Misplaced Pages

User talk:RK: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:05, 10 April 2005 editRK (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users10,561 edits Arbitration case - final decision← Previous edit Latest revision as of 02:26, 6 September 2023 edit undoPremeditated Chaos (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators127,965 edits Notification: proposed deletion of Private Asset Management.Tag: Twinkle 
(234 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
]<br> ]<br>
]<br> ]<br>
]<br>
]<br>


== New discussions and edits == ==New discussions==
{{You've got mail}}
Topics I will soon edit: ], ], ], ],
....<br />
Please help edit the rulings of ] and ] . Thanks. - ] (]) 07:02, 24 May 2014 (UTC)


== Source for Jimbo quote ==
Also, for those interested, please see my new comment at ]. I think we need to remove two of the redirects, and allow Misplaced Pages to develop one article on the X chromosome, and one article on the Y chromosome. What do you think? ] 22:36, Feb 13, 2005 (UTC)


CH, you recently wroye in the General Relativity Talk page:
:RK,
:While as of June 2006 there are still some Wikipedians knowledgeable about gtr, given what I view as the failure of WP as a source reliable information (see recent comments by our founder, Jimbo Wales),
I've killed the redirects and put up short stubs for the X and Y chromosomes, plus a list of of things that should and could be covered in the articles on their talk pages. I'd appreciate help with expanding the articles, the Y chromosome in particular has potential to become a very interesting article. I'm always finding gaps in wiki's genetics coverage, some more like ], and ] arise from this --] 00:23, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)


Could you give me a reference for this quote? Also, have you discussed the possibility of creating a Physics wiki, one that has a measure of formal peer review, disallows all edits by anonymoys users, and requires registered users to give a valid e-mail? If Jimbo weren't so insistent on anarchy (literally) Misplaced Pages could have had a chance to be useful. As it turns out, however, it has sunk into a morass that can never be redeemed. ] 12:42, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
==You're back!==
Praise Anthere, you're back! As you seem to plan some biology work as well, this is probably going to be quite enjoyable. What are your plans with ]?


Thanks, Robert. ] 12:42, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
I agree that the title ] does not cover the content and that ] and ] deserve to be seperate pages.


:I'm looking for it myself. I missed the NY Times article, unfortunately, but I've seen several ] which mention a ''St. Petersburg Times'' interview in which their most famous netizen allegedly said that Misplaced Pages cannot now or ever be used as a reference (e.g. for schoolwork), which to my mind is inconsistent with the reason I came here: to create an encyclopedia. I am still searching Google and places in WP for a working link to the text of this interview. ---] 21:22, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
I must warn you that ] is back and pretty much ]. I have already received a typical blast of rudeness when I offered my help in recovering his cherished infoboxes. ]&nbsp;|&nbsp;] 23:50, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)


==Criticism of Haredi Judaism==
:Its good to hear from you, and I hope you find my small additions today to be of some use. ]
Hello RK! I had mentioned in ] that until recently ] was the only major denomination with a criticism section. I notice in particular that ] doesn't have a criticism section. Perhaps you might be interested in created a section explaining the difficulties people to the left of Haredi Judaism have with it(properly sourced of course). Best wishes. And perhaps the way their leaders talk about other denominations might be one of the issues of concern. --] 22:33, 2 July 2006 (UTC)


==AfD==
Hi, Robert. Though we have had our differences, I am also glad to see you back. Thanks for sticking with us, through good times and bad. I am sincerely happy to hear that you will be joining us again. ] 00:57, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Hello again RK! It's great to see you're still active on Misplaced Pages. Just thought I'd let you know - if you have time, your expertise will be helpful on this page. Regards. ] | ] 05:03, 4 July 2006 (UTC)


==Blocked==
:Danny, it is good to be back, and good to hear from you. I look forward to working with you on any articles. ] 23:04, Feb 14, 2005 (UTC)
RK, you have been blocked for 1 week following your violation of the No personal attacks aspect of your arbitration case. Details can be found at http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Arbitration_enforcement#RK_2 --] | ] 03:24, 6 July 2006 (UTC)


== Merges, moves ==
Welcome back!! ] 03:07, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)


_ _ Hi, didn't notice your return until just now; welcome back. <br>
:Hey, 172, long time no see. Good to hear from you. ] 23:04, Feb 14, 2005 (UTC)
_ _ While i haven't looked to see whether you at least preserved the former text,
your of ] amounts to either a cut-&-paste move or a bootleg deletion. The previous revisions belong as part of the page-history of ], even if the text is redundant. Don't do that. <br>--]•] 06:17, 19 July 2006 (UTC)<br>


==What the Bleep Do We Know!?==
Welcome back, RK -- thank you for respecting the community's decision despite disagreeing with it. I think it a very clear demonstration of the fact that, regardless of what people may say about their interactions with you in the past, you are a user who values this project and who plans to continue doing good work here. I want to apologize once again for the confusion I created in applying the block on your account in October, and I hope that I can work cooperatively with you on an article at some point in the future. Best regards, ] 21:23, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Hello, I'm writing you to determine if there is concensus amoung recent editors of ] to remove it's NPOV tag. Please weigh in with your opinion on the talk page ]. Thanks!! ] 19:25, 21 July 2006 (UTC)


== hey ==
:The past is in the past, I am sure that everything is cool. I am sure we'll work well together. ] 23:04, Feb 14, 2005 (UTC)


If you have five minutes, go here and read talk topics 13-15. If you think it is important, then consider commenting, ] | ] 06:13, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
You are violating the AC ruling that "RK is banned from editing articles directly or indirectly related to Judaism for one year". You had better stop before someone starts applying the prescribed penalties. --] 01:20, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)


== the Good Book ==
:Zero, what the hell are you talking about? I have never heard of any such ban, ''ever''. And I do not know any of the people working on the Judaism oriented articles who would even ask for such a thing. ] 18:47, Feb 15, 2005 (UTC)


Hag Sameach!
Welcome back,RK. ]<sup><font color="DarkGreen">]</font></sup> 16:56, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)


Do you think it is controversial to claim that Jews call their Tanakh "the Bible?" I don't. Do you think it is controversial to claim that "the Bible" refers only to the combined "Old Testament" and "New Testament," i.e. is a term that refers to the sacred scriptures of Christians (but not Jews)? I do, but this is precisely the claim Home Computer is making on the Bible talk page: http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Bible#Current_layout
:Hi, Jay! Good to back, and I look forward to working with you. I have been doing limited work since, I got back - I just took a four day Wiki-break, only to come back when Wiki was down due to server problems. I've been on for over an hour today, and got very little done, except in the ] article. Maybe tomorrow the serve will be more compliant. ] 14:25, Feb 23, 2005 (UTC)


Feel free to weigh in. And please watch out for Home Computer's attempts to change the article. ] | ] 10:59, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
==Banned again for no reason?! ==
This is really sick. Simonides and Zero instigated four out of nine Admins to ban me from editing all Judaism articles for a full year. Worse, they did so on th every articles on which I and others have the most success cooperating!


Please disregard, this wikipedian is stirring trouble, see his talk page. --] 15:20, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
Josiah, JayJG, JFWolff and I have very different ideas about Judaism, yet we obviously have been able to work on these Judaism articles.


== Judaism and Christianity ==
It is a gross violation of Sysop and Admin power to create rules that apply to only one person, and to no one else. By definition, when Misplaced Pages Admins engage in such behaviour, they are violating their own mandate, and thei "rulings" have no authority and are not binding.


You may care to comment here: ] | ] 13:22, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
:1. I am not involved in any flame wars. So why the year long ban? Not a single Wikipedian was ever given a year ban when they were NOT in a flame war.


== Article in need of cleanup - please assist if you can ==
:2. I am not involved in any revert wars or edit wars. So why the ban? Not a single Misplaced Pages was ever given a ban when they were not in revert for edit wars.


<div class="messagebox cleanup metadata plainlinks">
:3. The supposed problems are in articles in which the articles HAVE ALREADY BEEN RESOLVED, long ago! So why the ban?
{| style="width:100%;background:none"
| bgcolor="#ffdead" width=60|]
| bgcolor="#ffdead" |'''The article ], to which you have helped contribute, has been flagged as requiring ].'''<br>
If possible, we would appreciate your assistance in cleaning up this article to bring it up to Misplaced Pages's ]. If you are unsure what the nature of the problem is, please discuss this on the ]'s talk page.<br>
<small>You have been left this message by ], an automated process that notifies editors that articles to which they may have contributed on more than one occasion in the past now need cleanup. If you have any comments or object to this message being left, please leave a message on ].</small>
|}</div>


==Your Trolling==
:Not a single Wikipedian was ever given a year ban when parties amicably came to an issue. It seems that some Admins are enraged that our system actually worked, and parties peacefully worked out their differences. What kind of hateful people think that such a positive result is grounds for a year long ban?
Stop trolling or I will need to block you. ] 03:49, 31 January 2007 (UTC)


==Re.:Greenpeace==
:4. I repeatedly take week-long (or longer) Wiki-breaks to let things cool down and allow
other people to have their say without any problem. So why the ban?


You asked who considers Greenpeace terrorists. All of the civilized world does. When France initiated some nuclear testing, Greenpeace tried to interfere, and got one of their boats shot all to hell, it sank. In the US, the FBI, other law enforcement considers them terrorists. See ] for more and/or go to this link: '''www.fbi.gov/page2/jan06/elf012006.htm''' which is the last known info on this law enforcement operation, status of which is '''Active/Ongoing'''. All of the known "Eco-Terrorists orgs and those not mentioned here are being infiltrated, to take them down. '''IF''' you're in one of these orgs, its best to GET OUT and wait for the heat to die down. ] (]) 17:08, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
:5. I have taken many contentious articles OFF of my Watchlist, and simply let others do what they want, rather then engage in multiple arguments. So why the ban?
:I did not mean to be hard on you, just stating that when these people are caught, they either end up in jail and/or in a mental hospital. ] (]) 17:10, 25 December 2007 (UTC)


== User:RobertKaiser vs User:RK ==
:6. I have asked for and successfully used mediation when necessary. So why the ban? The action to ban me was taken behind my back, without informing me, and proceeded based on false assumptions - and potentially deliberate lies.


Hi: Who is ] and who is ]? Are you one and the same or different users or both? ] 09:14, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
I have e-mailed Jimbo Wales and others about this very issue previously; they were all unable to come up with even a ''single'' instance of this ever happening. Ever. The entire ban is a violation of Misplaced Pages policy, and we should not allow four people with a vendetta to wreck our whole system.


:This user is ''not'' Robert Kaiser. He is a troll, ''pretending to be me''.
We are unfortunately dealing with a small number of people abusing their Admin power out of some sort of personal vendetta. If it happens to one person, it will happen to others. What steps should we take next to initiate disciplinary action against them for these serious violations?


