| Revision as of 07:30, 11 April 2007 editZero0000 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators41,951 edits Notice of block← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 16:20, 31 October 2022 edit undoIskandar323 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers47,732 edits Notification: proposed deletion of Swords of Truth.Tag: Twinkle | ||
| (262 intermediate revisions by 67 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ==Final decision in ] arbitration case== | |||
| <center> ''</center></big> | |||
| This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. Mere membership by an editor in some external group that has been involved in violations of policy is not actionable without evidence that the editor has some personal involvement in said violations. Sanctions previously imposed are confirmed. An amnesty is extended towards any editors who may have been involved in this external group and who have not been sanctioned for their participation in it. This is coupled with an expectation that these editors will not participate in similar efforts in the future. Members of the community who may have information regarding similar efforts by external groups to unduly influence our content are urged to forward that information to the Committee for review. {{userlinks|Hypnosadist}} is admonished to maintain an appropriate level of professionalism at all times, and to avoid misrepresenting Misplaced Pages policy to other editors. For the committee, <span style="font-family: verdana;"> — ] • ] • </span> 20:17, 28 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == ] nomination of ] == | |||
| {{archive box| | |||
| ]An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for ]. The nominated article is ]. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also ] and "]"). | |||
| *<small>] (] ] − ] ])</small><br /> | |||
| *<small>] (] ] − ] ])</small><br /> | |||
| *<small>] (] ] − ] ])</small><br /> | |||
| *<small>] (] ] − ] ])</small><br /> | |||
| }} | |||
| Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to ]. Please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). | |||
| == Welcome back == | |||
| You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the ] template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. | |||
| Hi Zeq: I noticed you've been very active again. Welcome back. ] 13:35, 18 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| '''Please note:''' This is an automatic notification by a ]. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --] (]) 01:13, 8 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Renaming Zionism and racism == | |||
| ==Unreferenced BLPs== | |||
| Hi Zeq: Shouldn't the ] article be renamed to ] as with ]? What are your thoughts? ] 03:10, 2 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ] Hello Zeq! Thank you for your contributions. I am a ] alerting you that {{#if:1|'''1''' of the articles that you created|}} {{#if:|and|}} {{#if:|'''{{{mcount}}}''' of the articles that you played a major role in creating|}} {{#ifeq:1|1| is an |are}} ]. Please note that all biographies of living persons '''must be sourced'''. If you were to add ], ] ] to {{#ifeq:1|1|this article| these articles}}, it would greatly help us with the current ''{{PAGESINCATEGORY:All_unreferenced_BLPs}}'' article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{tl|unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list: | |||
| # ] - <small>{{findsources|Seyran Ates}}</small> | |||
| == Jewish Settlement Police == | |||
| Thanks!--] (]) 04:54, 27 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| Well, I've answered, anyway. ]<sup><small><font color="DarkGreen">]</font></small></sup> 19:30, 2 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :How would you translate "yishuv kehilati"? ]<sup><small><font color="DarkGreen">]</font></small></sup> 19:36, 2 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Please translate "yishuv kehilati" into English. ]<sup><small><font color="DarkGreen">]</font></small></sup> 20:42, 2 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Which word translates as "Community" and which one translates as "with bylaws governing who can join that community"? ]<sup><small><font color="DarkGreen">]</font></small></sup> 20:47, 2 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ''Yeshuv is Kehila and Khilati is "by the community"'' - so there's no English translation for "Yishuv" in this case? It's an untranslatable word? ]<sup><small><font color="DarkGreen">]</font></small></sup> 21:00, 2 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :That's so strange, because the Israeli government seems to have no trouble translating it; it translates it as "". So, they seem to think that "yishuv" translates as "settlement", and "kehilla" as "community". ]<sup><small><font color="DarkGreen">]</font></small></sup> 21:13, 2 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| == Thanks == | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ] (]) 17:43, 4 September 2011 (UTC) | |||
| Thanks for your message last week. Yes, everybody is fine. It looks like Peretz is in hot water though, both the Left and the Right seem to hate him. That's what you get when you are both an Arab and a Jew :) | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| Shalom, ] <sup><small><font color="DarkBlue">]</font></small></sup> 21:59, 15 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ]  because of the following concern: | |||
