<ref name="sfn-20190402">{{Cite news |last=Clark |first=Stephen |date=April 2, 2019 |title=Boeing delays first Starliner test flight to August, NASA extends duration of first crew mission |url=https://spaceflightnow.com/2019/04/02/boeing-confirms-delay-of-first-starliner-crew-capsule-test-flight-to-august/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230608213713/https://spaceflightnow.com/2019/04/02/boeing-confirms-delay-of-first-starliner-crew-capsule-test-flight-to-august/ |archive-date=June 8, 2023 |access-date=April 3, 2019 |publisher=Spaceflight Now}}</ref> | ||
] abort engines during the ] in November 2019.]] | |||
In May 2019, all major hot-fire testing, including simulations of low-altitude abort thruster testing, was completed using a full up to service module test article that was "flight-like", meaning that the service module test rig used in the hot-fire testing included fuel and helium tanks, reaction control system, orbital maneuvering, and attitude control thrusters, launch abort engines and all necessary fuel lines and avionics that the ones that will be used for crewed missions will have. This cleared the way for the pad abort test and the subsequent uncrewed and crewed flights.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://spaceflightnow.com/2019/05/25/boeings-starliner-crew-capsule-completes-major-propulsion-test/|title=Boeing's Starliner crew capsule completes major propulsion test|author=Clark, Stephen |publisher=Spaceflight Now|date=25 May 2019}}</ref> | |||
In May 2019, all major hot-fire testing, including simulations of low-altitude abort-thruster testing, was completed using a full up-to-service module test article that was "flight-like," meaning that the service module test rig used in the hot-fire testing included fuel and helium tanks, reaction control system, orbital maneuvering, and attitude-control thrusters, launch abort engines and all necessary fuel lines and avionics that will be used for crewed missions. This cleared the way for the pad abort test and the subsequent uncrewed and crewed flights.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Clark |first=Stephen |date=May 25, 2019 |title=Boeing's Starliner crew capsule completes major propulsion test |url=https://spaceflightnow.com/2019/05/25/boeings-starliner-crew-capsule-completes-major-propulsion-test/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230425155849/https://spaceflightnow.com/2019/05/25/boeings-starliner-crew-capsule-completes-major-propulsion-test/ |archive-date=April 25, 2023 |access-date=May 30, 2019 |work=Spaceflight Now}}</ref> | |||
A pad abort test took place on 4 November 2019.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://spaceflightnow.com/2019/11/04/boeing-starliner-pad-abort/|title=Boeing tests crew capsule escape system|author=Clark, Stephen |publisher=Spaceflight Now|website=spaceflightnow.com|access-date=November 4, 2019}}</ref> The capsule accelerated away from its pad, but then one of the three parachutes failed to deploy and the capsule landed with only two parachutes.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://arstechnica.com/science/2019/11/starliner-flies-for-the-first-time-but-one-of-its-parachutes-failed-to-deploy/|title=Starliner flies for the first time, but one of its parachutes failed to deploy|author=Berger, Eric|publisher=Ars Technica|date=November 4, 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://boeing.mediaroom.com/2019-11-04-Boeing-statement-regarding-CST-100-Starliner-pad-abort-test|title=Boeing statement regarding CST-100 Starliner pad abort test|publisher=Boeing|date=November 4, 2019|access-date=November 4, 2019}}</ref> Landing was however deemed safe, and the test a success. Boeing did not expect the malfunction of one parachute to affect the Starliner development schedule.<ref name="Capsule Abort system test">{{cite web |url=https://spaceflightnow.com/2019/11/04/boeing-starliner-pad-abort/|title=Boeing tests crew capsule escape system|author=Clark, Stephen|publisher=Spaceflight Now|date=4 November 2019|access-date=29 August 2020}}</ref> | |||
A pad abort test took place on November 4, 2019.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Clark |first=Stephen |title=Boeing tests crew capsule escape system |url=https://spaceflightnow.com/2019/11/04/boeing-starliner-pad-abort/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191214044139/https://spaceflightnow.com/2019/11/04/boeing-starliner-pad-abort/ |archive-date=December 14, 2019 |access-date=November 4, 2019 |work=Spaceflight Now}}</ref> The capsule accelerated away from its pad, but then one of the three parachutes failed to deploy, and the capsule landed with only two parachutes.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Berger, Eric |date=November 4, 2019 |title=Starliner flies for the first time, but one of its parachutes failed to deploy |url=https://arstechnica.com/science/2019/11/starliner-flies-for-the-first-time-but-one-of-its-parachutes-failed-to-deploy/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191210173113/https://arstechnica.com/science/2019/11/starliner-flies-for-the-first-time-but-one-of-its-parachutes-failed-to-deploy/ |archive-date=December 10, 2019 |access-date=November 5, 2019 |publisher=Ars Technica}}</ref><ref>{{Cite press release |title=Boeing statement regarding CST-100 Starliner pad abort test |date=November 4, 2019 |publisher=Boeing |url=https://boeing.mediaroom.com/2019-11-04-Boeing-statement-regarding-CST-100-Starliner-pad-abort-test |access-date=November 4, 2019 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191104191046/https://boeing.mediaroom.com/2019-11-04-Boeing-statement-regarding-CST-100-Starliner-pad-abort-test |archive-date=November 4, 2019}}</ref> Landing was, however, deemed safe, and the test a success. Boeing did not expect the malfunction of one parachute to affect the Starliner development schedule.<ref name="Capsule Abort system test">{{Cite news |last=Clark |first=Stephen |date=November 4, 2019 |title=Boeing tests crew capsule escape system |url=https://spaceflightnow.com/2019/11/04/boeing-starliner-pad-abort/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191214044139/https://spaceflightnow.com/2019/11/04/boeing-starliner-pad-abort/ |archive-date=December 14, 2019 |access-date=August 29, 2020 |work=Spaceflight Now}}</ref> | |||
=== First orbital flight test === | |||
{{main|Boeing Orbital Flight Test}} | |||
] in ] following OFT in December 2019.]] | |||
=== First orbital flight test (uncrewed) === | |||
The orbital flight test launched on 19 December 2019, but after deployment, an 11-hour offset in the ] of Starliner caused the spacecraft to compute that "it was in an orbital insertion burn", when it was not. This caused the ] to consume more fuel than planned, precluding a docking with the ].<ref name=":1">{{cite web|url=https://spacenews.com/starliner-suffers-off-nominal-orbital-insertion-after-launch/|title=Starliner suffers "off-nominal" orbital insertion after launch|date=December 20, 2019 |publisher=SpaceNews|access-date=December 20, 2019}}</ref><ref name=":2">{{cite web|url=https://www.cnbc.com/2019/12/20/boeings-starliner-flies-into-wrong-orbit-jeopardizing-trip-to-the-international-space-station.html|last=Sheetz|first=Michael|date=December 20, 2019|title=Boeing Starliner fails mission, can't reach space station after flying into wrong orbit|publisher=CNBC|access-date=December 20, 2019}}</ref> The spacecraft landed at ], ], two days after launch.<ref name="bbc201219">{{cite news|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-50855395|title=Boeing astronaut ship stalls in orbit.|last=Amos|first=Jonathan|publisher=BBC News|date=December 20, 2019}}</ref> After the successful landing, the spacecraft was named ''Calypso'' (after the ] {{ship|RV|Calypso}} for the ] researcher ]) by the commander of the ] mission, NASA astronaut ].<ref name="nasa221219">{{cite news|url=https://blogs.nasa.gov/commercialcrew/2019/12/22/tune-in-for-starliner-postlanding-news-conference/|title=Tune in for Starliner Postlanding News Conference|last=Lewis |first=Marie|publisher=NASA Commercial Crew Program|date=December 22, 2019}} {{PD-notice}}</ref> | |||
] on June 19, 2018]] | |||
] in ] following an uncrewed Orbital Flight Test in December 2019.]] | |||
Two software errors detected during the test, one of which prevented a planned docking with the International Space Station, could each have led to the destruction of the spacecraft had they not been caught and corrected in time, ] said on 7 February 2020. A joint NASA-Boeing investigation team "found the two critical software defects were not detected ahead of flight despite multiple safeguards", according to an agency statement. "Ground intervention prevented the loss of the vehicle in both cases". Before re-entry, engineers discovered the second critical software error that affected the thruster firings needed to safely jettison the Starliner's service module. The service module software error "incorrectly translated" the jettison thruster firing sequence.<ref name="SFN20200207">{{cite web |url=https://spaceflightnow.com/2020/02/07/investigators-fault-boeing-for-potentially-catastrophic-software-errors-in-starliner-test-flight/|title=NASA, Boeing managers admit problems with Starliner software verification|author=Harwood, William|publisher=Spaceflight Now|date=7 February 2020|access-date=29 August 2020}}</ref> | |||
{{Main|Boeing Orbital Flight Test}} | |||
With the completion of the ]/] investigation into the Starliner OFT-1 flight of December 2019, the review team identified 80 recommendations that Boeing, in collaboration with NASA, was addressing in 2020, when action plans for each were already well under way. Since the full list of these recommendations are company sensitive and proprietary, only those changes publicly disclosed are known.<ref name="NASA20200707">{{cite web|url=https://www.nasa.gov/feature/nasa-and-boeing-complete-orbital-flight-test-reviews|title=NASA and Boeing Complete Orbital Flight Test Reviews|publisher=NASA|date=7 July 2020 |access-date=29 August 2020}} {{PD-notice}}</ref> | |||
{{Redirect-distinguish|Rosie the Rocketeer|Rosie the Rocketer|Rosie the Riveter}} | |||
=== Second orbital flight test === | |||
{{main|Boeing Orbital Flight Test 2}} | |||
The uncrewed Boeing Orbital Flight Test (OFT) launched on December 20, 2019, bearing an ] nicknamed "Rosie the Rocketeer" and clothed in Boeing's blue IVA spacesuit<ref name="FloridaToday-20191121">{{Cite news |last=Rachael Joy |date=November 21, 2019 |title=Remember Rosie the Riveter? Meet Rosie the Rocketeer |url=https://www.floridatoday.com/story/tech/science/space/2019/11/21/boeing-names-test-dummy-fly-aboard-first-starliner-flight-after-iconic-rosie-riveter/4230233002/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191221230937/https://www.floridatoday.com/story/tech/science/space/2019/11/21/boeing-names-test-dummy-fly-aboard-first-starliner-flight-after-iconic-rosie-riveter/4230233002/ |archive-date=December 21, 2019 |access-date=May 26, 2022 |work=Florida Today}}</ref> as well as a Plush toy of Jedediah Kerman from ].<ref>{{Cite web |author1=Robert Z. Pearlman |date=2022-05-21 |title=Video game character becomes real 'Kerbalnaut' on Boeing Starliner |url=https://www.space.com/boeing-starliner-oft2-kerbal-jeb-zerog-indicator |access-date=2024-10-02 |website=Space.com |language=en}}</ref> It landed two days later, having nearly ended in catastrophic failure. The mission was ultimately declared a partial failure.<ref name="Berger May 2024" /> | |||
After software problems and other issues plagued the first test flight, preventing the spacecraft from reaching the International Space Station, Boeing officials said on 6 April 2020 that the Starliner crew capsule would fly a second uncrewed demonstration mission, Orbital flight test 2, before flying astronauts. NASA said that it had accepted a recommendation from Boeing to fly a second unpiloted mission. ''The Washington Post'' reported that the ], with much the same objectives as the first, was expected to launch from Cape Canaveral "sometime in October or November 2020". Boeing said that it would fund the unplanned crew capsule test flight "at no cost to the taxpayer". Boeing told investors earlier in 2020 that it was taking a US$410 million charge against its earnings to cover the expected costs of a second unpiloted test flight.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://spaceflightnow.com/2020/04/06/after-problem-plagued-test-flight-boeing-will-refly-crew-capsule-without-astronauts/ |title=After problem-plagued test flight, Boeing will refly crew capsule without astronauts |author=Clark, Steven |publisher=Spaceflight Now |date=7 April 2020 |access-date=29 August 2020}}</ref> Boeing officials said on 25 August 2020 that they set the stage for the first Starliner demonstration mission with astronauts in mid-2021.<ref name="SFN20200825">{{cite web |url=https://spaceflightnow.com/2020/08/25/boeing-plans-second-starliner-test-flight-in-december-or-january/ |title=Boeing plans second Starliner test flight in December 2020 or January 2021 |author=Clark, Stephen |publisher=Spaceflight Now |date=25 August 2020 |access-date=26 August 2020}}</ref> Boeing modified the design of the Starliner docking system prior to OFT-2 to add a re-entry cover for additional protection during the capsule's fiery descent through the atmosphere. This re-entry cover is hinged, like the SpaceX design. Teams also installed the OFT-2 spacecraft's propellant heater, thermal protection tiles, and the airbags used to cushion the capsule's landing. The crew module for the OFT-2 mission began acceptance testing in August 2020, which is designed to validate the spacecraft's systems before it is mated with its service module, according to NASA.<ref name="SFN20200825"/><ref name="sfn20210118"/><ref name="space20210121"/> On 10 November 2020, NASA's Commercial Crew Program manager Steve Stich said that the second orbital flight test would be delayed until first quarter 2021 due to software issues.<ref>{{cite web |last=Malik |first=Tariq |title=NASA says Boeing's next Starliner test flight won't launch until 2021 |date=11 November 2020 |url=https://www.space.com/boeing-orbital-flight-test-2-early-2021-launch |access-date=2020-11-16 |publisher=SPACE.com}}</ref> The uncrewed test continued to slip, with the OFT-2 uncrewed test flight being scheduled for March 2021 and the crewed flight targeted for a launch the following summer.<ref name="Boeing20201209">{{cite web |url=https://starlinerupdates.com/nasa-and-boeing-target-new-launch-date-for-next-starliner-flight-test/ |title=NASA and Boeing Target New Launch Date for Next Starliner Flight Test |publisher=Boeing |date=9 December 2020 |access-date=9 December 2020}}</ref> The launch date of OFT-2 moved again with the earliest estimated launch date set for August 2021.<ref name="starliner-20210506">{{cite web |url=https://starlinerupdates.com/boeing-and-nasa-update-launch-target-for-next-starliner-test-flight/ |title=Boeing and NASA Update Launch Target for Next Starliner Test Flight |publisher=Boeing |date=6 May 2021 |access-date=6 May 2021}}</ref> During the August 2021 launch window some issues were detected with 13 propulsion system valves and Boeing decided to return the spacecraft back to factory.<ref name="starliner-20210813">{{cite web |url=https://starlinerupdates.com/starliner-returning-to-factory-to-resolve-valve-issue/ |title=Starliner Returning to Factory to Resolve Valve Issue |work=] |date=13 August 2021 |access-date=13 August 2021}}</ref><ref name="CNBC20120813">{{cite news |last=Sheetz |first=Michael |date=August 13, 2021 |title=Boeing delays test flight of Starliner crew spacecraft for at least two months after valve problems |url=https://www.cnbc.com/2021/08/13/boeing-further-delays-starliner-oft-2-crew-spacecraft-test-flight.html |work=] |access-date=August 13, 2021}}</ref> The valves had been corroded by intrusion of moisture, which interacted with the propellant, but the source of the moisture was not apparent. By late September 2021, Boeing had not determined the root cause of the problem, and the flight was delayed indefinitely.<ref name=WP20210924>{{cite web |title=Nearly two months after discovering a problem with its Starliner spacecraft, Boeing is still searching for answers |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/09/24/boeingnasastarlinerdelay |publisher=The Washington Post |last=Davenport |first=Christian |date=September 24, 2021 | access-date=27 September 2021}}</ref> {{asof|2021|10}} NASA and Boeing continue to make progress and are "working toward launch opportunities in the first half of 2022",<ref name=SC20211009>{{cite web |url=https://www.space.com/boeing-starliner-test-flight-oft-2-early-2022 |title=Boeing's next Starliner test launch for NASA slips to 2022 |first=Mike |last=Wall |publisher=Space.com |date= 9 October 2021|access-date= 9 October 2021}}</ref> though Boeing has taken another US$185 million charge against earnings, bringing the total cost to Boeing for OFT-2 to US$595 million.<ref name=SPO20211028>{{cite web |url=https://spacepolicyonline.com/news/boeing-takes-additional-185-million-earnings-charge-for-starliner/ |title=Boeing Takes Additional $185 Million Earnings Charge For Starliner |first=Marcia |last=Smith |publisher=SpacePolicyOnline.com |date= 27 October 2021|access-date= 28 October 2021}}</ref> | |||
After launch, the spacecraft captured a "]" from its Atlas V launch vehicle that was 11 hours off. Consequently, when the spacecraft separated from the rocket, instead of briefly firing its reaction control thrusters to enter orbit, its computers commanded them to fire for far longer, consuming so much fuel that the spacecraft no longer had enough to dock with the ISS.<ref name="Berger May 2024" /><ref>{{Cite news |last=Foust |first=Jeff |author-link=Jeff Foust |date=December 20, 2019 |title=Starliner suffers "off-nominal" orbital insertion after launch |url=https://spacenews.com/starliner-suffers-off-nominal-orbital-insertion-after-launch/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240606015657/https://spacenews.com/starliner-suffers-off-nominal-orbital-insertion-after-launch/ |archive-date=June 6, 2024 |access-date=December 20, 2019 |publisher=]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Sheetz |first=Michael |date=December 20, 2019 |title=Boeing Starliner fails mission, can't reach space station after flying into wrong orbit |url=https://www.cnbc.com/2019/12/20/boeings-starliner-flies-into-wrong-orbit-jeopardizing-trip-to-the-international-space-station.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210208170927/https://www.cnbc.com/2019/12/20/boeings-starliner-flies-into-wrong-orbit-jeopardizing-trip-to-the-international-space-station.html |archive-date=February 8, 2021 |access-date=December 20, 2019 |publisher=CNBC}}</ref> As the capsule was prepared for re-entry, another software error was discovered; it could have caused a catastrophic collision between the service module and crew capsule.<ref name="Berger May 2024" /><ref name="SFN20200207">{{Cite news |last=Harwood |first=William |date=February 7, 2020 |title=NASA, Boeing managers admit problems with Starliner software verification |url=https://spaceflightnow.com/2020/02/07/investigators-fault-boeing-for-potentially-catastrophic-software-errors-in-starliner-test-flight/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230531044623/https://spaceflightnow.com/2020/02/07/investigators-fault-boeing-for-potentially-catastrophic-software-errors-in-starliner-test-flight/ |archive-date=May 31, 2023 |access-date=August 29, 2020 |work=Spaceflight Now}}</ref> | |||
