| Revision as of 23:19, 12 December 2024 editMarincyclist (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users931 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 03:33, 14 January 2025 edit undoMarincyclist (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users931 edits OneClickArchived "yo lil bro" to User talk:Marincyclist/Archive 1Tag: Manual revert |
| (32 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
{{This is a new user}} |
|
{{This is a new user}} |
|
|
{{Archives|banner=yes}} |
|
== California Supreme Court Historical Society == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Marincyclist, I have moved the article you created to ]. I have moved it to ] to allow you to add sufficient sources to meet our ]. Thanks! ] (]) 05:49, 23 August 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:@] Thanks for letting me know, I added some more sources to the article. Let me know what you think. Best, ] (]) 04:00, 24 August 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Deletion discussion about ] == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hello Marincyclist, and thank you for your contributions to Misplaced Pages. |
|
|
|
|
|
While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, ], should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages in its current form. Your comments are welcome at ]. |
|
|
|
|
|
Deletion ] usually run for seven days and are ''not'' votes. ] about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is ], but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top. |
|
|
|
|
|
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with <code><nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>Miminity<nowiki>}}</nowiki></code>. And don't forget to sign your reply with <code><nowiki>~~~~</nowiki></code> . Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
|
<small>(Message delivered via the ] tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)</small><!-- Template:AfD-notice-NPF --> |
|
|
|
|
|
'''''Warm Regards''''', ] (]) (]) 10:46, 12 September 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
== Your ] nomination of ] == |
|
|
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've ] the article ] you nominated for ]-status according to the ]. ] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <!-- Template:GANotice --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 03:45, 17 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
== Your ] nomination of ] == |
|
|
The article ] you nominated as a ] has failed ]; see ] for reasons why ] failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. <!-- Template:GANotice result=fail --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 05:44, 17 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message == |
|
|
|
|
|
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> |
|
|
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div> |
|
|
<div class="ivmbox-text"> |
|
|
Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. |
|
|
|
|
|
The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. |
|
|
|
|
|
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:49, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small> |
|
|
|
|
|
</div> |
|
|
</div> |
|
|
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/08&oldid=1258243765 --> |
|
|
|
|
|
== Tulsi Gabbard == |
|
|
|
|
|
Your edits to ] have been, virtually without exception, problematic, violating policy and guidelines. Given that you are a newbie, I ] on your part. |
|
|
|
|
|
Your argument grossly conflated the points made in the interview. A close reading would not lead down this path. |
|
|
|
|
|
Beyond that, your , among other things, changed {{tq|Gabbard met various political and religious leaders from Syria and Lebanon}} to {{tq|Gabbard '''claims''' she met various political and religious leaders from Syria and Lebanon}}. For this you cited . In your , your edit summary said {{tq|gabbard claims the meetings with assad were unplanned, but we don't know if this is true. changed to reflect this.}} |
|
|
|
|
|
If you're going to doubt what Gabbard says, then you would have to also doubt she met Assad, as the aforementioned cite is entitled {{tq|Tulsi Gabbard '''Claims''' to Have Met With Syrian President Bashar al-Assad}}. |
|
|
|
|
|
After , I made a series of corrections and restorations of informative material you had deleted. |
|
|
|
|
|
You then made , which I with edit summary {{tq|Reverting edits w unsourced or misrepresented claims about Gabbard per WP:BLP. Please discuss on Talk}}. I also opened a ] on the Talk page and repeated my request there that you {{tq|Please bring your proposed edits here so we can discuss rather than edit war.}} |
|
|
|
|
|
You did not comply with my request, but rather did . |
|
|
|
|
|
Then after it was again reverted, you did . |
|
|
|
|
|
I with ES {{tq|Your first sentence is not supported by cited source. Much else problematic after that, Discuss on Talk, one small edit or isolated issue at a time.}} I posted on Talk {{tq|As I wrote in the undo, discuss here, one small edit or isolated issue at a time}} w ES {{tq|Pls stop with the wholesale revisions}}. |
|
|
|
|
|
{{u|Muboshgu}} (who is an admin) followed shortly thereafter with a request to {{tq|try telling us what you want to change and why, with sourcing, here}}. |
|
|
|
|
|
But rather than comply, you presumptively went straight to editing the lead §. |
|
|
|
|
|
Your editing is ], ], and can lead to a ]. |
|
|
|
|
|
] (]) 08:31, 12 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:@], I think we have gotten off on the wrong foot, so apologies. My edits were sourced with reliable sources, and I tried my best to use neutral language. You may have a point with some of your reversions, I probably made a few mistakes, but I think you should've just tweaked the wording rather than revert everything I added, as my edits had merit. |
|
|
:Your comment isn't accurate, as I did reply to you on the talk page after you made your reversions, and you didn't reply to me. Any edits I made after that were, to my knowledge, different to the ones you questioned. I have stopped editing the Assad section now. |
|
|
:"But rather than comply, you presumptively went straight to editing the lead §." |
|
|
:This is an improper criticism, I did comply. Your talk page post was about the section on Assad, I stopped editing that section so it can be discussed on the talk page. That does not mean I cannot edit the lead. The lead is now being discussed on the talk page, which I am participating in. Editors are within their rights to make edits, as I did. If someone disagrees, I'm happy to discuss on the talk page. The article isn't set in stone, nor should it be. |
|
|
:] (]) 19:40, 12 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
::Re your {{tq|Your comment isn't accurate, as I did reply to you on the talk page after you made your reversions, and you didn't reply to me}}: |
|
|
::You a lengthy reply at 19:43, 10 December 2024; Muboshgu raised additional issues in at 20:39; you saying {{tq|I agree}} at 21:42. Then less than 2 hrs later, at 23:26 made . |
|
|
::That does not seem to me (nor do I think would it to an objective observer) to allow sufficient time for a considered reply to the issues you and Muboshgu raised. It seemed to merely affirm that you were continuing on the same path. That is why I didn't respond. ] (]) 23:06, 12 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::@], I apologize, that is a mistake on my part then. I thought I was okay to make the edit after my reply to your talk page message, as I considered that edit to be of different content to the edit you were disputing. I can see now that this was rude and wrong of me to do, which is why I have stopped editing that section for the time being. If you look on the talk page, I have now responded to all of the messages that have been addressed to me, so we can work collaboratively to improve the article. Thanks, ] (]) 23:18, 12 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