Robert


::If you have evidence of tolling, suggest you report this on ]. If the primary issue is the name suggest ]. Shabbat Shalom, --] 20:53, 2 February 2007 (UTC)


==Stop pretending to be me==
:If you were an admin, your previous behavior would, I hope, lead to you losing your administrator privileges (as it should with other rogue admins like Jayjg). But as a simple user, a years ban seems excessive and unjust. - ].] 21:02, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Stop pretending to me, it is considered to be trolling and I will block you for it. ] 21:44, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
: Back off RobertKaiser. You are being disruptive. '']'' ] 02:31, 3 February 2007 (UTC)


== Could you review these articles? ==
] and various other users have protested to the arbcomm for this very lengthy and quite unnecessary ban. While arguments on Judaism articles often became heated in a truly Talmudic way, there was never flaming in the full sense of the word, nor did Robert revert and neither did he troll in any particular way. The only way to overturn the Arbcom ruling is by appealing to the ''present'' arbcom (the members of which are quite sensible) and emailing Jimbo again if necessary. ]&nbsp;|&nbsp;] 21:18, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)


Could you have a look at these articles and their talk?
:Is this the right place to do so? ]


* ]
:: JFW, you must be an alien from a parallel universe. --] 22:03, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
* ]


I feel the articles are extremely well sourced and balanced. I'd like somebody else to remove the tags. Please look at my last versions, because I have run up against somebody from the evolution/creation universe who wants to pick a fight. --] 03:10, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
:::First me, and now I see personal attacks against JFW? Pathetic. ] 22:54, Feb 15, 2005 (UTC)


== List of pubs ==


As someone who has contributed to the talk page discussion on List of publications in philosophy and/or that article's previous deletion debate, I thought you might be interested in participating in its new nomination for deletion which can be found ]. Thanks. - ] 17:20, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
1) I'd advise you to put it here instead ]


== Serious discussions about using the names Reform vs. Progressive Judaism ==
2) Calling someone an alien from parallel universe is a flowery way of saying "your preception of events is radically different from mine". I very much doubt that Zero meant it as an attack. ] ] 23:01, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)


Hi RK: Please see the present discussions at ]. Your input would be greatly appreciated. (They are the result of discussions that unfolded at ].) Thanks so much, ] 08:55, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
== Arbitration Committee case opening ==


== An interesting AfD ==
The Arbitration Committe has ]. Please present any formal evidence at ]. -- ]] ] 01:07, 2005 Feb 16 (UTC)


Hello. You may be interested in commenting on ] Afd and contributing to it's associated discussion.] (]) 22:36, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
Robert you state above that "The supposed problems are in articles in which the articles HAVE ALREADY BEEN RESOLVED, long ago!". Can you provide any evidence to back that claim up? Maybe a talk page where you have come to an amicable compromise with other editors who you disagree with?


==Question for RK==
:Of course: Please see the list of diffs I added on the RFA page, and the articles they point to. On a related note, I call your attention to the six points I made on the Request for Arbitration page. I made these points four months ago, and I now make them again - and so far not a single person has disagreed with them. No one has been unable to come up with a single example of anyone getting a significant ban in this situation. Not a single person. That alone speaks volumes! ]


I am interested in some information you wrote in the "Semicha" article.
::Thanks for adding the diffs, we will take a look at them. But I am confused on one point. You said above to Zero that "Zero, what the hell are you talking about? I have never heard of any such ban, ever." and now you are saying to me that you made these points 4 months ago. So it would appear that you were aware of the ban asfter all?
You wrote "A minority of Jewish writers maintain that a form of the original semicha continued to be practiced in small numbers as late as the eleventh century CE"( Posted by RK, 21:33, 24 August 2004).


This comment has recently been removed for lack of citation.
:::No, people still miss my point. I was aware of a ''four month ban''. Not a year-long ban. ] 18:34, Feb 17, 2005 (UTC)


I am very interested in the source of this information or anything else at all you may be able to share with me about it.
In the original RFAr there is evidence of you having called people antisemites or other nasty names, called for people to be banned, accused people of being liars and vandals. Have you apologised to any of these people?


You may answer on the Talk Page or feel free to contact me at the following email address: CWatchman2@gmail.com
:Are you under the impression that I alone made remarks about this? Some of the people that I worried about being anti-Semites were identified as making anti-Semitic edits by others as well. Yet none of the others who had similar complaints were banned. Some of the people I criticised openly wrote Nazi propaganda, and I had presented significant amounts of proof for this. In fact, one of these people eventually claimed that we was a Nazi (John Goode, Mr. Natural Health), and one eventually made a public death threat against me (EntmootsOfTrolls.) Contrary to what you may have heard, many of those people were recognized as a problem by many people, ''not just me'', and some were banned. Obviously, I take it, you are not referring to these cases. You would not allow open Nazi statements, actual vandalism, or death threats.


Thank you very much,
::I am not under any impression in particular at the moment. I am currently going through the evidence. it's just that ''if'' you have apologised to anyone at any time for a remark made in the heat of the moment it would sensible to put a link on the evidence page so that everyone can easily see it.


] (]) 03:05, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
:Therefore, you are saying that there is someone not in this above group that I was not getting along with (four months ago) and made ad homenim attacks, calling them an anti-Semite or vandals, etc.? If so, I am happy to apologize. ] 20:44, Feb 16, 2005 (UTC)
::You missunderstand me. I am not trying to prompt you to apologise to anyone. It's just that if you have done so, then it will look good on the evidence page.


== ''Binding of Isaac'' article name change ==
What I'm looking for is evidence that you have learned your lesson and are a reformed character. If you can provide any please stick it on the evidence page. ] ] 18:46, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)


Thanks for your comments and contributions at ]. About 3 weeks ago, I proposed to change the name of the article to "Sacrifice of Isaac" at ], but so far haven't seen any response. I plan to go ahead and rename the article on ], ] unless there are objections. I invite you to visit the article and submit any comments you have on the matter. Thanks! --] (]) 17:42, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
:I think you conflating two different claims. One claim is that I am a bad person who must not be allowed on Misplaced Pages. I obviously disagree, and I cannot say "Yes, I was hateful, but now I am good". We should not make someone grovel in order to be allowed to edit.


:Five editors have responded to the proposal described above. Four oppose and one is neutral. The consensus is opposed to the name change. I'll therfore leave the article as currently named ("Binding of Isaac") and consider the matter closed. --] (]) 03:00, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
::I completely agree.


==Proposed deletion of ]==
:The (first) claim that was the reason I was given a four month ban, ''which is now officially over''. However, there was a ''second claim'' and a second ban: This second claim was that I refused to work with others on the Judaism articles, and that I engaged in non-stop edit warson Judaism articles. The result was that the old Admin Committee barred me for a year from any editing on Judaism-related articles. The problem, of course, is that the claims were not true. Someone took ''old arguments'' that had long since been resolved, and falsely presented them as current arguments that could not be resolved. I was shocked to see such tactics.
]
A ] template has been added to the page ], suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this page may not satisfy Misplaced Pages's ], and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "]" and ]). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on ].


Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the ], the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the ] or it can be sent to ], where it may be deleted if ] to delete is reached. <small>Do you want to ] of receiving this notice?</small><!-- Template:PRODWarning --> –''']''' <sup>(])</sup> 01:56, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
::We are looking into this, any evidence that you can dig up showing that the arguments were resolved prior to the arbitration case starting will be of great help.


==WikiProject Judaism Newsletter==
:You do not need to take my word for it; please see for yourself. Long before the four-month ban occured, I had already had a history of working with many others on all of the Judaism articles, via the WikiProject on Judaism. This effort was (and is) very successful. In fact, every time I created an article I invite others to work on it, which is the opposite of what some people claim. And as you can see, JayJG, JFWolff, Josiah and many others all worked together with me to make some high quality articles. The people doing the editing on these articles don't understand the incredibly severe year-long ban. We ended up working well together for many months...and I was nevertheless banned after doing everything that was asked of me, and producing a high-level of Wiki-cooperation. Please see the diffs I noted on the RFA page for specific examples. ] 20:44, Feb 16, 2005 (UTC)
{| class="navbox collapsible collapsed" style="text-align: left; border: 2px; margin-top: 0.2em; background-color: #3740fe"
|-
! colspan="2" valign="middle" style="width: 60%; border: 2px #3740fe solid; background-color: #767cfc; padding: 1em;" |]
<div style="text-align:center; font-family:Georgia; font-size:x-large;">'''The WikiProject Judaism Newsletter'''</div><div style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-family:Georgia; font-size:large;">Issue I -- ],</span> ]</div>
|-
|
{| style="margin:1em auto; background:#FFFFFF; border:2px solid #3740fe;"
|
|<div class="center" style="font-family:Georgia;"><big><big>] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ]
] Judaism ]/] </big></big></div>
|}
{| cellpadding="10" cellspacing="8" style="width: 100%; margin-bottom:10px; background-color: #3740fe; border: 1px solid #3740fe; vertical-align: top; -moz-border-radius-topleft: 8px; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft: 8px; -moz-border-radius-topright: 8px; -moz-border-radius-bottomright: 8px;"
| style="width: 80%; background-color: #767cfc; border: 8px solid #767cfc; border-right-width:8px; border-bottom-width:8px; vertical-align: top; -moz-border-radius-topleft: 8px; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft: 8px; -moz-border-radius-topright: 8px; -moz-border-radius-bottomright: 8px;" rowspan="3" |


<table style="background: none; padding: 0px;"><tr><td valign="top">
::It's great that you invite people to work on articles with you. What would be even better though is if you could provide us with examples of you and another user initially disagreeing with one another over something and through reasonable discussion coming to an acceptable NPOV solution where everyone is reasonably happy that the article is worded ok. ] ] 22:51, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
<table style="width: 100%; float: left; border: 2px #3740fe solid; -moz-border-radius: 8px; background: #FFFFFF; margin-right: 4px;">
<tr><td><div style="-moz-border-radius-topright: 8px; -moz-border-radius-topleft: 8px; background: #FFFFFF; text-align: center; padding: 3px; margin-bottom: -3px; margin-top: 2px;">