== Potential Commercial Prospects == | |||
On 25 October 2021, ], Boeing, and ]'s ] subsidiary for commercial space activities and ], released their plan for a commercial space station.<ref>{{Cite news|last=Davenport|first=Justin|date=2021-10-27|title=Blue Origin, Sierra Space, and Boeing announce Orbital Reef|language=en|website=nasaspaceflight.com|url=https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2021/10/announce-orbital-reef/|access-date=2021-11-30}}</ref> The station, called ], is intended as a "mixed-use business park".<ref>{{Cite news|last=Chappell|first=Bill|date=2021-10-25|title=Blue Origin says it will build an orbiting mixed-use business park in space|language=en|work=NPR|url=https://www.npr.org/2021/10/25/1049077333/blue-origin-space-station-business-park-space-orbital-reef-bezos|access-date=2021-11-30}}</ref> Boeing was announced as a partner and Starliner, along with the Sierra Nevada Corporation's ], was chosen as one of the commercial spacecraft to transport commercial crew to and from the space station.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Grush|first=Loren|date=2021-10-25|title=Blue Origin reveals plans for future commercial space station called Orbital Reef|url=https://www.theverge.com/2021/10/25/22744526/blue-origin-space-station-orbital-reef-announcement|access-date=2021-11-29|website=The Verge|language=en}}</ref> | |||
The spacecraft landed at ], ], two days after launch.<ref name="bbc201219">{{Cite news |last=Amos |first=Jonathan |date=December 20, 2019 |title=Boeing astronaut ship stalls in orbit |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-50855395 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230117130936/https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-50855395 |archive-date=January 17, 2023 |access-date=December 20, 2019 |publisher=BBC News}}</ref> After its landing, NASA astronaut ] named the spacecraft ''Calypso'' after the ] {{ship|RV|Calypso}} used by ] researcher ].<ref name="nasa221219">{{Cite news |last=Lewis |first=Marie |date=December 22, 2019 |title=Tune in for Starliner Postlanding News Conference |url=https://blogs.nasa.gov/commercialcrew/2019/12/22/tune-in-for-starliner-postlanding-news-conference/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230529215303/https://blogs.nasa.gov/commercialcrew/2019/12/22/tune-in-for-starliner-postlanding-news-conference/ |archive-date=May 29, 2023 |access-date=December 22, 2019 |publisher=NASA Commercial Crew Program}} {{PD-notice}}</ref> | |||
== List of spacecraft == | |||
As of January 2020, Boeing planned to have three Boeing Starliner spacecraft in service to fulfill the needs of the Commercial Crew Program with each spacecraft expected to be capable of being reused up to ten times with a six-month refurbishment time.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://space.skyrocket.de/doc_sdat/starliner.htm|title=Starliner (CST-100)|author=Krebs, Gunter|publisher=Gunter's Space Page|access-date=29 August 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.boeing.com/space/starliner/|title=CST-100 Starliner|publisher=Boeing}}</ref> On 25 August 2020, Boeing announced its plan to alternate between just two capsules for all planned Starliner missions instead of three.<ref name="SFN20200825"/> | |||
After the mission, Boeing vice president John Mulholland acknowledged that the company had not conducted integrated end-to-end tests for the entire mission, but had instead performed tests of smaller segments. This approach contributed to the software errors that led to the near-catastrophic failures during the flight test. Mulholland insisted that Boeing cut no corners, and that end-to-end tests were not omitted to save money. NASA was also faulted for not pressing Boeing to conduct an end-to-end test.<ref name="Berger May 2024" /> | |||
Since Boeing does not intend to build Spacecraft 4, no spare vehicle contingency exists for spacecraft issues (or loss) during NASA Commercial Crew contract.<ref name="sfn20210118"/> Boeing only has two Starliner spacecraft, so it does not have the ability to pursue commercial space opportunities (Axiom commercial station, space tourists) during the NASA crew contract period.{{cn|date=August 2021}} | |||
The subsequent NASA–Boeing investigation into the flight made scores of recommendations for Boeing and NASA. Boeing declared these to be proprietary, so the only ones publicly known are the ones that officials deliberately disclosed. In 2020, company officials said they were addressing 80 of the recommendations.<ref name="NASA20200707">{{Cite web |date=July 7, 2020 |title=NASA and Boeing Complete Orbital Flight Test Reviews |url=https://www.nasa.gov/feature/nasa-and-boeing-complete-orbital-flight-test-reviews |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230327192048/https://www.nasa.gov/feature/nasa-and-boeing-complete-orbital-flight-test-reviews/ |archive-date=March 27, 2023 |access-date=August 29, 2020 |publisher=NASA}} {{PD-notice}}</ref> | |||
{| class="wikitable sortable" style="font-size:small;" | |||
! class="unsortable" | Image | |||
=== Second orbital flight test (uncrewed) === | |||
! colspan="2" style="width:6em;" | Designation | |||
] in ] following OFT-2 in May 2022]] | |||
! style="width:6em;" | Name | |||
! Status | |||
{{Main|Boeing Orbital Flight Test 2}} | |||
Because the first OFT did not achieve its objectives, Boeing officials said on April 6, 2020 that the Starliner crew capsule would fly a second uncrewed demonstration mission, ] (OFT-2), before flying astronauts. NASA said that it had accepted a recommendation from Boeing to fly a second unpiloted mission. ''The Washington Post'' reported that the second orbital flight test, with much the same objectives as the first, was expected to launch from Cape Canaveral "sometime in October or November 2020". Boeing said that it would fund the unplanned crew capsule test flight "at no cost to the taxpayer". Boeing told investors earlier in 2020 that it was taking a US$410 million charge against its earnings to cover the expected costs of a second unpiloted test flight.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Clark |first=Stephen |date=April 7, 2020 |title=After problem-plagued test flight, Boeing will refly crew capsule without astronauts |url=https://spaceflightnow.com/2020/04/06/after-problem-plagued-test-flight-boeing-will-refly-crew-capsule-without-astronauts/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200525042652/https://spaceflightnow.com/2020/04/06/after-problem-plagued-test-flight-boeing-will-refly-crew-capsule-without-astronauts/ |archive-date=May 25, 2020 |access-date=August 29, 2020 |work=Spaceflight Now}}</ref> Boeing officials said on August 25, 2020 that they set the stage for the first Starliner demonstration mission with astronauts in mid-2021.<ref name="SFN20200825">{{Cite news |last=Clark |first=Stephen |date=August 25, 2020 |title=Boeing plans second Starliner test flight in December 2020 or January 2021 |url=https://spaceflightnow.com/2020/08/25/boeing-plans-second-starliner-test-flight-in-december-or-january/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220517123040/https://spaceflightnow.com/2020/08/25/boeing-plans-second-starliner-test-flight-in-december-or-january/ |archive-date=May 17, 2022 |access-date=August 26, 2020 |work=Spaceflight Now}}</ref> Boeing modified the design of the Starliner docking system prior to OFT-2 to add a re-entry cover for additional protection during the capsule's fiery descent through the atmosphere. This re-entry cover is hinged, like the SpaceX design. Teams also installed the OFT-2 spacecraft's propellant heater, thermal-protection tiles, and the airbags used to cushion the capsule's landing. The crew module for the OFT-2 mission began acceptance testing in August 2020, which is designed to validate the spacecraft's systems before it is mated with its service module, according to NASA.<ref name="SFN20200825" /><ref name="sfn20210118" /><ref name="space20210121" /> On November 10, 2020, NASA's Commercial Crew Program manager Steve Stich said that the second orbital flight test would be delayed until first quarter 2021 due to software issues.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Malik |first=Tariq |date=November 11, 2020 |title=NASA says Boeing's next Starliner test flight won't launch until 2021 |url=https://www.space.com/boeing-orbital-flight-test-2-early-2021-launch |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201113141532/https://www.space.com/boeing-orbital-flight-test-2-early-2021-launch |archive-date=November 13, 2020 |access-date=November 16, 2020 |work=]}}</ref> The uncrewed test continued to slip, with the OFT-2 uncrewed test flight being scheduled for March 2021 and the crewed flight targeted for a launch the following summer.<ref name="Boeing20201209">{{Cite web |date=December 9, 2020 |title=NASA and Boeing Target New Launch Date for Next Starliner Flight Test |url=https://starlinerupdates.com/nasa-and-boeing-target-new-launch-date-for-next-starliner-flight-test/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220517122009/https://starlinerupdates.com/nasa-and-boeing-target-new-launch-date-for-next-starliner-flight-test/ |archive-date=May 17, 2022 |access-date=December 9, 2020 |publisher=Boeing}}</ref> The launch date of OFT-2 moved again with the earliest estimated launch date set for August 2021.<ref name="starliner-20210506">{{Cite web |date=May 6, 2021 |title=Boeing and NASA Update Launch Target for Next Starliner Test Flight |url=https://starlinerupdates.com/boeing-and-nasa-update-launch-target-for-next-starliner-test-flight/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210507044414/https://starlinerupdates.com/boeing-and-nasa-update-launch-target-for-next-starliner-test-flight/ |archive-date=May 7, 2021 |access-date=May 6, 2021 |publisher=Boeing}}</ref> | |||
During the August 2021 launch window some issues were detected with 13 propulsion-system valves in the spacecraft prior to launch. The spacecraft had already been mated to its launch rocket, United Launch Alliance's (ULA) ], and taken to the launchpad. Attempts to fix the problem while on the launchpad failed, and the rocket was returned to the ULA's VIF (Vertical Integration Facility). Attempts to fix the problem at the VIF also failed, and Boeing decided to return the spacecraft to the factory, thus cancelling the launch at that launch window.<ref name="starliner-20210813">{{Cite web |date=August 13, 2021 |title=Starliner Returning to Factory to Resolve Valve Issue |url=https://starlinerupdates.com/starliner-returning-to-factory-to-resolve-valve-issue/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220517112233/https://starlinerupdates.com/starliner-returning-to-factory-to-resolve-valve-issue/ |archive-date=May 17, 2022 |access-date=August 13, 2021 |website=]}}</ref><ref name="CNBC20120813">{{Cite news |last=Sheetz |first=Michael |date=August 13, 2021 |title=Boeing delays test flight of Starliner crew spacecraft for at least two months after valve problems |url=https://www.cnbc.com/2021/08/13/boeing-further-delays-starliner-oft-2-crew-spacecraft-test-flight.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220517113807/https://www.cnbc.com/2021/08/13/boeing-further-delays-starliner-oft-2-crew-spacecraft-test-flight.html |archive-date=May 17, 2022 |access-date=August 13, 2021 |work=]}}</ref> There was a commercial dispute between Boeing and Aerojet Rocketdyne over responsibility for fixing the problem.<ref name="guardian-20220521">{{Cite news |date=May 21, 2022 |title=Boeing's Starliner capsule docks for first time with International Space Station |url=https://www.theguardian.com/science/2022/may/21/boeings-starliner-capsule-docks-for-first-time-with-international-space-station |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240606015659/https://www.theguardian.com/science/2022/may/21/boeings-starliner-capsule-docks-for-first-time-with-international-space-station |archive-date=June 6, 2024 |access-date=May 21, 2022 |work=The Guardian |agency=Reuters}}</ref> The valves had been corroded by intrusion of moisture, which interacted with the propellant, but the source of the moisture was not apparent. By late September 2021, Boeing had not determined the root cause of the problem, and the flight was delayed indefinitely.<ref name="WP20210924">{{Cite news |last=Davenport |first=Christian |date=September 24, 2021 |title=Nearly two months after discovering a problem with its Starliner spacecraft, Boeing is still searching for answers |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/09/24/boeingnasastarlinerdelay |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220517114055/https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/09/24/boeingnasastarlinerdelay/ |archive-date=May 17, 2022 |access-date=September 27, 2021 |newspaper=The Washington Post}}</ref> Through October 2021, NASA and Boeing continued to make progress and were "working toward launch opportunities in the first half of 2022",<ref name="SC20211009">{{Cite news |last=Wall |first=Mike |date=October 9, 2021 |title=Boeing's next Starliner test launch for NASA slips to 2022 |url=https://www.space.com/boeing-starliner-test-flight-oft-2-early-2022 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211009114322/https://www.space.com/boeing-starliner-test-flight-oft-2-early-2022 |archive-date=October 9, 2021 |access-date=October 9, 2021 |work=]}}</ref> In December 2021, Boeing decided to replace the entire service module and anticipated OFT-2 to occur in May 2022.<ref name="2021-12-20">{{Cite news |last=Foust |first=Jeff |author-link=Jeff Foust |date=December 20, 2021 |title=Boeing Starliner test flight planned for spring 2022 |url=https://spacenews.com/boeing-starliner-test-flight-planned-for-spring-2022/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240606015702/https://spacenews.com/boeing-starliner-test-flight-planned-for-spring-2022/ |archive-date=June 6, 2024 |access-date=December 25, 2021 |work=] |language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Berger |first=Eric |author-link=Eric Berger (journalist) |date=December 14, 2021 |title=Leaky valve issue forces Boeing to swap out Starliner's service module |url=https://arstechnica.com/science/2021/12/boeing-to-replace-starliner-service-module-make-mid-2022-launch-attempt/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211225070743/https://arstechnica.com/science/2021/12/boeing-to-replace-starliner-service-module-make-mid-2022-launch-attempt/ |archive-date=December 25, 2021 |access-date=December 25, 2021 |work=] |language=en-us}}</ref> | |||
The OFT-2 mission launched on May 19, 2022.<ref name="NSF-2022-05-19">{{Cite news |last=William Graham |date=May 19, 2022 |title=Starliner OFT-2 launch makes it to orbit, heading to ISS |url=https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2022/05/starliner-oft2-launch/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221007052124/https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2022/05/starliner-oft2-launch/ |archive-date=October 7, 2022 |access-date=May 26, 2022 |publisher=NasaSpaceFlight.com}}</ref> It again carried Rosie the Rocketeer test dummy suited in the blue Boeing inflight spacesuit.<ref name="boeing-2022-05-21">{{Cite tweet |number=1528045424317169664 |user=BoeingSpace |title=@NASA_Astronauts open Starliner's hatch on @Space_Station for the first time and welcome #RosieTheRocketeer and Jebediah Kerman. |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220523164110/https://twitter.com/BoeingSpace/status/1528045424317169664 |archive-date=May 23, 2022 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="Space-2022-05-16">{{Cite news |last=Elizabeth Howell |date=May 16, 2022 |title=Rosie the Rocketeer: Meet the dummy flying on Boeing's OFT-2 test flight this week |url=https://www.space.com/rosie-rocketeer-dummy-boeing-starliner-oft-2 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220526180815/https://www.space.com/rosie-rocketeer-dummy-boeing-starliner-oft-2 |archive-date=May 26, 2022 |access-date=May 26, 2022 |publisher=Space.com}}</ref> Two Orbital Maneuvering and Attitude Control (OMAC) thrusters failed during the orbital insertion burn, but the spacecraft was able to compensate using the remaining OMAC thrusters with the addition of the Reaction Control System (RCS) thrusters. A couple of RCS thrusters used to maneuver Starliner also failed during docking due to low chamber pressure. Some thermal systems used to cool the spacecraft showed extra cold temperatures, requiring engineers to manage it during the docking.<ref name="theverge-2022.05">{{Cite news |last=Grush |first=Loren |date=May 25, 2022 |title=Boeing's Starliner spacecraft returns to Earth, wrapping up critical test mission |url=https://www.theverge.com/2022/5/25/23138395/boeing-cst-100-starliner-nasa-undocking-landing-oft-2 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220920172341/https://www.theverge.com/2022/5/25/23138395/boeing-cst-100-starliner-nasa-undocking-landing-oft-2 |archive-date=September 20, 2022 |access-date=September 19, 2022 |work=The Verge}}</ref><ref name="gizmodo-2022.05">{{Cite news |last=Rabie |first=Passant |date=May 20, 2022 |title=Boeing's Starliner On Track to Reach ISS Despite Propulsion Glitch |url=https://gizmodo.com/boeing-starliner-nasa-iss-spacecraft-1848954308 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220920173535/https://gizmodo.com/boeing-starliner-nasa-iss-spacecraft-1848954308 |archive-date=September 20, 2022 |access-date=September 19, 2022 |work=]}}</ref> | |||
