Misplaced Pages

Talk:Black supremacy: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 05:32, 6 January 2025 editPincrete (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers51,381 edits →Why no link to White Supremacy?: ReplyTag: Reply← Previous edit Latest revision as of 20:53, 16 January 2025 edit undoTheodoresTomfooleries (talk | contribs)173 edits →Black supremacy falls under 'discrimination'; end of story.: ReplyTag: Reply 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 32: Line 32:
:this is wikipedia, unfortunetaly you need to get used to it, i recommend conservapedia ] (]) 00:31, 6 January 2025 (UTC) :this is wikipedia, unfortunetaly you need to get used to it, i recommend conservapedia ] (]) 00:31, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
:All the evidence is that Black supremacy barely exists outside of a small amount of offensive rhetoric, which is usually reactive, rather than active. So the question as to whether the white/black variant is more offensive is fairly academic. Is a woman raping a man as offensive as the other way round? Outside instances of statutory rape ''(an adult woman with a legally child male)'', it hardly ever happens. You need to hold the power for supremacism to be more than offensive talk. ] (]) 05:32, 6 January 2025 (UTC) :All the evidence is that Black supremacy barely exists outside of a small amount of offensive rhetoric, which is usually reactive, rather than active. So the question as to whether the white/black variant is more offensive is fairly academic. Is a woman raping a man as offensive as the other way round? Outside instances of statutory rape ''(an adult woman with a legally child male)'', it hardly ever happens. You need to hold the power for supremacism to be more than offensive talk. ] (]) 05:32, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

== Black supremacy falls under 'discrimination'; end of story. ==

I've just re-added the discrimination sidebar template to the article, and I've looked through the edit history to see that certain editors have, in the past, removed both the discrimination template at the end of the article as well as the discrimination sidebar template.<br>
Whether or not editors believe that Black supremacy falls under 'racism' or not doesn't matter. The purpose of sidebar templates is to highlight that articles are part of a series and to allow for easy navigation between related topics. If Misplaced Pages and its editors have decided that the sidebar includes Black supremacy, then the Black supremacy article will include the sidebar template.<br>
I've looked through numerous "supremacy" articles, including ], ], ], ] and they have the discrimination sidebar as well. What concerns me the most is that there was little to no justification offered by the editors in their removal of the template, and the arguments that were given were largely irrelevant to whether or not the template should be included in the first place.

I hope that there will come an understanding after this of the purpose of sidebar templates. ] (]) 22:28, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

:If we add the discrimination sidebar or footer here, we need reliable sources stating that "Black supremacy" is a sort of discrimination. ] (]) 06:48, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
::The discrimination sidebar includes Black supremacy. If you want to object to its inclusion in the article, then start a topic on ]. ] (]) 20:53, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 20:53, 16 January 2025

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Black supremacy article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6Auto-archiving period: 6 months 
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
This article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
[REDACTED] African diaspora Mid‑importance
[REDACTED] This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
[REDACTED] Discrimination Low‑importance
[REDACTED] This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
WikiProject iconPolitics Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Articles for deletionThis article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Semi-protected edit request on 2 August 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Hello. I politely request for the ability to edit the "black supremacy" article on[REDACTED] so I can add additional informations to prevent any misunderstandings. I am sending you my best regards, and I hope that my request is accepted. Have a great day, or evening. Mraccidentallybombedyou (talk) 13:48, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: this is not the right page to request additional user rights. You may reopen this request with the specific changes to be made and someone may add them for you, or you can wait until you are autoconfirmed and edit the page yourself. Hyphenation Expert (talk) 14:48, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

Why no link to White Supremacy?

One of the article's category is entitled "Black Power", the other is titled "Discrimination". Is "Black Supremacy" somewhat morally acceptable, but "White Supremacy" isn't? Interesting POV, wikipedia. 2A0D:3344:231D:9C10:1C38:79F4:AC1E:8151 (talk) 03:46, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

this is wikipedia, unfortunetaly you need to get used to it, i recommend conservapedia VerseWiki (talk) 00:31, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
All the evidence is that Black supremacy barely exists outside of a small amount of offensive rhetoric, which is usually reactive, rather than active. So the question as to whether the white/black variant is more offensive is fairly academic. Is a woman raping a man as offensive as the other way round? Outside instances of statutory rape (an adult woman with a legally child male), it hardly ever happens. You need to hold the power for supremacism to be more than offensive talk. Pincrete (talk) 05:32, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Black supremacy falls under 'discrimination'; end of story.

I've just re-added the discrimination sidebar template to the article, and I've looked through the edit history to see that certain editors have, in the past, removed both the discrimination template at the end of the article as well as the discrimination sidebar template.
Whether or not editors believe that Black supremacy falls under 'racism' or not doesn't matter. The purpose of sidebar templates is to highlight that articles are part of a series and to allow for easy navigation between related topics. If Misplaced Pages and its editors have decided that the sidebar includes Black supremacy, then the Black supremacy article will include the sidebar template.
I've looked through numerous "supremacy" articles, including Supremacism, Aryanism, Autistic supremacism, White supremacy and they have the discrimination sidebar as well. What concerns me the most is that there was little to no justification offered by the editors in their removal of the template, and the arguments that were given were largely irrelevant to whether or not the template should be included in the first place.

I hope that there will come an understanding after this of the purpose of sidebar templates. TheodoresTomfooleries (talk) 22:28, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

If we add the discrimination sidebar or footer here, we need reliable sources stating that "Black supremacy" is a sort of discrimination. Rsk6400 (talk) 06:48, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
The discrimination sidebar includes Black supremacy. If you want to object to its inclusion in the article, then start a topic on its talk page. TheodoresTomfooleries (talk) 20:53, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
Categories:
Talk:Black supremacy: Difference between revisions Add topic