] celebrates Moses receiving the Ten Commandments.</small>]]
:::Fine by me, start with the article on ] and ]. There were serious NPOV and factual disagreements on these, with comments from all parties, yet we came to agreements. ] 18:34, Feb 17, 2005 (UTC)
<big>'''What's This?'''</big><br>
''Shalom aleichem'' sports fans, and welcome to the first of what I hope will be a monthly newsletter with the need-to-know information about our fair WikiProject. If you have any questions or comments, or would like to recommend a story for the newsletter, click to leave a message on the Newsletter Coordinator's talk page.<br>
<big>'''In the News'''</big>
*WikiProject Good Articles is doing sweeps over all our current good articles to ensure they still meet criteria. For more information and how you can help, check out ].
*GA status for the article ] has been put on hold pending a few minor revisions. A list of things that need to be done to return this top importance article to its proper status can be found ].
*] is a Featured Article Candidate! Go forth, my people, and ]!
<big>'''To Do'''</big>
*One new Judaism-related article was created this month, the long requested ]. Thanks to ] for creating it. Remember, folks, there are over forty ], so whenever you get the opportunity make sure to go create a few.
*In the right column you will see a listing of our most popular articles. All of these articles got 170,000+ page hits in the past month, and they should be on everyone's watchlist so we can keep them vandalism-free.
*Spread the word! No, not the '']''... <small>(well, you can do that too)</small> I'm talking about inviting knowledgeable users to join the project. You can proclaim your undying love of WikiProject Judaism in methods mild to wild, check the ] and ] for examples. We also now have a flashy advertisement, to use it add <nowiki>{{</nowiki>]|ad=148<nowiki>}}</nowiki> to your userpage.
</div></tr></td></table>


<td valign="top">
OK I'll take a look. ] ] 07:59, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
<table style="width: 250px; border: 2px #3740fe solid; -moz-border-radius: 8px; background: #ffffff; margin-bottom: 8px; padding-left: 1px;"><tr><td><div style="padding-left: 6px; padding-right: 6px; padding-top: 3px; text-align: left;">
'''Quick Stats'''<br>
On the date of publish, we had...
*275 ]
*6152 articles
:*2341 of which are ]
:*15 of which are ]
:*8 of which are ]
'''New Members'''
*]
*]
*]
*]
'''Most Popular Articles'''<br>
<small>By page hits. .</small>
#]
#]
#]
#]
#]


</div></td></tr></table></table>
== The business ==
{{Misplaced Pages ads|ad=148}}
|-
|}
|}
<small><small>This newsletter was automatically delivered by ] because you are a member of the WikiProject. If you would like to opt out of future mailings, please remove your name from ].</small></small>
Delivered by ]'''&nbsp;<small>(])</small>''' on 04:33, 4 July 2008 (UTC)


==Proposed deletion of ]==
RK, you've been away from Misplaced Pages too long. You're forgetting to sign your talk page comments!
]
A ] template has been added to the article ], suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Misplaced Pages's ], and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "]" and ]). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on ].


Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the ], the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the ] or it can be sent to ], where it may be deleted if ] to delete is reached.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> <b>]‑]-]</b> 15:35, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
Seriously, I'd love to give evidence in your ArbComm case, but most of my attempts to have your ban shortened were conducted with Danny over IRC. This is not admissible as evidence, I fear. Nonetheless, I think Zero0000 is being ridiculous. I have never heard of Dissident. Who is he/she?


==WikiProject Judaism Newsletter==
As for ], I have responded on the talk page. My argument is that none of them are open to discussion, so we'll just keep on reverting until we're ]. I do not believe the ] will come back. ]&nbsp;|&nbsp;] 22:15, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
<!--Begin Newsletter-->
{| class="navbox collapsible collapsed" style="text-align: left; border: 2px; margin-top: 0.2em; background-color: #1306c1"
|-
! colspan="2" valign="middle" style="width: 60%; border: 2px #1306c1 solid; background-color: #b4c6fe; padding: 1em;" |
<div style="text-align:center; font-family:Georgia; font-size:x-large;">'''The Judaism Newsletter'''</div>
<div style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-family:Georgia; font-size:large;">Issue II -- </span>], ]</div>
|-
|
{| style="margin:1em auto; background:#FFFFFF; border:2px solid #1306c1"
|
|<div class="center" style="font-family:Georgia;"><big><big>] (]/]) ] ] (]/]) ] ] (]/])</big></big></div>
|}
{| cellpadding="10" cellspacing="8" style="width: 100%; margin-bottom:10px; background-color: #1306c1; border: 1px solid #1306c1; vertical-align: top; -moz-border-radius-topleft: 8px; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft: 8px; -moz-border-radius-topright: 8px; -moz-border-radius-bottomright: 8px;"
| style="width: 80%; background-color: #b4c6fe; border: 8px solid #b4c6fe; border-right-width:8px; border-bottom-width:8px; vertical-align: top; -moz-border-radius-topleft: 8px; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft: 8px; -moz-border-radius-topright: 8px; -moz-border-radius-bottomright: 8px;" rowspan="3" |


<table style="background: none; padding: 0px;"><tr><td valign="top">
== re: Abuse by Stirling Newbury ==
<table style="width: 100%; float: left; border: 2px #1306c1 solid; -moz-border-radius: 8px; background: #FFFFFF; margin-right: 4px;">
<tr><td><div style="-moz-border-radius-topright: 8px; -moz-border-radius-topleft: 8px; background: #FFFFFF; text-align: center; padding: 3px; margin-bottom: -3px; margin-top: 2px;">


]
Agreed w.r.t. the RFC. The guy has some sort of point as far as citing sources, but he's completely failing to make it in any sane manner or discuss what exactly he objects to, and I don't have the patience to deal with him without more people capable of actual conversation around. -- ] 00:31, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
<big>'''Now with 200% ''more'' Jewishness!'''</big><br>
Yes, folks, we're moving on up. This newsletter is now the newsletter for both WikiProject Judaism, WikiProject Jewish History, ''and'' WikiProject Kabbalah. In the future, I may split them, but for now I think we'll be just fine with one. As always, any questions or comments should be directed to me, ].


<big>'''A Special Dispatch'''</big><br>
:Evidently my watchlist was lying to me before I posted this. 172 protecting the page has at least caused Stirling to speak more than a sentence at a time. -- ] 00:36, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Just a note, not aimed at anyone in particular. By order of the administrative cabal, it is officially not cool (and possibly ]) to call someone an anti-semite ''when'' they aren't being anti-semitic. Anti-semitic is a very charged word, and it's important only to use it when you're absolutely sure it applies, lest it become the subject of a ]. Remember Hanlon's Razor: never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.<br>
<big>'''In the News'''</big>
*A new class on the importance scale has been added- C Class- which covers articles better than start but not quite to B Class yet. It is up to the WikiProjects to decide whether to adopt them or not. Currently, there has been little discussion within our Projects, so if you feel strongly either way be sure to note so at your Project.
*There is a proposal to reword the section on NPOV regarding religious articles. Please see ] to weigh in.
*Thanks largely to the efforts of ], a new navbox has come into being featuring Halakha topics. See: ] to join in the conversation about how it can best be improved.
<big>'''To Do'''</big>
* The ] is beginning a project of creating and improving articles related to religion, including Judaism. At the present time, volunteers are needed to propose our most important subjects for articles to be created. The official working list is ] and a more extended list is ]. If you are unsure of proper topics, you might try checking our lists of top importance level articles: ] and ]. (WikiProject Kabbalah currently doesn't have such a list)
:* WikiProject Christianity is considering running a monthly drive wherein two or three top importance articles from English Misplaced Pages are simplified and moved over to S.E. They have extended an offer to work with us in creating a similar project for Judaism related articles. For questions or volunteer opportunities, please contact ].
*WikiProject Kabbalah is in dire need of an article rating system for quality and importance. If you are familiar with that system and have some time on your hands, please create one. It could also use some infoboxes...
<big>'''New Members'''</big>
*'''Judaism:''' ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ]
*'''Jewish History:''' ]
*'''Kabbalah:''' None. Won't you ?


<big>'''New Articles'''</big>
== Arbitration Committee injunction ==
*] (Thanks ]!)
*There are some 40 odd standing requests for Judaism related articles. Please make them! I would, but I'm too busy writing this. ].


] has been enacted; the ban on your editing of Judaism-related articles has been temporarily stayed pending the outcome of the case. -- ]] ] 04:22, 2005 Feb 17 (UTC)


</div></tr></td></table>
== Chabad ==


<td valign="top">
Hi RK, I'm having a good discussion with ] on ]. He postulates that the "Rebbe = God" issue is the result of a misunderstanding, and has kindly posted ], which contains (Hebrew) quotes that are meant to prove that all Hasidim see a degree of Godly revelation in their Rebbes. Could you review the discussion? Perhaps you can square this with things you have read on the messaging boards. ]&nbsp;|&nbsp;] 16:48, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)
<table style="width: 250px; border: 2px #1306c1 solid; -moz-border-radius: 8px; background: #ffffff; margin-bottom: 8px; padding-left: 1px;"><tr><td><div style="padding-left: 6px; padding-right: 6px; padding-top: 3px; text-align: left;">
]<br>
'''Quick Links'''<br>
*]
*]
*]
* ]
* ]


'''WikiProject Judaism Stats'''<br>
Hi, I see that the discusssion on ] has come to a standstill you mentioned three points which I tried responding to, and I would like to know your current thoughts on it. By the way I switched my name from ] to ]--] 02:13, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
*281 ]
*6155 articles
:*2342 of which are ]
:*15 of which are ]
:*8 of which are ]
'''WikiProject Jewish History Stats'''<br>
*69 ]
*1124 articles
:*241 of which are ]
:*10 of which are ]
:*10 of which are ]
'''WikiProject Kabbalah Stats'''<br>
*12 ]
*165 articles
:*87 of which are ]
:*1 of which is ]
:*1 of which is ]
</div></td></tr></table></table>
{{Misplaced Pages ads|ad=148}}
|-
|}
|}
<small><small>This newsletter was automatically delivered because you are a member of one or more Judaism related WikiProjects. If you would like to opt out of future mailings, please remove your name from ].</small></small>
<!--End Newsletter. Have a nice day!-->
:*<small>Newsletter delivery by ] 02:56, 3 August 2008 (UTC)</small>


==The Judaism Newsletter==
:I will reply, but probably tomorrow. I have just spent an hour and a half on Misplaced Pages, and my family duties await me!
<!--Begin Newsletter-->
{| class="navbox collapsible collapsed" style="text-align: left; border: 2px; margin-top: 0.2em; background-color: #1306c1"
|-
! colspan="2" valign="middle" style="width: 60%; border: 2px #1306c1 solid; background-color: #b4c6fe; padding: 1em;" |
<div style="text-align:center; font-family:Georgia; font-size:x-large;">'''The Judaism Newsletter'''</div>
<div style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-family:Georgia; font-size:large;">Issue III -- </span>], ]</div>
|-
|
{| style="margin:1em auto; background:#FFFFFF; border:2px solid #1306c1"
|
|<div class="center" style="font-family:Georgia;"><big><big>] (]/]) ] ] (]/]) ] ] (]/])</big></big></div>
|}
{| cellpadding="10" cellspacing="8" style="width: 100%; margin-bottom:10px; background-color: #1306c1; border: 1px solid #1306c1; vertical-align: top; -moz-border-radius-topleft: 8px; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft: 8px; -moz-border-radius-topright: 8px; -moz-border-radius-bottomright: 8px;"
| style="width: 80%; background-color: #b4c6fe; border: 8px solid #b4c6fe; border-right-width:8px; border-bottom-width:8px; vertical-align: top; -moz-border-radius-topleft: 8px; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft: 8px; -moz-border-radius-topright: 8px; -moz-border-radius-bottomright: 8px;" rowspan="3" |


<table style="background: none; padding: 0px;"><tr><td valign="top">
== Jewish mythology ==
<table style="width: 100%; float: left; border: 2px #1306c1 solid; -moz-border-radius: 8px; background: #FFFFFF; margin-right: 4px;">
<tr><td><div style="-moz-border-radius-topright: 8px; -moz-border-radius-topleft: 8px; background: #FFFFFF; text-align: center; padding: 3px; margin-bottom: -3px; margin-top: 2px;">


]
I am going out of town and won't have time for the next few days. Coincidentally, I am reading a book by Jeffrey Rubenstein (no relation) on Rabbinic stories. I think on myth/folklore we should follow established scholarship, but I just don't know that scholarship. I agree with your assessment of the article, ] | ] 20:08, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
<big>'''"Censorship" of names of G-d'''</big><br>
There is an interesting discussion currently taking place regarding whether or not it is acceptable to censor (i.e. G-d, HaShem->YodHey) names of G-d in articles to protect Jews who may be reading or editing the article. You can weigh in here: ].