On May 22, 2022, the capsule docked with the International Space Station.<ref name="CNET-2022-05-21">{{Cite news |last=Eric Mack |date=May 21, 2022 |title=Boeing Successfully Docks Starliner Capsule With ISS Years After Failed First Try |url=https://www.cnet.com/science/space/boeing-docks-starliner-capsule-with-iss-years-after-failed-first-try/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220526214607/https://www.cnet.com/science/space/boeing-docks-starliner-capsule-with-iss-years-after-failed-first-try/ |archive-date=May 26, 2022 |access-date=May 26, 2022 |publisher=CNET}}</ref> On May 25, 2022, the capsule returned from space and landed successfully.<ref name="CollectSpace-2022-05-25">{{Cite news |date=May 25, 2022 |title=Boeing Starliner completes Orbital Flight Test-2 with safe touchdown |url=http://www.collectspace.com/news/news-052522a-boeing-starliner-oft2-landing.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220526214607/http://www.collectspace.com/news/news-052522a-boeing-starliner-oft2-landing.html |archive-date=May 26, 2022 |access-date=May 26, 2022 |publisher=CollectSpace}}</ref> During reentry one of the navigation systems dropped communication with the GPS satellites, but Steve Stich, program manager for NASA's Commercial Crew Program, said this is not unexpected during reentry.<ref>{{Cite AV media |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oiS-SzU8UM0 |title=NASA Boeing Starliner OFT-2 Post-Landing Press Conference, May 25, 2022 |date=May 25, 2022 |last=Steve |first=Stich |publisher=Space SPAN |access-date=September 19, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220919133017/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oiS-SzU8UM0 |archive-date=September 19, 2022 |url-status=live |via=YouTube}}</ref> | |||
=== Third orbital flight test (crewed) === | |||
] | |||
] | |||
{{Main|Boeing Crew Flight Test}} | |||
The Starliner's crewed flight test was originally planned as the capsule's final test before entering regular service.<ref name="sn-20221103">{{Cite news |last=Foust |first=Jeff |author-link=Jeff Foust |date=November 3, 2022 |title=First Starliner crewed flight further delayed |url=https://spacenews.com/first-starliner-crewed-flight-further-delayed/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240606015721/https://spacenews.com/first-starliner-crewed-flight-further-delayed/ |archive-date=June 6, 2024 |access-date=November 3, 2022 |work=]}}</ref> This test would have involved launching two astronauts into orbit, docking with the International Space Station for approximately a week, and conducting additional tests while ground crews reviewed data from the launch and docking. Following a review and approval of this data, the capsule would have undocked and returned to Earth for a landing in the ] about eight days later. However, the capsule's thrusters malfunctioned as Starliner docked with the ISS, and despite months of testing, NASA felt it was not able to understand why the thrusters malfunctioned and decided that it was too risky to return its astronauts to Earth aboard Starliner, so it returned uncrewed. | |||
Originally planned for 2017,<ref name="nasa.gov">{{Cite web |date=September 16, 2014 |title=Boeing and SpaceX Selected to Build America's New Crew Space Transportation System |url=https://blogs.nasa.gov/commercialcrew/2014/09/16/boeing-and-spacex-selected-to-build-americas-new-crew-space-transportation-system/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170522164333/https://blogs.nasa.gov/commercialcrew/2014/09/16/boeing-and-spacex-selected-to-build-americas-new-crew-space-transportation-system/ |archive-date=May 22, 2017 |access-date=April 6, 2015 |publisher=NASA}} {{PD-notice}}</ref> the launch faced numerous delays, including issues with the parachute harness and flammable tape on wiring.<ref name="sn-20230329">{{Cite news |last=Foust |first=Jeff |author-link=Jeff Foust |date=March 29, 2023 |title=Starliner crewed test flight delayed to July |url=https://spacenews.com/starliner-crewed-test-flight-delayed-to-july/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240606000313/https://spacenews.com/starliner-crewed-test-flight-delayed-to-july/ |archive-date=June 6, 2024 |access-date=March 30, 2023 |work=]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Berger |first=Eric |author-link=Eric Berger (journalist) |date=June 1, 2023 |title=Boeing finds two serious problems with Starliner just weeks before launch |url=https://arstechnica.com/space/2023/06/boeing-stands-down-from-starliner-launch-to-address-recently-found-problems/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240606015836/https://arstechnica.com/space/2023/06/boeing-stands-down-from-starliner-launch-to-address-recently-found-problems/ |archive-date=June 6, 2024 |access-date=June 2, 2023 |work=Ars Technica |language=en-us}}</ref> These delays pushed the launch back to mid-2024. | |||
A launch attempt on May 6, 2024, was scrubbed due to an oxygen valve problem on the rocket.<ref name="space.com-20240404">{{Cite news |date=April 4, 2024 |title=Boeing's 1st Starliner astronaut launch delayed again, to May 6 |url=https://www.space.com/boeing-starliner-cft-astronaut-launch-delay-may-6 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240413130150/https://www.space.com/boeing-starliner-cft-astronaut-launch-delay-may-6 |archive-date=April 13, 2024 |access-date=April 4, 2024 |work=] |language=en}}</ref> Subsequently, a helium leak in the service module further delayed the mission.<ref name="may_6_scrub">{{Cite news |last=William Harwood |date=May 6, 2024 |title=Starliner launch scrubbed by trouble with a valve in the Atlas 5's Centaur upper stage |url=https://spaceflightnow.com/2024/05/07/starliner-launch-scrubbed-by-trouble-with-a-valve-in-the-atlas-5s-centaur-upper-stage/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240507022259/https://spaceflightnow.com/2024/05/07/starliner-launch-scrubbed-by-trouble-with-a-valve-in-the-atlas-5s-centaur-upper-stage/ |archive-date=May 7, 2024 |access-date=May 6, 2024 |work=Spaceflight Now}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Harwood |first=William |date=May 22, 2024 |title=Boeing Starliner launch Saturday ruled out as helium leak analysis continues – Spaceflight Now |url=https://spaceflightnow.com/2024/05/22/boeing-starliner-launch-saturday-ruled-out-as-helium-leak-analysis-continues/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240522084103/https://spaceflightnow.com/2024/05/22/boeing-starliner-launch-saturday-ruled-out-as-helium-leak-analysis-continues/ |archive-date=May 22, 2024 |access-date=May 22, 2024 |work=Spaceflight Now |language=en-US}}</ref> Another attempt on June 1 was scrubbed due to a ground computer hardware fault.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Foust |first=Jeff |author-link=Jeff Foust |date=June 1, 2024 |title=Starliner launch attempt scrubbed |url=https://spacenews.com/starliner-launch-attempt-scrubbed/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240606000409/https://spacenews.com/starliner-launch-attempt-scrubbed/ |archive-date=June 6, 2024 |access-date=July 22, 2024 |work=]}}</ref> Starliner successfully launched on June 5 at 14:52 UTC (10:52{{nbs}}am EDT).<ref>{{Cite news |last=Howell |first=Elizabeth |date=June 5, 2024 |title=Boeing's Starliner launches astronauts for 1st time in historic liftoff (photos, video) |url=https://www.space.com/boeing-starliner-crew-flight-test-launch |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240607234443/https://www.space.com/boeing-starliner-crew-flight-test-launch |archive-date=June 7, 2024 |access-date=June 9, 2024 |work=]}}</ref> | |||
Once in orbit and on approach to the ISS during this flight test, both the automated systems and astronauts taking manual control during the docking sequence were instructed to repeatedly fire the RCS thrusters. This stress testing revealed performance degradation in the thrusters, leading the spacecraft software to consider five of them damaged and unusable, and five separate helium leaks were detected in the service module.<ref name="Harwood240725">{{Cite news |last=Harwood |first=William |date=July 25, 2024 |title=Boeing's Starliner space capsule faces crucial tests |url=https://spaceflightnow.com/2024/08/24/nasa-rules-out-bringing-astronauts-home-on-boeings-starliner/ |work=CBS News |via=Yahoo News |quote=During rendezvous with the space station the day after launch, four more leaks developed and five of the ship’s aft-facing thrusters did not operate as expected.}}</ref><ref name="Harwood240726">{{Cite news |last=Harwood |first=William |date=July 26, 2024 |title=Make-or-break tests on tap for Boeing's Starliner capsule |url=https://spaceflightnow.com/2024/07/26/make-or-break-tests-on-tap-for-boeings-starliner-capsule/ |access-date=July 27, 2024 |work=Spaceflight Now |quote=five aft-facing maneuvering thrusters failed to operate as the flight software expected. Four were later successfully test fired and one was declared failed.}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Berger |first=Eric |date=2024-06-22 |title=NASA indefinitely delays return of Starliner to review propulsion data |url=https://arstechnica.com/space/2024/06/nasa-indefinitely-delays-return-of-starliner-to-review-propulsion-data/?utm_source=tldrnewsletter |access-date=2024-08-26 |website=Ars Technica |language=en-us}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Howell |first=Elizabeth |date=2024-07-29 |title=Boeing's Starliner tests thrusters at ISS as NASA reviews options for astronauts' return to Earth |url=https://www.space.com/boeing-starliner-iss-hot-fire-reentry-preparation |access-date=2024-08-26 |website=Space.com |language=en}}</ref> The five failed thrusters were all aft-facing, resulting in a loss of ] attitude control until four of them were restored.<ref name="harwood240824">{{Cite news |last=Harwood |first=William |date=August 24, 2024 |title=NASA rules out bringing astronauts home on Boeing's Starliner |url=https://spaceflightnow.com/2024/08/24/nasa-rules-out-bringing-astronauts-home-on-boeings-starliner/ |work=Spaceflight Now |quote=Resetting and firing the thrusters eventually showed that four of the five were again functioning, and the Starliner docked with the ISS after a delay.}}</ref><ref name="Boeing240802">{{Cite press release |title=Boeing's confidence remains high in Starliner's return with crew |date=August 2, 2024 |publisher=Boeing |url=https://starlinerupdates.com/boeings-confidence-remains-high-in-starliners-return-with-crew/ |quote=1 free-flight hot fire of 5 aft-facing thrusters prior to docking, returning 6-degree of freedom (DOF) axis control}} This statement acknowledges that ] control was lost due to the failures.</ref> The astronauts were able to safely dock the capsule to the ISS.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Berger |first=Eric |author-link=Eric Berger (journalist) |date=June 22, 2024 |title=NASA indefinitely delays return of Starliner to review propulsion data |url=https://arstechnica.com/space/2024/06/nasa-indefinitely-delays-return-of-starliner-to-review-propulsion-data/ |access-date=August 26, 2024 |work=] |language=en-us}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Howell |first=Elizabeth |date=July 29, 2024 |title=Boeing's Starliner tests thrusters at ISS as NASA reviews options for astronauts' return to Earth |url=https://www.space.com/boeing-starliner-iss-hot-fire-reentry-preparation |access-date=August 26, 2024 |work=] |language=en}}</ref> | |||
A joint NASA–Boeing team spent weeks trying to understand what caused the thrusters to malfunction, conducting ground tests at the ] in New Mexico on the Aerojet Rocketdyne thruster that was planned to be used on a future Starliner mission,<ref>{{Cite web |date=July 3, 2024 |title=Starliner testing continues in space and on the ground to support future long-duration missions |url=https://starlinerupdates.com/starliner-testing-continues-in-space-and-on-the-ground-to-support-future-long-duration-missions/ |access-date=July 10, 2024 |website=Boeing}}</ref> and working with the astronauts to replicate their testing in space.<ref>{{Cite web |title=NASA, Boeing Progress on Testing Starliner with Crew at Space Station |url=https://starlinerupdates.com/nasa-boeing-progress-on-testing-starliner-with-crew-at-space-station/ |website=]}}</ref> During these tests, the ground team was able to replicate the thrust degradation, and tied it back to a ] seal had been deformed by a buildup of heat.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Harwood |first=William |date=July 26, 2024 |title=Make-or-break tests on tap for Boeing's Starliner capsule |url=https://spaceflightnow.com/2024/07/26/make-or-break-tests-on-tap-for-boeings-starliner-capsule/ |access-date=July 27, 2024 |work=Spaceflight Now |language=en-US}}</ref> However, when these tests were conducted on the Starliner in orbit, the problem was not replicated.<ref name="Chang 2024">{{Cite news |last=Chang |first=Kenneth |date=August 7, 2024 |title=NASA Says Boeing Starliner Astronauts May Fly Home on SpaceX in 2025 |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2024/08/07/science/boeing-starliner-nasa-spacex.html |access-date=August 7, 2024 |work=The New York Times |language=en-US |issn=0362-4331}}</ref> | |||
Ultimately, NASA felt it was not able to understand why the thrusters malfunctioned and decided that it was too risky to return its astronauts to Earth aboard Starliner, which will attempt to return uncrewed.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Wattles |first=Jackie |date=August 24, 2024 |title=Boeing Starliner's astronauts will return to Earth on Spacex Crew Dragon, NASA says |url=https://www.cnn.com/2024/08/24/science/boeing-starliner-nasa-astronauts-spacex?cid=ios_app |access-date=August 24, 2024 |work=] |language=en}}</ref> Boeing, for its part, has expressed confidence in Starliner and believes there is flight rationale for returning the spacecraft to Earth with the astronauts aboard.<ref name="Chang 2024" /><ref>{{Cite web |title=Boeing's confidence remains high in Starliner's return with crew |url=https://starlinerupdates.com/boeings-confidence-remains-high-in-starliners-return-with-crew/ |access-date=August 7, 2024 |website=starlinerupdates.com}}</ref> | |||
Starliner landed safely in the ] in New Mexico on 7{{Nbsp}}September at 04:01:35{{nbsp}}UTC (6{{Nbsp}}September, 11:01:35{{Nbsp}}pm{{Nbsp}}], local time at the landing site), about six hours after it undocked from the ISS.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.space.com/boeing-starliner-lands-earth-crew-flight-test-mission | title=Boeing Starliner capsule lands back on Earth, without astronauts, to end troubled test flight (Video) | website=] | date=September 7, 2024 }}</ref><ref name="Return plan">{{Cite web |last=Niles-Carnes |first=Elyna |date=August 29, 2024 |title=NASA, Boeing Teams "Go" for Starliner Uncrewed Return – NASA's Boeing Crew Flight Test |url=https://blogs.nasa.gov/boeing-crew-flight-test/2024/08/29/nasa-boeing-teams-go-for-starliner-uncrewed-return/ |access-date=August 29, 2024 |website=] |language=en-US}}</ref> Starliner experienced two new technical problems unrelated to its earlier issues during the reentry. There was a brief glitch in Starliner's navigation system, and one of the 12 thrusters used to orient the capsule during atmospheric re-entry failed to ignite.<ref name="Clark 2024-09-07">{{Cite news |last=Clark |first=Stephen |date=September 7, 2024 |title=Leaving behind its crew, Starliner departs space station and returns to Earth |url=https://arstechnica.com/space/2024/09/leaving-behind-its-crew-starliner-departs-space-station-and-returns-to-earth/ |access-date=September 7, 2024 |work=]}}</ref> | |||
NASA says that it will review all mission-related data to inform what additional actions are required to meet its certification requirements.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Taveau |first=Jessica |date=August 24, 2024 |title=NASA Decides to Bring Starliner Spacecraft Back to Earth Without Crew |url=https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/nasa-decides-to-bring-starliner-spacecraft-back-to-earth-without-crew/ |access-date=August 24, 2024 |website=] |language=en-US}}</ref> ] ] has stated that Boeing CEO ] has committed to continuing the Starliner program despite the setback.<ref name="Roulette 2024">{{Cite news |last=Roulette |first=Joey |date=August 24, 2024 |title=SpaceX to return Boeing's Starliner astronauts from space next year, NASA says |url=https://www.reuters.com/technology/space/spacex-return-boeings-starliner-astronauts-space-next-year-nasa-says-2024-08-24/ |access-date=August 24, 2024 |work=]}}</ref> | |||
Boeing officials were scheduled to participate in a post-landing news conference, but they abruptly canceled at the last minute without providing a reason. After NASA decided to end the Starliner test flight without a crew on board, the company refused to answer questions from journalists, instead opting to release only brief statements.<ref name="Clark 2024-09-07" /> | |||
== Commercial use == | |||
] | |||
Under the CCP, Boeing owns and operates the Starliner capsules, allowing the company to offer non-CCP commercial flights if they do not interfere with NASA missions.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Juno: New Origins {{!}} CFT starliner fixed |url=https://www.simplerockets.com/c/cA8OIY/CFT-starliner-fixed |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240601195723/https://www.simplerockets.com/c/cA8OIY/CFT-starliner-fixed |archive-date=June 1, 2024 |access-date=June 1, 2024 |website=www.simplerockets.com}}</ref> While SpaceX has secured private commercial flights, Boeing has yet to do so. | |||
The CCP agreement permits Boeing to sell seats for space tourists on ISS flights. While initially proposed, the extended length of typical ISS missions makes this unlikely.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Klotz |first=Irene |date=September 17, 2014 |title=Boeing's 'space taxi' includes seat for a tourist |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/boeing-space-idUSL1N0RI2XY20140917 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150924204556/http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/09/17/boeing-space-idUSL1N0RI2XY20140917 |archive-date=September 24, 2015 |access-date=August 6, 2015 |work=Reuters}}</ref> | |||
