Misplaced Pages

User talk:MarioGom: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:23, 27 May 2024 editChess (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers11,268 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Latest revision as of 18:04, 21 January 2025 edit undoPhoebezz22 (talk | contribs)200 edits hello: new sectionTag: New topic 
(65 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
{{User:MiszaBot/config {{User:MiszaBot/config
|maxarchivesize = 200K |maxarchivesize = 200K
|counter = 4 |counter = 5
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 |minthreadstoarchive = 1
|minthreadsleft = 0 |minthreadsleft = 0
Line 10: Line 10:
}} }}


== There is a mop reserved in your name == == Women in Red December 2024 ==
<!-- From template {{Administrator without tools}} -->
<table style="background-color:#fcffdd; width:100%; border:3px solid #fceb92; margin:1em auto 1em auto">
<tr>]
<td style="vertical-align:middle; padding:1px">]</td>
<td style="vertical-align:middle; padding:1px; text-align:center">'''You are a remarkable editor in many ways.''' You would be a good administrator, in my opinion, and appear to be well qualified. You personify an ''''']''''' and have gained my support already!</td></tr>
</table> <!-- insert an optional message here --> ] (]) 08:07, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
:Wait… aren't you already an admin? Or do I miss my userhighlighter too much. ] &#124; ] &#124; ] (they/them) 21:02, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
:{{+1}}. Would support. Do you have any ] or featured content? Would likely make your run smoother if you did. –] <small>(])</small> 01:52, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
: I would happily support your RfA. – ] (''']''') 12:57, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
::Thank you for your kind words! I'm not considering it at the moment. Maybe some time in the future ;-) ] (]) 15:29, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
:::Can't wait, comrade.<span id="Usedtobecool:1711727447125:User_talkFTTCLNMarioGom" class="FTTCmt"> —&nbsp;''']'''&nbsp;] 15:50, 29 March 2024 (UTC)</span>

== Women in Red April 2024 ==


{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ; background-color: #FFFFFF;" {| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ; background-color: #FFFFFF;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" | |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" |
|rowspan="2" | |rowspan="2" |
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | ]'''<big>]</big>''' '''|''' <small>April 2024, Volume 10, Issue 4, Numbers 293, 294, 302, 303, 304</small> |style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | ]'''<big>]</big>''' <big>|</big> <small>December 2024, Vol 10, Issue 12, Nos 293, 294, 324, 325 </small>
<br /> <br />

'''Online events:''' '''Online events:'''
* New: ] | ] | ] * ''New'': ] <big>|</big> ]


* Continuing: ] | ] <small>(year-long initiative)</small> * ''Continuing'': ] <big>|</big> ] <small>(year-long initiative)</small>

'''Announcements''' '''Announcements from other communities'''
* ] have a monthly virtual edit-a-thon and the next session is<br> December 2nd 4:00 - 5:00 p.m. CST. For Zoom meeting details, contact ] or<br> ]. ] members are welcome to join the Zoom Meeting
*The second round of "One biography a week" begins in April as part of ].


'''Tip of the month:''' '''Tip of the month:'''
* ''Think of rewarding contributors, especially newcomers, with a ].''
*''If you run into technical problems, you might find help on our ]''


'''Other ways to participate:''' '''Other ways to participate:'''
Line 48: Line 36:
] '''|''' ] '''|'''
] '''|''' ] '''|'''
] ]
|} |}
--] (] 19:42, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging --] (] 18:46, 29 November 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
<!-- Message sent by User:Lajmmoore@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Outreach/G-N&oldid=1216332268 --> <!-- Message sent by User:Lajmmoore@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Outreach/G-N&oldid=1258737489 -->


== Welcome ==
== New Pages Patrol newsletter April 2024 ==


Welcome back, Mariogom! Just noticed your contributions after a long time. I hope everything is well with you. Regards! ] (]) 20:41, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
<div style="border:2px solid #90C0FF; background:#F0F0FF; width:99%; padding:4px">
<!-- do not use ;Header to make bold headers per ], causes errors for screen readers -->
{| style="float: right; border: 1px solid #BBB; background: #FFFFFF;
|}
Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}},
{| style="float: right;
|- style="font-size: 86%;"
|}
]


== New pages patrol January 2025 Backlog drive ==
'''Backlog update:''' The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to {{no ping|Schminnte}}, who led with over 2,300 points.