| == Thanks == | |||
| :'''] politician.''' | |||
| While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ]. | |||
| Thanks for the article, Zeq. I've added it to ] further reading. Hope all is well with you. :-) ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 17:38, 28 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| == Please explain == | |||
| Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> <span style="font-family:Papyrus;cursor:help">''''']]'''''</span> 11:37, 24 January 2012 (UTC) | |||
| I don't know which article you mean. The last link you gave me didn't work. I don't mean it had been deleted; I mean it didn't work at all. ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 09:12, 5 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Proposed deletion of The Boy Who Fell Out of the Sky == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ]  because of the following concern: | |||
| == Your recent edits to ]. == | |||
| :'''Notability.''' | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ]. | |||
| Hi Zeq. Recently you reverted my edits to the ] article, rewording the introduction. I'm curious – where in the map do you see the Shebaa farms bordering Israel? Thanks. — ]<sup> <nowiki>]<nowiki>]</nowiki></sup> 08:19, 6 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| :As a follow up, I've changed the statement to: "The Shebaa Farms is a small area of disputed ownership located on the border between Lebanon and the Golan Heights." I wasn't sure if you were opposed to the inclusion of the term "Israeli-occupied" or the "Golan Heights in Syria", so I've removed the mention of both to try to maintain neutrality. If readers want to learn more about the status of the Golan Heights, they can just read the wiki-linked article. Cheers. — ]<sup> <nowiki>]<nowiki>]</nowiki></sup> 10:33, 6 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] 00:17, 17 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == Undeletion request == | |||
| == File:QanaLeaflet.jpg listed for discussion == | |||
| ] A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw --> ] (]) 13:40, 23 July 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| Zeq, your Iranian involvement article didn't actually say anything. It was just a list of links. ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 19:59, 7 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| <blockquote>'''It's not clear that this group has any ] notability - with the coverage of its activities not really extending beyond a short-lived and poorly attested stint in 2007.'''</blockquote> | |||
| :It's best to write that sort of thing offline or on a user subpage before putting it into the encyclopedia. I think CJCurrie did the right thing to delete it, to be honest, because it wasn't ready, and I'm not sure it ever will be with that title, which is clearly OR. ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 20:20, 7 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
| ::I don't know what I'd call it. Your best bet is to write it offline and see what title is most obvious once you've finished, but make sure you avoid OR, because if it looks like a personal essay, it'll likely be deleted again. Do you have a copy of the links in the deleted version? ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 06:12, 8 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| == Your note == | |||
| Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 16:20, 31 October 2022 (UTC) | |||
| For sure that's a reliable source. ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 21:26, 20 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==When in need== | |||
| ...Feel free to contact me to avoid breaking WP:3RR. You and I consistently edit similar articles and I often find myself agreeing with your edits. ] 06:02, 2 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Mediation == | |||
| Mediators are all volunteers, and I have no place "assigning" people to cases. − ] <small>( ] • ] • ] )</small> 20:01, 2 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I am not one-sided. The source is reliable, which is exactly what you asked us to concede. However, a potentially libelous claim should not be put in Misplaced Pages. − ] <small>( ] • ] • ] )</small> 20:03, 2 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| === Proposed compromise === | |||
| A compromise ''']'''. It is toned down to simply state that the allegation was made, and that the allegation was denied. − ] <small>( ] • ] • ] )</small> 20:47, 2 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Twas Now did not provide mediation, he provided his opinion on an entirely separate, nonexistent issue. This is two to one here. If Tarc decides to remove the paragraph again, I'll revert, he'll revert, you will revert, and he will run out of 'em before one of us does. It's a result of his not having an argument to base his edits. ] 06:36, 4 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| === Bunglawala issue settled === | |||
| I am glad we could come to an agreement regarding ]! Thank you for the ] process. − ] <small>( ] • ] • ] )</small> 01:33, 23 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Archiving == | |||
