Revision as of 00:59, 21 March 2024 edit37.231.124.191 (talk) →Suggestions on cutting length: ReplyTags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 12:56, 24 December 2024 edit undo12.146.12.2 (talk) →far northwest africa as arab as arabian peninsula to the east: new sectionTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic |
(60 intermediate revisions by 28 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{talk header}} |
|
{{talk header|archive_age=3|archive_units=months|archive_bot=Lowercase sigmabot III}} |
|
|
{{Contentious topics/talk notice|topic=a-i|section=yes}} |
|
{{Contentious topics/talk notice|topic=a-i|section=yes}} |
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
|archiveheader = {{aan}} |
|
|archiveheader = {{aan}} |
|
|maxarchivesize = 100K |
|
|maxarchivesize = 100K |
|
|counter = 14 |
|
|counter = 15 |
|
|minthreadsleft = 5 |
|
|minthreadsleft = 5 |
|
|minthreadstoarchive = 2 |
|
|minthreadstoarchive = 2 |
Line 10: |
Line 10: |
|
|archive = Talk:Arabs/Archive %(counter)d |
|
|archive = Talk:Arabs/Archive %(counter)d |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|vital=y|class=C|collapsed=y|1= |
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|vital=yes|class=C|collapsed=y|1= |
|
{{WikiProject Ethnic groups |importance=High}} |
|
{{WikiProject Ethnic groups |importance=High}} |
|
{{WikiProject Arab world |importance=Top}} |
|
{{WikiProject Arab world |importance=Top}} |
Line 33: |
Line 33: |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
== Hyperlink change == |
|
== Wrong information == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is just generalizing on entire groups of people with different cultures and ancestries that they are all Arabs. This article like ] is entirely misleading. There are Arabic speaking people ] of Iranian Ancestry and ] of origin, further more ] and ] in generally have completely ] (same with ] most of which are ]) and history and ] influenced by their older languages. The ethnic Arabs are those with high level of J1 Haplogroup such as Yemen and Saudi, and that's it. Actual Arabs are a minority everywhere else. ] (]) 16:33, 20 September 2024 (UTC) |
⚫ |
{{edit extended-protected|Arabs|answered=yes}} |
|
|
Under the Religion subsection, at the end of the first sentence of the second paragraph, the hyperlink to the goddess Uzza links to a species of animal. This should be changed to the https://en.wikipedia.org/Al-Uzza page. ] (]) 00:45, 8 December 2023 (UTC) |
|
⚫ |
:{{done}}<!-- Template:EEp --> ] (]) 03:37, 8 December 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
:You appear to be conflating ethnicity with haplogroups. ] (]) 17:22, 20 September 2024 (UTC) |
⚫ |
== Edomites == |
|
|
|
::I understand the distinction you're drawing, but ethnicity is about more than just language. It's a complex combination of shared cultural practices, language, history, and sometimes genetic ancestry. My point is that labeling entire populations as "Arabs" based solely on the fact that they speak Arabic today ignores the diverse ethnic and cultural backgrounds of these groups. |
|
|
::For example, many people in Bahrain ], despite speaking Arabic, retain distinct Persian cultural and ancestral ties—our cuisine, music, language, and traditions have been preserved over time. Similarly, North Africans, like the ], have their own rich history and culture, which predates the introduction of Arabic. These differences are often reflected in local dialects, influenced by older languages and cultures. |
|
|
::Haplogroups, while not the sole determinant of ethnicity, are helpful in understanding deep ancestral origins, especially when discussing the relatively small populations of ethnic Arabs (e.g., in Yemen and parts of Saudi Arabia) compared to the broader Arabic-speaking world. |
|
|
::According to Cambridge, is a noun that refers to a large group of people who have the same national, ], or ] origins, or the state of belonging to such a group - we share none of that with Syrians or Egyptians, we don't speak the same dialect, our culture is entirely different, and we never ever felt like we belong to such groups, they look nothing like us, have different dialects, have different cultures, and our history is entirely different. |
|
|
::Last but not least; I was brainwashed to identify as Arab as a child in school (how is that consensual?) and did so for some time, and then we got older and realize we're all not Arabs. So whatever you say or write, we will always remain as such. I am proud of being able to speak Arabic (Bahraini-which is heavily influenced by Persian), but that's were our similarities end, many words in our dialect are not even understood by Egyptians and co. I also speak English, and Persian, both Bushehri and Iranian/Tehrani,so what am I then? |
|
|
::Moreover, of scholars like ] and ] to Arab culture is factually incorrect. ] (]) 19:03, 20 September 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
== Map == |
|
{{ping|Skitash}} The presentation of the Edomites as one of the Arab peoples is not in the body of the article, and also the source used does not adequately support the text. ] (]) 23:29, 12 December 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
:I reverted your changes because you were not providing an adequate explanation for them. As to the source, it indeed supports the statement, and I have added it to the body of the article. ] (]) 15:01, 13 December 2023 (UTC) |
|
The map in the lede is a bit misleading. Rather than grading on amount of Arabs on each country, it should be done on the percentage of the population being Arab. ] (]) 12:43, 13 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
