Misplaced Pages

Affair of Porto Novo: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:41, 30 December 2024 editBruce1ee (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers269,755 editsm fixed lint errors – missing end tag← Previous edit Latest revision as of 06:30, 10 January 2025 edit undoWikipedialuva (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers39,807 editsm clean up, typo(s) fixed: estabish → establish, negotiatons → negotiationsTag: AWB 
(6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 13: Line 13:
| combatants_header = | combatants_header =
| combatant1 = {{tree list}} | combatant1 = {{tree list}}
* {{flagicon|Swedish Empire}} ] * {{flagicon|Sweden|naval}} ]
** ] ** ]
{{tree list end}} {{tree list end}}
Line 20: Line 20:
** {{flag|French East India Company}} ** {{flag|French East India Company}}
{{tree list/end}} {{tree list/end}}
| commander1 = {{flagicon|Swedish Empire}} Petter von Utfall | commander1 = {{flagicon|Sweden|naval}} Petter von Utfall
| commander2 = {{flagicon|East India Company}} ] <br /> {{flagicon|East India Company}} Gostlin <br /> {{flagicon|East India Company}} Roach <br /> {{flagicon|French East India Company}} ] <br /> {{flagicon|French East India Company}} de la Farelle | commander2 = {{flagicon|East India Company}} ] <br /> {{flagicon|East India Company}} Gostlin <br /> {{flagicon|East India Company}} Roach <br /> {{flagicon|French East India Company}} ] <br /> {{flagicon|French East India Company}} de la Farelle
| units1 = {{flagicon|Swedish Empire}} Porto Novo garrison <br /> {{flagicon|Swedish Empire}} '']'' | units1 = {{flagicon|Sweden|naval}} Porto Novo garrison <br /> {{flagicon|Sweden|naval}} '']''
| units2 = {{flagicon|East India Company}} ''Prince Augustus'' | units2 = {{flagicon|East India Company}} ''Prince Augustus''
| strength1 = 40–50 men <br /> 1 ship | strength1 = 40–50 men <br /> 1 ship
Line 30: Line 30:
| campaignbox = {{Campaignbox Swedish colonial conflicts}} | campaignbox = {{Campaignbox Swedish colonial conflicts}}
}} }}
The '''Affair of Porto Novo''', also called the '''Porto Novo incident''',{{Sfn|Hodacs|2020|p=575}} was a successful Anglo–French attack and destruction of the newly founded Swedish factory at Porto Novo in ] on 20 October 1733. The '''Affair of Porto Novo''', also called the '''Porto Novo incident''',{{Sfn|Hodacs|2020|p=575}} was a successful Anglo–French attack and destruction of the newly founded Swedish factory at Porto Novo (modern ]) in ] on 20 October 1733.


The English governor at Madras, George Morton Pitt, had been alerted to the newly established Swedish factory at Porto Novo, and after failing to convince the Nabob to prevent the Swedes there from conducting trade, contacted Pierre Le Noir, the French governor of Pondicherry. After making an agreement, they sent a force of several hundred men led by Captain de la Garalle down the coast towards Porto Novo and attacked the warehouse, with the Swedes surrendering a day after the attack. The English governor at Madras, ], had been alerted to the newly established Swedish factory at Porto Novo, and after failing to convince the ] to prevent the Swedes there from conducting trade, contacted ], the French governor of ]. After making an agreement, they sent a force of several hundred men led by Captain de la Garalle down the coast towards Porto Novo and attacked the warehouse, with the Swedes surrendering a day after the attack.


== Background == == Background ==
=== Foundation of the SOIC === === Foundation of the SOIC ===
{{Main article|Swedish East India Company}} {{Main|Swedish East India Company}}
] allowing the SOIC to conduct trade in the ]]] ] allowing the SOIC to conduct trade in the ]]]
On 14 June 1731, after the collapse of the ], the SOIC received its charter.{{Sfn|Ivarsson|2022|p=9}} The government granted the company permission to trade "with all places east of the ]" which initiated its first ]. After its establishment, the company aroused a lot of opposition in Sweden, as despite the long-distance shipping and direct purchases "from the source" aligned with the mercantilist principles, the planned import of foreign manufactured and luxury goods was hard to reconcile with.<ref name=":1">{{Cite web |last=Boëthius |first=Bertil |title=Colin Campbell |url=https://sok.riksarkivet.se/sbl/Presentation.aspx?id=16347 |access-date=2024-12-20 |website=sok.riksarkivet.se |publisher=]}}</ref> On 14 June 1731, after the collapse of the ], the SOIC received its charter.{{Sfn|Ivarsson|2022|p=9}} The government granted the company permission to trade "with all places east of the ]" which initiated its first ]. After its establishment, the company aroused a lot of opposition in Sweden, as despite the long-distance shipping and direct purchases "from the source" aligned with the mercantilist principles, the planned import of foreign manufactured and luxury goods was hard to reconcile with.<ref name=":1">{{Cite web |last=Boëthius |first=Bertil |title=Colin Campbell |url=https://sok.riksarkivet.se/sbl/Presentation.aspx?id=16347 |access-date=2024-12-20 |website=sok.riksarkivet.se |publisher=]}}</ref>