{| style="border: 2px solid #36c; border-radius: 4px; background: linear-gradient(to right, #ffffff, #eaf3ff); padding: 10px; color: #000;"
Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to {{no ping|JTtheOG}}, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.
| style="vertical-align: middle; font-size: 130%" | ] | <span style="font-size: 85%">''']''' </span>

| rowspan=3 | ]
Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the ].

It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!

'''2023 Awards'''
]
{{no ping|Onel5969}} won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. {{no ping|Hey man im josh}} led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the ] and the ]. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!

'''WMF work on PageTriage:''' The ] and volunteer software developers ], and then ]. This concludes most major work to ], and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who ]. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.

'''Recruitment:''' A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.

'''Reviewing tip:''' Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated tool.

{{refbegin}}
'''Reminders:'''
* You can access live chat with patrollers on the .
* Consider adding ] to your watchlist.
* To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself ].

{{refend}}
</div>
] (]) 16:26, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1216676254 -->

== Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment ==

]Your feedback is requested &#32;at ]. Thank you for helping out!<br/><small>You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of ] subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by ].</small> <!-- Template:FRS notification --><div class="paragraphbreak" style="margin-top:0.5em"></div> Message delivered to you with love by ] :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact ]. &#124; Sent at 09:31, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

== Feedback request: History and geography request for comment ==

]Your feedback is requested &#32;at ]. Thank you for helping out!<br/><small>You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of ] subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by ].</small> <!-- Template:FRS notification --><div class="paragraphbreak" style="margin-top:0.5em"></div> Message delivered to you with love by ] :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact ]. &#124; Sent at 16:31, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

== New page patrol May 2024 Backlog drive ==

{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ; background-color: #FFF; padding:10px 15px 0"
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em; font-size:130%" |'''] |''' <span style="font-size:85%">May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive</span>
|rowspan=3|]
|- |-
| |
* On 1 May 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. * On 1 January 2025, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin in hopes of addressing the growing backlog.
* Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. * Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled.
* Each article review will earn 1 point, while each redirect review will earn 0.2 points.
* Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
* ] will be given out based on consistently hitting point thresholds for each week of the drive.
* Each review will earn 1 point.
* Interested in taking part? ''']'''. * Barnstars will also be granted for ] previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
* Interested in taking part? ''']'''.
|- |-
|colspan=2 style="font-size:85%; padding-top:15px;"|You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself ] |colspan=2 style="font-size:85%; padding-top:15px;"|You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself ]
|}
|} ] (]) 16:14, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
] (]) 01:53, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1219352352 -->
<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1263150419 -->


== Feedback request: History and geography request for comment ==
== Women in Red May 2024 ==

]Your feedback is requested &#32;at ]. Thank you for helping out!<br/><small>You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of ] subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by ].</small> <!-- Template:FRS notification --><div class="paragraphbreak" style="margin-top:0.5em"></div> Message delivered to you with love by ] :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact ]. &#124; Sent at 16:30, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

== Women in Red January 2025 ==


{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ; background-color: #FFFFFF;" {| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ; background-color: #FFFFFF;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" | |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" |
|rowspan="2" | |rowspan="2" |
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | ]'''<big>]</big>''' <big>|</big> <small>May 2024, Volume 10, Issue 5, Numbers 293, 294, 305, 306, 307</small> |style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | ] ]'''<big>]</big>''' <big>|</big> <small>January 2025, Vol 11, Issue 1, Nos 324, 326, 327, 328, 329 </small>
<br /> <br />
'''Online events:''' '''Online events:'''
* New: ] <big>|</big> ] <big>|</big> ] * ''New'': ] <small>(year-long initiative)</small> <big>|</big> ] <big>|</big> ]
* ''Continuing'': ] <small>(year-long initiative)</small> <big>|</big> ]

* Continuing: ] <big>|</big> ] <small>(year-long initiative)</small>

'''Announcements from other communities''' '''Announcements from other communities'''
* Celebrate ] on Jan 15, 2025
* ] - contest with certificates of participation and prizes
* The Misplaced Pages Library: ] - May 15th to June 5th * Participate in ] Jan 15 Feb 5, 2025


'''Tip of the month:''' '''Tip of the month:'''
* Celebrate WiR's 20% achievement by adding <nowiki>{{User:ForsythiaJo/20%Userbox}}</nowiki> to your user page.
* ''Use ] references wherever possible, but a ] reliable source {{br}}is better than none, particularly for biographies of living people.''


