| Revision as of 21:33, 9 January 2025 editMalcolmxl5 (talk | contribs)Administrators149,393 edits →Thomas Partney: Issue at Thomas Partey.Tag: New topic← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 23:58, 23 January 2025 edit undoMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,142,207 edits →Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 5 closed: new sectionTag: MassMessage delivery | ||
| (10 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| == I have sent you a note about a page you started == | |||
| == Block == | |||
| Hi Black Kite. Thank you for your work on ]. Another editor, ], has reviewed it as part of ] and left the following comment: | |||
| Block with. All project ] (]) 11:56, 4 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | * |
||
| {{Bq|1=Thanks for creating this page for a Scottish band. I've expanded their Wikidata page, linking with 'authority control', a step that can help readers to access other databases. Notability through the non-routine reviews they have received.}} | |||
| == Thomas Partney == | |||
| To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|<nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>Klbrain<nowiki>}}</nowiki>}}. <small>(Message delivered via the ] tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)</small><!-- Template:Sentnote-NPF --> | |||
| Can you have a look at the antics at ] please? The short story is that the police have been investigating allegations made about a Premier League player and a file has been passed to the CPS but neither have named the individual (and they can’t due to privacy rules regarding the identification of suspects) meaning any sources naming anyone are conjecture. We have a young editor persisting adding the accusations to the article and talk page who will not stop. They have a CTOP notification. — ] (]) 21:33, 9 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ] (]) 17:46, 13 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| == Help (Violations of WP:BLP) == | |||
| Can you please have a look at {{ph|Ghana national football team}}, {{ph|2024–25 Arsenal F.C. season}} & {{ph|Talk:2024–25 Arsenal F.C. season}}? An editor ({{uco|London2025|contribs}}) kept adding the accusations agaisnt a Premier League player to the articles and the talk page when they were removed. Thanks. ––] (]) 12:00, 15 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | * Thanks, looks like another admin has dealt with it. ] 12:47, 15 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| *:Thanks very much. ––] (]) 14:32, 15 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| *:Bro i know I am violating but I wanted to add page ,"List of converts to Islam from Hinduism" plz guide me how to make it ] (]) 02:35, 22 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ==Blocked user has returned== | |||
| Hello - shortly after multiple pages were unprotected a user restored exactly the same content to all the pages. For example | |||
| == ] closed == | |||
| The arbitration case ] has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted: | |||
| * All articles whose topic is strictly within the Arab-Israeli conflict topic area shall be extended confirmed protected by default, without requiring prior disruption on the article. | |||
| * AndreJustAndre, BilledMammal, Iskandar323, Levivich, Makeandtoss, Nableezy, Nishidani, and Selfstudier are indefinitely topic banned from the Palestine-Israel conflict, broadly construed. These restrictions may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter. | |||
| * Zero0000 is warned for their behavior in the Palestine-Israel topic area, which falls short of the conduct expected of an administrator. | |||
| * Should the Arbitration Committee receive a complaint at ] about AndreJustAndre, within 12 months of the conclusion of this case, AndreJustAndre may be banned from the English Misplaced Pages by motion. | |||
| * ] and ] are both modified to add as a new second sentence to each: {{tq|Citations and quotations (whether from sources, Misplaced Pages articles, Misplaced Pages discussions, or elsewhere) do not count toward the word limit.}} | |||
| * Any AE report is limited to a max of two parties: the party being reported, and the filer. If additional editors are to be reported, separate AE reports must be opened for each. AE admins may waive this rule if the particular issue warrants doing so. | |||
| * The community is encouraged to run a ] aimed at better addressing or preventing POV forks, after appropriate workshopping. | |||
| * The Committee recognizes that working at AE can be a thankless and demanding task, especially in the busy PIA topic area. We thus extend our appreciation to the many administrators who have volunteered their time to help out at AE. | |||
| * Editors are reminded that outside actors have a vested interest in this topic area, and might engage in behaviors such as doxxing in an attempt to influence content and editors. The ] page contains information that may help. | |||
| * Within this topic area, the '''balanced editing restriction''' is added as one of the sanctions that may be imposed by an individual administrator or rough consensus of admins at AE. {{cot|Details of the balanced editing restriction}} | |||
| :* In a given 30-day period, a user under this restriction is limited to making no more than one-third of their edits in the Article, Talk, Draft, and Draft talk namespaces to pages that are subject to the extended-confirmed restriction under Arab–Israeli conflict contentious topic procedures. | |||
| :**This will be determined by an edit filter that tracks edits to pages in these namespaces that are extended confirmed protected, or are talk pages of such pages, and are tagged with templates to be designated by the arbitration clerks. Admins are encouraged to apply these templates when protecting a page, and the clerks may use scripts or bots to add these templates to pages where the protection has been correctly ], and may make any necessary changes in the technical implementation of this remedy in the future. | |||
| :**Making an edit in excess of this restriction, as determined at the time the edit is made, should be treated as if it were a topic ban violation. Admins should note that a restricted user effectively cannot violate the terms of this and above clauses until at least 30 days after the sanction has been imposed. | |||
| :* They are topic banned from the Arab–Israeli conflict, broadly construed, in all namespaces other than these four (except for their own userspace and user talkspace). | |||
