Revision as of 21:53, 9 April 2022 editWikiCleanerMan (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users63,012 edits Top importance for Croatia and readership← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 08:10, 1 September 2024 edit undoCewbot (talk | contribs)Bots8,049,050 editsm Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: The article is NOT listed in any vital article list page. |
(8 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
{{Talk header|archive_age=60|archive_bot=Lowercase sigmabot III}} |
|
{{Talk header}} |
|
⚫ |
{{Contentious topics/talk notice|b}} |
⚫ |
{{WikiProject banner shell|1= |
|
|
⚫ |
{{Controversial-issues}} |
⚫ |
{{WikiProject Biography|living=n|class=C|politician-work-group=yes|politician-priority=mid|military-work-group=y|military-priority=low|listas=Tudman, Franjo}} |
|
|
⚫ |
{{Not a forum}} |
⚫ |
{{WikiProject Croatia|class=C |
|
|
⚫ |
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|blp=n|listas=Tudman, Franjo| |
|
<!-- B-Class 5-criteria checklist --> |
|
|
⚫ |
{{WikiProject Biography|politician-work-group=yes|politician-priority=mid|military-work-group=y|military-priority=low}} |
|
|b1 <!-- Referencing and citations --> =n |
|
|
⚫ |
{{WikiProject Croatia|importance=top}} |
|
|b2 <!-- Coverage and accuracy --> =n |
|
|
⚫ |
{{WikiProject Yugoslavia|importance=Mid}} |
|
|b3 <!-- Structure --> =y |
|
|
|b4 <!-- Grammar and style --> =y |
|
|
|b5 <!-- Supporting materials --> =y |
|
|
|b6 <!--Accessibility --> =y |
|
|
|importance=top}} |
|
⚫ |
{{WikiProject Yugoslavia|class=C|importance=Mid}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Military history|class=Start |
|
{{WikiProject Military history|class=Start |
|
<!-- B-Class 5-criteria checklist --> |
|
<!-- B-Class 5-criteria checklist --> |
Line 21: |
Line 16: |
|
|Biography=yes|Balkan=yes|WWII=y|Post-Cold-War=y|Cold-War=y}} |
|
|Biography=yes|Balkan=yes|WWII=y|Post-Cold-War=y|Cold-War=y}} |
|
}} |
|
}} |
⚫ |
{{Ds/talk notice|b}} |
|
⚫ |
{{Controversial-issues}} |
|
⚫ |
{{Not a forum}} |
|
|
{{Copied|from=Vrhovnik|to=Franjo Tuđman|diff=http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Franjo_Tuđman&action=historysubmit&diff=474314372&oldid=473533063}} |
|
{{Copied|from=Vrhovnik|to=Franjo Tuđman|diff=http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Franjo_Tuđman&action=historysubmit&diff=474314372&oldid=473533063}} |
|
{{afd-merged-from|Vrhovnik|Vrhovnik|16 January 2012}} |
|
{{afd-merged-from|Vrhovnik|Vrhovnik|16 January 2012}} |
Line 41: |
Line 33: |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
{{Annual readership}} |
|
{{Annual readership}} |
|
|
|
|
|
== Bosnian war section == |
|
|
|
|
|
The second para starts with "The Bosniak leadership initially showed willingness to remain in a rump Yugoslavia, (...)", this is just half true. In reality it was one of two currents within the SDA party, the one led by two prominent party leaders Muhamed Filipović and that other guy dissident from Switzerland, whose name I can't remember, which opted to negotiate with Milosevic and seek some way to stay within YUG. Filipovic and this other guy were in fact on the meeting with Milosevic in Belgrade, and this matter practically caused the party to break into two factions and at the first elections they were already completely separated into SDA and some other party, which was completely ignored by Bosniak electorate. Characters like Izetbegovic, Silajdzic, Ganic, Cengic, etc never even contemplated such variant, and they were key Bosniak leaders. Kristo exploiting rather simplistic view on this episode in history. ]] 20:13, 28 November 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Antisemitism section needed == |
|
|
|
|
|
Clearly, Franjo Tudjman left behind not only highly antisemitic academic work, as already described in the article, but is on the record of making antisemitic remarks in public as well. |
|
|
|
|
|
Such as his 1990 election speech where he makes antisemitic remarks about supposed rumors that he is of Jewish, or that his wife is either of Jewish or Serbian descent - namely that "had that been true he'd be rich and not a communist" and his happiness regarding "his wife not being either (Jew or Serb)". |
|
|
|
|
|
The speech is easy to find on YouTube, has been since at least 2020, and it should be added, along with other instances of Tudjman's antisemitism into a new, separate, section. Clearly, from the rambling character of the speech it is obvious that such antisemitic ideas were integral to his personal way of thinking and not just a part of some political speech, perhaps prepared by someone else. |
|
|
|
|
|
] (]) 16:15, 6 March 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:The article already describes this at length, if you have a specific suggestion to make please do, otherwise this sounds like a bit of ]. --] (]) 11:30, 7 March 2024 (UTC) |
The second para starts with "The Bosniak leadership initially showed willingness to remain in a rump Yugoslavia, (...)", this is just half true. In reality it was one of two currents within the SDA party, the one led by two prominent party leaders Muhamed Filipović and that other guy dissident from Switzerland, whose name I can't remember, which opted to negotiate with Milosevic and seek some way to stay within YUG. Filipovic and this other guy were in fact on the meeting with Milosevic in Belgrade, and this matter practically caused the party to break into two factions and at the first elections they were already completely separated into SDA and some other party, which was completely ignored by Bosniak electorate. Characters like Izetbegovic, Silajdzic, Ganic, Cengic, etc never even contemplated such variant, and they were key Bosniak leaders. Kristo exploiting rather simplistic view on this episode in history. ౪ Santa ౪ 20:13, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
Clearly, Franjo Tudjman left behind not only highly antisemitic academic work, as already described in the article, but is on the record of making antisemitic remarks in public as well.
The speech is easy to find on YouTube, has been since at least 2020, and it should be added, along with other instances of Tudjman's antisemitism into a new, separate, section. Clearly, from the rambling character of the speech it is obvious that such antisemitic ideas were integral to his personal way of thinking and not just a part of some political speech, perhaps prepared by someone else.