| Would you be opposed if I archived much of your talk page? It is quite long. − ] <small>( ] • ] • ] )</small> 05:47, 6 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I've made two new archives and given them and your original two archives the {{]}} template. I also put up no this page the {{]}} template and put a date range on each of the archives. Yes, I am very bored. Are you willing to accept Tarc's wording for the Bunglawala article? Bunglawala does seem to be anti-Semitic, but I don't think the article should focus on that: the reader should be able to come to that conclusion on their own (especially after visiting the links). − ] <small>( ] • ] • ] )</small> 07:18, 6 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == MedCab Case: 2007-02-11 Mohammad Amin al-Husayni == | |||
| You had filed the MedCab Case ]. If you wish to proceed with informal mediation with me acting as your mediator, please state your acceptance of Alan.ca as your mediator and your intention to proceed in the discussion section of the mediation page. . ] 07:18, 7 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ] and bad faith == | |||
| Y'know, I'd seen that some 3rd parties had come in and removed the littlegreenfootballs incident entirely, and that you had reverted those reversions back, which I did not object to you doing. Silly me, I assumed good faith and never actually went back to '''read''' the Bunglawala article, as I just assumed you'd reverted back to the last version I'd put in as of March 5th. But what I find today is, you went back and stuck in the version that KazakhPol was trying to revert war over, a version which was most certainly NOT agreed upon in mediation. That full e-mail text has no place in this article and you good as well know it. | |||
| Assuming that you made a good faith edit was a bad assumption on my part. Trust me; that mistake will not be made a second time. ] 03:12, 24 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| I just bring what the source has and what was agreed in mediation. ] 19:33, 24 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Zeq, you are flat-out lying. The version with the needless e-mail link was NOT agreed to at all; it is irrelevant to the article, and certainly violates BLP as it is adding serious undue weight to a charge THAT CANNOT BE PROVEN. Add it back out again, and we'll have to resort to warnings. ] 12:35, 25 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Having a reliable source is not a good enough reason to include it in an article. The information must be encyclopedic and not be in conflict with any policies, particularly ] − ] <small>( ] • ] • ] )</small> 01:56, 27 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Fixed the above to say "a reliable source is '''not''' a good enough…", which was my initial intention. − ] <small>( ] • ] • ] )</small> 10:22, 3 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == chill for a sec == | |||
| We're starting to make some progress on this page, chill for a bit with the lead and focus on filling in the Israeli view point on the issues. Peace, --] 17:08, 29 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Stalking? :) == | |||
| You are one paranoid little chap, aren't ya? I've commented on the al-Husayni dispute in the past, and found my way there once again the other day via Zero's (quite a good and reputable editor, I must say) edit history, actually. | |||
| Obviously, we have share similar interests (Middle Eastern affairs) albeit from different sides, so it is rather natural that we will cross paths on any number of articles, from Bunglawala to al-Husayni to Israeli apartheid. When I happen to come across an article where you are blatantly POV-pushing, then I will do what I can within the bounds of Misplaced Pages rules to correct it. | |||
| Don't pollute my talk page with tinfoil conspiracy theories again, please. ] 16:53, 1 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Notice regarding ] == | |||
| This is a formal notification. As specified by the Arbitration Committee, any anon can ban you from an article for persistently disrupting it. Since you are persistently disrupting ], this is to notify you that you are hereby banned from editing it. Failure to observe this ban will lead to a block. --]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 12:55, 5 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I'm not sure a person who's "cautioned to use the dispute resolution procedure" and is heavily involved on content dispute is allowed to block you like this esp. considering what seems to be a ban on which was issued over a year ago<sup></sup>. however i'm not very much informed in the history of your disputes and it does seem that you were blocked officially from two other articles. ] 13:35, 5 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Your recent revert of my revert to ] == | |||
| Hi Zeq, I noticed you recently reverted of a series of anon edits to the ], which I'd like to discuss with you. | |||
| #The first edit was to add the word civilian before villages in "The conflict began after Hezbollah fired Katyusha rockets and mortars at Israeli border villages..." I disagree with this change because the term "civilian village" is redundant. There is no such thing as a military village, and we never refer to Lebanese villages in the article as "civilian" villages. Purely POV. | |||