<big>'''Article Cleanup Lists'''</big><br>
== ] ==
] has generously offered us use of his bot to generate lists that show which articles of ours are tagged for cleanup. You can read more about this service here: ] and if you would like to take him up on his offer, contact him on ].


<big>'''In the News'''</big>
Can you give me your comments on ]? I created the article a few days ago and several editors have improved on it since then; I'd like to have your input. ]<sup>]</sup> 04:22, Mar 31, 2005 (UTC)
]
]
*There is a collaboration drive to get ] to ] status. For information about how you can help, see the talk page or ].
*WikiProject Kabbalah's only Featured and Good articles have been removed from the WikiProject, on the grounds that neither article (] and ], respectively) actually mention the subject's affiliation with ]. If you have sourced information linking either of these people to Kabbalah, please add it so the articles can be returned to the WikiProject.
*After a rather heated discussion, there are now ''two'' barnstars for use by the Jewish WikiProjects, {{tl|The Jewish Barnstar}} and {{tl|The New Jewish Barnstar}}, and you can choose which one you would like to use.. Remember: barnstars are for rewarding users who are doing good work on the project or on Judaism, Jewish History, or Kabbalah articles, and anyone can give anyone else a barnstar. If you see a user who you thinks deserves a thank you, give them a barnstar!
<big>'''To Do/Help Requests'''</big>
*If you have some spare time on your hands, we could use an article about a Kabbalah scholar named ]. According to ] there are quite a few sources easily available, you can contact him if you have questions. Be sure to nominate it for ] if the finished article is eligible.
*The folks at ] need some assistance from someone familiar with both the Hebrew calendar and language to help them figure out the subject's birthday. If you can help, please see ].
<big>'''New Members'''</big>
*'''Judaism:''' ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ]
*'''Jewish History:''' ], ], ], ], ], ]
*'''Kabbalah:''' ]


<big>'''New Articles'''</big>
== Offensive Nazi image ==
* ] (thanks ]!}, ] (thanks ]!), ] (thanks ])
RK: Please see ] for vote on offensive ] propaganda "image" Image:MoneyJews.jpg Thank you. ] 09:37, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
*We get a lot of articles that are being created and not announced! By announcing new articles, you attract attention to them, and the more people looking and editing the better they will get. If you would like your new article to appear in the newsletter, add it ] for Judaism and Kabbalah and ] for Jewish History.
*There are some 40 odd standing requests for Judaism related articles. Please make them! I would, but I'm too busy writing this. ].


:Done. At first I was very offended by the image, but I think that it is important that our article on anti-Semitism offer a few examples of classic European anti-Semitic cartoons, ''as long as they are described as such''. The website of the Anti-Defamation League has a similar gallary of modern day anti-Semitic cartoons that are being published in the Arab press. 15:38, Mar 31, 2005 (UTC)


</div></tr></td></table>
==Halakhic-Jews-Only has a shot across his bow, too==


<td valign="top">
I only said one thing to ]: "Praised be Hashem, Monarch of the Universe (switches to English from Hebrew, as I know English better) for Reform Judaism, and Amen to that." ] 21:30, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC) And I meant it, too.
<table style="width: 250px; border: 2px #1306c1 solid; -moz-border-radius: 8px; background: #ffffff; margin-bottom: 8px; padding-left: 1px;"><tr><td><div style="padding-left: 6px; padding-right: 6px; padding-top: 3px; text-align: left;">
]<br>
'''Quick Links'''<br>
*]
*]
*]
*]
* ]
* ]


'''WikiProject Judaism Stats'''<br>
== Offensive anti-Israel image for deletion ==
*291 ]
*6248 articles
:*2356 of which are ]
:*18 of which are ]
:*6 of which are ]
'''WikiProject Jewish History Stats'''<br>
*77 ]
*1141 articles
:*244 of which are ]
:*10 of which are ]
:*10 of which are ]
'''WikiProject Kabbalah Stats'''<br>
*13 ]
*165 articles
:*87 of which are ]
:*'''0''' of which are Good
:*'''0''' of which are Featured
</div></td></tr></table></table>
{{Misplaced Pages ads|ad=148}}
|-
|}
|}
<small><small>This newsletter was automatically delivered because you are a member of one or more Judaism related WikiProjects. If you would like to opt out of future mailings, please remove your name from ]. As always, please direct all questions, comments, requests, <s>barnstars</s>, offers of help, and angry all-caps anti-semitic rants to my talk page. Thanks, and have a great month. ]<span style="color:#838B8B;">]|]|]</span>]</span> 20:31, 31 August 2008 (UTC)</small></small>
<!--End Newsletter. Have a nice day!-->
::*<small>Newsletter delivery by ] 21:38, 31 August 2008 (UTC)</small>


==Rebbe ]==
RK, please see ] to delete ]
Hello. I saw that you once edited the above page. I have decided to submit this article to ] in order to qualify for Featured Article status. Would you kindly click on the above link and add your comments or suggestions? Thank you, ] (]) 21:30, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
This highly offensive anti-Israel "caricature" spoofing '']'' that depicts the ] that Israel is the the aggressive "shark" and that the Palestinians are poor little innocent "victims". This is raw pro-Arab ] and unfortunately fits the pattern of ]'s insertion of the offensive ] taken from the ]s. Sure looks like it's becoming a "pattern of ]" to me. Thank you. ] 07:41, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)


== Edit war on NOI article == == Many many thanks ==


You did a wonderful job in your section on 20th & 21st century commentaries. You trod in waters that I was afraid to tread in. I avoided the moderns by only including commentaries printed in a Mikraot Gedolot, and I didn't realize that would confine me to Hebrew. Now I feel free to put in sections about Nechama Leibovits, Umberto Cassuto, etc. Again, thanks for pulling me out of a rut as well as the research you did.
My interest in this article is stated at the top of the ] page. In that spirit, I have reviewed the edit war going on the ] article. I believe that you have documented the items factually and that they are presented in just about as close to a NPOV as you can get on such a controversial subject. I have left a message on ]'s Talk page as well as a much longer comment on the page ]. Please be sure to be extra careful to cite your sources and avoid deleting the other writer's work (which is of course what he has apparently been doing). We'll see where all this goes. If you are getting any "threats" beyond what I can read in edit comments, or wish to leave me communication, feel free to leave work at ].


I am going to make a few changes though. I don't think the appendices to the Etz Hayim belong in this article. Also I don't know how much overlap there is between the Etz Hayim and the new JPS commentary/translation. Just know that nothing I say is written in stone, and I'm almost always open to suggestions. ] (]) 04:08, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
==Threats==


== Torah Judaism and Daat Miqra ==
I want to clarify something. In the message you left on my talk page, if I am reading it correctly, are you saying that you feel that I have threatend you? ] 17:41, Apr 5, 2005 (UTC)


Robert, thanks for giving me the benefit of the doubt. As far as the Daat Miqra goes, I wish there were an English translation. That would be an incredible thing. Unfortunately, none exists that I know of. That'd be a fascinating project, though. I wonder if Mossad Harav Kook would be interested in it. They do the Daat Miqra series, no? -] (]) 04:28, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
:No, no! I re-wrote something that I originally wrote to Firebug, and mistakenly didn't rephrase some sentences. I have since rewritten my note. Please check my updated note on your Talk page! Sorry about that. ] 17:46, Apr 5, 2005 (UTC)


== Your user page ==
Whew! To the best of my knowledge, I have never threatened anyone on WP, nor do I ever intend to. My involvement with the NOI article was almost accidental, and I am not very up on the facts themselves. Regarding threats, I think that you need to retain a record of anything you feel someone should be held accountable for. I will talk witha couple of other admins and get some advise on how this situation could be resolved, or at least, kept from escalating into personal attacks. Mark in Richmond. ] 18:00, Apr 5, 2005 (UTC)


I found your old user page while checking out some old deleted contributions. I have ] it, so that all edits are in one place. Hope you don't mind. ''']'''] 12:07, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
== Protest method of editing, then proposing deletion ==


==Copyright question==
You do not appear to have learned anything from your time away. Editing articles and then proposing to delete them if you cannot steer them your own way is not ethical behaviour. If you edited them, then, that is a sign that you agree that they should exist, is it not? Before proposing any deletions, have a look in the page history and you'll find a very reasonable version as with ] - which has now been restored to a balanced version. If it was you editing it anonymously to do damage, then proposing a ], shame on you. Read ] for some reasoning as to why this is not a good strategy for an encyclopedia.
Hi. Another contributor has noted a similarity between the page ], which you contributed way back in 2003, and , which bears a copyright notice of 2002. I have confirmed substantial duplication of text, so I've blanked the article pending some clarification of the matter. Can you help provide any clarification on this issue and the origin of this text? --] <sup>]</sup> 14:08, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
:Just noting for bypassers (since I have mailed the contributor): I've clarified this one for myself. Notwithstanding the copyright notice, the material is ]. --] <sup>]</sup> 14:46, 17 March 2009 (UTC)


==Merge==
People find it difficult to work with you more because of your unethical editing and carping and paraphrasing of others, than because of your idiosyncratic views. Please do attempt to understand that others are doing you a favour by pointing out these behaviours to you as above.
I've just proposed merging ] (which you worked on) into ]. Please join in the discussion, if you like. ] (]) 15:42, 4 July 2009 (UTC)


==Orphaned non-free image (File:Page layout Or Hadash.JPG)==
==Arbitration case - final decision ==
<span style="font-size:32px; line-height:1em">''']'''</span> Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently ], meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. ] if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]).