In October 2021, ], Boeing, and ] announced plans for a commercial space station called ]. This "mixed-use business park" could be serviced by both Starliner and Sierra Nevada's ] spacecraft.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Davenport |first=Justin |date=October 27, 2021 |title=Blue Origin, Sierra Space, and Boeing announce Orbital Reef |url=https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2021/10/announce-orbital-reef/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211130060908/https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2021/10/announce-orbital-reef/ |archive-date=November 30, 2021 |access-date=November 30, 2021 |work=nasaspaceflight.com |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Chappell |first=Bill |date=October 25, 2021 |title=Blue Origin says it will build an orbiting mixed-use business park in space |url=https://www.npr.org/2021/10/25/1049077333/blue-origin-space-station-business-park-space-orbital-reef-bezos |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211129160341/https://www.npr.org/2021/10/25/1049077333/blue-origin-space-station-business-park-space-orbital-reef-bezos |archive-date=November 29, 2021 |access-date=November 30, 2021 |work=NPR |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Grush |first=Loren |date=October 25, 2021 |title=Blue Origin reveals plans for future commercial space station called Orbital Reef |url=https://www.theverge.com/2021/10/25/22744526/blue-origin-space-station-orbital-reef-announcement |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211129160340/https://www.theverge.com/2021/10/25/22744526/blue-origin-space-station-orbital-reef-announcement |archive-date=November 29, 2021 |access-date=November 29, 2021 |work=] |language=en}}</ref> | |||
== Launch vehicle == | |||
Starliner was designed to be compatible with multiple launch vehicles, including the Atlas V, ], ], and ].<ref name="sdc20180803">{{Cite news |last=Wall |first=Mike |date=August 3, 2018 |title=Crew Dragon and Starliner: A Look at the Upcoming Astronaut Taxis |url=https://www.space.com/41367-commercial-crew-spacecraft-starliner-dragon.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190821180355/https://www.space.com/41367-commercial-crew-spacecraft-starliner-dragon.html |archive-date=August 21, 2019 |access-date=August 29, 2020 |publisher=SPACE.com}}</ref> | |||
For the three completed test flights and up to six further missions, Starliner is expected to fly atop the Atlas V. However, United Launch Alliance, the operator of the Atlas V, ceased production of the rocket in 2024 after producing vehicles for all remaining contracted launches.<ref name="Verge">{{Cite news |last=Roulette |first=Joey |date=August 26, 2021 |title=ULA stops selling its centerpiece Atlas V, setting path for the rocket's retirement |url=https://www.theverge.com/2021/8/26/22641048/ula-boeing-lockheed-end-sales-atlas-v-rocket-russia-rd180 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211228153058/https://www.theverge.com/2021/8/26/22641048/ula-boeing-lockheed-end-sales-atlas-v-rocket-russia-rd180 |archive-date=December 28, 2021 |access-date=September 1, 2021 |publisher=The Verge}}</ref><ref>{{Cite tweet |number=1800818621247008910 |user=torybruno |title=Bitter sweet. The final Atlas V is making its way through the factory. There are 16 AV missions to go. They will all be built this year, making more room for #Vulcan rate production |first=Tory |last=Bruno |author-link=Tory Bruno |date=June 12, 2024 |access-date=June 14, 2024}}</ref> The vehicles have been allocated to customers, including the six needed for the remaining Starliner flights.<ref name="Berger 2022-06-02">{{Cite news |last=Berger |first=Eric |author-link=Eric Berger (journalist) |date=June 2, 2022 |title=NASA just bought the rest of the space station crew flights from SpaceX |url=https://arstechnica.com/science/2022/06/nasa-just-bought-all-the-seats-needed-for-space-station-crews-into-2030/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221006171726/https://arstechnica.com/science/2022/06/nasa-just-bought-all-the-seats-needed-for-space-station-crews-into-2030/ |archive-date=October 6, 2022 |access-date=May 9, 2024 |work=] |language=en-us}}</ref> | |||
The Starliner faces an uncertain future after that. Delta IV is retired and no more are available,<ref>{{Cite news |last=Berger |first=Eric |author-link=Eric Berger (journalist) |date=August 22, 2019 |title=The last single-stick Delta rocket launched Thursday, and it put on a show |url=https://arstechnica.com/science/2019/08/the-last-single-stick-delta-rocket-launched-thursday-and-it-put-on-a-show/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201107224032/https://arstechnica.com/science/2019/08/the-last-single-stick-delta-rocket-launched-thursday-and-it-put-on-a-show/ |archive-date=November 7, 2020 |access-date=August 6, 2020 |work=]}}</ref> the Falcon 9 is owned by crewed launch competitor SpaceX, and the Vulcan Centaur has not yet been human-rated, testing Boeing would have to pay for.<ref name="Berger 2022-06-02" /> | |||
=== Configuration === | |||
For Starliner launches, ULA uses the Atlas N22 configuration. All other Atlas V launches use a payload fairing and the single-engine version of the Centaur upper stage. N22 is configured with no payload fairing, two solid rocket boosters (SRBs), and a ] second stage. | |||
Starliner is the only crewed payload for Atlas V. | |||
While most Atlas V launches since 2021 have used the newer Northrop Grumman ] SRBs, these boosters are not rated for human spaceflight. Therefore, crewed missions employ the older Aerojet Rocketdyne ] SRBs.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Clark |first=Stephen |date=May 15, 2021 |title=Billion-dollar missile defense satellite ready for launch Monday in Florida |url=https://spaceflightnow.com/2021/05/15/billion-dollar-missile-defense-satellite-ready-for-launch-monday-at-cape-canaveral/ |access-date=September 16, 2024 |work=Spaceflight Now}}</ref> | |||
Although the Dual Engine Centaur had not been used since 2000 after the introduction of the more powerful Atlas V, it was brought back into service for Starliner missions. Two engines allow the rocket to fly a gentler and flatter trajectory to minimize the G-forces experienced by the astronauts and ensures the capsule can abort at any time, returning the crew to Earth in case of a problem.<ref>{{Cite web |last= |date=July 28, 2021 |title=OFT-2: Dual Engine Centaur returns to service for Starliner launches |url=https://blog.ulalaunch.com/blog/oft-2-dual-engine-centaur-returns-to-service-for-starliner-launches |access-date=2024-09-16 |website=United Launch Alliance |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=OFT-2: Dual Engine Centaur returns to service for Starliner launches |url=https://blog.ulalaunch.com/blog/oft-2-dual-engine-centaur-returns-to-service-for-starliner-launches |access-date=August 27, 2024 |website=ULA |language=en}}</ref> | |||
== Launch profile == | |||
After passing through the stages of ], SRB jettison, booster separation, Centaur ignition, nosecone and aeroskirt jettison, it releases the Starliner spacecraft at stage separation, nearly 15 minutes after lift-off on a {{cvt|181 × 72|km|mi|order=flip|adj=mid|-high}} suborbital trajectory, just below the ] needed to enter a stable orbit around Earth. After separating from the Dual Engine Centaur, the Starliner's own thrusters, mounted on its service module, boost the spacecraft into orbit to continue its journey to the International Space Station. | |||
The suborbital trajectory is unusual for a satellite launch, but it is ] used by the ] and ]. It ensures that, if the spacecraft fails to make the orbital insertion burn, it will re-enter the atmosphere in a controlled way.<ref>{{cite news |last=Clark |first=Stephen |date=December 19, 2019 |title=Starliner test flight to use special Atlas 5 configuration, unusual launch trajectory |journal=Spaceflight Now |url=https://spaceflightnow.com/2019/12/19/starliner-test-flight-to-use-special-atlas-5-configuration-unusual-launch-trajectory/ |quote=The 44-mile-high perigee, or low point, of the suborbital trajectory is inside Earth’s atmosphere, meaning the Starliner would re-enter the atmosphere and come back to Earth without an additional propulsive maneuver.}}</ref> The Starliner's orbit insertion burn begins about 31 minutes into the mission and lasts 45 seconds.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Clark |first=Stephen |date=May 19, 2022 |title=Boeing's Starliner crew capsule takes off on long-awaited test flight |url=https://spaceflightnow.com/2022/05/19/boeings-starliner-crew-capsule-takes-off-on-long-awaited-test-flight/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220520180402/https://spaceflightnow.com/2022/05/19/boeings-starliner-crew-capsule-takes-off-on-long-awaited-test-flight/ |archive-date=May 20, 2022 |access-date=May 20, 2022 |work=Spaceflight Now}}</ref> | |||
== List of spacecraft == | |||
{{As of|2020|1}}, Boeing planned to have three Boeing Starliner spacecraft in service to fulfill the needs of the Commercial Crew Program with each spacecraft expected to be capable of being reused up to ten times with a six-month refurbishment time.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Krebs, Gunter |title=Starliner (CST-100) |url=https://space.skyrocket.de/doc_sdat/starliner.htm |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230608182241/https://space.skyrocket.de/doc_sdat/starliner.htm |archive-date=June 8, 2023 |access-date=August 29, 2020 |publisher=Gunter's Space Page}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=CST-100 Starliner |url=https://www.boeing.com/space/starliner/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210719145445/https://www.boeing.com/space/starliner/ |archive-date=July 19, 2021 |access-date=January 19, 2020 |publisher=Boeing}}</ref> On August 25, 2020, Boeing announced it would alternate between just two capsules for all planned Starliner missions instead of three.<ref name="SFN20200825" /> | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
! {{nowrap|{{Abbr|S/N|Serial number}}}} | |||
! Name | |||
! Type | |||
! Status | |||
! Flights | ! Flights | ||
! Flight time | |||
! Time in flight | |||
! Total flight time | |||
! class="unsortable" | Notes | |||
! Notes<ref name="starlinerlist-1" /><ref name="starlinernotebook" /> | |||
! class="unsortable" title="Category" | Cat. | |||
! {{abbr|Cat.|Commons category and Wikidata page}} | |||
|- | |- | ||
| {{abbr|S1|Spacecraft 1}} | |||
| | |||
| {{color|grey|None}} | |||
| style="background:#ff9e3d;" title="Test article" | | |||
| Prototype | |||
| Spacecraft 1 | |||
| class="table-na" style="color:grey;" data-sort-value="" | None | |||
| {{Draw|Retired}} | | {{Draw|Retired}} | ||
| 1 | | 1 | ||
| {{Time interval|4 November 2019, 14:15:00|4 November 2019, 14:16:19|show=dhms|abbr=on}} (]) | |||
| data-sort-value="T00:01:35" | 1 minute 35 seconds | |||
| {{Time interval|4 November 2019, 14:15:00|4 November 2019, 14:16:19|show=dhms|abbr=on}} | |||
| Vehicle used in the ] and then retired.<ref name="NASA20170406"/><ref name="starlinerlist-1"/><ref name="starlinernotebook"/> | |||
| Prototype used only for pad abort test. | |||
| ] | | ] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| ] | |||
| | |||
| {{color|grey|TBA}} | |||
| style="background:#3d9eff;" title="Flight vehicle" | | |||
| Crew | |||
| ] | |||
| class="table-na" style="color:grey;" data-sort-value="" title="To be announced" | TBA | |||
| {{Active}} | | {{Active}} | ||
| |
| 1 | ||
| {{Time interval|May 19, 2022, 22:54:47|25 May 2022, 22:49|show=dhm|abbr=on}} (]) | |||
| class="table-na" style="color:grey;" data-sort-value="" | None | |||
| {{Time interval|May 19, 2022, 22:54:47|25 May 2022, 22:49|show=dhm|abbr=on}} | |||
| Was first Starliner planned to carry crew, now to be used on OFT-2.<ref name="starlinernotebook"/> | |||
| Completed the ] flight. | |||
| ] | |||
| ] ] | |||
|- | |- | ||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| '']'' | |||
| style="background:#3d9eff;" title="Flight vehicle" | | |||
| Crew | |||
| ] | |||
| {{Active|Active}} | |||
| ''Calypso'' | |||
| 2 | |||
| {{Active}} | |||
| {{Plainlist| | |||
| 1 | |||
* {{Time interval|December 20, 2019, 11:36:43|22 December 2019, 12:58:53|show=dhm|abbr=on}} (]) | |||
| data-sort-value="T49:22:10" | 2{{nbsp}}days 1{{nbsp}}hour 22{{nbsp}}minutes 10{{nbsp}}seconds | |||
* {{Time interval|5 June 2024 14:52:15|7 September 2024 04:01:35|show=dhm|abbr=on}} (]) | |||
| Named after ]'s research vessel ].<ref name="starlinerlist-1"/> First Starliner to fly in space.<ref name="starlinerlist-1"/><ref name="starlinernotebook"/> | |||
}} | |||
| 95d 14h 31m | |||
| Named after ]'s ship {{ship|RV|Calypso}}. First Starliner to orbit during ], first to carry crew to space during ]. | |||
| ] ] | | ] ] | ||
|} | |} | ||
{{hlist | |||
| {{Legend inline|#ff9e3d|Test article}} | |||
| {{Legend inline|#3d9eff|Spaceflight vehicle}} | |||
}} | |||
== List of flights == | == List of flights == | ||
List includes only completed or currently manifested missions. Dates are listed in ], and for future events, they are the earliest possible opportunities (also known as {{Abbr|NET|no earlier than}} dates) and may change. | |||
{| class="wikitable sticky-header" | |||
! Mission and ] | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
! Capsule | |||
! Launch date | |||
! Landing date | |||
! Remarks | |||
! Crew | |||
! Outcome | |||
|- | |- | ||
| ]<br/>(])<!--Please do not insert any non-free images as visible images--> | |||
! scope="col" style="width:100px;" | Mission | |||
! scope="col" | Patch | |||
! scope="col" | Vehicle | |||
! scope="col" | Launch date, UTC | |||
! scope="col" style="width:200px;" | Crew | |||
! scope="col" | Remarks | |||
! scope="col" | Duration | |||
! scope="col" | Outcome | |||
|- | |||
| ] | |||
| | |||
| {{abbr|S1|Spacecraft 1}} | | {{abbr|S1|Spacecraft 1}} | ||
| colspan="2" style="text-align:center" | November 4, 2019 | |||
| 4 November 2019, 14:15:00 | |||
| Simulating an escape from a failing rocket, Starliner's RS-88 engines lifted the capsule from a pad at ]. Only two of three parachutes opened, but was declared a success. | |||
| {{N/A}} | | {{N/A}} | ||
| Pad abort test, White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico. One of three parachutes failed to fully open due to being rigged incorrectly before launch, but parachute system functioned adequately.<ref name="Capsule Abort system test"/> | |||
| 95 seconds | |||
| {{success}} | | {{success}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
| ]<br/>(])<!--Please do not insert any non-free images as visible images--> | |||
| ] | | ] | ||
| December 19, 2019 | |||
| | |||
| December 22, 2019 | |||
| S3.1<br>'']'' | |||
| First uncrewed orbital flight test. Orbited but failed to rendezvous with ISS. Landed successfully. | |||
| 19 December 2019, 11:36:43 | |||
| {{N/A}} | | {{N/A}} | ||
| {{Partial failure}} | |||
| First uncrewed orbital test flight of Starliner. The mission's main objective of ISS rendezvous was aborted due to software incorrectly keeping mission time, leading to a late orbital insertion burn with excessive fuel expenditure. Starliner landed in New Mexico two days after launch.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Halaschak|first1=Zachary|title=Boeing Starliner spacecraft goes off course and fails mission |date=20 December 2019|url=https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/boeing-starliner-spacecraft-goes-off-course-and-fails-mission|publisher=Washington Examiner|access-date=December 20, 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite tweet|last1=Bridenstine |first1=Jim|number=1208021843388633090|title=Update: #Starliner had a Mission Elapsed Time (MET) anomaly causing the spacecraft to believe that it was in an orbital insertion burn, when it was not |date=December 20, 2019|user=JimBridenstine|access-date=December 20, 2019|author-link=Jim Bridenstine}} {{PD-notice}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last1=Gebhardt|first1=Chris|title=Starliner suffers mission-shortening failure after successful launch|date=20 December 2019|url=https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2019/12/starliner-mission-shortening-failure-successful-launch/|publisher=NASASpaceFlight.com|access-date=December 20, 2019}}</ref><ref name=bbc201219/> | |||
| 2 days | |||
| {{Partial failure}} | |||
|- | |- | ||
| ]<br/>(])<!--Please do not insert any non-free images as visible images--> | |||
| ] | | ] | ||
| May 19, 2022 | |||
| ] | |||
| May 25, 2022 | |||
| S2.1 | |||
| Second uncrewed orbital flight test. Experienced {{abbr|OMAC|Orbital Maneuvering and Attitude Control}} and {{abbr|RCS|Reaction Control System}} thruster malfunctions, but successfully docked to ISS. | |||
| H1 2022<ref name="nasa-20211008">{{cite web |last=Herridge |first=Linda |url=https://blogs.nasa.gov/kennedy/2021/10/08/nasa-boeing-update-starliner-orbital-flight-test-2-status/ |title=NASA, Boeing Update Starliner Orbital Flight Test-2 Status |publisher=NASA |date=8 October 2021 |access-date=9 October 2021}}</ref> | |||
| {{N/A}} | | {{N/A}} | ||
| {{success}} | |||
| Second uncrewed orbital test flight of Starliner added due to partial failure of previous test flight. Will attempt to dock with the ISS.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2020/04/06/boeing-starliner-test-repeat/|title=After botched test flight, Boeing will refly its Starliner spacecraft for NASA|last=Davenport|first=Christian |newspaper=The Washington Post|date=6 April 2020|access-date=7 April 2020}}</ref> Valve problems during a 3 August launch attempt were still being analyzed in late September 2021.<ref name=WP20210924/> | |||
| 5 days | |||
| {{Planned}} | |||
|- | |- | ||
| ]<br/>(])<!--Please do not insert any non-free images as visible images--> | |||
| ] | | ] | ||
| June 5, 2024 | |||
| ] | |||
| September 7, 2024 | |||
| {{abbr|TBD|to be determined}}<br>(S2 or S3) | |||
| Crewed flight test to ISS. Landed uncrewed due to malfunctioning RCS thrusters. | |||
| 2022<ref name=SFN20211007>{{cite web |url=https://spaceflightnow.com/2021/10/07/nasa-reassigns-two-astronauts-from-boeing-missions-to-spacex-crew-flight |title=NASA swaps two astronauts from Boeing missions to SpaceX crew flight |date=7 October 2021 |access-date=7 October 2021 |first=Stephen |last=Clark |website= Spaceflight Now}}</ref> | |||
| {{plainlist| | | {{plainlist| | ||
* {{Flagicon| |
* {{nowrap|{{Flagicon|United States}} ]}} | ||
* {{Flagicon| |
* {{nowrap|{{Flagicon|United States}} ]}} | ||
* {{Flagicon|USA}} TBA | |||
}} | }} | ||
| {{Partial failure}} | |||
| First crewed test flight of Boeing Starliner. ] was originally scheduled to participate in this flight but was reassigned.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Potter|first=Sean|date=2021-10-06|title=NASA Announces Astronaut Changes for Upcoming Commercial Crew Missions|url=http://www.nasa.gov/press-release/nasa-announces-astronaut-changes-for-upcoming-commercial-crew-missions|access-date=2021-10-06|website=NASA}}</ref> | |||
| 2–4 months | |||
| {{Planned}} | |||
|- | |- | ||
| ] | |||