| #The second was to change "Hezbollah then launched more rockets into northern Israel..." by inserting "the civilian areas of" before northern Israel. It is ] to say that they were either (a) only targetting civilian areas, or (b) only hitting civilians areas – the two things this change implies. The original wording was more neutrally vague. | |||
| #The third change was to add the sentence "After the war Lebanon has received millions in aid for rebuilding it's infrastructure, and Israel has received nothing for it's thousands of rocket attacks in civilian areas." This is a completely unsourced edit. If you can find sources to support the statement, I will support its inclusion, but not only is this unsourced, it's also wrong, so I doubt you'll find many sources to support it... | |||
| #The fourth is again to use the term "civilian village," which is redundant, and to remove "military outposts". This removal contradicts with the . | |||
| #The fifth is to state as fact the Israeli assertion that the international airport was being used to smuggle weapons into the country. This is entirely POV. | |||
| #The sixth is again redundant - unguided rockets are inherently indiscriminate, and towns are inherently civilian. | |||
| #The seventh is factually inaccurate. It states that a UNDP report is accusing Hezbollah of using human shields. I know of no such report by the UNDP. Furthermore, any mention of such reports does not belong in this section, but in the "Use of human shields" section later in the article. | |||
| #The eighth is again stating as fact the Israeli position that Hezbollah used roads and bridges to smuggle weapons. The entire addition was unsourced, and tends to ramble into other categories. This section deals with civilian objects, while the addition also talks about human shields and civilian casualties, which have their own sections. | |||
| #The ninth is an unsourced edit about Israeli civilian casualties being lower because they are required to build bomb shelters, then an entirely POV OR statement about Lebanese civilians not expecting attacks from Israel. | |||
| #The tenth is the same as the third, an unsourced addition of OR. | |||
| I'm reverting these changes yet again. Please join the discussion on the articles ] before re-adding these statements. <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (] • ]) 18:40, 5 April 2007 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned --> | |||
| :Can you provide me with a definition or policy page on wikilayering? I've never heard the phrase used before. Thanks. — ]<sup> <nowiki>]<nowiki>]</nowiki></sup> 19:03, 5 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Doc ] == | |||
| Hey, I was confused by . It seems like OR. Do you have a source saying that it was not a mistake and that they intended to use the Arabic word for "poison"? If not I ask that you remove it until you find this source. Thanks. ] 06:09, 6 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I'm not questioning the translation itself (though I haven't actually verified it), but rather your association of that translation with the text of the sign. I don't see any source indicating that was an intentional use of the ''Arabic'' word for "poison." And if you check here , and type in "poison", you will find that "Israel" is not one of the results. So it may not even be an Arabic word used in Persian. | |||
| :Anyway, there is not source for your claim that this was not a 'typo' and that they intended to use a supposed Arabic word for "poison," so I again ask you to please remove the OR from the the article. Thank you. ] 06:18, 6 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Again, I didn't dispute the translation itself, but rather your association of the phrase with that sign. There is no source saying that it is an intentional use of the Arabic word for 'poison', so it seems your parenthetical comment is OR. Unless you can provide a source making this association, your addition will be removed. I am asking you to do it yourself so that we don't have problems. | |||
| ::By the way, I looked at some English -> Arabic dictionaries online and couldn't find any that translate "poison" as "IsraeL". Most of them translated to something that looked like "sam" (or perhaps "som", it is not clear). Those providing multiple translations didn't have any resembling "Isreal". So now I am even questioning your translation, though it doesn't really affect the OR aspect of your addition anyway. | |||
| ::Please reconsider this situation and kindly remove the OR from the page. Thank you. ] 06:30, 6 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::I checked it by typing "poison" into the English side. Anyway, this doesn't really matter, because it is OR for you to list the translation there in parentheses when there is no source that associates that particular statement to that Arabic word's definition. Your recent replacement does not solve the underlying problem. I think you'd best remove it. Cheers. ] 06:34, 6 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::::It's called verification, and under that logic I could just as easily call your claim of that meaning OR as well. But the point is that I am not calling your edit OR on account of the translation but rather on the association of that translation with the phrase at hand. If you don't provide the source, then the article won't keep the statement. Is that clear? I've