If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on ]. Thank you. <!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> ]&nbsp;(]) 23:24, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
A decision has been reached in the arbitration case relating to you. Remedy #2 of the previous Arbitration case is hereby revoked and replaced with a revert limitation and personal attack parole for the same period. Personal attacks on Wikimedia mailing lists are included in the personal attack parole. Please see ] for further details and the full decision. -- ] ] 22:44, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)


==Orphaned non-free image (File:Or Hadash covers.JPG)==
:Understood and accepted. Thanks for taking the time. ] 12:05, Apr 10, 2005 (UTC)
<span style="font-size:32px; line-height:1em">''']'''</span> Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently ], meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. ] if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]).


If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on ]. Thank you. <!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> ]&nbsp;(]) 23:25, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
== ] ==
==]==
]
This is an automated message from ]. I have performed a web search with the contents of ], and it appears to be very similar to another Misplaced Pages page: ]. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page&mdash; you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally moving or duplicating content, please be sure you have followed the procedure at ] by acknowledging the duplication of material in ] to preserve attribution history.


This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on ]. ] (]) 13:53, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
You might be interested in ]. ]<sup><font color="DarkGreen">]</font></sup> 17:33, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)


==File copyright problem with File:Page layout Or Hadash.JPG==
== Welcome back ==
]
Thank you for uploading ]. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Misplaced Pages takes ] very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the '''license''' and the '''source''' of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a ''']''' to the ].


If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following .
Welcome back. ] Co., ] 21:05, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)


If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the ]. Thanks again for your cooperation.<!-- Template:Di-no license-notice --> ] (]) 11:55, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
==EntmootsOfTrolls==


I'm sorry RK, I don't have any insightful solutions to this problem. EntmootsOfTrolls is banned, absolutely and (excepting a surprise decision by Jimbo) irrevocably. As you know, the problem is purely a technical one of keeping him off the site. At the moment, all we can do is revert him, block him, and refuse to respond to him. Any articles that are clearly by him can be deleted. This applies to ''any'' sockpuppet of his we find (with due care to identify these accurately of course). If at any time this conflicts with your revert limitation, then I would suggest a note on ] to ask for help in reverting. Apologies for the slow response to your message -- ] ] 17:31, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)


==File copyright problem with File:Or Hadash covers.JPG==
: RK, I am pursuing this matter through various channels. Please let me know if I can help with anything specific. I can appreciate the fact that you are following the rules and he isn't. ] Co., ] 01:41, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
]
Thank you for uploading ]. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Misplaced Pages takes ] very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the '''license''' and the '''source''' of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a ''']''' to the ].

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following .

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the ]. Thanks again for your cooperation.<!-- Template:Di-no license-notice --> ] (]) 11:56, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

== "Ultra-Orthodox" in Haredi article (courtesy note) ==

You contributed to a ] about the term "Ultra-Orthodox" on the ] page. I removed the content in ] that claimed that "Ultra-Orthodox" is pejorative. I have explained my reasons on the ]. ]<sup>]</sup> 15:30, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

==Sirach article==
In an to the ] article you added the /* Reference */ section with ''Amidah'', entry in the ''Encyclopedia Judaica'', Keter Publishing. The article has been considerably changed since then. I am not sure what that reference was intended as. Any help you could provide would be appreciated. Please reply, if appropriate, at ]. Thanks. --] (]) 21:50, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

==Jewish philosophy==
If you're still active here, can you take a look at ]? There's an editor turning the piece into a complete ploughed field... ] (]) 17:42, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

== ] nomination of ] ==
]An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for ]. The nominated article is ]. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also ] and "]").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to ]. Please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the ] template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

'''Please note:''' This is an automatic notification by a ]. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --] (]) 01:08, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
==Your Intro ==
You quote .P._Lovecraft: "We know nothing except through logical analysis, and if we reject that sole connexion with reality, we might as well stop trying to be adults and retreat into the capricious dream-world of infantility."
This seems incorrect. We know our consciousness exists with a visceral self-awareness. There is no logical analysis. An anti-Nietzschean argument but still.......] (]) 20:04, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

==AfD==
I've nominated ], ], and ] together for deletion: ].] (]) 16:29, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

== Chabad on Misplaced Pages arbitration request ==

Since you have been kind enough to comment at the unresolved ] case at ], you may wish to know that it has now been nominated for arbitration. Feel free to review at ] and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—
* ];
* ].

Thank you for your input and patience, ] (]) 09:20, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

== Arbitration case opens/Chabad movement ==

Hi RK: Since you have been involved in the topic of ], this is to let you know that an official arbitration case has been opened at ]. You may wish to add your comments for the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, ]. The ArbCom asks that evidence be submitted within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, ]. Thanks, ] (]) 06:06, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

==Unreferenced BLPs==
] Hello RK! Thank you for your contributions. I am a ] alerting you that '''5''' of the articles that you created are tagged as]. The ] policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure ], all biographies should be based on ]. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current '']'' article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{tl|unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

# ] - <small>{{findsources|Jack Wertheimer}}</small>
# ] - <small>{{findsources|Reuven Hammer}}</small>
# ] - <small>{{findsources|William E. Kaufman}}</small>
# ] - <small>{{findsources|Neil Gillman}}</small>
# ] - <small>{{findsources|Jules Harlow}}</small>
Thanks!--] (]) 07:42, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

== Motion to dismiss or keep the Chabad editors case ==

Hi RK: A discussion has started if the Chabad editors case should be dismissed or should remain open. As someone who has been involved in the serious COI discussions leading up to this ArbCom case you should be informed of this motion and have the right to explain if you agree or disagree with this proposed motion and why. Please see ]. Thank you, ] (]) 07:06, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

==] of ]==
]

The article ] has been ]&#32; because of the following concern:
:<b>out of scope</b>

While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ].

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> will stop the ], but other ]es exist. The ] can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> ] (]) 00:58, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

== ] nomination of ] ==

<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>I have nominated ], an article that you created, for ]. I do not think that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. <!-- Template:AFDWarning --> ] (]) 10:52, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

==The Living Torah and Nach article==

In the Living Torah and Nach article you wrote, "Rabbi Kaplan's translation has been criticised for mis-translating the text. The dispute comes about because Kaplan consciously attempted not to present a straight translation of the text, but rather interspersing the translation with later rabbinic commentary and Jewish law." You did not source this information. I am writing another article in which I quoted your above-mentioned statement. I was confronted about this statement and was asked for sources which I was unable to find. Could you please assist me in finding this source or sources?

Thank you very much. ] (]) 03:29, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

== ] ==

Since you seem to think that "dark star" is a synonym for this, you might want to create a redirect ] to it. ] (]) 05:31, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

==] of ]==
]

The article ] has been ]&#32; because of the following concern:
:'''Portion of the article on Aristotle & "Metaphysics" doesn't seem to mention God.'''

While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ].

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> will stop the ], but other ]es exist. The ] can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> ] (]) 02:25, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

== ] ==

You might like to message ] and ask for his views, since he's been active as an editor. You might also like to look at the Torah section in the article ] - mostly for some useful books on the subject.

You're welcome to edit the article as you please - Misplaced Pages is open to all. ] (]) 11:26, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

== Autopatrolled ==

]
Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the ] permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting ]. Please remember:
*This permission does not give you any special status or authority
*Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
*You may wish to display the {{tl|Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{tl|User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
*If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it
:If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! ] 14:02, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

== ] ==

Happy New Year. If you have time can you look at section of the talk page and the sections that follow it (all created in the past couple of days, esp the current conflict with Telpardec)? Thanks, ] | ] 10:57, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
== Nomination of ] for deletion ==

<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].

The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> ] (]) 13:23, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].

The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> -- ] (] - ]) 05:33, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

== Requested move: Alternative medicine → Complementary and alternative medicine ==

Request initiated for the article ] to be moved to ]. I'm notifying you as major contributor to the article. Relevant talk page discussion found ]. ] (]) 02:59, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
==] nomination of ]==
]
{{Quote box|quote=<p>If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read ].</p><p>You may want to consider using the ] to help you create articles.</p>|width=20%|align=right}}
A tag has been placed on ], requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read ] and ] for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request ]. <!-- Template:Db-spam-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> —] (]) 07:52, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

== Just to let you know -- Missing Wikipedians ==

You have been mentioned at ]. ] (]) 09:33, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

==Disambiguation link notification for March 29==

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 09:03, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
== Proof that Nazis deliberately killed six million Jews listed at ] ==
]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Proof that Nazis deliberately killed six million Jews'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] if you have not already done so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;">] | ] </span></small> 04:10, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

== Gog and Magog ==

Hi RK. I just reverted an edit of yours at ], for reasons given in the edit summary - it was pretty hard to read for anyone not already acquainted with Rabbinic literature, and seemed to cover material already dealt with in the second para of the following sections. However, if you could do some research into more recent sources, it could lead to a useful stand-alone section section on Jewish treatment of Gog/Magog through to the modern period. Let me know if you'd like to take this on. ] (]) 05:20, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

== ] ==

{{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 08:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=691963760 -->

== ]: Voting now open! ==

{{Ivmbox|Hello, RK. Voting in the ''']''' is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review ] and submit your choices on ''']'''.
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52 bot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52_bot/spamlist/1&oldid=750798257 -->

== ]: Voting now open! ==

{{Ivmbox|Hello, RK. Voting in the ''']''' is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review ] and submit your choices on ''']'''. ] (]) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52 bot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52_bot/spamlist/1&oldid=750798257 -->

== ] talk page ==

Please see my question on the talk page for History of religious Jewish music.

Thanks, Moshe ] (]) 15:24, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

== ArbCom 2017 election voter message ==

{{Ivmbox|Hello, RK. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2017/Coordination/MMS/08&oldid=813407029 -->

== Jewish neopaganism ==
You're a vandal. Stop adding Kohenet Institute into article about '''paganism''', when it doesn't pagan organization. --] (]) 19:29, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

You're a pathological liar. You are lying about the words of the women in Kohenet, and lying that they are Orthodox Jews. Stop this vandalism. ] (])
* I never tell something like that and I going to report this to the administration. --] (]) 14:18, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
* ] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> ] (]) 14:31, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

=== Re: ] ===
Do you ever read the pages, that you used as sources? Look, the Kohenet Institute says: "Kohenet Hebrew Priestess Institute reclaims and innovates embodied, earth-based '''feminist Judaism'''." . The JWeekly says: " Kohenet women say that by exploring a feminist perspective, they’re actually drawing some women back, or deeper, '''into Judaism — not turning them away from it, or even necessarily inventing something new'''." . It's clear that Kohenet isn't a Pagan or Neopagan organization, but a Feminist Judaistic. What are you don't understand it that? --] (]) 12:25, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].