'''Other ways to participate:''' '''Other ways to participate:'''
Line 147: Line 95:
] ]
|} |}
--] (] 06:17, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging --] (] 17:50, 28 December 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
<!-- Message sent by User:Lajmmoore@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Outreach/G-N&oldid=1220367061 --> <!-- Message sent by User:Lajmmoore@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Outreach/G-N&oldid=1263556351 -->


== Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment ==
== Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C ==


]Your feedback is requested &#32;at ]. Thank you for helping out!<br/><small>You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of ] subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by ].</small> <!-- Template:FRS notification --><div class="paragraphbreak" style="margin-top:0.5em"></div> Message delivered to you with love by ] :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact ]. &#124; Sent at 17:30, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
<section begin="announcement-content" />
:''] ''


== hello ==
Dear Wikimedian,


{{You've got mail}}
You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.
@] Thank you so much for your time, and have a great week =) ] (]) 18:04, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the ] to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please ].

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,<section end="announcement-content" />

] 23:09, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:RamzyM (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=Universal_Code_of_Conduct/Coordinating_Committee/Election/2024/Previous_voters_list_2&oldid=26721207 -->

== RFA2024 update: phase I concluded, phase II begins ==

Hi there! Phase I of the ] has concluded, with several impactful changes gaining community consensus and proceeding to various stages of implementation. Some proposals will be implemented in full outright; others will be discussed at phase II before being implemented; and still others will proceed on a trial basis before being brought to phase II. The following proposals have gained consensus:

* '''Proposals 2 and 9b''' (''']'''): ] and ]
* '''Proposal 3b''' (in trial): ]
* '''Proposal 13''' (in trial): ]
* '''Proposal 14''' (implemented): ]
* '''Proposals 16 and 16c''' (''']'''): ] and ]
* '''Proposal 17''' (''']'''): ]
* '''Proposal 24''' (''']'''): ]
* '''Proposal 25''' (implemented): ]
See the ] for a full list of proposals and their outcomes. A huge thank-you to everyone who has participated so far :) looking forward to seeing lots of hard work become a reality in phase II. ] (]), via ] (]) 08:09, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Theleekycauldron@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_adminship/2024_review/Mailing_list&oldid=1218650058 -->

== Feedback request: History and geography request for comment ==

]Your feedback is requested &#32;at ]. Thank you for helping out!<br/><small>You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of ] subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by ].</small> <!-- Template:FRS notification --><div class="paragraphbreak" style="margin-top:0.5em"></div> Message delivered to you with love by ] :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact ]. &#124; Sent at 15:30, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

== Question regarding SPI ==

Hi ], I was surprised to see that you closed the SPI report I submitted stating that no evidence had been presented approximately 10 hours after I supplied additional diffs and said that more were available if needed. Why was this case closed in such a short time after opening? Can you please explain? ] (]) 19:19, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

:{{u|Nwlaw63}}: What you presented so far, if I read it correctly is: 1) a shared (not uncommon) interest with other editors, 2) certain temporal overlap, 3) overlap in an article with a few other editors involved, and 4) disagreeing with you. None of these seem unique or telling enough to make any determination. If you still want to make a case, please, provide a ''concise'' explanation with diffs. Bullet points usually work better to convey each piece of evidence, and diffs should generally be presented at least in pairs, at least one for the master, and at least one for the reported user. The similarities need to clearly raise above common similarities across users in the topic area. ] (]) 22:04, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
::Thanks for your prompt response and advice; this is my first experience at SPI and I am not aware of the procedures and conventions. But I am puzzled by the rapid closure without allowing time either for me to provide further examples as I offered, or for other editors to comment. This seems very unusual, as there are open cases as far back as early March, and the only rapid closures that I have found are where the sock was agreed and blocked. In any case, I would think that the comment from Polygnotus itself is evidence of longstanding involvement with Misplaced Pages, in their knowledge of events and editors of over 15 years ago by an account that only started 18 months ago? In any event, can you clarify - do I need to start a new SPI request or can the one I started be reopened? ] (]) 14:09, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
:::{{u|Nwlaw63}}: I have reopened the case, feel free to post further evidence, technically you can also post when it's closed but not archived. About the timeline to closure, clerks rarely work in cases in a first come, first served fashion. Cases that are open for months are generally just some exceptions that are particularly hard to handle. About your comment: {{tq|their knowledge of events and editors of over 15 years ago by an account that only started 18 months ago}}. No, it's not the case. I have read many discussions from the early Misplaced Pages days in the articles where I edit the most. It's not all that uncommon. We have page histories and talk page archives for a reason. And, in any case, it is not evidence enough that this account is the same person as Cirt. "Not being new" is simply not enough, and it is not a policy violation. ] (]) 14:40, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
::::Unsurprisingly, they have not added any evidence. Now another cult member is using the opportunity to try to ]. ] (]) 17:48, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