Moreover, the company faced competition from major foreign companies, a sentiment that was further hightened by the suspicion that it was merely a disguised continuation of the Ostend Company.<ref name=":1" /> Moreover, the company faced competition from major foreign companies, and the suspicion was that it was merely a disguised continuation of the Ostend Company.<ref name=":1" />


=== Arrival at Porto Novo === === Arrival at Porto Novo ===
In January 1733, the ''Ulrica Eleonora'', a renamed English ship under the command of Petter von Utfall, left Göteborg. Its destination was India, where they intended on finding any possible business in the region.{{Sfn|Frängsmyr|1976|p=26}} In January 1733, the '']'', a renamed English ship under the command of Petter von Utfall, left Göteborg. Its destination was India, where they intended on finding any possible business in the region.{{Sfn|Frängsmyr|1976|p=26}}


Upon the '']'' arrival at Porto Novo in September,<ref name=":0" /> the officers onboard immediately began negotiatons with agents from the Mughal Emperor. Their intention was to estabish a Swedish factory there, in other words a station with a magazine and office for continued trade in the East Indies.{{Sfn|Frängsmyr|1976|p=26}} The Swedes were welcomed, promised the protection of the ], and were allowed to unload a majority of their cargo into the warehouse.{{Sfn|Gill|1958|p=52}} Upon the ''Ulrica Eleonora''{{'s}} arrival at Porto Novo in September,<ref name=":0" /> the officers onboard immediately began negotiations with agents from the ]. Their intention was to establish a Swedish factory there, in other words a station with a magazine and office for continued trade in the East Indies.{{Sfn|Frängsmyr|1976|p=26}} The Swedes were welcomed, promised the protection of the ], and were allowed to unload a majority of their cargo intoa warehouse.{{Sfn|Gill|1958|p=52}}


After a month, when the monsoon came, Petter von Utfall decided it was best for the ''Ulrica Eleonora'' to sail towards ] for refitting during the winter instead of going to China, and to leave some people behind in Porto Novo to open up trade.{{Sfn|Banerji|1967|p=76}}{{Sfn|Frängsmyr|1976|p=26}} Several members of the crew, Charles Barrington, Thomson, Thomas Combes, and the writer, along with 36 others remained in Porto Novo to protect the warehouse and conduct trade with the goods stored there.{{Sfn|Gill|1958|p=52}} Other sources claim there were some 50 men left in Porto Novo.{{Sfn|Frängsmyr|1976|p=26}} After a month, when the monsoon came, Petter von Utfall decided it was best for the ''Ulrica Eleonora'' to sail towards ] for refitting during the winter instead taking a planned trip to China, and to leave some people behind in Porto Novo to open up trade.{{Sfn|Banerji|1967|p=76}}{{Sfn|Frängsmyr|1976|p=26}} Several members of the crew, Charles Barrington, Thomson, Thomas Combes, and the writer, along with 36 others remained in Porto Novo to protect the warehouse and conduct trade with the goods already accumulated.{{Sfn|Gill|1958|p=52}} Other sources claim there were some 50 men left in Porto Novo.{{Sfn|Frängsmyr|1976|p=26}}


=== Prelude === === Prelude ===
For a month, the people at Porto Novo remained there undisturbed, and trading continued. However, Thomson heard a rumour that ], the Governor of Madras, "designs to play the devil with us; but I hope their boastings will not frighten any of our friends or the concerned, for we are not apprehensive of anything they can do to us."{{Sfn|Gill|1958|p=52}} For a month, the merchants at Porto Novo remained there undisturbed, and trading continued. However, Thomson heard a rumour that ], the Governor of Madras, "designs to play the devil with us; but I hope their boastings will not frighten any of our friends or the concerned, for we are not apprehensive of anything they can do to us."{{Sfn|Gill|1958|p=52}}