The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> ] (]) 06:37, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

== ArbCom 2018 election voter message ==

{{Ivmbox|Hello, RK. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2018/Coordination/MMS/09&oldid=866998319 -->

== Invitation to join the Fifteen Year Society ==
] Dear {{PAGENAME}},

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the ''']''', an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Misplaced Pages project for fifteen years or more. &#x200B;

Best regards, ] (]) 02:44, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
{{clear}} <!-- Template:Fifteen Year Society invitation -->

==Where O where==
...did the lengthy material that you posted in 2002, to create the "Crypto-Jews" article, come from? It now significantly populates the article for the ], and it is a blight on the encyclopedia. Perhaps, as you celebrate your 15th, you can join us in celebrating ], and instead of forcing others to do second-best, follow-on, guesswork sourcing of this original material, you can own up, and honestly state where it is you drew it from in the first place. Please. It is the first entry on your "Things to remember when writing on Misplaced Pages" list, on your User page. For the sake of the encyclopedia, its quality, and honest scholarship. ] (]) 04:37, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
== "9/11 conspiracy theories regarding Jews or Israel" listed at ] ==
] A discussion is taking place to address the redirect ]. The discussion will occur at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 18:28, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
== "Nazi" listed at ] ==
]
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect ]. The discussion will occur at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 16:15, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

== Names of God in Judaism ==

Greetings!


I couldn't help noticing that you made the following edit at ] on 15 April, 2003 — that is, precisely 18 years and 2 months ago ... wow! Anyways, the addition goes as follows:

{{quote|However, R. Jose considered tzevaot a common name (Soferim iv. 1; Yer. R. H. i. 1; Ab. R. N. xxxiv). R. Ishmael held that even Elohim is common (Sanh. 66a). All other names, such as Merciful, Gracious, and Faithful, merely represent attributes that are common also to human beings (Sheb. 35a).}}

I was wondering if you were willing to help to clarify the source a bit? It's been tagged ever since September 2015 with a <nowiki>{{clarify}}</nowiki> template, and so far I've been able to decipher — if you may — the first part of the reference, . But what the latter abbreviations stand for or where are they referring to, I have no idea...

So if you could write open those abbreviations (''Yer. R. H. 1:1''; ''Ab. R. N. 34''; ''Sheb. 35a'') — or even better offer a link to the sources — that'd be more than welcome! When it comes to , I could find it over the Internet as well, but something a bit more detailed than a range of 27 verses would be needed.

Thanks a lot in advance!


Cheers! ] (]) 14:52, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
== ] of ] ==
]

The article ] has been ]&#32;because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''No indication this meets ]. No independent coverage or indication of awards won or anything like that. Parent publisher Pageant Media doesn't have an article, so can't redirect.'''</blockquote>

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ].

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> &spades;]&spades; ] 02:26, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 02:26, 6 September 2023

Old stuff

User talk:RK/Archive
User talk:RK/Archive 2
User talk:RK/Archive 3
user talk:RK/Departure
User talk:RK/Archive 5
User talk:RK/Archive 6
User talk:RK/Archive 7

New discussions

Hello, RK. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

....
Please help edit the rulings of Salat and Islamic_views_on_sin . Thanks. - Verycuriousboy (talk) 07:02, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Source for Jimbo quote

CH, you recently wroye in the General Relativity Talk page:

While as of June 2006 there are still some Wikipedians knowledgeable about gtr, given what I view as the failure of WP as a source reliable information (see recent comments by our founder, Jimbo Wales),

Could you give me a reference for this quote? Also, have you discussed the possibility of creating a Physics wiki, one that has a measure of formal peer review, disallows all edits by anonymoys users, and requires registered users to give a valid e-mail? If Jimbo weren't so insistent on anarchy (literally) Misplaced Pages could have had a chance to be useful. As it turns out, however, it has sunk into a morass that can never be redeemed. RK 12:42, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, Robert. RK 12:42, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

I'm looking for it myself. I missed the NY Times article, unfortunately, but I've seen several which mention a St. Petersburg Times interview in which their most famous netizen allegedly said that Misplaced Pages cannot now or ever be used as a reference (e.g. for schoolwork), which to my mind is inconsistent with the reason I came here: to create an encyclopedia. I am still searching Google and places in WP for a working link to the text of this interview. ---CH 21:22, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

Criticism of Haredi Judaism

Hello RK! I had mentioned in Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Judaism that until recently Modern Orthodox Judaism was the only major denomination with a criticism section. I notice in particular that Haredi Judaism doesn't have a criticism section. Perhaps you might be interested in created a section explaining the difficulties people to the left of Haredi Judaism have with it(properly sourced of course). Best wishes. And perhaps the way their leaders talk about other denominations might be one of the issues of concern. --Shirahadasha 22:33, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

AfD

Hello again RK! It's great to see you're still active on Misplaced Pages. Just thought I'd let you know - if you have time, your expertise will be helpful on this page. Regards. 172 | Talk 05:03, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Blocked

RK, you have been blocked for 1 week following your violation of the No personal attacks aspect of your arbitration case. Details can be found at http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Arbitration_enforcement#RK_2 --PinchasC | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 03:24, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Merges, moves

_ _ Hi, didn't notice your return until just now; welcome back.
_ _ While i haven't looked to see whether you at least preserved the former text, your conversion into a Dab of Avodah Zarah amounts to either a cut-&-paste move or a bootleg deletion. The previous revisions belong as part of the page-history of Idolatry in Judaism, even if the text is redundant. Don't do that.
--Jerzyt 06:17, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

What the Bleep Do We Know!?

Hello, I'm writing you to determine if there is concensus amoung recent editors of What the Bleep Do We Know!? to remove it's NPOV tag. Please weigh in with your opinion on the talk page Talk:What_the_Bleep_Do_We_Know!?. Thanks!! Adelord 19:25, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

hey

If you have five minutes, go here and read talk topics 13-15. If you think it is important, then consider commenting, Slrubenstein | Talk 06:13, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

the Good Book

Hag Sameach!

Do you think it is controversial to claim that Jews call their Tanakh "the Bible?" I don't. Do you think it is controversial to claim that "the Bible" refers only to the combined "Old Testament" and "New Testament," i.e. is a term that refers to the sacred scriptures of Christians (but not Jews)? I do, but this is precisely the claim Home Computer is making on the Bible talk page: http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Bible#Current_layout

Feel free to weigh in. And please watch out for Home Computer's attempts to change the article. Slrubenstein | Talk 10:59, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Please disregard, this wikipedian is stirring trouble, see his talk page. --Home Computer 15:20, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Judaism and Christianity

You may care to comment here: Slrubenstein | Talk 13:22, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Article in need of cleanup - please assist if you can

The article Book of Ezekiel, to which you have helped contribute, has been flagged as requiring cleanup.

If possible, we would appreciate your assistance in cleaning up this article to bring it up to Misplaced Pages's quality standards. If you are unsure what the nature of the problem is, please discuss this on the article's talk page.
You have been left this message by PocKleanBot, an automated process that notifies editors that articles to which they may have contributed on more than one occasion in the past now need cleanup. If you have any comments or object to this message being left, please leave a message on PocKleanBot's talk page.

Your Trolling

Stop trolling or I will need to block you. RobertKaiser 03:49, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Re.:Greenpeace

You asked who considers Greenpeace terrorists. All of the civilized world does. When France initiated some nuclear testing, Greenpeace tried to interfere, and got one of their boats shot all to hell, it sank. In the US, the FBI, other law enforcement considers them terrorists. See Operation Backfire (FBI) for more and/or go to this link: www.fbi.gov/page2/jan06/elf012006.htm which is the last known info on this law enforcement operation, status of which is Active/Ongoing. All of the known "Eco-Terrorists orgs and those not mentioned here are being infiltrated, to take them down. IF you're in one of these orgs, its best to GET OUT and wait for the heat to die down. 65.163.112.128 (talk) 17:08, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

I did not mean to be hard on you, just stating that when these people are caught, they either end up in jail and/or in a mental hospital. 65.163.112.128 (talk) 17:10, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

User:RobertKaiser vs User:RK

Hi: Who is User:RobertKaiser and who is User:RK? Are you one and the same or different users or both? IZAK 09:14, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

This user is not Robert Kaiser. He is a troll, pretending to be me.


If you have evidence of tolling, suggest you report this on WP:AN. If the primary issue is the name suggest WP:RFCN. Shabbat Shalom, --Shirahadasha 20:53, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Stop pretending to be me

Stop pretending to me, it is considered to be trolling and I will block you for it. RobertKaiser 21:44, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Back off RobertKaiser. You are being disruptive. Yuser31415 (Editor review two!) 02:31, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Could you review these articles?

Could you have a look at these articles and their talk?

I feel the articles are extremely well sourced and balanced. I'd like somebody else to remove the tags. Please look at my last versions, because I have run up against somebody from the evolution/creation universe who wants to pick a fight. --Metzenberg 03:10, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

List of pubs

As someone who has contributed to the talk page discussion on List of publications in philosophy and/or that article's previous deletion debate, I thought you might be interested in participating in its new nomination for deletion which can be found here. Thanks. - KSchutte 17:20, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Serious discussions about using the names Reform vs. Progressive Judaism

Hi RK: Please see the present discussions at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Countering systemic bias/open tasks#WikiProject Judaism needs help - geographical bias concerns. Your input would be greatly appreciated. (They are the result of discussions that unfolded at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Judaism#Concern about duplicating Reform and Progressive labels.) Thanks so much, IZAK 08:55, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

An interesting AfD

Hello. You may be interested in commenting on this Afd and contributing to it's associated discussion.Ghanadar galpa (talk) 22:36, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Question for RK

I am interested in some information you wrote in the "Semicha" article. You wrote "A minority of Jewish writers maintain that a form of the original semicha continued to be practiced in small numbers as late as the eleventh century CE"( Posted by RK, 21:33, 24 August 2004).

This comment has recently been removed for lack of citation.

I am very interested in the source of this information or anything else at all you may be able to share with me about it.

You may answer on the Talk Page or feel free to contact me at the following email address: CWatchman2@gmail.com

Thank you very much,

CWatchman (talk) 03:05, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Binding of Isaac article name change

Thanks for your comments and contributions at Binding of Isaac. About 3 weeks ago, I proposed to change the name of the article to "Sacrifice of Isaac" at Talk:Binding of Isaac#Name of this article, but so far haven't seen any response. I plan to go ahead and rename the article on March 20, 2008 unless there are objections. I invite you to visit the article and submit any comments you have on the matter. Thanks! --Bryan H Bell (talk) 17:42, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Five editors have responded to the proposal described above. Four oppose and one is neutral. The consensus is opposed to the name change. I'll therfore leave the article as currently named ("Binding of Isaac") and consider the matter closed. --Bryan H Bell (talk) 03:00, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of User:RK/A Liberal Defense of Zionism

A proposed deletion template has been added to the page User:RK/A Liberal Defense of Zionism, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this page may not satisfy Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not" and Misplaced Pages's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Miscellany for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice?Black Falcon 01:56, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Judaism Newsletter

Menorah
Menorah
The WikiProject Judaism NewsletterIssue I -- Sivan, 5768
Main Project Page Star of David Talk Page Star of David Judaism Portal Star of David Categories Star of David To Do Star of David Judaism AFD/RFC
Shavuot celebrates Moses receiving the Ten Commandments.

