| Revision as of 10:50, 10 May 2024 editLorddanofwiki (talk | contribs)20 editsNo edit summaryTags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 00:51, 22 January 2025 edit undoHarold (talk | contribs)433 edits Undid revision 1270924150 by Jeðuđěɗæk v2a (talk)Tag: Undo | ||
| (199 intermediate revisions by 96 users not shown) | |||
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
| <div style="clear: both;" ></div> | <div style="clear: both;" ></div> | ||
| == |
== Question regarding ClueBot == | ||
| Can I please see the source? (A github url for ClueBot) ? | |||
| {| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
| Is it being run on someone's PC or is it being run in the cloud? | |||
| |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
| I have more questions than I have answers coming to this page. | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Thank you for reverting vandalism ] (]) 13:57, 29 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| Thanks ] (]) 12:20, 8 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Archiving H2 sections which sit under H1 'YYYY' headers == | |||
| :@] the bot runs on Wikimedia Toolforge and its source code is . <span style="white-space:nowrap"><span style="font-family:monospace">'''<nowiki>''']<nowiki>]]'''</nowiki>'''</span> (] • ])</span> 13:47, 8 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == About ClueBot III JustArchiveThis == | |||
| I'm helping a user at their Talk page: ], and after their config was added, archiving kicked in right away and looks good. ] wishes to group discussions under H1 YYYY section headers (e.g. <nowiki>= 2024 =</nowiki>), and I believe that this is compatible with the bot archiving standard H2 discussion threads, but I wanted to make sure. I presume that signed & dated H2 discussions will get archived properly as they individually go stale, is that right? What happens to the H1 headers—do they end up remaining on the talk page to be culled manually later, or do they perhaps get archived when the first H2 under it is archived, or the last one? (As a complicating factor which I presume is unrelated to the general question, the user previously had a heading with unbalanced equal signs; this apparently stopped the bot when it hit that section, but this has since been resolved.) Thanks, ] (]) 20:06, 3 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Why the default are set to <code>|format=Y/F</code> when <code>format= %%i</code> is better according to the ]? | |||
| :Thanks for the help @], but i decided i don't really need the headings, I just got rid of them. Then manually archived the bits that went weird. ] (]) 14:40, 5 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :Is there a way to protect specific threads from archiving though? there's a few I want to keep. I thought "start at" might work to keep the top few, but it seems that does something else. ] (]) 14:42, 5 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :: ], Yes, just use the {{tls|DNAU}} template somewhere within the section to stop archiving a particular discussion section. You can also use it to delay archiving; see the doc page. ] (]) 18:28, 5 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::thank you. ] (]) 19:06, 5 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Also can I to switch to numbered formats later? Or it's not possible because it will break the bot? - ] (]) 14:31, 11 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| == Daniele Orsato == | |||
| :Because ] to the documentation without updating ]. But I prefer dated archives, myself, because they just make more sense to me, but it's a debated issue. From a technical perspective, it's (slightly) better for the bot and the Misplaced Pages servers to use dated archives since then the bot doesn't have to "find" the right archive by checking the sizes of archives, it just knows based on the date. This isn't a big deal, but when it comes to defaults for a popular bot where most people won't care one way or another, it's better generally that the default be the more efficient option. <span style="color:#dbb5ff;font:bold 125% 'Brush Script MT',cursive;padding-left:.75em;padding-right:.5em">— ] ]</span> 23:56, 11 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| Can you check for grammer on ] page because I added his referring on PSG vs Dortmund and his retirement confirmed after the match. The referee was seen in tears after full time which explained he is going to retire after Euro 2024. | |||
| :What? ] ] ] 00:03, 12 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| https://www.sportbible.com/football/football-news/champions-league/psg-borussia-dortmund-referee-crying-daniele-orsato-386963-20240508 ] (]) 12:49, 8 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Whatt??? == | |||
| WHAT ON EARTH IS THIS? Why did you revert my edits? For God’s sake, what is your problem with my editing? I didn’t vandalise any article or falsified anything! What the hell is this? A JOKE? My edits are being taken for granted now huh? You have no shame in disregarding your own personal policies! Shame! Utter disgrace! What did I do wrong? I didn’t vandalise anything and I edited with good faith! This is sham! What do you expect from people like me? Every time I do a damn edit, some idiot comes along and revert all of my work, what a shame you are! Just embarrassing! Your establishment is the worst encyclopaedia on the internet for being such garbage and treating my edits like they were so-called “vandalism”. Your platform is pure bias and lies. Shame on you! Disgrace! ] (]) 10:48, 10 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 00:51, 22 January 2025
| Skip to table of contents |
False positives and false negativesIf you believe that ClueBot NG has mistakenly identified a good edit as vandalism, please follow the directions in the warning it gave or click here. Please do not report it on this talk page. It takes less time to report the case to the correct location, and we can handle it more effectively there.If you believe that ClueBot NG has missed an edit that is vandalism, again do not report it here. ClueBot is unable to catch all vandalism. Just revert the edit and warn the editor. ClueBot NG Links!Report False Positives • Frequently Asked Questions Purpose of this PageThis page is for comments on or questions about the ClueBots.
The current status of ClueBot NG is: Running
The current status of ClueBot III is: Not running - last edit was User talk:Bgsu98 28701s ago
Praise should go on the praise page. Barnstars and other awards should go on the awards page.
Use the "new section" button at the top of this page to add a new section. Use the link above each section to edit that section.
This page is automatically archived by ClueBot III.
The ClueBots' owner or someone else who knows the answer to your question will reply on this page.
| ClueBots | |
|---|---|
| ClueBot NG/Anti-vandalism · ClueBot II/ClueBot Script |  |
| ClueBot III/Archive · Talk page for all ClueBots |
 | Beware! This user's talk page is monitored by talk page watchers. Some of them even talk back. |
Question regarding ClueBot
Can I please see the source? (A github url for ClueBot) ? Is it being run on someone's PC or is it being run in the cloud? I have more questions than I have answers coming to this page.
Thanks Vidyagamerfromaus (talk) 12:20, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Vidyagamerfromaus the bot runs on Wikimedia Toolforge and its source code is here. ''']''' (talk • contribs) 13:47, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
About ClueBot III JustArchiveThis
Why the default are set to |format=Y/F when format= %%i is better according to the documentation?
Also can I to switch to numbered formats later? Or it's not possible because it will break the bot? - Ivan530 (Talk) 14:31, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Because someone added that comment to the documentation without updating User:ClueBot III/JustArchiveThis. But I prefer dated archives, myself, because they just make more sense to me, but it's a debated issue. From a technical perspective, it's (slightly) better for the bot and the Misplaced Pages servers to use dated archives since then the bot doesn't have to "find" the right archive by checking the sizes of archives, it just knows based on the date. This isn't a big deal, but when it comes to defaults for a popular bot where most people won't care one way or another, it's better generally that the default be the more efficient option. — Naomi Amethyst 23:56, 11 January 2025 (UTC)