::The source doesn't say "Edomites are Arabs" or "Edomites are considered Arabs by most/many scholars." Instead, the source mentions that Edomites are a Semitic people "identified by '''some''' scholars as Arab." Presenting the Edomites in the lead without acknowledging this detail mislead the reader into believing that Edomites are widely considered Arabs. Furthermore, the source used to support this information is not the most appropriate, as it is about a 1st-century individual, not the Edomites or Arabs. I suggest excluding the Edomites from the lead based on ] because, even though this information is now in the article's body, the Edomites are unimportant in overall Arab history, and their mention in the body is also very brief. The second option would be to mention clearly in the lead that Edomites are considered Arabs only by some scholars. ] (]) 00:13, 17 December 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:The percentages are not mentioned in the article. ] (]) 12:49, 13 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
⚫ |
::Good point ] (]) 12:53, 13 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Semitic language == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Semitic is a proto-language or a family. The article should not reference a "Semitic language", because it is not an attested language. It is only known through historical reconstruction. ] (]) 09:24, 24 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
# |
|
|
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/345499508_The_Religion_of_Idumea_and_Its_Relationship_to_Early_Judaism |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:"Semitic language" is the ordinary way to characterize a language as a member of the Semitic language family, in the same way that we say English is an Indo-European language, Malagasy is an Austronesian language, etc. ] (]) 16:22, 24 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
“Two nations are in your womb, and two peoples born of you shall be divided; the one shall be stronger than the other, and the elder shall serve the younger” (Gen. 25:23), said God to Rebekah. “You shall not abhor an Edomite, for he is your brother” (Deut. 23:7), God instructed the people of Israel. “Is not Esau Jacob’s brother?” asked Malachi (1:2). Within the specifically Jewish collection that we call the Hebrew Bible, Esau and Jacob, the eponymous ancestors of Edom and Israel, were twins, and this influenced the relationship between their descendants throughout the biblical period. While we have no way of knowing what the Edomites thought about this relationship, Edom and Judah and then Idumea and Judea were of course geographically very close, so it would stand to reason that their inhabitants would have more than a few cultural traits in common. Based on the few Iron Age inscriptions found on both sides of the ‘Arabah, Vanderhooft has classified the Edomite language as Northwest Semitic, “in the Canaanite linguistic group”, and not, as has sometimes been claimed, as an Arabic dialect. This of course matches the biblical view of the Edomites as Israel’s “brothers”. According to Rollston, the late Iron Age Edomite script seems to be based on that of Aramaic. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 4 November 2024 == |
|
# |
|
|
https://www.academia.edu/26914216/The_Formation_of_Idumean_Identity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
{{edit extended-protected|Arabs|answered=yes}} |
|
In his book published in the 1960’s, Avi-Yonah summarized what was then the general view: ‘south of Judah was the province of Idumaea, inhabited by Edomite Arabs who moved there after the fall of Jerusalem in 586 B.C. It included all southern Judah, from Beth-zur to Beersheba, except for the coastal plain. Its capital may have been Lachish, Mareshah, or even Hebron, the ancient capital of Judah’.23 We have already stated that the Edomites were not ‘Arabs’. Arguably, Eph‘al was the first to challenge the old paradigm, by realizing that the province of Idumea was only formed after the Macedonian conquest, officially recognizing what had by then become the main population of the area. |
|
|
|
First sentence of fourth paragraph states 'during the middle ages arabs fostered a vast arab union'. This should be changed to something such as 'After the emergence of Islam in the 7th century an unprecedented conquest established a vast Arab empire'. The term 'arab union' is highly anachronistic and the accompanying description fails to capture the reality of this remarkable and violent (see: fostered) event. ] (]) 19:18, 4 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:] '''Not done''': it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a ] and provide a ] if appropriate.<!-- Template:EEp --> ] (]) 09:36, 5 November 2024 (UTC) |
⚫ |
] (]) 00:19, 22 December 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 27 December 2023 == |
|
|
|
|
|
{{Edit extended-protected|Arabs|answered=yes}} |
|
|
The hyperlink for mezes, the Arabian dishes, links to https://en.wikipedia.org/Dr%C4%83g%C4%83ne%C8%99ti,_Bihor ] (]) 19:12, 27 December 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
:{{done}}<!-- Template:EEp --> ] is a redirect to ] as it is a subdivision of the commune. Not sure if this is the most appropriate target... ] (]) 19:26, 27 December 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
::I've just ]ly retargeted the redirect. We'll see if anyone objects. ] (]) 19:29, 27 December 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== really an ethnic group? == |
|
|
|
|
|