==== Anglo–French preparation ==== ==== Anglo–French preparation ====
] ]
When news of the Swedish presence reached Governor Pitt in ], he wished to end the Swedish trade in the region and attempted to convince the Nabob to put a stop to it.{{Sfn|Frängsmyr|1976|p=26}} However, the Nabob refused, and Pitt subsequently decided to act independently. He contacted Governor ] of ], seeking help. Le Noir strongly disapproved of the Swedish expedition and agreed to militarily support the British.{{Sfn|Hellstenius|1860|p=11}} He wrote to Pitt: "We are entirely of opinion that such interlopers must cause a great deal of trouble and loss to our Companies."{{Sfn|Gill|1958|pp=52–53}} When news of the Swedish presence reached Governor Pitt in ], he wished to end the Swedish trade in the region and attempted to convince the Nawab to put a stop to it.{{Sfn|Frängsmyr|1976|p=26}} However, the Nawab refused, and Pitt subsequently decided to act independently. He contacted Governor ] of ], seeking help. Le Noir strongly disapproved of the Swedish expedition and agreed to militarily support the British.{{Sfn|Hellstenius|1860|p=11}} He wrote to Pitt: "We are entirely of opinion that such interlopers must cause a great deal of trouble and loss to our Companies."{{Sfn|Gill|1958|pp=52–53}}
After being notified of the Swedish presence, Le Noir and the council there prohibited the residents and merchants in Pondicherry to trade with Porto Novo, and after seven men of the ''Ulrica Eleonora'' defected to Pondicherry, Le Noir refused to hand them over to Captain Petter von Utfall.{{Sfn|Gill|1958|p=53}}{{Sfn|Dalgliesh|1933|p=196}} After being notified of the Swedish presence, Le Noir and his council prohibited the residents and merchants in Pondicherry to trade with Porto Novo, and when seven men of the ''Ulrica Eleonora'' defected to Pondicherry, Le Noir refused to hand them over to Captain Petter von Utfall.{{Sfn|Gill|1958|p=53}}{{Sfn|Dalgliesh|1933|p=196}}


== Affair == == Affair ==
The governors assembled a force; estimates vary from several hundred{{Sfn|Gill|1958|p=53}}{{Sfn|Dickson|Parmentier|Ohlmeyer|2007|p=155}}{{Sfn|Frängsmyr|1976|p=26}} to 600<ref>{{Cite web |last=Simons |first=Christin |date=2021-01-21 |year=2021 |title=The law is open on both sides: Great Britain and Sweden’s Interpretation of the Law of Nations in the East India Trade in the 1730s |url=https://www.kcl.ac.uk/events/the-law-is-open-on-both-sides-great-britain-and-swedens-interpretation-of-the-law-of-nations-in-the-east-india-trade-in-the-1730s |access-date=2024-12-19 |website=www.kcl.ac.uk |publisher=] |language=en |publication-place=]}}</ref> or 700 men.{{Sfn|Hellstenius|1860|p=11}} This force, led by Captain de la Farelle, sailed down the coast towards Porto Novo and subsequently landed there. Despite the town being in Mughal territory, where neither the British nor French had special right to, they attacked the warehouse on 20 October,<ref name=":0">{{Cite web |date=1915 |title=1431-1432 (Nordisk familjebok / Uggleupplagan. 21. Papua - Posselt) |url=https://runeberg.org/nfca/0776.html |access-date=2024-12-19 |website=runeberg.org |language=sv}}</ref> seizing the cargo, along with the ''Ulrica Eleonora's'' papers and took them to Fort St. David.{{Sfn|Gill|1958|p=53}}{{Sfn|Banerji|1967|p=76}}{{Sfn|Frängsmyr|1976|p=26}} After only a day after the attack, the remaining Swedes gave up.{{Sfn|Frängsmyr|1976|p=26}} The governors assembled a force; estimates vary from several hundred{{Sfn|Gill|1958|p=53}}{{Sfn|Dickson|Parmentier|Ohlmeyer|2007|p=155}}{{Sfn|Frängsmyr|1976|p=26}} to 200,{{Sfn|Lannoy|Linden|1938|p=38}} 600,<ref>{{Cite web |last=Simons |first=Christin |date=2021-01-21 |title=The law is open on both sides: Great Britain and Sweden's Interpretation of the Law of Nations in the East India Trade in the 1730s |url=https://www.kcl.ac.uk/events/the-law-is-open-on-both-sides-great-britain-and-swedens-interpretation-of-the-law-of-nations-in-the-east-india-trade-in-the-1730s |access-date=2024-12-19 |website=www.kcl.ac.uk |publisher=] |language=en |publication-place=]}}</ref> or 700 men.{{Sfn|Hellstenius|1860|p=11}} This force, led by Captain de la Farelle, sailed down the coast towards Porto Novo and subsequently landed there. Despite the town being in Mughal territory, where neither the British nor French had territorial rights, they attacked the warehouse on 20 October,<ref name=":0">{{Cite web |date=1915 |title=1431-1432 (Nordisk familjebok / Uggleupplagan. 21. Papua - Posselt) |url=https://runeberg.org/nfca/0776.html |access-date=2024-12-19 |website=runeberg.org |language=sv}}</ref> seizing the cargo, along with the ''Ulrica Eleonora's'' papers and took them to Fort St. David.{{Sfn|Gill|1958|p=53}}{{Sfn|Banerji|1967|p=76}}{{Sfn|Frängsmyr|1976|p=26}} After only a day after the attack, the remaining Swedes gave up.{{Sfn|Frängsmyr|1976|p=26}}