| ] |
| ] | ||
| {{abbr|TBD|to be determined}}<ref name="CCP 2025 plan">{{Cite web |last=Niles-Carnes |first=Elyna |date=2024-10-15 |title=NASA Updates 2025 Commercial Crew Plan |url=https://blogs.nasa.gov/commercialcrew/2024/10/15/nasa-updates-2025-commercial-crew-plan/ |access-date=2024-10-15 |website=NASA |language=en-US|quote="The timing and configuration of Starliner’s next flight will be determined once a better understanding of Boeing’s path to system certification is established. This determination will include considerations for incorporating Crew Flight Test lessons learned, approvals of final certification products, and operational readiness. NASA is keeping options on the table for how best to achieve system certification. NASA will provide more information when available."}}</ref> | |||
| {{abbr|TBD|to be determined}} | |||
| | | | ||
| S3.2 ♺<br>'']'' | |||
| {{abbr|NET|no earlier than}} March 2023<ref>{{cite web |url=https://blogs.esa.int/exploration/crew-3-target-30-october-launch/ |title=Crew-3 target 30 October launch |work=] |date=1 October 2021 |access-date=7 October 2021 |quote=Following Crew-4, the next US Commercial Crew flights are targeting September 2022 and March 2023 with the specific commercial partner to be determined.}}</ref> | |||
| {{plainlist| | | {{plainlist| | ||
* {{Flagicon| |
* {{nowrap|{{Flagicon|United States}} ]}} | ||
* {{Flagicon| |
* {{nowrap|{{Flagicon|United States}} ]}} | ||
* {{Flagicon| |
* {{nowrap|{{Flagicon|Canada}} ]}} | ||
* {{nowrap|{{Flagicon|Japan}} ]}} | |||
* TBA<ref>{{cite web |title=NASA, Boeing target July 30 for redo of Starliner test flight to ISS |url=https://www.orlandosentinel.com/space/os-bz-nasa-boeing-starliner-test-flight-redo-20210521-vjzkkmprirddrluuy6x532vwea-story.html |website=orlandosentinel.com |access-date=21 May 2021}}</ref> | |||
}} | }} | ||
| First operational flight of Boeing Starliner. Before the partial failure of OFT and the addition of OFT-2 to the schedule this was to be a reflight of the OFT vehicle which was christened ''Calypso'' by mission commander Williams upon its return to Earth.<ref>{{cite tweet|user=Astro_Suni|last1=Williams|first1=Sunita|number=1208780116630876160|date=December 22, 2019|author-link=Sunita Williams|title=A couple of the awesome people who brought ''Calypso'' home! Thank you Steve and Kayva!|website=Twitter|access-date=December 22, 2019}} {{PD-notice}}</ref> ] was originally scheduled to participate in this flight but was reassigned.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Potter|first=Sean|date=2021-10-06|title=NASA Announces Astronaut Changes for Upcoming Commercial Crew Missions|url=http://www.nasa.gov/press-release/nasa-announces-astronaut-changes-for-upcoming-commercial-crew-missions|access-date=2021-10-06|website=NASA}}</ref> | |||
| 6 months | |||
| {{Planned}} | | {{Planned}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Starliner-2 | |||
| {{abbr|TBD|to be determined}} | |||
| Starliner-2 to Starliner-6 | |||
| {{abbr|TBD|to be determined}} | |||
| {{abbr|TBD|to be determined}} | |||
| | | | ||
| {{abbr|TBA|to be announced}} | |||
| Alternating S2 and S3 ♺ | |||
| {{Planned}} | |||
| 2023–2026 | |||
|- | |||
| {{plainlist| | |||
| Starliner-3 | |||
* {{Flagicon|USA}} {{abbr|TBA|to be announced}} | |||
| {{abbr|TBD|to be determined}} | |||
| {{abbr|TBD|to be determined}} | |||
| {{abbr|TBD|to be determined}} | |||
| | |||
}} | |||
| {{abbr|TBA|to be announced}} | |||
| Following Starliner-1, NASA has contracted Boeing for at least five more operational flights to the ISS.<ref>{{cite web|title=NASA Secures Crew Rotation Flights Through 2024|url=https://blogs.nasa.gov/commercialcrew/2017/01/03/nasa-secures-crew-rotation-flights-through-2024/|first=Steven|last=Siceloff|date=January 3, 2017|publisher=NASA}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Boeing Commercial Crew Transportation Capability Contract|url=https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/files/CCtCap_Boeing_508.pdf |publisher=NASA.gov}} {{PD-notice}}</ref> | |||
| 6 months | |||
| {{Planned}} | | {{Planned}} | ||
|} | |} | ||
NASA has only placed firm orders for three Starliner flights once the capsule is certified for operational use. Under the terms of its contract with Boeing it has the option to purchase up to six operational flights, Starliner-1 through Starliner-6, however it is unclear if it will be possible to operate that many missions before the scheduled retirement of the ISS in 2030.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Clark |first=Stephen |date=August 25, 2024 |title=NASA's Starliner decision was the right one, but it's a crushing blow for Boeing |url=https://arstechnica.com/space/2024/08/after-latest-starliner-setback-will-boeing-ever-deliver-on-its-crew-contract/ |access-date=August 26, 2024 |work=] |language=en-us |quote=Tellingly, perhaps, NASA has only placed firm orders with Boeing for three Starliner flights once the agency certifies the spacecraft for operational use.}}</ref> | |||
== Technology partners == | == Technology partners == | ||
{{ |
{{div col}} | ||
* ], reaction control system and retrorockets<ref>{{Cite news |date=December 12, 2019 |title=Aerojet Rocketdyne gears up for first flight of Boeing's Starliner Spacecraft |url=https://www.rocket.com/article/aerojet-rocketdyne-gears-first-flight-boeing%E2%80%99s-starliner-spacecraft |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230506184709/https://www.rocket.com/article/aerojet-rocketdyne-gears-first-flight-boeing%E2%80%99s-starliner-spacecraft |archive-date=May 6, 2023 |access-date=May 6, 2023 |publisher=Aerojet Rocketdyne}}</ref> | |||
* ], for RCS and retrorockets{{clarify|date=July 2021}} | |||
* Airborne Systems, parachutes<ref>{{Cite web |date=May 4, 2012 |title=Boeing Tests Parachute System for CST-100 Spacecraft |url=https://www.nasa.gov/exploration/commercial/crew/boeingdroptest.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230531222513/https://www.nasa.gov/exploration/commercial/crew/boeingdroptest.html |archive-date=May 31, 2023 |access-date=May 6, 2023 |publisher=NASA}}</ref> | |||
* Airborne Systems, for parachutes {{clarify|date=July 2021}} | |||
* ], elements of crew capsule<ref name="bigelow" /> | |||
* ] {{clarify|date=July 2021}} | |||
* ], life support systems<ref>{{Cite news |date=April 8, 2019 |title=Collins Aerospace to provide Earth-like atmosphere on Boeing's new 'space taxi' for NASA |url=https://spaceref.com/press-release/collins-aerospace-to-provide-earth-like-atmosphere-on-boeings-new-space-taxi-for-nasa/ |access-date=May 6, 2023 |work=spaceref.com}}</ref> | |||
* ] {{clarify|date=July 2021}} | |||
* ], spacesuits<ref>{{Cite news |last=Howell |first=Elizabeth |date=April 17, 2024 |title='I really like these suits.' Boeing's snazzy (and flexible) Starliner spacesuits have astronauts buzzing (exclusive) |url=https://www.space.com/boeing-starliner-astronaut-spacesuit-fashion-safety |access-date=June 20, 2024 |language=en}}</ref> | |||
* ] {{clarify|date=July 2021}} | |||
* ], airbags<ref>{{Cite news |date=May 31, 2022 |title=ILC Dover becomes a provider of spacesuits for Boeing's Starliner |url=https://www.spacedaily.com/reports/ILC_Dover_becomes_a_provider_of_spacesuits_for_Boeings_Starliner_999.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230506192634/https://www.spacedaily.com/reports/ILC_Dover_becomes_a_provider_of_spacesuits_for_Boeings_Starliner_999.html |archive-date=May 6, 2023 |access-date=May 6, 2023 |work=spacedaily.com}}</ref> | |||
* Spincraft {{clarify|date=July 2021}} | |||
* ], mobile communications technology<ref>{{Cite news |last=Leon Spencer |date=May 22, 2014 |title=Samsung and Boeing collaborate on mobile tech in space |url=https://www.zdnet.com/article/samsung-and-boeing-collaborate-on-mobile-tech-in-space/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230506184711/https://www.zdnet.com/article/samsung-and-boeing-collaborate-on-mobile-tech-in-space/ |archive-date=May 6, 2023 |access-date=May 6, 2023 |work=]}}</ref> | |||
* Airbags manufactured by ILC Dover | |||
* Spincraft, crew module pressure shell spin-form work<ref>{{Cite news |last=Richardson |first=Mike |date=July 20, 2018 |title=Building a better spaceship |url=https://www.aero-mag.com/boeing-starliner-international-space-station |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230506184716/https://www.aero-mag.com/boeing-starliner-international-space-station |archive-date=May 6, 2023 |access-date=May 6, 2023 |work=Aerospace Manfacturing}}</ref> | |||
{{colend}} | |||
{{div col end}} | |||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
{{Portal|Spaceflight}} | |||
{{div col}} | |||
{{Div col}} | |||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ], a spaceplane under development | |||
* ] | |||
* ], a human-rated spacecraft being developed in ] | |||
* ], human rated capsule type spacecraft | |||
* ], a human-rated spaceplane under development | |||
* ], a human-rated spacecraft being developed in ] | * ], a human-rated spacecraft being developed in ] | ||
* {{annotated link|Orion (spacecraft)}} | |||
* ], human rated, sub-orbital rocket & capsule | |||
* ], human-rated capsule-type spacecraft | |||
* ] | |||
{{ |
{{Div col end}} | ||
== Notes == | == Notes == | ||
Line 319: | Line 363: | ||
{{Reflist|refs= | {{Reflist|refs= | ||
<ref name="sfn20210118">{{ |
<ref name="sfn20210118">{{Cite news |last=Clark |first=Stephen |date=January 18, 2021 |title=Boeing making progress on Starliner software for test flight in March |url=https://spaceflightnow.com/2021/01/18/boeing-making-progress-on-starliner-software-for-test-flight-in-march/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220517123307/https://spaceflightnow.com/2021/01/18/boeing-making-progress-on-starliner-software-for-test-flight-in-march/ |archive-date=May 17, 2022 |access-date=January 18, 2021 |work=Spaceflight Now}}</ref> | ||
<ref name="space20210121">{{ |
<ref name="space20210121">{{Cite news |last=Howell |first=Elizabeth |date=January 21, 2021 |title=Boeing's Starliner spacecraft software passes qualification review for next NASA test flight |url=https://www.space.com/boeing-starliner-software-approved-oft-2-test-flight |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210121204136/https://www.space.com/boeing-starliner-software-approved-oft-2-test-flight |archive-date=January 21, 2021 |access-date=January 21, 2021 |work=]}}</ref> | ||
<ref name=" |
<ref name="starlinerlist-1">{{Cite news |last=Clark |first=Stephen |date=December 22, 2019 |title=Boeing's first commercial crew capsule christened "Calypso" |url=https://spaceflightnow.com/2019/12/22/boeings-first-crew-capsule-christened-calypso/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200309230903/https://spaceflightnow.com/2019/12/22/boeings-first-crew-capsule-christened-calypso/ |archive-date=March 9, 2020 |access-date=March 9, 2020 |work=Spaceflight Now |quote=The Starliner vehicle that landed Sunday in New Mexico, designated Spacecraft 3 Spacecraft 1 was built for Boeing's pad abort test and is not intended to fly in space. she has named the Starliner vehicle that returned Sunday "Calypso" in an ode to the research vessel used by French explorer Jacques Cousteau}}</ref> | ||
<ref name=" |
<ref name="starlinernotebook">{{Cite web |date=2019 |title=Reporter's Starliner Notebook |url=https://www.boeing.com/space/starliner/launch/documents/Starliner_Notebook.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230824233443/https://www.boeing.com/space/starliner/launch/documents/Starliner_Notebook.pdf |archive-date=August 24, 2023 |access-date=March 9, 2020 |publisher=Boeing |page=9 |quote=Spacecraft 1 was used for testing the launch abort system during the program's Pad Abort Test in New Mexico. Spacecraft 2 being prepared to fly the first people on Starliner's Crew Flight Test. Spacecraft 3 slated for the uncrewed Orbital Flight Test...}}</ref> | ||
<ref name="starlinernotebook">{{cite web|title=Reporter's Starliner Notebook|url=https://www.boeing.com/space/starliner/launch/documents/Starliner_Notebook.pdf|publisher=Boeing|access-date=March 9, 2020 |page=9|date=2019|quote=Spacecraft 1 was used for testing the launch abort system during the program's Pad Abort Test in New Mexico. Spacecraft 2 being prepared to fly the first people on Starliner's Crew Flight Test. Spacecraft 3 slated for the uncrewed Orbital Flight Test...}}</ref> | |||
}} | }} | ||
== External links == | == External links == | ||
{{Commons}} | |||
* at Boeing.com | |||
* {{YouTube|Mn_gXEK5XmQ|Boeing/Bigelow Crew Space Transport Vehicle}} by Boeing (2010) | * {{YouTube|Mn_gXEK5XmQ|Boeing/Bigelow Crew Space Transport Vehicle}} by Boeing (2010) | ||
* {{YouTube|6VYIUi9H3vM|Boeing Unveils America's First Space Taxi, Unlocks Possibilities for Future}} by Boeing (2014) | * {{YouTube|6VYIUi9H3vM|Boeing Unveils America's First Space Taxi, Unlocks Possibilities for Future}} by Boeing (2014) | ||
* | * | ||
* | |||
* - the fixed price contract with NASA for the Starliner program | |||
{{Boeing Starliner}} | |||
{{Portal bar|Spaceflight}} | |||
{{Starliner spaceflights}} | |||
{{Crewed spacecraft}} | {{Crewed spacecraft}} | ||
{{ |
{{Crewed ISS flights}} | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | |||
] |
Latest revision as of 15:22, 13 January 2025
Class of partially reusable crew capsules
Boeing Starliner Spacecraft 2 approaching the ISS in May 2022, during Orbital Flight Test 2 | |
Manufacturer | Boeing Defense, Space & Security |
---|---|
Country of origin | United States |
Operator | Boeing Defense, Space & Security |
Applications | ISS crew transport |
Website | boeing |
Specifications | |
Spacecraft type | Capsule |
Payload capacity | To ISS: 4 crew and 100 kg (220 lb) cargo |
Crew capacity | Up to 7 |
Volume | 11 m (390 cu ft) |
Regime | Low Earth orbit |
Design life |
|
Dimensions | |
Length | 5.03 m (16.5 ft) (Capsule and SM) |
Diameter | 4.56 m (15 ft) |
Production | |
Status | Active |
Built | 3 |
Operational | 2 |
Retired | 1 |
Maiden launch | Uncrewed: December 20, 2019 Crewed: June 5, 2024 |
Related spacecraft | |
Launch vehicle | Atlas V N22 |
[REDACTED] | |
Configuration | |
Exploded view of the Starliner A: Crew capsule, B: Service module 1: Nosecone, 2: Parachute compartment cover, 3: Crew access hatch, 4: RCS thrusters for re-entry, 5: Airbags, 6: Heat shield, 7: NASA Docking System, 8: Parachutes, 9: Window, 10: Umbilical, 11: Radiators, 12: "Doghouse" with RCS and OMAC thrusters, 13: Propellant tanks, 14: Roll control thruster, 15: RS-88 engines for launch escape, 16: Solar panels |
The Boeing Starliner (or CST-100) is a spacecraft designed to transport crew to and from the International Space Station (ISS) and other low-Earth-orbit destinations. Developed by Boeing under NASA's Commercial Crew Program (CCP), it consists of a reusable crew capsule and an expendable service module.
Slightly larger than the Apollo command module or SpaceX Crew Dragon, but smaller than the Orion capsule, the Starliner can accommodate a crew of up to seven, though NASA plans to fly no more than four. It can remain docked to the ISS for up to seven months and is launched on an Atlas V N22 rocket from Cape Canaveral Space Launch Complex 41 in Florida.
In 2014, NASA awarded Boeing a US$4.2 billion fixed-price contract to develop and operate Starliner, while SpaceX received $2.6 billion to develop and operate Crew Dragon. By October 2024, Boeing's effort had exceeded its budget by at least $1.85 billion.
Originally planned to be operational in 2017, Starliner has been repeatedly delayed by problems in management and engineering. The first uncrewed Orbital Flight Test in December 2019 was deemed a partial failure, leading to a second Orbital Flight Test in May 2022. During the Crew Flight Test, launched in June 2024, the Starliner's thrusters malfunctioned on approach to the ISS and NASA concluded that it was too risky to return its astronauts to Earth aboard the spacecraft, which landed uncrewed in September 2024.
Background
Further information: Development of the Commercial Crew ProgramAs the Space Shuttle program drew to a close, NASA sought to foster the development of new spaceflight capabilities. Departing from the traditional model of government-owned and operated spacecraft, NASA proposed a revolutionary approach: companies would own and operate spacecraft, while NASA would act as a customer, purchasing flights as needed. To incentivize innovation, NASA offered funding to support the development of these new vehicles. However, unlike previous cost-plus contracts, these new contracts would be fixed-price, placing the financial risk of cost overruns on the companies themselves.
Boeing has an extensive history of developing vehicles for space exploration, having built the first stage (S-IC) of the Saturn V rockets, assembling the Lunar Roving Vehicles, and serving as the prime contractor for the US Orbital Segment of the ISS since 1993. With its proven track record and deep expertise, Boeing was seen as well-positioned to compete for the commercial spaceflight contracts.
In 2010, Boeing unveiled its entry into NASA's Commercial Crew Program competition: the CST-100. The company received initial funding of $18 million in the first round of the Commercial Crew Development (CCDev 1) program to support Starliner's development. Additionally, United Launch Alliance, a joint venture between Boeing and Lockheed Martin, secured $6.7 million to develop the Emergency Detection System to allow its Atlas V rocket to be human-rated to launch Starliner. At the time, Boeing expressed optimism that the Starliner could be operational as early as 2015, contingent upon timely approvals and funding.
In October 2011, NASA announced that the Orbiter Processing Facility-3 at Kennedy Space Center would be leased to Boeing for manufacture and test of Starliner, through a partnership with Space Florida.
Over the next three years, NASA would hold three more rounds of development funding, awarding Boeing $92.3 million under CCDev 2 in 2011, $460 million under the Commercial Crew integrated Capability (CCiCap) program in 2012, and $9.9 million under the Certification Products Contract (CPC) in 2013.
NASA was expected to announce its selection for the lucrative Commercial Crew Transportation Capability (CCtCap) contract in September 2014. Boeing had lobbied NASA for a sole-source contract, arguing that it needed the program's full budget for the successful development of Starliner. Within NASA, there was considerable support for this approach, with many decision-makers expressing confidence in Boeing's capabilities and safety record. In fact, NASA officials had even drafted a justification for selecting Boeing as the sole provider.