i've heard a lot of Arabs say they regard ''Arab'' chiefly as a ''linguistic'' group identity; ''ethnically'' they are Moroccan or Palestinian, Jordanian or Druze, Iraqi or Algerian. I know this is just hearsay, but maybe the contested nature of the label should be elaborated? ] (]) 05:46, 9 January 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== The map colours are very misleading == |
|
: here's at least one .edu source which agrees https://www.africa.upenn.edu/K-12/Who_16629.html it's pretty clearly a rudimentary kids' intro to the topic, but seemingly one made by qualified experts ] (]) 05:48, 9 January 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The black and dark green colours are too similar, which could lead to a misconception thinking Brazil and Turkey are Arabic or something. I propose using a different colour scale for non-Arabic countries. ] ]<sup>/</sup>] 08:50, 21 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
== Suggestions on cutting length == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== far northwest africa as arab as arabian peninsula to the east == |
|
In follow-up to , I'd suggest trimming the "History" section in particular, transferring any well-sourced content to ] or elsewhere. Not only is it the largest section by far, but most of this history is covered directly by other relevant articles, so an overview article about one ethno-linguistic group doesn't really need to go into all this detail. The sections on "Antiquity" and the paragraphs preceding it are especially in need of ]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
according to this, almost eerie map legend implying whole populations 'erased' and arabized (which does imply genetics, thus 'eerie', as in potentially irreversibly altered to 'foreigners' more likely preference). it'd be like, take italy today, with a long antique and roman history, was depicted today as much say 'russian' as very russia itself, despite the distance, and historical differences. wouldn't you at least wonder whose/if so agenda it served, to see it that way.. |
|
The "Renaissance" subsection is also inserted awkwardly out of chronological order and has a bit of a POV slant: emphasizing an "Arab" character on the history of the whole Muslim world, even for something like the "]", which is hardly of central relevance here. We could probably move the most relevant points to other subsections and trim some of the more ]-ish material. The ], which is only mentioned in passing, might deserve more attention as part of the "Modern period". ] (]) 20:30, 15 February 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in the maps, morocco in the far west is depicted as arab as arabia to the far east, plus the article mentions ancestry as a continuum within the arab sphere.. well, if its indigenous ancestry, and not clear cut sudden to 'appear' at some point in history, would seem to matter.. ] (]) 12:56, 24 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
:I support trimming the "History" section. ] (]) 03:07, 16 February 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::@ ] (]) 00:59, 21 March 2024 (UTC) |
|
This is just generalizing on entire groups of people with different cultures and ancestries that they are all Arabs. This article like Persians is entirely misleading. There are Arabic speaking people in Bahrain of Iranian Ancestry and most Kuwaitis are Iranian of origin, further more Egyptians and North Africans in generally have completely different genetics (same with Morocans most of which are Amazigh) and history and dialects of Arabic influenced by their older languages. The ethnic Arabs are those with high level of J1 Haplogroup such as Yemen and Saudi, and that's it. Actual Arabs are a minority everywhere else. Mrox2 (talk) 16:33, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
The map in the lede is a bit misleading. Rather than grading on amount of Arabs on each country, it should be done on the percentage of the population being Arab. Kowal2701 (talk) 12:43, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
Semitic is a proto-language or a family. The article should not reference a "Semitic language", because it is not an attested language. It is only known through historical reconstruction. 83.110.109.171 (talk) 09:24, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
First sentence of fourth paragraph states 'during the middle ages arabs fostered a vast arab union'. This should be changed to something such as 'After the emergence of Islam in the 7th century an unprecedented conquest established a vast Arab empire'. The term 'arab union' is highly anachronistic and the accompanying description fails to capture the reality of this remarkable and violent (see: fostered) event. Mdmagnitogorsk (talk) 19:18, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
The black and dark green colours are too similar, which could lead to a misconception thinking Brazil and Turkey are Arabic or something. I propose using a different colour scale for non-Arabic countries. Youprayteas 08:50, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
according to this, almost eerie map legend implying whole populations 'erased' and arabized (which does imply genetics, thus 'eerie', as in potentially irreversibly altered to 'foreigners' more likely preference). it'd be like, take italy today, with a long antique and roman history, was depicted today as much say 'russian' as very russia itself, despite the distance, and historical differences. wouldn't you at least wonder whose/if so agenda it served, to see it that way..
in the maps, morocco in the far west is depicted as arab as arabia to the far east, plus the article mentions ancestry as a continuum within the arab sphere.. well, if its indigenous ancestry, and not clear cut sudden to 'appear' at some point in history, would seem to matter.. 12.146.12.2 (talk) 12:56, 24 December 2024 (UTC)