Thomson, Combes, and several others were captured and sent to Fort St. David. However, Charles Barrington, who the British were more eager to catch, managed to escape alongside some people, taking refuge in ].{{Sfn|Ivarsson|2022|p=41}}{{Sfn|Gill|1958|p=53}}{{Sfn|Dickson|Parmentier|Ohlmeyer|2007|p=155}} In Tranquebar, Barrington sent the first account of the "violence commited at Porto Novo" back home and eventually managed to return to Sweden, leaving the Swedish sailors who made up the guard in Porto Novo to join British service in ], who had no other means to sustain themselves. After the attack, only two Swedes remained in Porto Novo, Dr. Munck, and Anthony Bengsten.{{Sfn|Gill|1958|p=53}} Thomson, Combes, and several others were captured and sent to Fort St. David. However, Charles Barrington, who the British were more eager to catch, managed to escape alongside some people, taking refuge in ].{{Sfn|Ivarsson|2022|p=41}}{{Sfn|Gill|1958|p=53}}{{Sfn|Dickson|Parmentier|Ohlmeyer|2007|p=155}} In Tranquebar, Barrington sent the first account of the "violence commited at Porto Novo" back home and eventually managed to return to Sweden, leaving the Swedish sailors who made up the guard in Porto Novo to join British service in ], who had no other means to sustain themselves. After the attack, only two Swedes remained in Porto Novo: Dr. Munck and Anthony Bengsten.{{Sfn|Gill|1958|p=53}}


After the seizure, the staff from both the French and English companies investigated the confiscated books, letters, and other papers. After reading the documents, they claimed that they found proof of the illegitimacy of the SOIC in the instructions for the ship, therefore, taking control of the factory and seizing the ship would serve as a warning against pursuing illicit trade in the East Indies.{{Sfn|Ivarsson|2022|pp=41–42}} After the seizure, the staff from both the French and English companies investigated the confiscated books, letters, and other papers. After reading the documents, they claimed that they found proof of the illegitimacy of the SOIC in the instructions for the ship, therefore, taking control of the factory and seizing the ship would serve as a warning against pursuing illicit trade in the East Indies.{{Sfn|Ivarsson|2022|pp=41–42}}


=== Attack on the ''Ulrica Eleonora'' === === Attack on the ''Ulrica Eleonora'' ===
During the Anglo-French attack, the '']'' had remained in ], where its men and officers were well received. During Christmas time in 1733, Utfall had heard of what happened through rumours.{{Sfn|Frängsmyr|1976|p=26}} In early 1734, the ''Ulrica Eleonora'' headed back to Porto Novo in order to collect her cargo after being refitted for the home voyage to Sweden. However, when she arrived in early March and about to anchor, two vessels in the roadstead fired warning shots at her.{{Sfn|Dickson|Parmentier|Ohlmeyer|2007|pp=155–156}}{{Sfn|Gill|1958|p=53}}{{Sfn|Frängsmyr|1976|p=26}} During the Anglo-French attack, the '']'' had remained in ], where its men and officers were well received. During Christmas time in 1733, Utfall had heard rumours of what had happened.{{Sfn|Frängsmyr|1976|p=26}} In early 1734, the ''Ulrica Eleonora'' headed back to Porto Novo in order to collect her cargo after being refitted for the home voyage to Sweden. However, when she arrived in early March and about to anchor, two vessels in the roadstead fired warning shots at her.{{Sfn|Dickson|Parmentier|Ohlmeyer|2007|pp=155–156}}{{Sfn|Gill|1958|p=53}}{{Sfn|Frängsmyr|1976|p=26}}
These ships had been dispatched by the Governors, one French and one British with each holding a hundred men, in anticipation of the ''Ulrica Eleonora's'' return. The British troops were commanded by Major Roach, and the British ship, the ''Prince Augustus'', was commanded by Captain Gostlin.{{Sfn|Gill|1958|p=53}} These ships had been dispatched by the Governors, one French and one British with each holding a hundred men, in anticipation of the ''Ulrica Eleonora's'' return. The British troops were commanded by Major Roach, and the British ship, the ''Prince Augustus'', was commanded by Captain Gostlin.{{Sfn|Gill|1958|p=53}}


