| Revision as of 11:22, 22 January 2025 editTaabii (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers5,553 edits Added {{Uncategorized}} tagTag: Twinkle← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 12:56, 22 January 2025 edit undoEst. 2021 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers14,634 editsm cleanup via script | ||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Draft article}} | |||
| ⚫ | Under this act anyone, who was not a member of the ], was banned from firing hail-shot, meaning more than one pellet at a time. |
||
| {{Lead missing|date=January 2025}} | |||
| ⚫ | Under this act anyone, who was not a member of the ], was banned from firing hail-shot, meaning more than one pellet at a time. The prescribed penalty was a £10 fine and 3 months in prison. | ||
| In 1592, John Baseden of ], a miller, was fined under this statute.<ref>University of Houston O'Quinn Law Library Anglo American Legal Tradition Archive: http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/Eliz/KB29no229/aKB29no229fronts/IMG_0028.htm</ref> | In 1592, John Baseden of ], a miller, was fined under this statute.<ref>University of Houston O'Quinn Law Library Anglo American Legal Tradition Archive: http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/Eliz/KB29no229/aKB29no229fronts/IMG_0028.htm</ref> | ||
| The act was repealed by the ]<ref>British History Online: Militia Act 1694 https://www.british-history.ac.uk/statutes-realm/vol6/p594</ref> |
The act was repealed by the ].<ref>British History Online: Militia Act 1694 https://www.british-history.ac.uk/statutes-realm/vol6/p594</ref> The preamble in that act said that however useful it might have been back then, it had now fallen into disuse. However it needed repealing, because a number of malicious prosecutions citing this act had been launched of late. | ||
| == References == | == References == | ||
| {{Reflist}} | |||
| {{Uncategorized|date=January 2025}} | {{Uncategorized|date=January 2025}} | ||
| {{Drafts moved from mainspace|date=January 2025}} | |||
Latest revision as of 12:56, 22 January 2025
 | This is a draft article. It is a work in progress open to editing by anyone. Please ensure core content policies are met before publishing it as a live Misplaced Pages article.
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Last edited by Est. 2021 (talk | contribs) 3 minutes ago. (Update) Finished drafting? Submit for review or Publish now |
 | This article has no lead section. Please improve this article by adding one in your own words. (January 2025) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
Under this act anyone, who was not a member of the House of Lords, was banned from firing hail-shot, meaning more than one pellet at a time. The prescribed penalty was a £10 fine and 3 months in prison.
In 1592, John Baseden of Tenterden, a miller, was fined under this statute.
The act was repealed by the Militia Act 1694. The preamble in that act said that however useful it might have been back then, it had now fallen into disuse. However it needed repealing, because a number of malicious prosecutions citing this act had been launched of late.
References
- University of Houston O'Quinn Law Library Anglo American Legal Tradition Archive: http://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT7/Eliz/KB29no229/aKB29no229fronts/IMG_0028.htm
- British History Online: Militia Act 1694 https://www.british-history.ac.uk/statutes-realm/vol6/p594