What's This?
Shalom aleichem sports fans, and welcome to the first of what I hope will be a monthly newsletter with the need-to-know information about our fair WikiProject. If you have any questions or comments, or would like to recommend a story for the newsletter, click here to leave a message on the Newsletter Coordinator's talk page.
In the News

  • WikiProject Good Articles is doing sweeps over all our current good articles to ensure they still meet criteria. For more information and how you can help, check out WikiProject Good Articles Sweeps.
  • GA status for the article Jew has been put on hold pending a few minor revisions. A list of things that need to be done to return this top importance article to its proper status can be found here.
  • Jerusalem is a Featured Article Candidate! Go forth, my people, and !vote!

To Do

  • One new Judaism-related article was created this month, the long requested Hebrew Punctuation. Thanks to Epson291 for creating it. Remember, folks, there are over forty standing requests for Judaism articles, so whenever you get the opportunity make sure to go create a few.
  • In the right column you will see a listing of our most popular articles. All of these articles got 170,000+ page hits in the past month, and they should be on everyone's watchlist so we can keep them vandalism-free.
  • Spread the word! No, not the Word... (well, you can do that too) I'm talking about inviting knowledgeable users to join the project. You can proclaim your undying love of WikiProject Judaism in methods mild to wild, check the project template page and member list for examples. We also now have a flashy advertisement, to use it add {{Misplaced Pages ads|ad=148}} to your userpage.

Quick Stats
On the date of publish, we had...

New Members

Most Popular Articles
By page hits. Source.

  1. Israel
  2. The Holocaust
  3. Judaism
  4. Ten Commandments
  5. Ark of the Covenant
Misplaced Pages ad for Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Judaism
Misplaced Pages adsfile info – #148

This newsletter was automatically delivered by ShepBot because you are a member of the WikiProject. If you would like to opt out of future mailings, please remove your name from this list. Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) on 04:33, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gabriel J. Chin

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Gabriel J. Chin, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not" and Misplaced Pages's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. TNX-Man 15:35, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Judaism Newsletter

The Judaism Newsletter Issue II -- Tammuz, 5768
WikiProject Judaism (/to do) Star of David WikiProject Jewish History (/to do) Star of David WikiProject Kabbalah (/to do)
Worship of the Golden Calf
Worship of the Golden Calf

Now with 200% more Jewishness!
Yes, folks, we're moving on up. This newsletter is now the newsletter for both WikiProject Judaism, WikiProject Jewish History, and WikiProject Kabbalah. In the future, I may split them, but for now I think we'll be just fine with one. As always, any questions or comments should be directed to me, L'Aquatique.

A Special Dispatch
Just a note, not aimed at anyone in particular. By order of the administrative cabal, it is officially not cool (and possibly dickish) to call someone an anti-semite when they aren't being anti-semitic. Anti-semitic is a very charged word, and it's important only to use it when you're absolutely sure it applies, lest it become the subject of a Godwin-esque law. Remember Hanlon's Razor: never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.
In the News

  • A new class on the importance scale has been added- C Class- which covers articles better than start but not quite to B Class yet. It is up to the WikiProjects to decide whether to adopt them or not. Currently, there has been little discussion within our Projects, so if you feel strongly either way be sure to note so at your Project.
  • There is a proposal to reword the section on NPOV regarding religious articles. Please see Wikipedia_talk:NPOV#Religion section - Disputes between historians or scientists and religious_views to weigh in.
  • Thanks largely to the efforts of Xyz7890, a new navbox has come into being featuring Halakha topics. See: Template talk:Halakha to join in the conversation about how it can best be improved.

To Do

  • The Simple English Misplaced Pages is beginning a project of creating and improving articles related to religion, including Judaism. At the present time, volunteers are needed to propose our most important subjects for articles to be created. The official working list is here and a more extended list is here. If you are unsure of proper topics, you might try checking our lists of top importance level articles: Judaism and Jewish History. (WikiProject Kabbalah currently doesn't have such a list)
  • WikiProject Christianity is considering running a monthly drive wherein two or three top importance articles from English Misplaced Pages are simplified and moved over to S.E. They have extended an offer to work with us in creating a similar project for Judaism related articles. For questions or volunteer opportunities, please contact User:John Carter.
  • WikiProject Kabbalah is in dire need of an article rating system for quality and importance. If you are familiar with that system and have some time on your hands, please create one. It could also use some infoboxes...

New Members

New Articles

  • Habib ben Elisha Faturechi (Thanks PhatJew!)
  • There are some 40 odd standing requests for Judaism related articles. Please make them! I would, but I'm too busy writing this. Grin.


Menorah
Menorah

Quick Links

WikiProject Judaism Stats

WikiProject Jewish History Stats

WikiProject Kabbalah Stats

Misplaced Pages ad for Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Judaism
Misplaced Pages adsfile info – #148

This newsletter was automatically delivered because you are a member of one or more Judaism related WikiProjects. If you would like to opt out of future mailings, please remove your name from this list.

The Judaism Newsletter

The Judaism Newsletter Issue III -- Av, 5768
WikiProject Judaism (/to do) Star of David WikiProject Jewish History (/to do) Star of David WikiProject Kabbalah (/to do)
Sir Moses Montefore, a Jewish activist who died 123 years ago this month
Sir Moses Montefore, a Jewish activist who died 123 years ago this month

"Censorship" of names of G-d
There is an interesting discussion currently taking place regarding whether or not it is acceptable to censor (i.e. G-d, HaShem->YodHey) names of G-d in articles to protect Jews who may be reading or editing the article. You can weigh in here: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Judaism#Yahweh.

Article Cleanup Lists
User:B. Wolterding has generously offered us use of his bot to generate lists that show which articles of ours are tagged for cleanup. You can read more about this service here: User:B._Wolterding/Cleanup_listings and if you would like to take him up on his offer, contact him on his talk page.

In the News

The Jewish Barnstar
The Jewish Barnstar
The New Jewish Barnstar
The New Jewish Barnstar
  • There is a collaboration drive to get Holocaust in Lithuania to good article status. For information about how you can help, see the talk page or contact User:Piotrus.
  • WikiProject Kabbalah's only Featured and Good articles have been removed from the WikiProject, on the grounds that neither article (Diane Keaton and David Beckham, respectively) actually mention the subject's affiliation with Kabbalah. If you have sourced information linking either of these people to Kabbalah, please add it so the articles can be returned to the WikiProject.
  • After a rather heated discussion, there are now two barnstars for use by the Jewish WikiProjects, {{The Jewish Barnstar}} and {{The New Jewish Barnstar}}, and you can choose which one you would like to use.. Remember: barnstars are for rewarding users who are doing good work on the project or on Judaism, Jewish History, or Kabbalah articles, and anyone can give anyone else a barnstar. If you see a user who you thinks deserves a thank you, give them a barnstar!

To Do/Help Requests

  • If you have some spare time on your hands, we could use an article about a Kabbalah scholar named Moshe Idel. According to HG there are quite a few sources easily available, you can contact him if you have questions. Be sure to nominate it for DYK if the finished article is eligible.
  • The folks at Shimon Peres need some assistance from someone familiar with both the Hebrew calendar and language to help them figure out the subject's birthday. If you can help, please see Talk:Shimon_Peres#Birthday.

New Members

New Articles

  • Bezalel Rudinsky (thanks Shirulashem!}, Jewish tartan (thanks Briangotts!), Hebrew spelling (thanks Epson291)
  • We get a lot of articles that are being created and not announced! By announcing new articles, you attract attention to them, and the more people looking and editing the better they will get. If you would like your new article to appear in the newsletter, add it here for Judaism and Kabbalah and here for Jewish History.
  • There are some 40 odd standing requests for Judaism related articles. Please make them! I would, but I'm too busy writing this. Grin.


Menorah
Menorah

Quick Links

WikiProject Judaism Stats

WikiProject Jewish History Stats

WikiProject Kabbalah Stats

  • 87 of which are Stubs
  • 0 of which are Good
  • 0 of which are Featured
Misplaced Pages ad for Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Judaism
Misplaced Pages adsfile info – #148

This newsletter was automatically delivered because you are a member of one or more Judaism related WikiProjects. If you would like to opt out of future mailings, please remove your name from this list. As always, please direct all questions, comments, requests, barnstars, offers of help, and angry all-caps anti-semitic rants to my talk page. Thanks, and have a great month. L'Aquatique 20:31, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Rebbe Nachman of Breslov

Hello. I saw that you once edited the above page. I have decided to submit this article to peer review in order to qualify for Featured Article status. Would you kindly click on the above link and add your comments or suggestions? Thank you, Yoninah (talk) 21:30, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Many many thanks

You did a wonderful job in your section on 20th & 21st century commentaries. You trod in waters that I was afraid to tread in. I avoided the moderns by only including commentaries printed in a Mikraot Gedolot, and I didn't realize that would confine me to Hebrew. Now I feel free to put in sections about Nechama Leibovits, Umberto Cassuto, etc. Again, thanks for pulling me out of a rut as well as the research you did.