Seeing that an attempted landing would result in a disaster, Captain Petter von Utfall once again put to sea again, sailing southwards. The French and British ships pursued Utfall closely for some 15 hours, managing to keep the ''Ulrica Eleonora'' within firing range. Eventually, they abandoned the chase and left her to continue her journey, without most of her cargo, a large portion of her crew, and nearly all of the ]es.{{Sfn|Gill|1958|pp=53–54}} Seeing that an attempted landing would result in a disaster, Captain Petter von Utfall once again put to sea, sailing southwards. The French and British ships pursued Utfall closely for some 15 hours, managing to keep the ''Ulrica Eleonora'' within firing range. Eventually, they abandoned the chase and left her to continue her journey, without most of her cargo, a large portion of her crew, and nearly all of the ]es.{{Sfn|Gill|1958|pp=53–54}}


== Aftermath == == Aftermath ==
Line 75: Line 75:
Following her repulsion from Porto Novo, the ''Ulrica Eleonora'' went around southern India and later proceeded along the ] towards the town of ], with the intention to collect water. However, the Dutch authorities in the town not only declined to give them any water, but also detained a certain Ouchterlony and 13 other men who had accompanied him ashore with him after a short fight where two men were killed,{{Sfn|Banerji|1967|p=77}} in order to make the ''Ulrica Eleonora'' continue her journey now with a far smaller crew.{{Sfn|Gill|1958|p=54}} Further attempts to dock at other Dutch ports ended just as badly.{{Sfn|Frängsmyr|1976|p=26}} Following her repulsion from Porto Novo, the ''Ulrica Eleonora'' went around southern India and later proceeded along the ] towards the town of ], with the intention to collect water. However, the Dutch authorities in the town not only declined to give them any water, but also detained a certain Ouchterlony and 13 other men who had accompanied him ashore with him after a short fight where two men were killed,{{Sfn|Banerji|1967|p=77}} in order to make the ''Ulrica Eleonora'' continue her journey now with a far smaller crew.{{Sfn|Gill|1958|p=54}} Further attempts to dock at other Dutch ports ended just as badly.{{Sfn|Frängsmyr|1976|p=26}}


The Swedish situation was critical, as the remaining water and food was slowly running out, and the winds were pulling the ship westwards.{{Sfn|Frängsmyr|1976|p=26}} To her luck, the ''Ulrica Elenora'', once it came near ], came across a French vessel that was "a-fishing for turtle" which was manned by a more friendly crew than any of the British or French who the Swedes encountered in India. After meeting, the ''Ulrica Eleonora'' was finally given the water they desperately needed, and her crew bought supplies at a high cost on the island, along with fifteen ] joining the voyage.{{Sfn|Gill|1958|pp=54–55}} The Swedes were also allowed to stay there for seven months where they could recollect their strength and repair the ship.{{Sfn|Frängsmyr|1976|p=26}} The Swedish situation was critical, as the remaining water and food was slowly running out, and the winds were pulling the ship westwards.{{Sfn|Frängsmyr|1976|p=26}} To her luck, the ''Ulrica Elenora'', once it came near ], came across a French vessel that was "a-fishing for turtle" which was manned by a more friendly crew than any of the British or French who the Swedes encountered in India. After meeting, the ''Ulrica Eleonora'' was finally given the water they desperately needed, and her crew bought supplies at a high cost on the island, along with fifteen ]s joining the voyage.{{Sfn|Gill|1958|pp=54–55}} The Swedes were also allowed to stay there for seven months to regain their strength and repair the ship.{{Sfn|Frängsmyr|1976|p=26}}


In February, the ''Ulrica Eleonora'' finally arrived back in Europe, with only 35 members of her original crew.{{Sfn|Gill|1958|p=55}}{{Sfn|Dickson|Parmentier|Ohlmeyer|2007|p=156}} In February, the ''Ulrica Eleonora'' finally arrived back in Europe, with only 35 members of her original crew.{{Sfn|Gill|1958|p=55}}{{Sfn|Dickson|Parmentier|Ohlmeyer|2007|p=156}}
Line 83: Line 83:


== Works cited == == Works cited ==
* {{Cite website |last=Ivarsson |first=Elin |year=2022 |title=Finding One's Place in a Global Market: Chartered Companies, Masculinities, and the Porto Novo Affair |url=https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1667151/FULLTEXT01.pdf |publisher=]}} * {{Cite journal |last=Banerji |first=R.N. |year=1967 |title=Early Swedish Trade Relation with India |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/44137998 |journal=Proceedings of the Indian History Congress |volume=29 |pages=74–82 |publisher=] |jstor=44137998}}
* {{Cite website |last=Gill |first=Conrad |year=1958 |title=The Affair of Porto Novo: An Incident in Anglo-Swedish Relations |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/558969 |publisher=] |jstor=558969}} * {{Cite book |last=Dalgliesh |first=Wilbert Harold |title=The Perpetual Company of the Indies in the Days of Dupleix |publisher=] |year=1933 |isbn= |edition= |location= |pages= |language=en |trans-title= |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=yWo_AAAAMAAJ&q=Porto%20Novo%20%201733}}
* {{Cite book |last1=Dickson |first1=David |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=IplIv0Z7NNAC&dq=porto+novo+india+1733&pg=PA155 |title=Irish and Scottish Mercantile Networks in Europe and Overseas in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries |last2=Parmentier |first2=Jan |last3=Ohlmeyer |first3=Jane H. |publisher=] |year=2007 |isbn=9789038210223 |language=en}}
* {{Cite website |last=Banerji |first=R.N. |year=1967 |title=EARLY SWEDISH TRADE RELATION WITH INDIA |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/44137998 |website=www.jstor.org |publisher=] |jstor=44137998}}
* {{Cite book |last=Dickson |first=David |url=https://www.google.se/books/edition/Irish_and_Scottish_Mercantile_Networks_i/IplIv0Z7NNAC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=porto+novo+india+1733&pg=PA155&printsec=frontcover |title=Irish and Scottish Mercantile Networks in Europe and Overseas in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries |last2=Parmentier |first2=Jan |last3=Ohlmeyer |first3=Jane H. |publisher=] |year=2007 |isbn=9789038210223 |language=en}}
* {{Cite website |last=Hodacs |first=Hanna |year=2020 |title=Keeping It in the Family: The Swedish East India Company and the Irvine Family, 1731–1770 |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/27106169 |publisher=] |jstor=27106169}}
* {{Cite book |last=Hellstenius |first=John |url=https://www.google.se/books/edition/Bidrag_till_Svenska_Ost_Indiska_Compagni/XM1AAAAAcAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1 |title=Bidrag till Svenska Ost-Indiska Compagniets Historia: 1731-1766. |publisher=Edquist |year=1860}}
* {{Cite book |last=Frängsmyr |first=Tore |author-link=Tore Frängsmyr |title=Ostindiska kompaniet: människorna, äventyret och den ekonomiska drömmen |publisher=Bokförlaget Bra Böcker |year=1976 |isbn=9789170246531 |language=sv |trans-title=East India Company: the people, the adventure and the financial dream}} * {{Cite book |last=Frängsmyr |first=Tore |author-link=Tore Frängsmyr |title=Ostindiska kompaniet: människorna, äventyret och den ekonomiska drömmen |publisher=Bokförlaget Bra Böcker |year=1976 |isbn=9789170246531 |language=sv |trans-title=East India Company: the people, the adventure and the financial dream}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Gill |first=Conrad |year=1958 |title=The Affair of Porto Novo: An Incident in Anglo-Swedish Relations |journal=The English Historical Review |volume=73 |issue=286 |pages=47–65 |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/558969 |publisher=] |doi=10.1093/ehr/LXXIII.286.47 |jstor=558969}}
* {{Cite book |title=The Perpetual Company of the Indies in the Days of Dupleix |last=Dalgliesh |first=Wilbert Harold |date= |publisher=] |year=1933 |isbn= |edition= |location= |publication-date= |pages= |language=en |trans-title= |url=https://www.google.se/books/edition/The_Perpetual_Company_of_the_Indies_in_t/yWo_AAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=0&bsq=Porto%20Novo%20%201733}}
* {{Cite book |last=Hellstenius |first=John |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=XM1AAAAAcAAJ |title=Bidrag till Svenska Ost-Indiska Compagniets Historia: 1731-1766. |publisher=Edquist |year=1860}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Hodacs |first=Hanna |year=2020 |title=Keeping It in the Family: The Swedish East India Company and the Irvine Family, 1731–1770 |journal=Journal of World History |volume=31 |issue=3 |pages=567–596 |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/27106169 |publisher=] |doi=10.1353/jwh.2020.0032 |jstor=27106169}}
* {{Cite web |last=Ivarsson |first=Elin |year=2022 |title=Finding One's Place in a Global Market: Chartered Companies, Masculinities, and the Porto Novo Affair |url=https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1667151/FULLTEXT01.pdf |publisher=]}}
* {{Cite book |last=Lannoy |first=Charles de |url=https://www.google.se/books/edition/A_History_of_Swedish_Colonial_Expansion/jEoIAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=0&bsq=porto%20novo%20faktori%201733 |title=A History of Swedish Colonial Expansion |last2=Linden |first2=Herman Vander |publisher=] |year=1938 |language=en |translator-last=Brinton |translator-first=George Elder |translator-last2=Reed |translator-first2=Henry Clay}}


] ]
]
] ]
] ]
] ]
]