== Introduction to contentious topics ==
{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = You have recently edited a page related to '''the Balkans or Eastern Europe''', a topic designated as ''']'''. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and <em>does <strong>not</strong> imply that there are any issues with your editing</em>.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as ''contentious topics''. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Misplaced Pages’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Misplaced Pages administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit <strong>carefully</strong> and <strong>constructively</strong>, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
*adhere to the purposes of Misplaced Pages;
*comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
*follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
*comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
*refrain from gaming the system.

<p>Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics ''procedures'' you may ask them at the ] or you may learn more about this contentious topic ]. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{tl|Ctopics/aware}} template. </p>}}<!-- Derived from Template:Contentious topics/alert/first --> ] (]) 20:02, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

==Per your suggestion of moving this here==
Hello MarioGom. To recapitulate , when I asked how you had arrived at the title "Characterization as a cult", you said you had ''not'' used sources but had summarized the content of the section. However the same verbatim title change proposal was made by two editors that are now banned and who used as the basis for the title change. ] (]) 09:40, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
:Your explanation about this is "I have read many previous discussions over the years, and I'll never claim all my proposals are novel ". That doesn't address the question of how your ''summary'' of a section can be identical to a proposal made 4 years ago by two banned users. Are you saying it's just mere coincidence? Or are you now changing your answer to claim that you were in fact reviving a proposal from 4 years ago? ] (]) 09:40, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
::{{u|Hogo-2020}}: I stand by my previous answers (]). I did not change the answer, and I think my previous clarifications would have made sense if read while assuming good faith. But since you seem to be particularly interested in my thought process, I'll try to break it down here as much as possible:
::* Some historical context: this section has been subject to controversy for years. Early disputes I could find trace back to 2018 (]) when it was titled "Designation as a cult" (]). It was changed to "Cult of personality" (]) in 2021. It has been subject to several disputes over the years, not just the one you linked to. Over time, several possible names have been thrown around. From a quick look to the archives, some were "Characterization as a cult", "Cult-like behavior", "Classification as a cult", "Description as a cult" (yes, some of them mentioned by SharabSalam). "Characterization as a cult", in particular, is mentioned in . And one of the most recent proposals seem to have been in 2021 (]).
::* When I said I'm familiar with previous discussions, that means I have read probably all of the archive pages at least once. So my views on consensus building are informed by past discussions. That was what I meant when I said I wouldn't claim all my proposals are novel.
::* I don't think I ever read the linked source, although I'm not 100% since the link seems to be broken now. If you are concerned I was motivated by the contents of that source, rest assured I was not (whatever these contents are).
::* SharabSalam's contributions were not particularly memorable to me, and I don't think I would had any of their comments in mind when doing any particular contribution. I had no good memory of the particular comment you linked to.
::* But since you bring that discussion up, I see it already documented the use of these kind of formulations across other articles in Misplaced Pages: ], ], ] (yes, I have now taken these examples from the conversation you linked to). These formulations are just not so original and unique.
::* In March 2024, when I was doing various improvements to the article, I came across this section again. The title "cult of personality" immediately came across incongruent with the content and cited sources. That is when I changed it to "Characterization as a cult" {{diff2|1214232661}}, and I made my rationale pretty clear: {{tq|rename section to "Characterization as a cult"; many reliable sources used through the article describe the MEK as a cult or a religious sect, that goes well beyond "cult of personality" which is a partial facet that might be attributed to many kinds of organizations, even some that would otherwise not be characterized as a "cult"}}.
::* I thought about other titles like "Cult-like practices". But given the diversity of sources, I thought it would be more appropriate to have a less assertive title, something that lends itself to discuss some historiography, to have some balanced discussion about the different degrees of characterizations by different sources. "Designation as a cult" does not seem appropriate, since "designation" can imply it is a category assigned by some official body, which it is not. Same with "Classification". "Characterization" and "Description" seem fairly appropriate, but "Description as a cult" sounds a bit weirder to me.
::* Have the previous occurrences of the word "Characterization" in multiple past discussions influenced my choice? Yes, I am sure they have. Had a different synonym been discussed more often, there's chanced that I would have used that one instead.
::* Is this "reviving a 4 year old" proposal? No, per my above reasoning, I think that would be a misrepresentation, since I did not have that proposal you linked in mind. Although, had I chosen to bring it up based on that old discussion, there would have not been anything wrong with it. Just like there's nothing wrong with you repeating the same arguments as other banned users in the same previous discussions.
::I hope that clarifies it and dispels whatever concerns you had, even if I have no idea what legitimate concern you had. ] (]) 12:35, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
:::My inquiry is about the title change you proposed, "Characterization as a cult" (]) which I found is the same verbatim title change proposal made 4 years ago by two banned editors. On May 15 2024 I asked you how you arrived at this title, and you said "It's a summary of the content"{{dif|1223934059}}{{dif|1223938821}}. But now you are saying "I have read probably all of the archive pages at least once. So my views on consensus building are informed by past discussions." These look like two totally different answers. ] (]) 08:10, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
::::{{u|Hogo-2020}}: it seems obvious you will not accept my answers as honest. That's fine. What's your point, and why does it matter? There's really not more I can tell you on this topic. ] (]) 16:40, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
:::::Hello MarioGom. You initially said your proposed title was a "summary of the content", and after I the same verbatim proposal was made 4 years earlier by two banned users, you changed your answer to saying the proposal came from reading many previous discussions over the years. I accept your answers, but your answer now differs from the answer you initially gave me, that is my point. ] (]) 08:33, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
::::::{{u|Hogo-2020}}: I explained why it was not a change, but an extended explanation given your insistence. But I cannot change your mind, so be it. I guess we'll have to leave this here. ] (]) 12:29, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