I am going to make a few changes though. I don't think the appendices to the Etz Hayim belong in this article. Also I don't know how much overlap there is between the Etz Hayim and the new JPS commentary/translation. Just know that nothing I say is written in stone, and I'm almost always open to suggestions. Phil_burnstein (talk) 04:08, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Torah Judaism and Daat Miqra

Robert, thanks for giving me the benefit of the doubt. As far as the Daat Miqra goes, I wish there were an English translation. That would be an incredible thing. Unfortunately, none exists that I know of. That'd be a fascinating project, though. I wonder if Mossad Harav Kook would be interested in it. They do the Daat Miqra series, no? -LisaLiel (talk) 04:28, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Your user page

I found your old user page while checking out some old deleted contributions. I have history merged it, so that all edits are in one place. Hope you don't mind. Graham87 12:07, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Copyright question

Hi. Another contributor has noted a similarity between the page Hillel the Elder, which you contributed way back in 2003, and the Jewish Encyclopedia article, which bears a copyright notice of 2002. I have confirmed substantial duplication of text, so I've blanked the article pending some clarification of the matter. Can you help provide any clarification on this issue and the origin of this text? --Moonriddengirl 14:08, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Just noting for bypassers (since I have mailed the contributor): I've clarified this one for myself. Notwithstanding the copyright notice, the material is public domain. --Moonriddengirl 14:46, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Merge

I've just proposed merging Unification Church and antisemitism (which you worked on) into Divine Principle. Please join in the discussion, if you like. Steve Dufour (talk) 15:42, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Page layout Or Hadash.JPG)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Page layout Or Hadash.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 23:24, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Or Hadash covers.JPG)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Or Hadash covers.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 23:25, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Silver Bridge (bridge)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Silver Bridge (bridge), and it appears to be very similar to another Misplaced Pages page: Silver Bridge. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally moving or duplicating content, please be sure you have followed the procedure at Misplaced Pages:Splitting by acknowledging the duplication of material in edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:53, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Page layout Or Hadash.JPG

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Page layout Or Hadash.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Misplaced Pages takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. J Milburn (talk) 11:55, 28 July 2009 (UTC)


File copyright problem with File:Or Hadash covers.JPG

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Or Hadash covers.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Misplaced Pages takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. J Milburn (talk) 11:56, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

"Ultra-Orthodox" in Haredi article (courtesy note)

You contributed to a past discussion about the term "Ultra-Orthodox" on the Haredi Judaism page. I removed the content in Haredi Judaism that claimed that "Ultra-Orthodox" is pejorative. I have explained my reasons on the talk page. -shirulashem 15:30, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Sirach article

In an 18 May 2003 edit to the Sirach article you added the /* Reference */ section with Amidah, entry in the Encyclopedia Judaica, Keter Publishing. The article has been considerably changed since then. I am not sure what that reference was intended as. Any help you could provide would be appreciated. Please reply, if appropriate, at Talk:Sirach#Sources and citations. Thanks. --Bejnar (talk) 21:50, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Jewish philosophy

If you're still active here, can you take a look at Jewish philosophy? There's an editor turning the piece into a complete ploughed field... Jheald (talk) 17:42, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Jewish fundamentalism

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Jewish fundamentalism. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Misplaced Pages:Notability and "What Misplaced Pages is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Jewish fundamentalism. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:08, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Your Intro

You quote .P._Lovecraft: "We know nothing except through logical analysis, and if we reject that sole connexion with reality, we might as well stop trying to be adults and retreat into the capricious dream-world of infantility." This seems incorrect. We know our consciousness exists with a visceral self-awareness. There is no logical analysis. An anti-Nietzschean argument but still.......38.117.213.19 (talk) 20:04, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

AfD

I've nominated List of former Jews, List of former Christians, and List of former Muslims together for deletion: Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of former Jews.Kitfoxxe (talk) 16:29, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

Chabad on Misplaced Pages arbitration request

Since you have been kind enough to comment at the unresolved WP:COI case at Misplaced Pages:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/User:Yehoishophot Oliver, you may wish to know that it has now been nominated for arbitration. Feel free to review at Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration#Chabad movement editors and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—

Thank you for your input and patience, IZAK (talk) 09:20, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Arbitration case opens/Chabad movement

Hi RK: Since you have been involved in the topic of Chabad, this is to let you know that an official arbitration case has been opened at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Chabad movement. You may wish to add your comments for the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Chabad movement/Evidence. The ArbCom asks that evidence be submitted within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Chabad movement/Workshop. Thanks, IZAK (talk) 06:06, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello RK! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 5 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 21 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

  1. Jack Wertheimer - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  2. Reuven Hammer - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  3. William E. Kaufman - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  4. Neil Gillman - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  5. Jules Harlow - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 07:42, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Motion to dismiss or keep the Chabad editors case

Hi RK: A discussion has started if the Chabad editors case should be dismissed or should remain open. As someone who has been involved in the serious COI discussions leading up to this ArbCom case you should be informed of this motion and have the right to explain if you agree or disagree with this proposed motion and why. Please see Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Chabad movement/Evidence#Contemplated motion to dismiss. Thank you, IZAK (talk) 07:06, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jacob Neusner bibliography

The article Jacob Neusner bibliography has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

out of scope

While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ysangkok (talk) 00:58, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Jacob Neusner bibliography

I have nominated Jacob Neusner bibliography, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Jacob Neusner bibliography (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ysangkok (talk) 10:52, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

The Living Torah and Nach article

In the Living Torah and Nach article you wrote, "Rabbi Kaplan's translation has been criticised for mis-translating the text. The dispute comes about because Kaplan consciously attempted not to present a straight translation of the text, but rather interspersing the translation with later rabbinic commentary and Jewish law." You did not source this information. I am writing another article in which I quoted your above-mentioned statement. I was confronted about this statement and was asked for sources which I was unable to find. Could you please assist me in finding this source or sources?

Thank you very much. CWatchman (talk) 03:29, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

Dark energy star

Since you seem to think that "dark star" is a synonym for this, you might want to create a redirect dark star (dark energy) to it. 70.29.208.247 (talk) 05:31, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Aristotelian view of God

The article Aristotelian view of God has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Portion of the article on Aristotle & "Metaphysics" doesn't seem to mention God.

While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Editor2020 (talk) 02:25, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Documentary hypothesis

You might like to message User:TomS TDotO and ask for his views, since he's been active as an editor. You might also like to look at the Torah section in the article Authorship of the bible - mostly for some useful books on the subject.

You're welcome to edit the article as you please - Misplaced Pages is open to all. PiCo (talk) 11:26, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Autopatrolled

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

  • This permission does not give you any special status or authority
  • Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
  • You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
  • If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it
If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! Acalamari 14:02, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

The Bible

Happy New Year. If you have time can you look at this section of the talk page and the sections that follow it (all created in the past couple of days, esp the current conflict with Telpardec)? Thanks, Slrubenstein | Talk 10:57, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Jewish views on astrology for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jewish views on astrology is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Jewish views on astrology until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. MakeSense64 (talk) 13:23, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of List of books by Jacob Neusner for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of books by Jacob Neusner is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of books by Jacob Neusner until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 05:33, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Requested move: Alternative medicine → Complementary and alternative medicine

Request initiated for the article Alternative medicine to be moved to Complementary and alternative medicine. I'm notifying you as major contributor to the article. Relevant talk page discussion found here. FiachraByrne (talk) 02:59, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Silver Bridge Advisors

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Silver Bridge Advisors, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Misplaced Pages:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. —Unforgettableid (talk) 07:52, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Just to let you know -- Missing Wikipedians

You have been mentioned at Misplaced Pages:Missing Wikipedians. Ottawahitech (talk) 09:33, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Haggadah, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Enlightenment. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Proof that Nazis deliberately killed six million Jews listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Proof that Nazis deliberately killed six million Jews. Since you had some involvement with the Proof that Nazis deliberately killed six million Jews redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Tavix |  Talk  04:10, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Gog and Magog

Hi RK. I just reverted an edit of yours at Gog and Magog, for reasons given in the edit summary - it was pretty hard to read for anyone not already acquainted with Rabbinic literature, and seemed to cover material already dealt with in the second para of the following sections. However, if you could do some research into more recent sources, it could lead to a useful stand-alone section section on Jewish treatment of Gog/Magog through to the modern period. Let me know if you'd like to take this on. PiCo (talk) 05:20, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, RK. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, RK. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

History of religious Jewish music talk page

Please see my question on the talk page for History of religious Jewish music.

Thanks, Moshe פשוט pashute ♫ (talk) 15:24, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, RK. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Jewish neopaganism

You're a vandal. Stop adding Kohenet Institute into article about paganism, when it doesn't pagan organization. --Wojsław Brożyna (talk) 19:29, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

You're a pathological liar. You are lying about the words of the women in Kohenet, and lying that they are Orthodox Jews. Stop this vandalism. RK (talk)

Re: Feminist Judaism

Do you ever read the pages, that you used as sources? Look, the Kohenet Institute says: "Kohenet Hebrew Priestess Institute reclaims and innovates embodied, earth-based feminist Judaism." . The JWeekly says: " Kohenet women say that by exploring a feminist perspective, they’re actually drawing some women back, or deeper, into Judaism — not turning them away from it, or even necessarily inventing something new." . It's clear that Kohenet isn't a Pagan or Neopagan organization, but a Feminist Judaistic. What are you don't understand it that? --Wojsław Brożyna (talk) 12:25, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Ethics in the Bible for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ethics in the Bible is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Ethics in the Bible until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Softlavender (talk) 06:37, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, RK. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Invitation to join the Fifteen Year Society

Dear RK,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Misplaced Pages project for fifteen years or more. ​

Best regards, Urhixidur (talk) 02:44, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

Where O where

...did the lengthy material that you posted in 2002, to create the "Crypto-Jews" article, come from? It now significantly populates the article for the Marrano, and it is a blight on the encyclopedia. Perhaps, as you celebrate your 15th, you can join us in celebrating WP:VERIFY, and instead of forcing others to do second-best, follow-on, guesswork sourcing of this original material, you can own up, and honestly state where it is you drew it from in the first place. Please. It is the first entry on your "Things to remember when writing on Misplaced Pages" list, on your User page. For the sake of the encyclopedia, its quality, and honest scholarship. 2601:246:C700:9B0:302C:E77E:31EC:5050 (talk) 04:37, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

"9/11 conspiracy theories regarding Jews or Israel" listed at Redirects for discussion

Information icon A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 9/11 conspiracy theories regarding Jews or Israel. The discussion will occur at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 6#9/11 conspiracy theories regarding Jews or Israel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. BDD (talk) 18:28, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

"Nazi" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Nazi. The discussion will occur at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 6#Nazi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. PyroFloe (talk) 16:15, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Names of God in Judaism

Greetings!


I couldn't help noticing that you made the following edit at Names of God in Judaism on 15 April, 2003 — that is, precisely 18 years and 2 months ago ... wow! Anyways, the addition goes as follows:

However, R. Jose considered tzevaot a common name (Soferim iv. 1; Yer. R. H. i. 1; Ab. R. N. xxxiv). R. Ishmael held that even Elohim is common (Sanh. 66a). All other names, such as Merciful, Gracious, and Faithful, merely represent attributes that are common also to human beings (Sheb. 35a).

I was wondering if you were willing to help to clarify the source a bit? It's been tagged ever since September 2015 with a {{clarify}} template, and so far I've been able to decipher — if you may — the first part of the reference, Soferim, 4:1. But what the latter abbreviations stand for or where are they referring to, I have no idea...

So if you could write open those abbreviations (Yer. R. H. 1:1; Ab. R. N. 34; Sheb. 35a) — or even better offer a link to the sources — that'd be more than welcome! When it comes to Sanh. 66a, I could find it over the Internet as well, but something a bit more detailed than a range of 27 verses would be needed.

Thanks a lot in advance!


Cheers! Jayaguru-Shishya (talk) 14:52, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Private Asset Management

Notice

The article Private Asset Management has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication this meets WP:NPERIODICAL. No independent coverage or indication of awards won or anything like that. Parent publisher Pageant Media doesn't have an article, so can't redirect.

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC(talk) 02:26, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

User talk:RK: Difference between revisions Add topic