Latest revision as of 06:30, 10 January 2025

Anglo–French attack on Porto Novo
Affair of Porto Novo

Painting of the ship Ulrica Eleonora, 1719
Date20 October 1733 – Early 1734
LocationPorto Novo (modern-day Parangipettai) India
Result Anglo–French victory
Territorial
changes
Swedish factory at Porto Novo is destroyed
Belligerents
 East India Company
Commanders and leaders
Sweden Petter von Utfall East India Company George Morton Pitt
East India Company Gostlin
East India Company Roach
French East India Company Pierre Le Noir
French East India Company de la Farelle
Units involved
Sweden Porto Novo garrison
Sweden Ulrica Eleonora
East India Company Prince Augustus
Strength
40–50 men
1 ship
Hundreds–700 men
2 ships
Casualties and losses
Several captured Unknown
Swedish colonial conflicts
9th century
12th century
13th century
15th century
16th century
17th century
18th century
19th century
20th century

The Affair of Porto Novo, also called the Porto Novo incident, was a successful Anglo–French attack and destruction of the newly founded Swedish factory at Porto Novo (modern Parangipettai) in Southern India on 20 October 1733.

The English governor at Madras, George Morton Pitt, had been alerted to the newly established Swedish factory at Porto Novo, and after failing to convince the Nawab to prevent the Swedes there from conducting trade, contacted Pierre Le Noir, the French governor of Pondicherry. After making an agreement, they sent a force of several hundred men led by Captain de la Garalle down the coast towards Porto Novo and attacked the warehouse, with the Swedes surrendering a day after the attack.

Background

Foundation of the SOIC

Main article: Swedish East India Company
First page of the document from Frederick I of Sweden allowing the SOIC to conduct trade in the East Indies

On 14 June 1731, after the collapse of the Ostend Company, the SOIC received its charter. The government granted the company permission to trade "with all places east of the Cape of Good Hope" which initiated its first octroi. After its establishment, the company aroused a lot of opposition in Sweden, as despite the long-distance shipping and direct purchases "from the source" aligned with the mercantilist principles, the planned import of foreign manufactured and luxury goods was hard to reconcile with.

Moreover, the company faced competition from major foreign companies, and the suspicion was that it was merely a disguised continuation of the Ostend Company.

Arrival at Porto Novo

In January 1733, the Ulrica Eleonora, a renamed English ship under the command of Petter von Utfall, left Göteborg. Its destination was India, where they intended on finding any possible business in the region.

Upon the Ulrica Eleonora's arrival at Porto Novo in September, the officers onboard immediately began negotiations with agents from the Mughal Emperor. Their intention was to establish a Swedish factory there, in other words a station with a magazine and office for continued trade in the East Indies. The Swedes were welcomed, promised the protection of the Nawab, and were allowed to unload a majority of their cargo intoa warehouse.

After a month, when the monsoon came, Petter von Utfall decided it was best for the Ulrica Eleonora to sail towards Bengal for refitting during the winter instead taking a planned trip to China, and to leave some people behind in Porto Novo to open up trade. Several members of the crew, Charles Barrington, Thomson, Thomas Combes, and the writer, along with 36 others remained in Porto Novo to protect the warehouse and conduct trade with the goods already accumulated. Other sources claim there were some 50 men left in Porto Novo.

Prelude

For a month, the merchants at Porto Novo remained there undisturbed, and trading continued. However, Thomson heard a rumour that George Morton Pitt, the Governor of Madras, "designs to play the devil with us; but I hope their boastings will not frighten any of our friends or the concerned, for we are not apprehensive of anything they can do to us."

Anglo–French preparation

French map of the Coromandel coast by Monsieur d'Anville from 1753

When news of the Swedish presence reached Governor Pitt in Madras, he wished to end the Swedish trade in the region and attempted to convince the Nawab to put a stop to it. However, the Nawab refused, and Pitt subsequently decided to act independently. He contacted Governor Pierre Le Noir of Pondicherry, seeking help. Le Noir strongly disapproved of the Swedish expedition and agreed to militarily support the British. He wrote to Pitt: "We are entirely of opinion that such interlopers must cause a great deal of trouble and loss to our Companies." After being notified of the Swedish presence, Le Noir and his council prohibited the residents and merchants in Pondicherry to trade with Porto Novo, and when seven men of the Ulrica Eleonora defected to Pondicherry, Le Noir refused to hand them over to Captain Petter von Utfall.

Affair

The governors assembled a force; estimates vary from several hundred to 200, 600, or 700 men. This force, led by Captain de la Farelle, sailed down the coast towards Porto Novo and subsequently landed there. Despite the town being in Mughal territory, where neither the British nor French had territorial rights, they attacked the warehouse on 20 October, seizing the cargo, along with the Ulrica Eleonora's papers and took them to Fort St. David. After only a day after the attack, the remaining Swedes gave up.