asked you nicely and with much explanation at this point, so if you don't remove it now I will have to seek help from others. ] 06:39, 6 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::::No that doesn't solve the problem. There is no reason to include that 'note' as there is no source associating them. By adding the translation note you imply that the misspelling used should be noted as meaning 'poison' in Arabic, when there is no reason to make this association. This is just about ]. Don't associate that translation with that phrase unless you can verify that they ''intended'' to use that particular word in that statement. Otherwise, keep it out of the article (until you find an appropriate source). I hope this was just a misunderstanding and that you now understand why I find the addition inappropriate. Thanks. ] 06:44, 6 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| your commentary is requested here: . ] 20:13, 6 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Bishara's resignation from the Knesset == | |||
| Please see ]. Thanks. ] 10:52, 9 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == English == | |||
| Hi Zeq. The language seems OK, but I am not a native speaker. As you know, edits supported by ] have greater stickability. ←] <sup>]]</sup> 22:06, 9 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Notice of block == | |||
| I have been away for a few days as you know. I have examined the rules carefully and my conclusions are: | |||
| # There is no ruling at ] nor a general rule at ] that sets a time limit on your probation. Therefore your probation continues until the Arbitration Committee decides to withdraw it. | |||
| # Both of the above-mentioned pages clearly state that the Arbitration ruling can be enforced by ''"any"'' administrator. The only restrictions are those of reasonableness and good faith, which I am willing to argue for. | |||
| Therefore, I am blocking you for 48 hours on account of your editing of ] in of my ban. Considering the severity of your action, this is a very small penalty. You cannot expect such leniency to continue. Reported in the required places. --]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 07:30, 11 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 16:20, 31 October 2022
Final decision in CAMERA lobbying arbitration case
This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. Mere membership by an editor in some external group that has been involved in violations of policy is not actionable without evidence that the editor has some personal involvement in said violations. Sanctions previously imposed are confirmed. An amnesty is extended towards any editors who may have been involved in this external group and who have not been sanctioned for their participation in it. This is coupled with an expectation that these editors will not participate in similar efforts in the future. Members of the community who may have information regarding similar efforts by external groups to unduly influence our content are urged to forward that information to the Committee for review. Hypnosadist (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is admonished to maintain an appropriate level of professionalism at all times, and to avoid misrepresenting Misplaced Pages policy to other editors. For the committee, — Rlevse • Talk • 20:17, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Hebron massacres
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Hebron massacres. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Misplaced Pages:Notability and "What Misplaced Pages is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Hebron massacres. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:13, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Zeq! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 21 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:
- Seyran Ates - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 04:54, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
Nomination of Sallah Sultan for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sallah Sultan is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Sallah Sultan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Bbb23 (talk) 17:43, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Hussein Naboulsi
The article Hussein Naboulsi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Non-notable politician.
While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ClaretAsh 11:37, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of The Boy Who Fell Out of the Sky
The article The Boy Who Fell Out of the Sky has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Notability.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ...William 00:17, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
File:QanaLeaflet.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:QanaLeaflet.jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:40, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Swords of Truth
The article Swords of Truth has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
It's not clear that this group has any WP:SUSTAINED notability - with the coverage of its activities not really extending beyond a short-lived and poorly attested stint in 2007.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Iskandar323 (talk) 16:20, 31 October 2022 (UTC)