== Women in Red June 2024 ==

{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ; background-color: #FFFFFF;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" |
|rowspan="2" |
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | ]'''<big>]</big>''' <big>|</big> <small>June 2024, Volume 10, Issue 6, Numbers 293, 294, 308, 309, 310</small>
<br />
'''Online events:'''
* New: ] <big>|</big> ] <big>|</big> ]

* Continuing: ] <big>|</big> ] <small>(year-long initiative)</small>

'''Announcements from other communities'''
* ]
* The Misplaced Pages Library: ] - May 15th to June 5th

'''Tip of the month:'''
* ''''']''' is '''NOT''' a reliable source (]). It '''can''' be used <br>to look for biographical clues.

'''Other ways to participate:'''
* ]. You can always ].
* ].
* ] and add any general ideas on developing the project.
* Follow us on social media:
] '''|'''
] '''|'''
]
|}
--] (] 07:05, 23 May 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
<!-- Message sent by User:Lajmmoore@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Outreach/G-N&oldid=1225116316 -->
==Notice of reliable sources noticeboard discussion==
] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is ].<!--Template:RSN-notice--> Thank you. I am informing you because you have commented on a ]. <span class="nowrap">] (]) <small>(please ] me on reply)</small></span> 02:23, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 18:04, 21 January 2025

Archiving icon
Archives
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3
Archive 4Archive 5


This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Women in Red December 2024

Women in Red | December 2024, Vol 10, Issue 12, Nos 293, 294, 324, 325


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

  • Think of rewarding contributors, especially newcomers, with a barnstar.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 18:46, 29 November 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Welcome

Welcome back, Mariogom! Just noticed your contributions after a long time. I hope everything is well with you. Regards! Maliner (talk) 20:41, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

New pages patrol January 2025 Backlog drive

January 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
  • On 1 January 2025, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin in hopes of addressing the growing backlog.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled.
  • Each article review will earn 1 point, while each redirect review will earn 0.2 points.
  • Streak awards will be given out based on consistently hitting point thresholds for each week of the drive.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:53, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Feedback request: History and geography request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Jesus on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:30, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red January 2025

Women in Red | January 2025, Vol 11, Issue 1, Nos 324, 326, 327, 328, 329


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

  • Celebrate WiR's 20% achievement by adding {{User:ForsythiaJo/20%Userbox}} to your user page.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 17:50, 28 December 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Misplaced Pages:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:30, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

hello

Hello, MarioGom. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

@MarioGom Thank you so much for your time, and have a great week =) Phoebezz22 (talk) 18:04, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

User talk:MarioGom: Difference between revisions Add topic