Thomson, Combes, and several others were captured and sent to Fort St. David. However, Charles Barrington, who the British were more eager to catch, managed to escape alongside some people, taking refuge in Danish Tranquebar. In Tranquebar, Barrington sent the first account of the "violence commited at Porto Novo" back home and eventually managed to return to Sweden, leaving the Swedish sailors who made up the guard in Porto Novo to join British service in Madras, who had no other means to sustain themselves. After the attack, only two Swedes remained in Porto Novo: Dr. Munck and Anthony Bengsten.

After the seizure, the staff from both the French and English companies investigated the confiscated books, letters, and other papers. After reading the documents, they claimed that they found proof of the illegitimacy of the SOIC in the instructions for the ship, therefore, taking control of the factory and seizing the ship would serve as a warning against pursuing illicit trade in the East Indies.

Attack on the Ulrica Eleonora

During the Anglo-French attack, the Ulrica Eleonora had remained in Bengal, where its men and officers were well received. During Christmas time in 1733, Utfall had heard rumours of what had happened. In early 1734, the Ulrica Eleonora headed back to Porto Novo in order to collect her cargo after being refitted for the home voyage to Sweden. However, when she arrived in early March and about to anchor, two vessels in the roadstead fired warning shots at her.

These ships had been dispatched by the Governors, one French and one British with each holding a hundred men, in anticipation of the Ulrica Eleonora's return. The British troops were commanded by Major Roach, and the British ship, the Prince Augustus, was commanded by Captain Gostlin.

Seeing that an attempted landing would result in a disaster, Captain Petter von Utfall once again put to sea, sailing southwards. The French and British ships pursued Utfall closely for some 15 hours, managing to keep the Ulrica Eleonora within firing range. Eventually, they abandoned the chase and left her to continue her journey, without most of her cargo, a large portion of her crew, and nearly all of the supercargoes.

Aftermath

Map of Cochin from 1635

Following her repulsion from Porto Novo, the Ulrica Eleonora went around southern India and later proceeded along the Malabar Coast towards the town of Cochin, with the intention to collect water. However, the Dutch authorities in the town not only declined to give them any water, but also detained a certain Ouchterlony and 13 other men who had accompanied him ashore with him after a short fight where two men were killed, in order to make the Ulrica Eleonora continue her journey now with a far smaller crew. Further attempts to dock at other Dutch ports ended just as badly.

The Swedish situation was critical, as the remaining water and food was slowly running out, and the winds were pulling the ship westwards. To her luck, the Ulrica Elenora, once it came near Mauritius, came across a French vessel that was "a-fishing for turtle" which was manned by a more friendly crew than any of the British or French who the Swedes encountered in India. After meeting, the Ulrica Eleonora was finally given the water they desperately needed, and her crew bought supplies at a high cost on the island, along with fifteen Lascars joining the voyage. The Swedes were also allowed to stay there for seven months to regain their strength and repair the ship.

In February, the Ulrica Eleonora finally arrived back in Europe, with only 35 members of her original crew.

References

  1. Hodacs 2020, p. 575.
  2. Ivarsson 2022, p. 9.
  3. ^ Boëthius, Bertil. "Colin Campbell". sok.riksarkivet.se. National Archives of Sweden. Retrieved 2024-12-20.
  4. ^ Frängsmyr 1976, p. 26.
  5. ^ "1431-1432 (Nordisk familjebok / Uggleupplagan. 21. Papua - Posselt)". runeberg.org (in Swedish). 1915. Retrieved 2024-12-19.
  6. ^ Gill 1958, p. 52.
  7. ^ Banerji 1967, p. 76.
  8. ^ Hellstenius 1860, p. 11.
  9. Gill 1958, pp. 52–53.
  10. ^ Gill 1958, p. 53.
  11. Dalgliesh 1933, p. 196.
  12. ^ Dickson, Parmentier & Ohlmeyer 2007, p. 155.
  13. Lannoy & Linden 1938, p. 38.
  14. Simons, Christin (2021-01-21). "The law is open on both sides: Great Britain and Sweden's Interpretation of the Law of Nations in the East India Trade in the 1730s". www.kcl.ac.uk. London: King's College London. Retrieved 2024-12-19.
  15. Ivarsson 2022, p. 41.
  16. Ivarsson 2022, pp. 41–42.
  17. Dickson, Parmentier & Ohlmeyer 2007, pp. 155–156.
  18. Gill 1958, pp. 53–54.
  19. Banerji 1967, p. 77.
  20. Gill 1958, p. 54.
  21. Gill 1958, pp. 54–55.
  22. Gill 1958, p. 55.
  23. Dickson, Parmentier & Ohlmeyer 2007, p. 156.

Works cited

Categories:
Affair of Porto Novo: Difference between revisions Add topic