While William H. Gerstenmaier, NASA's human exploration lead, had considered the Starliner proposal as stronger, he was hesitant to award a sole-source contract. The multi-year Commercial Crew Program had been designed to foster competition and redundancy, and Gerstenmaier believed that selecting just one company would undermine these goals. Through his efforts, he successfully convinced NASA to delay the CCtCap announcement and secure additional funding to support two competing efforts.
On September 16, 2014, NASA announced that both Boeing and SpaceX would be awarded CCtCap contracts to develop crewed spacecraft. Boeing received a US$4.2 billion to complete and certify the Starliner, while SpaceX received a US$2.6 billion to complete and certify Crew Dragon. To receive the full contract amount, each company would need to successfully complete an abort test, an uncrewed orbital flight test, a crewed orbital flight test, and six crewed missions to the ISS. However, NASA would not need to pay for any failed tests and was only required to purchase two crewed missions to the ISS from each company. Following the initial guaranteed missions, the companies would compete for launch contracts on an ongoing basis.
In November 2015, NASA announced that it had dropped Boeing from consideration in the multibillion-dollar Commercial Resupply Services competition to fly cargo to the International Space Station.
Development
The name CST-100 was first used when the capsule was unveiled to the public in June 2010. The acronym "CST" stands for Crew Space Transportation, while the number "100" represents to the Kármán line, the unofficial boundary of space located at an altitude of 100 kilometers (62 mi) above Earth. The design draws upon Boeing's experience with NASA's Apollo, Space Shuttle, and ISS programs, as well as the Orbital Express project.
The spacecraft consists of a reusable capsule and an expendable service module and is designed for missions to low Earth orbit. The capsule accommodates seven passengers, or a mix of crew and cargo. For NASA missions to the ISS it will carry four passengers and a small amount of cargo. The Starliner capsule uses a weldless, spun-formed structure and is reusable up to ten times with a six-month turnaround time. Boeing plans to alternate between two reusable crew modules for all planned Starliner missions. Each flight uses a new service module, which provides propulsion and power-generation capacity for the spacecraft. Starliner features wireless Internet and tablet technology for crew interfaces.
Starliner uses the NASA Docking System. Boeing modified the Starliner design prior to OFT-2, adding a hinged re-entry cover below its expendable nosecone for additional protection of the docking port during atmospheric entry. This was tested on the OFT-2 mission. By contrast, the reusable SpaceX Dragon 2 nosecone is hinged and protects its docking port during both launch and reentry.
The capsule uses the Boeing Lightweight Ablator for its re-entry heat shield.
Solar cells provided by Boeing subsidiary Spectrolab are installed onto the aft face of the service module, providing 2.9 kW of electricity.
In addition to the capsule and service module, a 5.8 ft (1.78 m) structure called an aeroskirt is integrated into the launch vehicle adapter of Atlas V. The aeroskirt provides aerodynamic stability and dampens the shock waves that come from the front of the rocket.
The spacecraft's propulsion system is produced by Aerojet Rocketdyne and consists of 64 engines:
- 12 × 100 lbf (440 N) MR-104J RCS (reaction control system) thrusters on the capsule, using hydrazine monopropellant and reserved for orienting the capsule during atmospheric re-entry
- 52 on the service module using monomethylhydrazine and nitrogen tetroxide bipropellant:
- 28 × 85 lbf (380 N) RCS thrusters on the service module for attitude control during the majority of the flight
- 20 × 1,500 lbf (6,700 N) OMAC (orbital maneuvering and attitude control) thrusters for altering orbits
- 4 × 40,000 lbf (180,000 N) RS-88 engines for launch escape capability in the event of an abort
The RCS and OMAC thrusters on the service module are grouped into four "doghouses" equally spaced around the perimeter of the service module, each containing five OMAC thrusters (three aft-facing and two forward-facing), and seven RCS thrusters: two aft-facing, two forward-facing, and one each in the radial and two tangential directions. The latter three are in a plane which is very close to the spacecraft's center of mass.
To translate the spacecraft, thrusters are used in balanced pairs so that the center of force goes through the spacecraft's center of mass. To rotate the spacecraft, thrusters are used in unbalanced pairs so there is no net force and the net torque is centered within the spacecraft. The RCS thrusters are used for rotation (attitude control) and very fine docking maneuvers, while the OMAC thrusters are used for significant orbital adjustments. The RCS thrusters are also used to compensate for slight imbalances in the OMAC thrusters.
Boeing designed the capsule to make ground landings instead of a splashdown, a first for a crewed capsule mission launched from the United States. After reentering the atmosphere, three parachutes will be deployed, slowing the capsule to approximately 4 miles per hour (350 ft/min; 1.8 m/s). Before reaching the ground, six airbags will deploy to cushion the landing. There are four primary landing locations, including two sites inside the White Sands Missile Range in New Mexico, the Willcox Playa in Arizona and the Dugway Proving Ground in Utah. Edwards Air Force Base in California serves as a contingency landing location. All of the landing sites are in the Western United States, allowing the service module to be jettisoned for a destructive reentry over the Pacific Ocean. Boeing says that between all five landing sites, there will be around 450 landing opportunities each year.
Following the award of the Commercial Crew Transportation Capability (CCtCap) contract in 2014, NASA assigned a team of four experienced astronauts, Bob Behnken, Eric Boe, Doug Hurley and Sunita Williams, to serve as consultants to engineers at both Boeing and SpaceX. These astronauts were also slated to be the test pilots on the inaugural missions. Hurley recounted a stark contrast in the working relationships between the astronauts and the engineers at the two companies. While the SpaceX engineers were receptive to feedback, enthusiastic about collaborating, and attentive to suggestions, Hurley found the Boeing engineers to be indifferent, arrogant, and overconfident. He also said the Boeing team failed to inform the astronauts about the propellant leak that occurred during the Pad Abort Test. Ultimately, Hurley told the chief of the astronaut office that he would not fly on Starliner. Hurley and Behnken would later go on to command the Crew Dragon's historic Demo-2 mission, the first crewed flight of the spacecraft. Williams would fly into space on the Boeing Crew Flight Test, but would return to Earth on a Crew Dragon, after thrusters malfunctioned on the Starliner.
Despite being initially awarded significantly more funding, Boeing has faced substantial budget overruns for the Starliner program, exceeding $1.85 billion as of October 2024.
In November 2019, NASA's Office of Inspector General released a report revealing that a change to Boeing's contract had occurred in 2016, stating: "For Boeing's third through sixth crewed missions, we found that NASA agreed to pay an additional $287.2 million above Boeing's fixed prices to mitigate a perceived 18-month gap in ISS flights anticipated in 2019 and to ensure the contractor continued as a second commercial crew provider", and NASA and Boeing committed to six missions instead of the last four being optional.
In August 2024, after the setbacks experienced during the Crew Flight Test, NASA Administrator Bill Nelson stated that Boeing CEO Kelly Ortberg committed to continuing the Starliner program. However, financial analysts expressed skepticism that Boeing would continue to invest in a money-losing program and in October The Wall Street Journal reported that Boeing was exploring a sale of some of its space division programs, including Starliner. As of January 2025 NASA and Boeing have not announced plans for the next flight.
Testing
Various validation tests began on test articles in 2011 and continued on actual spacecraft starting in 2019.
Abort and drop tests
Main article: Boeing Pad Abort TestIn September 2011, Boeing announced the completion of a set of ground drop tests to validate the design of the airbag cushioning system. The airbags are located underneath the heat shield of the Starliner, which is designed to be separated from the capsule while under parachute descent at about 5,000 ft (1,500 m) altitude. The airbags, manufactured by ILC Dover, are deployed by filling with a mixture of compressed nitrogen and oxygen gas, not with the pyro-explosive mixture sometimes used in automotive airbags. The tests were carried out in the Mojave Desert of southeast California, at ground speeds between 10 and 30 mph (16 and 48 km/h) in order to simulate crosswind conditions at the time of landing. Bigelow Aerospace built the mobile test rig and conducted the tests.
In April 2012, Boeing dropped a mock-up of its Starliner over the Nevada desert at the Delamar Dry Lake, Nevada, successfully testing the craft's three main landing parachutes from 11,200 ft (3,400 m).
Boeing reported in May 2016 that its test schedule would slip by eight months in order to reduce the mass of the spacecraft, address aerodynamics issues anticipated during launch and ascent on the Atlas V rocket, and meet new NASA-imposed software requirements. The Orbital Flight Test was scheduled for spring 2019. The booster for this Orbital Flight Test, an Atlas V N22 rocket, was assembled at United Launch Alliance's (ULA) facility at Decatur, Alabama by the end of 2017. The first crewed flight (Boe-CFT) was scheduled for summer 2019, pending test results from Boe-OFT. It was planned to last 14 days and carry one NASA astronaut and one Boeing test pilot to the ISS. On April 5, 2018, NASA announced that the first planned two-person flight, originally slated for November 2018, was likely to occur in 2019 or 2020.
A serious incident occurred during a hot-fire test in June 2018. A design flaw in the propellant system left four of eight valves open, leading to the release of over 4,000 pounds (1,800 kg) of toxic monomethylhydrazine propellant, resulting in a fireball that engulfed the equipment. The incident was reportedly exacerbated by animosity with the propulsion system subcontractor, Aerojet Rocketdyne, who Boeing refused to pay for design changes. While it informed NASA of the incident, Boeing attempted to keep the incident quiet, even withholding information from the astronauts involved in the project.
In October 2018, the first unpiloted orbital mission was delayed to April 2019, and the first crew launch was rescheduled to August 2019. In March 2019, Reuters reported that these test flights had been delayed by at least three months, and in April 2019 Boeing announced that the unpiloted orbital mission was scheduled for August 2019.
In May 2019, all major hot-fire testing, including simulations of low-altitude abort-thruster testing, was completed using a full up-to-service module test article that was "flight-like," meaning that the service module test rig used in the hot-fire testing included fuel and helium tanks, reaction control system, orbital maneuvering, and attitude-control thrusters, launch abort engines and all necessary fuel lines and avionics that will be used for crewed missions. This cleared the way for the pad abort test and the subsequent uncrewed and crewed flights.
A pad abort test took place on November 4, 2019. The capsule accelerated away from its pad, but then one of the three parachutes failed to deploy, and the capsule landed with only two parachutes. Landing was, however, deemed safe, and the test a success. Boeing did not expect the malfunction of one parachute to affect the Starliner development schedule.
First orbital flight test (uncrewed)
Main article: Boeing Orbital Flight Test "Rosie the Rocketeer" redirects here. Not to be confused with Rosie the Rocketer or Rosie the Riveter.The uncrewed Boeing Orbital Flight Test (OFT) launched on December 20, 2019, bearing an Anthropomorphic Test Device nicknamed "Rosie the Rocketeer" and clothed in Boeing's blue IVA spacesuit as well as a Plush toy of Jedediah Kerman from Kerbal Space Program. It landed two days later, having nearly ended in catastrophic failure. The mission was ultimately declared a partial failure.
After launch, the spacecraft captured a "mission elapsed time" from its Atlas V launch vehicle that was 11 hours off. Consequently, when the spacecraft separated from the rocket, instead of briefly firing its reaction control thrusters to enter orbit, its computers commanded them to fire for far longer, consuming so much fuel that the spacecraft no longer had enough to dock with the ISS. As the capsule was prepared for re-entry, another software error was discovered; it could have caused a catastrophic collision between the service module and crew capsule.
The spacecraft landed at White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico, two days after launch. After its landing, NASA astronaut Sunita Williams named the spacecraft Calypso after the research vessel RV Calypso used by oceanographic researcher Jacques Cousteau.
After the mission, Boeing vice president John Mulholland acknowledged that the company had not conducted integrated end-to-end tests for the entire mission, but had instead performed tests of smaller segments. This approach contributed to the software errors that led to the near-catastrophic failures during the flight test. Mulholland insisted that Boeing cut no corners, and that end-to-end tests were not omitted to save money. NASA was also faulted for not pressing Boeing to conduct an end-to-end test.
The subsequent NASA–Boeing investigation into the flight made scores of recommendations for Boeing and NASA. Boeing declared these to be proprietary, so the only ones publicly known are the ones that officials deliberately disclosed. In 2020, company officials said they were addressing 80 of the recommendations.
Second orbital flight test (uncrewed)
Main article: Boeing Orbital Flight Test 2Because the first OFT did not achieve its objectives, Boeing officials said on April 6, 2020 that the Starliner crew capsule would fly a second uncrewed demonstration mission, Boeing Orbital Flight Test 2 (OFT-2), before flying astronauts. NASA said that it had accepted a recommendation from Boeing to fly a second unpiloted mission. The Washington Post reported that the second orbital flight test, with much the same objectives as the first, was expected to launch from Cape Canaveral "sometime in October or November 2020". Boeing said that it would fund the unplanned crew capsule test flight "at no cost to the taxpayer". Boeing told investors earlier in 2020 that it was taking a US$410 million charge against its earnings to cover the expected costs of a second unpiloted test flight. Boeing officials said on August 25, 2020 that they set the stage for the first Starliner demonstration mission with astronauts in mid-2021. Boeing modified the design of the Starliner docking system prior to OFT-2 to add a re-entry cover for additional protection during the capsule's fiery descent through the atmosphere. This re-entry cover is hinged, like the SpaceX design. Teams also installed the OFT-2 spacecraft's propellant heater, thermal-protection tiles, and the airbags used to cushion the capsule's landing. The crew module for the OFT-2 mission began acceptance testing in August 2020, which is designed to validate the spacecraft's systems before it is mated with its service module, according to NASA. On November 10, 2020, NASA's Commercial Crew Program manager Steve Stich said that the second orbital flight test would be delayed until first quarter 2021 due to software issues. The uncrewed test continued to slip, with the OFT-2 uncrewed test flight being scheduled for March 2021 and the crewed flight targeted for a launch the following summer. The launch date of OFT-2 moved again with the earliest estimated launch date set for August 2021.
During the August 2021 launch window some issues were detected with 13 propulsion-system valves in the spacecraft prior to launch. The spacecraft had already been mated to its launch rocket, United Launch Alliance's (ULA) Atlas V, and taken to the launchpad. Attempts to fix the problem while on the launchpad failed, and the rocket was returned to the ULA's VIF (Vertical Integration Facility). Attempts to fix the problem at the VIF also failed, and Boeing decided to return the spacecraft to the factory, thus cancelling the launch at that launch window. There was a commercial dispute between Boeing and Aerojet Rocketdyne over responsibility for fixing the problem. The valves had been corroded by intrusion of moisture, which interacted with the propellant, but the source of the moisture was not apparent. By late September 2021, Boeing had not determined the root cause of the problem, and the flight was delayed indefinitely. Through October 2021, NASA and Boeing continued to make progress and were "working toward launch opportunities in the first half of 2022", In December 2021, Boeing decided to replace the entire service module and anticipated OFT-2 to occur in May 2022.
The OFT-2 mission launched on May 19, 2022. It again carried Rosie the Rocketeer test dummy suited in the blue Boeing inflight spacesuit. Two Orbital Maneuvering and Attitude Control (OMAC) thrusters failed during the orbital insertion burn, but the spacecraft was able to compensate using the remaining OMAC thrusters with the addition of the Reaction Control System (RCS) thrusters. A couple of RCS thrusters used to maneuver Starliner also failed during docking due to low chamber pressure. Some thermal systems used to cool the spacecraft showed extra cold temperatures, requiring engineers to manage it during the docking.
On May 22, 2022, the capsule docked with the International Space Station. On May 25, 2022, the capsule returned from space and landed successfully. During reentry one of the navigation systems dropped communication with the GPS satellites, but Steve Stich, program manager for NASA's Commercial Crew Program, said this is not unexpected during reentry.
Third orbital flight test (crewed)
Main article: Boeing Crew Flight TestThe Starliner's crewed flight test was originally planned as the capsule's final test before entering regular service. This test would have involved launching two astronauts into orbit, docking with the International Space Station for approximately a week, and conducting additional tests while ground crews reviewed data from the launch and docking. Following a review and approval of this data, the capsule would have undocked and returned to Earth for a landing in the American Southwest about eight days later. However, the capsule's thrusters malfunctioned as Starliner docked with the ISS, and despite months of testing, NASA felt it was not able to understand why the thrusters malfunctioned and decided that it was too risky to return its astronauts to Earth aboard Starliner, so it returned uncrewed.
Originally planned for 2017, the launch faced numerous delays, including issues with the parachute harness and flammable tape on wiring. These delays pushed the launch back to mid-2024.
A launch attempt on May 6, 2024, was scrubbed due to an oxygen valve problem on the rocket. Subsequently, a helium leak in the service module further delayed the mission. Another attempt on June 1 was scrubbed due to a ground computer hardware fault. Starliner successfully launched on June 5 at 14:52 UTC (10:52 am EDT).
Once in orbit and on approach to the ISS during this flight test, both the automated systems and astronauts taking manual control during the docking sequence were instructed to repeatedly fire the RCS thrusters. This stress testing revealed performance degradation in the thrusters, leading the spacecraft software to consider five of them damaged and unusable, and five separate helium leaks were detected in the service module. The five failed thrusters were all aft-facing, resulting in a loss of six degrees of freedom attitude control until four of them were restored. The astronauts were able to safely dock the capsule to the ISS.
A joint NASA–Boeing team spent weeks trying to understand what caused the thrusters to malfunction, conducting ground tests at the White Sands Missile Range in New Mexico on the Aerojet Rocketdyne thruster that was planned to be used on a future Starliner mission, and working with the astronauts to replicate their testing in space. During these tests, the ground team was able to replicate the thrust degradation, and tied it back to a Teflon seal had been deformed by a buildup of heat. However, when these tests were conducted on the Starliner in orbit, the problem was not replicated.
Ultimately, NASA felt it was not able to understand why the thrusters malfunctioned and decided that it was too risky to return its astronauts to Earth aboard Starliner, which will attempt to return uncrewed. Boeing, for its part, has expressed confidence in Starliner and believes there is flight rationale for returning the spacecraft to Earth with the astronauts aboard.