| :* This sanction is not subject to the normal standards of evidence for disruptive editing; it simply requires a finding that it would be a net positive for the project were the user to lower their activity in the topic area, particularly where an editor has repeatedly engaged in conflict but is not being intentionally or egregiously disruptive. | |||
| :* Any admin finding a user in violation of this restriction may, at their discretion, impose other contentious topic sanctions. | |||
| {{cob}} | |||
| * If a ] or member of the CheckUser team feels that third-party input is not helpful at an investigation, they are encouraged to use their ] to ask users to stop posting to that investigation or to SPI as a whole. In addition to clerks and members of the CheckUser team, patrolling administrators ] contributions that impede the efficient resolution of investigations without warning. | |||
| For the Arbitration Committee, ] ] 23:58, 23 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| : Discuss this at: '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard|Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 5 closed}}''' | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:SilverLocust@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel_articles_5/Update_list&oldid=1271418026 --> | |||
Latest revision as of 23:58, 23 January 2025
 | "And while I'm alive, I'll make tiny changes to earth." Frightened Rabbit |
| Black Kite Hi, I'm an administrator here, and have been since 2007. I'll try to answer any questions here as soon as I can, though I do have periods where I'm not available. For admins: if you think I've done something really f***ing stupid and I don't respond to a question about it, please feel free to reverse it ... we can work it out later on. |
| For Talk Page Archives, click here. |
| If you email me via Misplaced Pages, please leave me a note here (unless there's a good reason you do not want that fact to be public). I do check my Misplaced Pages email fairly regularly, but not that regularly. |
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hi Black Kite. Thank you for your work on Wrest. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Thanks for creating this page for a Scottish band. I've expanded their Wikidata page, linking with 'authority control', a step that can help readers to access other databases. Notability through the non-routine reviews they have received.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Klbrain (talk) 17:46, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
Help (Violations of WP:BLP)
Can you please have a look at Ghana national football team, 2024–25 Arsenal F.C. season & Talk:2024–25 Arsenal F.C. season? An editor (contribs) kept adding the accusations agaisnt a Premier League player to the articles and the talk page when they were removed. Thanks. ––Phikia (talk) 12:00, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks, looks like another admin has dealt with it. Black Kite (talk) 12:47, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks very much. ––Phikia (talk) 14:32, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- Bro i know I am violating but I wanted to add page ,"List of converts to Islam from Hinduism" plz guide me how to make it Rohit Mahra (talk) 02:35, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
Blocked user has returned
Hello - shortly after multiple pages were unprotected a user restored exactly the same content to all the pages. For example
Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 5 closed
The arbitration case Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 5 has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:
- All articles whose topic is strictly within the Arab-Israeli conflict topic area shall be extended confirmed protected by default, without requiring prior disruption on the article.
- AndreJustAndre, BilledMammal, Iskandar323, Levivich, Makeandtoss, Nableezy, Nishidani, and Selfstudier are indefinitely topic banned from the Palestine-Israel conflict, broadly construed. These restrictions may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
- Zero0000 is warned for their behavior in the Palestine-Israel topic area, which falls short of the conduct expected of an administrator.
- Should the Arbitration Committee receive a complaint at WP:ARCA about AndreJustAndre, within 12 months of the conclusion of this case, AndreJustAndre may be banned from the English Misplaced Pages by motion.
- WP:Contentious topics/Arab–Israeli conflict#Word limits (discretionary) and WP:Contentious topics/Arab–Israeli conflict#Word limits (1,000 words) are both modified to add as a new second sentence to each:
Citations and quotations (whether from sources, Misplaced Pages articles, Misplaced Pages discussions, or elsewhere) do not count toward the word limit.
- Any AE report is limited to a max of two parties: the party being reported, and the filer. If additional editors are to be reported, separate AE reports must be opened for each. AE admins may waive this rule if the particular issue warrants doing so.
- The community is encouraged to run a Request for Comment aimed at better addressing or preventing POV forks, after appropriate workshopping.
- The Committee recognizes that working at AE can be a thankless and demanding task, especially in the busy PIA topic area. We thus extend our appreciation to the many administrators who have volunteered their time to help out at AE.
- Editors are reminded that outside actors have a vested interest in this topic area, and might engage in behaviors such as doxxing in an attempt to influence content and editors. The digital security resources page contains information that may help.
- Within this topic area, the balanced editing restriction is added as one of the sanctions that may be imposed by an individual administrator or rough consensus of admins at AE.
| Details of the balanced editing restriction |
|---|
|
- If a sockpuppet investigations clerk or member of the CheckUser team feels that third-party input is not helpful at an investigation, they are encouraged to use their existing authority to ask users to stop posting to that investigation or to SPI as a whole. In addition to clerks and members of the CheckUser team, patrolling administrators may remove or collapse contributions that impede the efficient resolution of investigations without warning.
For the Arbitration Committee, SilverLocust 💬 23:58, 23 January 2025 (UTC)