| Revision as of 12:59, 3 July 2023 editStarlighsky (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,370 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 03:11, 23 July 2023 edit undoLiz (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators771,714 edits →Lorrie Lynch: Closed as no consensus (XFDcloser) | ||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed archived mw-archivedtalk" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| ⚫ | ===]=== | ||
| :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' | |||
| {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}} | |||
| <!--Template:Afd top | |||
| Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
| The result was '''no consensus'''__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. My tendency when things like ] rewriting this article occur is to relist this article but I think I'm too liberal with relistings so I'll close this now as No consensus instead as the guidelines suggest we do. <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 03:11, 23 July 2023 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | ===]=== | ||
| <noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude> | <noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude> | ||
| :{{la|1=Lorrie Lynch}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude> | ]) | :{{la|1=Lorrie Lynch}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude> | ]) | ||
| :({{Find sources AFD|title=Lorrie Lynch}}) | :({{Find sources AFD|title=Lorrie Lynch}}) | ||
| Looks like page was made with minimal sources long ago and by the subject of the article. ] (]) 02:28, 2 July 2023 (UTC) | Looks like page was made with minimal sources long ago and by the subject of the article. ] (]) 02:28, 2 July 2023 (UTC) | ||
| Line 10: | Line 15: | ||
| *'''Keep''' She should qualify under ] because she has written several textbooks. She was a founder of and a journalist at ''USA Today'' and she wrote several textbooks, which should qualify for "significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded" under ]. ] (]) 12:59, 3 July 2023 (UTC)Starlighsky | *'''Keep''' She should qualify under ] because she has written several textbooks. She was a founder of and a journalist at ''USA Today'' and she wrote several textbooks, which should qualify for "significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded" under ]. ] (]) 12:59, 3 July 2023 (UTC)Starlighsky | ||
| *'''Delete''' - nothing here to suggest notability. Writing books does not qualify, not does working for a newspaper. ] (]) 10:53, 3 July 2023 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' - nothing here to suggest notability. Writing books does not qualify, not does working for a newspaper. ] (]) 10:53, 3 July 2023 (UTC) | ||
| :<p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />'''Relisting comment:''' Relisting to review sources brought up in this AFD discussion.<br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 02:28, 9 July 2023 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:XfD relist --></p> | |||
| :<p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ] (]) 02:54, 16 July 2023 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:XfD relist --></p> | |||
| *<s>'''Delete''' or maybe draftify, not sure there is enough there but seems borderline. Noticed the subject also seems to have contributed to her article briefly in 2008. - ] (]) 03:30, 16 July 2023 (UTC)</s> | |||
| *'''Comment''' I've taken a pass on the article. Still needs work but it's in a better state now. I stick with my !vote after further investigation. —]]] 05:39, 16 July 2023 (UTC) | |||
| * Struck delete vote above per Siroxo. Hesitant to vote keep still but will not stand in the way of that. - ] (]) 04:05, 19 July 2023 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Weak Delete''' Admittedly, there are lots of other academics with articles on this site about which this could also be said, but this article does not seem to establish notability under ] guidelines. However, I won’t object if there is consensus to keep. ] (]) 01:49, 20 July 2023 (UTC) | |||
| {{clear}} | |||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | |||
Latest revision as of 03:11, 23 July 2023
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. My tendency when things like User:Siroxo rewriting this article occur is to relist this article but I think I'm too liberal with relistings so I'll close this now as No consensus instead as the guidelines suggest we do. Liz 03:11, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Lorrie Lynch
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- Lorrie Lynch (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Looks like page was made with minimal sources long ago and by the subject of the article. Iljhgtn (talk) 02:28, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. Some cursory searching of this subject turns up enough to convince me. For example,Exploring journalism and the media has 17 citations per Google Scholar, including a review published in a journal. I also see some sigcov here: , and other evidence of influence in subject's field: . Note, some text from the apparent COI does remain and should probably be rewritten/verified. —siroχo 09:03, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Women, and United States of America. Shellwood (talk) 10:12, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep She should qualify under Misplaced Pages:Notability (academics) because she has written several textbooks. She was a founder of and a journalist at USA Today and she wrote several textbooks, which should qualify for "significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded" under Misplaced Pages:Notability (people). Starlighsky (talk) 12:59, 3 July 2023 (UTC)Starlighsky
- Delete - nothing here to suggest notability. Writing books does not qualify, not does working for a newspaper. Deb (talk) 10:53, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to review sources brought up in this AFD discussion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz 02:28, 9 July 2023 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 02:54, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
Delete or maybe draftify, not sure there is enough there but seems borderline. Noticed the subject also seems to have contributed to her article briefly in 2008. - Indefensible (talk) 03:30, 16 July 2023 (UTC)- Comment I've taken a pass on the article. Still needs work but it's in a better state now. I stick with my !vote after further investigation. —siroχo 05:39, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- Struck delete vote above per Siroxo. Hesitant to vote keep still but will not stand in the way of that. - Indefensible (talk) 04:05, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
- Weak Delete Admittedly, there are lots of other academics with articles on this site about which this could also be said, but this article does not seem to establish notability under WP:GNG guidelines. However, I won’t object if there is consensus to keep. Go4thProsper (talk) 01:49, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.