Starliner landed safely in the White Sands Missile Range in New Mexico on 7 September at 04:01:35 UTC (6 September, 11:01:35 pm MDT, local time at the landing site), about six hours after it undocked from the ISS. Starliner experienced two new technical problems unrelated to its earlier issues during the reentry. There was a brief glitch in Starliner's navigation system, and one of the 12 thrusters used to orient the capsule during atmospheric re-entry failed to ignite.
NASA says that it will review all mission-related data to inform what additional actions are required to meet its certification requirements. NASA Administrator Bill Nelson has stated that Boeing CEO Kelly Ortberg has committed to continuing the Starliner program despite the setback.
Boeing officials were scheduled to participate in a post-landing news conference, but they abruptly canceled at the last minute without providing a reason. After NASA decided to end the Starliner test flight without a crew on board, the company refused to answer questions from journalists, instead opting to release only brief statements.
Commercial use
Under the CCP, Boeing owns and operates the Starliner capsules, allowing the company to offer non-CCP commercial flights if they do not interfere with NASA missions. While SpaceX has secured private commercial flights, Boeing has yet to do so.
The CCP agreement permits Boeing to sell seats for space tourists on ISS flights. While initially proposed, the extended length of typical ISS missions makes this unlikely.
In October 2021, Blue Origin, Boeing, and Sierra Nevada Corporation announced plans for a commercial space station called Orbital Reef. This "mixed-use business park" could be serviced by both Starliner and Sierra Nevada's Dream Chaser spacecraft.
Launch vehicle
Starliner was designed to be compatible with multiple launch vehicles, including the Atlas V, Delta IV, Falcon 9, and Vulcan Centaur.
For the three completed test flights and up to six further missions, Starliner is expected to fly atop the Atlas V. However, United Launch Alliance, the operator of the Atlas V, ceased production of the rocket in 2024 after producing vehicles for all remaining contracted launches. The vehicles have been allocated to customers, including the six needed for the remaining Starliner flights.
The Starliner faces an uncertain future after that. Delta IV is retired and no more are available, the Falcon 9 is owned by crewed launch competitor SpaceX, and the Vulcan Centaur has not yet been human-rated, testing Boeing would have to pay for.
Configuration
For Starliner launches, ULA uses the Atlas N22 configuration. All other Atlas V launches use a payload fairing and the single-engine version of the Centaur upper stage. N22 is configured with no payload fairing, two solid rocket boosters (SRBs), and a Dual Engine Centaur second stage. Starliner is the only crewed payload for Atlas V.
While most Atlas V launches since 2021 have used the newer Northrop Grumman GEM63 SRBs, these boosters are not rated for human spaceflight. Therefore, crewed missions employ the older Aerojet Rocketdyne AJ-60A SRBs.
Although the Dual Engine Centaur had not been used since 2000 after the introduction of the more powerful Atlas V, it was brought back into service for Starliner missions. Two engines allow the rocket to fly a gentler and flatter trajectory to minimize the G-forces experienced by the astronauts and ensures the capsule can abort at any time, returning the crew to Earth in case of a problem.
Launch profile
After passing through the stages of max q, SRB jettison, booster separation, Centaur ignition, nosecone and aeroskirt jettison, it releases the Starliner spacecraft at stage separation, nearly 15 minutes after lift-off on a 112 mi × 45 mi-high (181 km × 72 km) suborbital trajectory, just below the orbital velocity needed to enter a stable orbit around Earth. After separating from the Dual Engine Centaur, the Starliner's own thrusters, mounted on its service module, boost the spacecraft into orbit to continue its journey to the International Space Station.
The suborbital trajectory is unusual for a satellite launch, but it is similar to the technique used by the Space Shuttle and Space Launch System. It ensures that, if the spacecraft fails to make the orbital insertion burn, it will re-enter the atmosphere in a controlled way. The Starliner's orbit insertion burn begins about 31 minutes into the mission and lasts 45 seconds.
List of spacecraft
As of January 2020, Boeing planned to have three Boeing Starliner spacecraft in service to fulfill the needs of the Commercial Crew Program with each spacecraft expected to be capable of being reused up to ten times with a six-month refurbishment time. On August 25, 2020, Boeing announced it would alternate between just two capsules for all planned Starliner missions instead of three.
S/N | Name | Type | Status | Flights | Flight time | Total flight time | Notes | Cat. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S1 | None | Prototype | Retired | 1 | 1m 19s (PAT) | 1m 19s | Prototype used only for pad abort test. | [REDACTED] |
S2 | TBA | Crew | Active | 1 | 5d 23h 54m (OFT-2) | 5d 23h 54m | Completed the OFT-2 flight. | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] |
S3 | Calypso | Crew | Active | 2 | 95d 14h 31m | Named after Jacques Cousteau's ship RV Calypso. First Starliner to orbit during OFT, first to carry crew to space during CFT. | [REDACTED] [REDACTED] |
List of flights
List includes only completed or currently manifested missions. Dates are listed in UTC, and for future events, they are the earliest possible opportunities (also known as NET dates) and may change.
Mission and Patch | Capsule | Launch date | Landing date | Remarks | Crew | Outcome |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pad Abort Test (patch) |
S1 | November 4, 2019 | Simulating an escape from a failing rocket, Starliner's RS-88 engines lifted the capsule from a pad at White Sands. Only two of three parachutes opened, but was declared a success. | — | Success | |
Orbital Flight Test (patch) |
S3.1 Calypso |
December 19, 2019 | December 22, 2019 | First uncrewed orbital flight test. Orbited but failed to rendezvous with ISS. Landed successfully. | — | Partial failure |
Orbital Flight Test 2 (patch) |
S2.1 | May 19, 2022 | May 25, 2022 | Second uncrewed orbital flight test. Experienced OMAC and RCS thruster malfunctions, but successfully docked to ISS. | — | Success |
Crew Flight Test (patch) |
S3.2 Calypso |
June 5, 2024 | September 7, 2024 | Crewed flight test to ISS. Landed uncrewed due to malfunctioning RCS thrusters. | Partial failure | |
Starliner-1 | S2.2 | TBD | TBD | Planned | ||
Starliner-2 | TBD | TBD | TBD | TBA | Planned | |
Starliner-3 | TBD | TBD | TBD | TBA | Planned |
NASA has only placed firm orders for three Starliner flights once the capsule is certified for operational use. Under the terms of its contract with Boeing it has the option to purchase up to six operational flights, Starliner-1 through Starliner-6, however it is unclear if it will be possible to operate that many missions before the scheduled retirement of the ISS in 2030.
Technology partners
- Aerojet Rocketdyne, reaction control system and retrorockets
- Airborne Systems, parachutes
- Bigelow Aerospace, elements of crew capsule
- Collins Aerospace, life support systems
- David Clark Company, spacesuits
- ILC Dover, airbags
- Samsung, mobile communications technology
- Spincraft, crew module pressure shell spin-form work
See also
- List of crewed spacecraft
- Dream Chaser, a spaceplane under development
- Mengzhou, a human-rated spacecraft being developed in China
- Orel, a human-rated spacecraft being developed in Russia
- Orion (spacecraft) – American crewed spacecraft for the Artemis program
- SpaceX Dragon 2, human-rated capsule-type spacecraft
Notes
- The first piloted Boeing Crew Flight Test mission carries 2 crew plus 344 kg (758 lb) of cargo.
- N22 designates that the Atlas V has no payload fairing, two solid rocket boosters, and two Centaur second-stage engines.
- CST is an initialism for Crew Space Transportation.
References
- Reiley, Keith; Burghardt, Michael; Wood, Michael; Ingham, Jay; Lembeck, Michael (2011). "Design Considerations for a Commercial Crew Transportation System" (PDF). AIAA SPACE 2011 Conference & Exposition. AIAA SPACE 2011 Conference & Exposition. September 27–29, 2011. Long Beach, California. doi:10.2514/6.2011-7101. ISBN 978-1-60086-953-2. Archived from the original (PDF) on May 1, 2013. Retrieved May 9, 2014.
- Carreau, Mark (July 24, 2013). "Boeing Refines CST-100 Commercial Crew Capsule Approach". Aviation Week. Archived from the original on May 12, 2014. Retrieved May 8, 2014.
- "Commercial Crew Program Press it" (PDF). NASA. October 1, 2015. Archived (PDF) from the original on March 26, 2024. Retrieved March 28, 2024.
- "Packing Starliner cargo is a balancing act". Boeing. February 28, 2024. Archived from the original on March 28, 2024. Retrieved March 28, 2024.
- Krebs, Gunther (April 2017). "Starliner (CST-100)". Gunther's Space Page. Archived from the original on May 3, 2017. Retrieved April 11, 2017.
- ^ Burghardt, Mike (August 2011). "Boeing CST-100: Commercial Crew Transportation System" (PDF). Boeing. Archived from the original (PDF) on May 1, 2013. Retrieved May 8, 2014.
- Adam Mann (October 25, 2021). "The Boeing Company: From rockets to commercial crew". Space.com. Retrieved August 24, 2024.
- Weiss, Stanley I. (May 31, 2019). "Boeing Company". SpaceNext50 | Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved August 24, 2024.
- ^ "NASA Selects Commercial Firms to Begin Development of Crew Transportation Concepts and Technology Demonstrations for Human Spaceflight Using Recovery Act Funds". press release (Press release). NASA. February 1, 2010. Archived from the original on February 3, 2010. Retrieved June 9, 2012.
- ^ Clark, Stephen (July 21, 2010). "Boeing space capsule could be operational by 2015". Spaceflight Now. Archived from the original on June 22, 2018. Retrieved September 18, 2011.
- Weaver, David; Curie, Michael; Philman, Amber; Lange, Tina; Korn, Paula (October 31, 2011). "NASA Signs Agreement with Space Florida to Reuse Kennedy Facilities" (Press release). NASA. Archived from the original on August 13, 2020. Retrieved November 1, 2011. This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
- "NASA Awards Next Set Of Commercial Crew Development Agreements" (Press release). NASA. April 18, 2011. Archived from the original on November 10, 2018. Retrieved June 9, 2012.
- "NASA Announces Next Steps in Effort to Launch Americans from U.S. Soil" (Press release). NASA. August 3, 2012. Archived from the original on August 5, 2012. Retrieved August 3, 2012.
- "NASA Awards Contracts In Next Step Toward Safely Launching American Astronauts From U.S. Soil" (Press release). NASA. December 10, 2012. Archived from the original on October 21, 2020. Retrieved December 11, 2012.
- ^ Berger, Eric (2024). Reentry: SpaceX, Elon Musk, and the Reusable Rockets that Launched a Second Space Age. BenBella Books. pp. 270–275. ISBN 978-1637745274.
- Norris, Guy (October 11, 2014). "Why NASA Rejected Sierra Nevada's Commercial Crew Vehicle". Aviation Week. Archived from the original on October 13, 2014. Retrieved October 13, 2014.
- ^ Gerstenmaier, William H. (September 15, 2014). "Source Selection Statement for Commercial Crew Transportation Capability Contract" (PDF). NASA. Retrieved August 24, 2024.
- Schierholz, Stephanie; Martin, Stephanie (September 16, 2014). "NASA Chooses American Companies to Transport U.S. Astronauts to International Space Station". NASA. Archived from the original on June 9, 2016. Retrieved September 18, 2014. This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
- Rhian, Jason (November 6, 2015). "NASA delays CRS 2 awards again, drops Boeing from consideration". Spaceflight Insider. Archived from the original on November 22, 2015. Retrieved November 21, 2015.
- ^ Gedmark, John; Gold, Mike (June 16, 2010). "Bigelow Aerospace Joins the Commercial Spaceflight Federation" (Press release). Commercial Spaceflight Federation. Archived from the original on September 25, 2017. Retrieved May 9, 2014.
- "Commercial Crew Spacecraft". NASA. July 28, 2023. Retrieved December 25, 2024.
- "A 21st Century Space Capsule". Boeing. Archived from the original on December 15, 2011. Retrieved August 29, 2020.
- Grondin, Yves-A. (August 5, 2013). "NASA Outlines its Plans for Commercial Crew Certification". NASASpaceFlight.com. Archived from the original on October 5, 2017. Retrieved January 9, 2014.
- Commercial Space Flight Panel. youtube.com. SpaceUp Houston. 2011. Archived from the original on December 21, 2021.
- Messier, Doug (March 23, 2011). "Update on Boeing CST-100 Crew program". Parabolic Arc. Archived from the original on September 25, 2017. Retrieved March 27, 2011.
- ^ Clark, Stephen (August 25, 2020). "Boeing plans second Starliner test flight in December 2020 or January 2021". Spaceflight Now. Archived from the original on May 17, 2022. Retrieved August 26, 2020.
- ^ Clark, Stephen (January 18, 2021). "Boeing making progress on Starliner software for test flight in March". Spaceflight Now. Archived from the original on May 17, 2022. Retrieved January 18, 2021.
- ^ Howell, Elizabeth (January 21, 2021). "Boeing's Starliner spacecraft software passes qualification review for next NASA test flight". Space.com. Archived from the original on January 21, 2021. Retrieved January 21, 2021.
- Latrell, Joe (July 28, 2015). "Boeing's CST-100 takes shape at former NASA facility". Spaceflight Insider. Archived from the original on April 30, 2023. Retrieved August 3, 2018.
- "Spectrolab Solar Cells to Power Boeing's Starliner Spacecraft". November 17, 2016. Archived from the original on August 5, 2018. Retrieved August 5, 2018.
- Mike Wall (December 19, 2019). "Boeing's Starliner Atlas V Rocket Ride Is Wearing a 'Skirt' for Launch. Here's Why". Space.com. Archived from the original on April 3, 2023. Retrieved April 2, 2023.
- "Aerojet Rocketdyne Ships Starliner Re-entry Thrusters" (Press release). Aerojet Rocketdyne. March 15, 2018. Retrieved August 26, 2024.
- Weitering, Hanneke (April 24, 2019). "The Emergency Launch Abort Systems of SpaceX and Boeing Explained". Space.com. Archived from the original on May 25, 2020. Retrieved February 6, 2020.
- "Starliner Crew Flight Test: Reporter's Notebook" (PDF). Boeing. December 19, 2023. p. 3.
- Starliner doghouse, cover removed (Photograph). Wired (magazine).
- "NASA's Boeing Crew Flight Test Mission Overview". NASA. Archived from the original on June 1, 2024. Retrieved June 1, 2024.
- Clark, Stephen (September 22, 2015). "Boeing identifies CST-100 prime landing sites". Spaceflight Now. Archived from the original on August 5, 2018. Retrieved August 5, 2018.
- "NASA assigns 4 astronauts to commercial Boeing, SpaceX test flights". collectSPACE. July 9, 2015. Retrieved August 24, 2024.
- Berger, Eric (2024). Reentry: SpaceX, Elon Musk, and the Reusable Rockets that Launched a Second Space Age. BenBella Books. pp. 293–296. ISBN 978-1637745274.
- ^ Johnsson, Julie (August 25, 2024). "New Boeing CEO Faces Hard Choices After NASA Snubs Starliner for SpaceX". Bloomberg. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
- Foust, Jeff (October 24, 2024). "Boeing losses on Starliner increase by $250 million". SpaceNews. Retrieved October 25, 2024.
- Foust, Jeff (November 14, 2019). "NASA inspector general criticizes additional Boeing commercial crew payments". SpaceNews. Archived from the original on June 6, 2024. Retrieved October 28, 2021.
- "NASA's Management of Crew Transportation to the International Space Station" (PDF). OIG.NASA.gov. November 14, 2019. Archived (PDF) from the original on October 23, 2021. Retrieved October 28, 2021.
- ^ Roulette, Joey (August 24, 2024). "SpaceX to return Boeing's Starliner astronauts from space next year, NASA says". Reuters. Retrieved August 24, 2024.
- Terlep, Sharon; Maidenberg, Micah (October 25, 2024). "Boeing Explores Sale of Space Business". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved October 25, 2024.
The beleaguered company is exploring a sale of its storied NASA business, including the troubled Starliner space vehicle and operations that support the International Space Station, according to people familiar with the matter.
- ^ Niles-Carnes, Elyna (October 15, 2024). "NASA Updates 2025 Commercial Crew Plan". NASA. Retrieved October 15, 2024.
The timing and configuration of Starliner's next flight will be determined once a better understanding of Boeing's path to system certification is established. This determination will include considerations for incorporating Crew Flight Test lessons learned, approvals of final certification products, and operational readiness. NASA is keeping options on the table for how best to achieve system certification. NASA will provide more information when available.
- Memi, Edmund G. (September 12, 2011). "Space capsule tests aim to ensure safe landings". Boeing. Archived from the original on September 24, 2011. Retrieved September 18, 2011.
- Clark, Stephen (April 3, 2012). "Parachutes for Boeing crew capsule tested over Nevada". Spaceflight Now. Archived from the original on April 6, 2012. Retrieved April 3, 2012.
- Foust, Jeff (May 12, 2016). "Boeing delays first crewed CST-100 flight to 2018". SpaceNews. Archived from the original on June 6, 2024. Retrieved May 14, 2016.
- Rhian, Jason (January 4, 2018). "Boeing CST-100 Starliner one step closer to flight with completion of DCR". Spaceflight Insider. Archived from the original on April 8, 2018. Retrieved April 8, 2018.
- Bergin, Chris (November 27, 2017). "Boeing Starliner trio preparing for test flights". NASASpaceFlight.com. Archived from the original on February 9, 2018. Retrieved April 8, 2018.
- Pasztor, Andy (April 5, 2018). "NASA, Boeing Signal Regular Missions to Space Station to Be Delayed". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on April 6, 2018. Retrieved April 8, 2018.
- ^ Berger, Eric (May 6, 2024). "The surprise is not that Boeing lost commercial crew but that it finished at all". Ars Technica. Retrieved August 26, 2024.
- "NASA's Commercial Crew Program Target Test Flight Dates". October 4, 2018. Archived from the original on October 6, 2018. Retrieved October 5, 2018. This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
- "Commercial Crew Program – February 6, 2019". blogs.nasa.gov. February 6, 2019. Archived from the original on March 2, 2019. Retrieved February 6, 2019. This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
- Eric M. Johnson (March 20, 2019). "Boeing delays by months test flights for U.S. human space program: sources". Reuters. Archived from the original on June 2, 2023. Retrieved March 22, 2019.
- Clark, Stephen (April 2, 2019). "Boeing delays first Starliner test flight to August, NASA extends duration of first crew mission". Spaceflight Now. Archived from the original on June 8, 2023. Retrieved April 3, 2019.
- Clark, Stephen (May 25, 2019). "Boeing's Starliner crew capsule completes major propulsion test". Spaceflight Now. Archived from the original on April 25, 2023. Retrieved May 30, 2019.
- Clark, Stephen. "Boeing tests crew capsule escape system". Spaceflight Now. Archived from the original on December 14, 2019. Retrieved November 4, 2019.
- Berger, Eric (November 4, 2019). "Starliner flies for the first time, but one of its parachutes failed to deploy". Ars Technica. Archived from the original on December 10, 2019. Retrieved November 5, 2019.
- "Boeing statement regarding CST-100 Starliner pad abort test" (Press release). Boeing. November 4, 2019. Archived from the original on November 4, 2019. Retrieved November 4, 2019.
- Clark, Stephen (November 4, 2019). "Boeing tests crew capsule escape system". Spaceflight Now. Archived from the original on December 14, 2019. Retrieved August 29, 2020.
- Rachael Joy (November 21, 2019). "Remember Rosie the Riveter? Meet Rosie the Rocketeer". Florida Today. Archived from the original on December 21, 2019. Retrieved May 26, 2022.
- Robert Z. Pearlman (May 21, 2022). "Video game character becomes real 'Kerbalnaut' on Boeing Starliner". Space.com. Retrieved October 2, 2024.
- Foust, Jeff (December 20, 2019). "Starliner suffers "off-nominal" orbital insertion after launch". SpaceNews. Archived from the original on June 6, 2024. Retrieved December 20, 2019.
- Sheetz, Michael (December 20, 2019). "Boeing Starliner fails mission, can't reach space station after flying into wrong orbit". CNBC. Archived from the original on February 8, 2021. Retrieved December 20, 2019.
- Harwood, William (February 7, 2020). "NASA, Boeing managers admit problems with Starliner software verification". Spaceflight Now. Archived from the original on May 31, 2023. Retrieved August 29, 2020.
- Amos, Jonathan (December 20, 2019). "Boeing astronaut ship stalls in orbit". BBC News. Archived from the original on January 17, 2023. Retrieved December 20, 2019.
- Lewis, Marie (December 22, 2019). "Tune in for Starliner Postlanding News Conference". NASA Commercial Crew Program. Archived from the original on May 29, 2023. Retrieved December 22, 2019. This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
- "NASA and Boeing Complete Orbital Flight Test Reviews". NASA. July 7, 2020. Archived from the original on March 27, 2023. Retrieved August 29, 2020. This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
- Clark, Stephen (April 7, 2020). "After problem-plagued test flight, Boeing will refly crew capsule without astronauts". Spaceflight Now. Archived from the original on May 25, 2020. Retrieved August 29, 2020.
- Malik, Tariq (November 11, 2020). "NASA says Boeing's next Starliner test flight won't launch until 2021". Space.com. Archived from the original on November 13, 2020. Retrieved November 16, 2020.
- "NASA and Boeing Target New Launch Date for Next Starliner Flight Test". Boeing. December 9, 2020. Archived from the original on May 17, 2022. Retrieved December 9, 2020.
- "Boeing and NASA Update Launch Target for Next Starliner Test Flight". Boeing. May 6, 2021. Archived from the original on May 7, 2021. Retrieved May 6, 2021.
- "Starliner Returning to Factory to Resolve Valve Issue". Boeing. August 13, 2021. Archived from the original on May 17, 2022. Retrieved August 13, 2021.
- Sheetz, Michael (August 13, 2021). "Boeing delays test flight of Starliner crew spacecraft for at least two months after valve problems". CNBC. Archived from the original on May 17, 2022. Retrieved August 13, 2021.
- "Boeing's Starliner capsule docks for first time with International Space Station". The Guardian. Reuters. May 21, 2022. Archived from the original on June 6, 2024. Retrieved May 21, 2022.
- Davenport, Christian (September 24, 2021). "Nearly two months after discovering a problem with its Starliner spacecraft, Boeing is still searching for answers". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on May 17, 2022. Retrieved September 27, 2021.
- Wall, Mike (October 9, 2021). "Boeing's next Starliner test launch for NASA slips to 2022". Space.com. Archived from the original on October 9, 2021. Retrieved October 9, 2021.
- Foust, Jeff (December 20, 2021). "Boeing Starliner test flight planned for spring 2022". SpaceNews. Archived from the original on June 6, 2024. Retrieved December 25, 2021.
- Berger, Eric (December 14, 2021). "Leaky valve issue forces Boeing to swap out Starliner's service module". Ars Technica. Archived from the original on December 25, 2021. Retrieved December 25, 2021.
- William Graham (May 19, 2022). "Starliner OFT-2 launch makes it to orbit, heading to ISS". NasaSpaceFlight.com. Archived from the original on October 7, 2022. Retrieved May 26, 2022.
- @BoeingSpace (May 21, 2022). "@NASA_Astronauts open Starliner's hatch on @Space_Station for the first time and welcome #RosieTheRocketeer and Jebediah Kerman" (Tweet). Archived from the original on May 23, 2022 – via Twitter.
- Elizabeth Howell (May 16, 2022). "Rosie the Rocketeer: Meet the dummy flying on Boeing's OFT-2 test flight this week". Space.com. Archived from the original on May 26, 2022. Retrieved May 26, 2022.
- Grush, Loren (May 25, 2022). "Boeing's Starliner spacecraft returns to Earth, wrapping up critical test mission". The Verge. Archived from the original on September 20, 2022. Retrieved September 19, 2022.
- Rabie, Passant (May 20, 2022). "Boeing's Starliner On Track to Reach ISS Despite Propulsion Glitch". Gizmodo. Archived from the original on September 20, 2022. Retrieved September 19, 2022.
- Eric Mack (May 21, 2022). "Boeing Successfully Docks Starliner Capsule With ISS Years After Failed First Try". CNET. Archived from the original on May 26, 2022. Retrieved May 26, 2022.
- "Boeing Starliner completes Orbital Flight Test-2 with safe touchdown". CollectSpace. May 25, 2022. Archived from the original on May 26, 2022. Retrieved May 26, 2022.
- Steve, Stich (May 25, 2022). NASA Boeing Starliner OFT-2 Post-Landing Press Conference, May 25, 2022. Space SPAN. Archived from the original on September 19, 2022. Retrieved September 19, 2022 – via YouTube.
- Foust, Jeff (November 3, 2022). "First Starliner crewed flight further delayed". SpaceNews. Archived from the original on June 6, 2024. Retrieved November 3, 2022.
- "Boeing and SpaceX Selected to Build America's New Crew Space Transportation System". NASA. September 16, 2014. Archived from the original on May 22, 2017. Retrieved April 6, 2015. This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
- Foust, Jeff (March 29, 2023). "Starliner crewed test flight delayed to July". SpaceNews. Archived from the original on June 6, 2024. Retrieved March 30, 2023.
- Berger, Eric (June 1, 2023). "Boeing finds two serious problems with Starliner just weeks before launch". Ars Technica. Archived from the original on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 2, 2023.
- "Boeing's 1st Starliner astronaut launch delayed again, to May 6". Space.com. April 4, 2024. Archived from the original on April 13, 2024. Retrieved April 4, 2024.
- William Harwood (May 6, 2024). "Starliner launch scrubbed by trouble with a valve in the Atlas 5's Centaur upper stage". Spaceflight Now. Archived from the original on May 7, 2024. Retrieved May 6, 2024.
- Harwood, William (May 22, 2024). "Boeing Starliner launch Saturday ruled out as helium leak analysis continues – Spaceflight Now". Spaceflight Now. Archived from the original on May 22, 2024. Retrieved May 22, 2024.
- Foust, Jeff (June 1, 2024). "Starliner launch attempt scrubbed". SpaceNews. Archived from the original on June 6, 2024. Retrieved July 22, 2024.
- Howell, Elizabeth (June 5, 2024). "Boeing's Starliner launches astronauts for 1st time in historic liftoff (photos, video)". Space.com. Archived from the original on June 7, 2024. Retrieved June 9, 2024.
- Harwood, William (July 25, 2024). "Boeing's Starliner space capsule faces crucial tests". CBS News – via Yahoo News.
During rendezvous with the space station the day after launch, four more leaks developed and five of the ship's aft-facing thrusters did not operate as expected.
- Harwood, William (July 26, 2024). "Make-or-break tests on tap for Boeing's Starliner capsule". Spaceflight Now. Retrieved July 27, 2024.
five aft-facing maneuvering thrusters failed to operate as the flight software expected. Four were later successfully test fired and one was declared failed.
- Berger, Eric (June 22, 2024). "NASA indefinitely delays return of Starliner to review propulsion data". Ars Technica. Retrieved August 26, 2024.
- Howell, Elizabeth (July 29, 2024). "Boeing's Starliner tests thrusters at ISS as NASA reviews options for astronauts' return to Earth". Space.com. Retrieved August 26, 2024.
- Harwood, William (August 24, 2024). "NASA rules out bringing astronauts home on Boeing's Starliner". Spaceflight Now.
Resetting and firing the thrusters eventually showed that four of the five were again functioning, and the Starliner docked with the ISS after a delay.
- "Boeing's confidence remains high in Starliner's return with crew" (Press release). Boeing. August 2, 2024.
1 free-flight hot fire of 5 aft-facing thrusters prior to docking, returning 6-degree of freedom (DOF) axis control
This statement acknowledges that 6DoF control was lost due to the failures. - Berger, Eric (June 22, 2024). "NASA indefinitely delays return of Starliner to review propulsion data". Ars Technica. Retrieved August 26, 2024.
- Howell, Elizabeth (July 29, 2024). "Boeing's Starliner tests thrusters at ISS as NASA reviews options for astronauts' return to Earth". Space.com. Retrieved August 26, 2024.
- "Starliner testing continues in space and on the ground to support future long-duration missions". Boeing. July 3, 2024. Retrieved July 10, 2024.
- "NASA, Boeing Progress on Testing Starliner with Crew at Space Station". Boeing.
- Harwood, William (July 26, 2024). "Make-or-break tests on tap for Boeing's Starliner capsule". Spaceflight Now. Retrieved July 27, 2024.
- ^ Chang, Kenneth (August 7, 2024). "NASA Says Boeing Starliner Astronauts May Fly Home on SpaceX in 2025". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved August 7, 2024.
- Wattles, Jackie (August 24, 2024). "Boeing Starliner's astronauts will return to Earth on Spacex Crew Dragon, NASA says". CNN. Retrieved August 24, 2024.
- "Boeing's confidence remains high in Starliner's return with crew". starlinerupdates.com. Retrieved August 7, 2024.
- "Boeing Starliner capsule lands back on Earth, without astronauts, to end troubled test flight (Video)". Space.com. September 7, 2024.
- Niles-Carnes, Elyna (August 29, 2024). "NASA, Boeing Teams "Go" for Starliner Uncrewed Return – NASA's Boeing Crew Flight Test". NASA. Retrieved August 29, 2024.
- ^ Clark, Stephen (September 7, 2024). "Leaving behind its crew, Starliner departs space station and returns to Earth". Ars Technica. Retrieved September 7, 2024.
- Taveau, Jessica (August 24, 2024). "NASA Decides to Bring Starliner Spacecraft Back to Earth Without Crew". NASA. Retrieved August 24, 2024.
- "Juno: New Origins | CFT starliner fixed". www.simplerockets.com. Archived from the original on June 1, 2024. Retrieved June 1, 2024.
- Klotz, Irene (September 17, 2014). "Boeing's 'space taxi' includes seat for a tourist". Reuters. Archived from the original on September 24, 2015. Retrieved August 6, 2015.
- Davenport, Justin (October 27, 2021). "Blue Origin, Sierra Space, and Boeing announce Orbital Reef". nasaspaceflight.com. Archived from the original on November 30, 2021. Retrieved November 30, 2021.
- Chappell, Bill (October 25, 2021). "Blue Origin says it will build an orbiting mixed-use business park in space". NPR. Archived from the original on November 29, 2021. Retrieved November 30, 2021.
- Grush, Loren (October 25, 2021). "Blue Origin reveals plans for future commercial space station called Orbital Reef". The Verge. Archived from the original on November 29, 2021. Retrieved November 29, 2021.
- Wall, Mike (August 3, 2018). "Crew Dragon and Starliner: A Look at the Upcoming Astronaut Taxis". SPACE.com. Archived from the original on August 21, 2019. Retrieved August 29, 2020.
- Roulette, Joey (August 26, 2021). "ULA stops selling its centerpiece Atlas V, setting path for the rocket's retirement". The Verge. Archived from the original on December 28, 2021. Retrieved September 1, 2021.
- Bruno, Tory (June 12, 2024). "Bitter sweet. The final Atlas V is making its way through the factory. There are 16 AV missions to go. They will all be built this year, making more room for #Vulcan rate production" (Tweet). Retrieved June 14, 2024 – via Twitter.
- ^ Berger, Eric (June 2, 2022). "NASA just bought the rest of the space station crew flights from SpaceX". Ars Technica. Archived from the original on October 6, 2022. Retrieved May 9, 2024.
- Berger, Eric (August 22, 2019). "The last single-stick Delta rocket launched Thursday, and it put on a show". Ars Technica. Archived from the original on November 7, 2020. Retrieved August 6, 2020.
- Clark, Stephen (May 15, 2021). "Billion-dollar missile defense satellite ready for launch Monday in Florida". Spaceflight Now. Retrieved September 16, 2024.
- "OFT-2: Dual Engine Centaur returns to service for Starliner launches". United Launch Alliance. July 28, 2021. Retrieved September 16, 2024.
- "OFT-2: Dual Engine Centaur returns to service for Starliner launches". ULA. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
- Clark, Stephen (December 19, 2019). "Starliner test flight to use special Atlas 5 configuration, unusual launch trajectory". Spaceflight Now.
The 44-mile-high perigee, or low point, of the suborbital trajectory is inside Earth's atmosphere, meaning the Starliner would re-enter the atmosphere and come back to Earth without an additional propulsive maneuver.
- Clark, Stephen (May 19, 2022). "Boeing's Starliner crew capsule takes off on long-awaited test flight". Spaceflight Now. Archived from the original on May 20, 2022. Retrieved May 20, 2022.
- Krebs, Gunter. "Starliner (CST-100)". Gunter's Space Page. Archived from the original on June 8, 2023. Retrieved August 29, 2020.
- "CST-100 Starliner". Boeing. Archived from the original on July 19, 2021. Retrieved January 19, 2020.
- Clark, Stephen (December 22, 2019). "Boeing's first commercial crew capsule christened "Calypso"". Spaceflight Now. Archived from the original on March 9, 2020. Retrieved March 9, 2020.
The Starliner vehicle that landed Sunday in New Mexico, designated Spacecraft 3 Spacecraft 1 was built for Boeing's pad abort test and is not intended to fly in space. she has named the Starliner vehicle that returned Sunday "Calypso" in an ode to the research vessel used by French explorer Jacques Cousteau
- "Reporter's Starliner Notebook" (PDF). Boeing. 2019. p. 9. Archived (PDF) from the original on August 24, 2023. Retrieved March 9, 2020.
Spacecraft 1 was used for testing the launch abort system during the program's Pad Abort Test in New Mexico. Spacecraft 2 being prepared to fly the first people on Starliner's Crew Flight Test. Spacecraft 3 slated for the uncrewed Orbital Flight Test...
- Clark, Stephen (August 25, 2024). "NASA's Starliner decision was the right one, but it's a crushing blow for Boeing". Ars Technica. Retrieved August 26, 2024.
Tellingly, perhaps, NASA has only placed firm orders with Boeing for three Starliner flights once the agency certifies the spacecraft for operational use.
- "Aerojet Rocketdyne gears up for first flight of Boeing's Starliner Spacecraft". Aerojet Rocketdyne. December 12, 2019. Archived from the original on May 6, 2023. Retrieved May 6, 2023.
- "Boeing Tests Parachute System for CST-100 Spacecraft". NASA. May 4, 2012. Archived from the original on May 31, 2023. Retrieved May 6, 2023.
- "Collins Aerospace to provide Earth-like atmosphere on Boeing's new 'space taxi' for NASA". spaceref.com. April 8, 2019. Retrieved May 6, 2023.
- Howell, Elizabeth (April 17, 2024). "'I really like these suits.' Boeing's snazzy (and flexible) Starliner spacesuits have astronauts buzzing (exclusive)". Retrieved June 20, 2024.
- "ILC Dover becomes a provider of spacesuits for Boeing's Starliner". spacedaily.com. May 31, 2022. Archived from the original on May 6, 2023. Retrieved May 6, 2023.
- Leon Spencer (May 22, 2014). "Samsung and Boeing collaborate on mobile tech in space". ZDNet. Archived from the original on May 6, 2023. Retrieved May 6, 2023.
- Richardson, Mike (July 20, 2018). "Building a better spaceship". Aerospace Manfacturing. Archived from the original on May 6, 2023. Retrieved May 6, 2023.
External links
- Boeing/Bigelow Crew Space Transport Vehicle on YouTube by Boeing (2010)
- Boeing Unveils America's First Space Taxi, Unlocks Possibilities for Future on YouTube by Boeing (2014)
- Reporter's Starliner Notebook
- Astronaut Doug Hines enters the Boeing Starliner for the first time during OFT-2
- Boeing Commercial Crew Transportation Capability Contract (CCtCap) - the fixed price contract with NASA for the Starliner program
Boeing Starliner | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Missions | ||
Spacecraft |
| |
Hardware | ||
|
Crewed spacecraft (programs) | |
---|---|
Active |
|
Retired |
|
In development |
|
Cancelled |
|
Human spaceflights to the International Space Station | ||
---|---|---|
See also: ISS expeditions, Uncrewed ISS flights | ||
1998–2004 |
| |
2005–2009 | ||
2010–2014 | ||
2015–2019 |
| |
Since 2020 |
| |
Future | ||
Individuals | ||
Vehicles |
| |
|