| Revision as of 08:07, 1 August 2007 editBuddhipriya (talk | contribs)16,977 edits →August 2007: 3rd parties may help← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 03:27, 12 January 2024 edit undoToomuchcuriosity (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users559 edits Notification: listing of Neural circuitry at WP:Redirects for discussion.Tag: Twinkle | ||
| (596 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == Note == | |||
| '''Welcome!''' | |||
| Hi, you left me a message quite a long time ago. I'm not really active and haven't logged in for a long time, but I had a go at making a response in case this issue still concerns you. Cheers, ] (]) 23:35, 27 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
| Hello, {{BASEPAGENAME}}, and ] to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| I hope you enjoy editing here and being a ]! Please ] on talk pages using four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out ], ask me on my talk page, or place <code><nowiki>{{helpme}}</nowiki></code> on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! | |||
| ==Vairotsana== | |||
| Thanks very much for starting the article on Vairotsana -- However -- I worry that | |||
| the text may not be licensed in a way that allows us to use it verbatim on Misplaced Pages (if indeed it was copied from the linked source -- I confess I didn't | |||
| look at it *that* closely. ) In any event, I would be happy to work with you to | |||
| expand the article, as Tibetan Buddhism (in particular Dzogchen) is an area I | |||
| want to contribute more to. Feel free to leave me a note on my talk page, and welcome. | |||
| ] 15:51, 16 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Removal of the section ''Tulpas as explanation for unverified creatures'' == | |||
| :: thanks for understanding. May many blessings attend you on your retreat. ] 21:45, 20 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Hi, I saw that you had removed a section I had written in the article ]. Why did you do that? You left no explanation. Personally, I saw no reason why you should removed it, and I think it deserves to be there, so I restored it again (this time a little reduced from last time). If you remove a complete section again like you did in this article, please motivate why you are doing so. --] (]) 00:11, 19 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| Hello, and ]! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as ], but we regretfully cannot accept ] text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from {{{2|http://www.rangjung.com/authors/Vairotsana.htm}}}. As a copyright violation, ] appears to qualify for ] under the ]. ] has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source. | |||
| : Ediug, I don't remember the particular edit to which you make reference. It would have been if I found the content uncited or considered it invaluable in the sense of fanciful and ungrounded. Which would have been very unusual if I had as I am quite a conservative editor and preserve content in articles rather than delete it as a matter of course. I will give it a read I haven't read it for a very long time. Thanks for your contribution ]<sup> (] • ])</sup> 12:53, 22 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
| If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the ], you can comment to that effect on ]. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at ], '''after''' describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Misplaced Pages. <!-- Inserted via Template:Nothanks-sd --> ] | ] 05:49, 18 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ]  because of the following concern: | |||
| ==Singing Bowls== | |||
| :'''No third-party sources to establish notability of the article's subject.''' | |||
| Hi, sorry about the reverts, I must have been gettign sloppy. I've been trying to practice patrolling recent changes as quickly as possible. Might I suggest that you log in with your account in future, as it might prevent confusion of this sort? ] 13:01, 1 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ]. | |||
| ==Probity== | |||
| :Nothing leaps out at me, but remember if someone reverts 3x in 24 hours, you can report them -- see . The article on Phurpa probably needs a lot more references -- I'll see what I can dig up there. Bottom line: don't take any of it personally :) ] 04:37, 5 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| == Ganachakra == | |||
| Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] 04:23, 19 July 2011 (UTC) | |||
| I am sorry, I fail to see that Ganachakra is anything like transubstantiation. Is there supposed to be a real objective change in the underlying reality? Perhaps transignification is analogous, but, as far as I can see, not transubstantiation. ] 05:44, 5 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Merge discussion for ]== | |||
| == Tantra vs. sex magic and other topics == | |||
| ] An article that you have been involved in editing, ], has been proposed for a ] with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going {{ #if: Talk:Tulpa#Merger proposal |]|to the article and clicking on the (Discuss) link at the top of the article}}, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. ] (]) 01:22, 4 July 2012 (UTC) <!-- Template:mergenote --> | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ]  because of the following concern: | |||
| While these are related, they are not the same. ] is a Western practice which have the same goals as ] and may not use the same techniques. For example, some sex magic requires emission; Vajrayana practices prohibit it. In fact, it might be better to say they practiced ], as the ] article is primarily about Hindu tantra. In any case, sex magic is a Western term coined significantly after the time of Padmasambhava. The use of it represents an editorial opinion. Can you cite a source that says they practiced sex magic? A reliable academic one? If not, ] says it can't be said. If there is someone who thinks they are the same, you could report on that and cite it, but it would have to be clear whose opinion it was describing. | |||
| :'''No sources, no evidence that this is a valid definition, and only a dictionary definition in any case.''' | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ]. | |||
| On the other articles, I've done some sprucing up. ] (]) 15:19, 5 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| P.S. does B9 stand for benign? | |||
| Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ]] 17:48, 7 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == your articles == | |||
| ==] nomination of ]== | |||
| You'd want to start here: ]. You'll want to talk to ] and ] will be able to help you.--] 06:21, 6 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| {{Quote box|quote=<p>If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read ].</p><p>You may want to consider using the ] to help you create articles.</p>|width=20%|align=right}} | |||
| Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see ] for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on ] subjects and should provide references to ] that ] their content. | |||
| If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request ]. <!-- Template:Db-nocontext-notice --> ] (]) 03:20, 8 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == Eagle 101's over-speedy deletion of article == | |||
| ==draconian cyber-bullying== | |||
| Regarding the following book citation i created: *{{cite book | author=Gold, Peter | title = ] | year=]| id=ISBN 0-89281-411-X}} Rochester, Vermont: Inner Traditions International. | |||
| I washed my hands of editing Misplaced Pages with the draconian cyber-bullying I experienced. If anyone wishes to dialogue with me you can pursue me via: | |||
| https://twitter.com/B9Joker108 | |||
| ]<sup> (] • ])</sup> 08:40, 12 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ==MfD nomination of ]== | |||
| ], a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ] and please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of ] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:MFDWarning --> ] (]) 07:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| I would note that despite all the melodramatic promises that they are done here and don't care anymore, this user used an IP to evade their block and edit the above-referenced MFD . ] (]) 19:07, 28 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| I entered the chapter headings...i looked at another book article on Wiki, refer following, *{{cite book | author=Brown, Dee | title = ] | year=]| id=ISBN 0-330-23219-3}} and used this as a template. Note that they have the chapter headings in there. If this is not a violation please reinstate the chapter headings into the article and paste a response to this on my chat page. ] in ] ] 09:20, 6 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==MfD nomination of ]== | |||
| ], a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ] and please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of ] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:MFDWarning --> ] (]) 19:11, 28 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == Purba listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Purba'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] if you have not already done so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 10:34, 7 December 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :thank you very much I will have a look... It might be of value to separate the Kila / Phurba Misplaced Pages articles/pages as they are related but different & distinct traditions as well as conflated but they are also of one family. It is actually very complex. I championed the same distinction with Chatushkoti (Sanskrit) / Tetralemma (Greek): they are related and iterated each other but also culturally distinct: keep apples with apples. ]<sup> (] • ])</sup> 03:50, 18 December 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ==assistance required== | |||
| == Religion project == | |||
| Hi.I am not a regular editor.I was reading the article "astra' and found many factual inaccuracies,particularly the one where it says sudarshan chakra can be stopped by lord shiva.I tried to edit it,but some editor is reverting it,and i found in history that other editors have found this inaccurate too.I have found supporting links in google books,but don't know how to substantiate it.can you please look into it? ] (]) <!--Template:Undated--><small class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added 11:27, 17 July 2016 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| == ]: Voting now open! == | |||
| First, I should note that the banner was only added to the ] article because the Tibetan Buddhism and Buddhism banners had not yet had assessment parameters in them. Those banners now do have assessment parameters, and I am in the process of removing the Religion banners from inappropriate articles. However, I do note that it the Singing Bowl is significant in the ] religion as well, and I am less certain if the adherents of or editors dealing with that faith would want to be grouped into the Tibetan Buddhism project. It is also a matter I cannot personally respond to, being a more-or-less orthodox ] whose major other areas of knowledge are the older Indo-European and Semitic religions. The intentions of the ] are to provide "Project support" (including at least now assessment and peer review on request, occasionally copyediting and other activities as we have members and time, hopefully other things as well later) to all those articles which do not fall within the scope of any existing projects, including those articles which deal in subjects that cross religious lines, like ], ], ], and so on. Also, we hope, eventually, to be able to set up work groups similar to ] and ] to work with articles relating to specific religions which do not yet have that degree of focused attention. Personally, I would be more than happy to welcome any new member or participant, particularly anyone who could bring any existing knowledge or experience regarding any of those religions which lack project support. I'm not sure if that answers your question, though. If it doesn't, please feel free to leave a follow-up message on the ] page, or contact me directly. Thank you for your interest. ] 14:31, 5 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| {{Ivmbox|Hello, B9 hummingbird hovering. Voting in the ''']''' is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. | |||
| == Sig == | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| Go to your '''user preferences''' and write your signature as code. Then check raw signature. My signature ''']''' <sup></nowiki></font>]]</nowiki></font>]]</sup> has the following code: | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review ] and submit your choices on ''']'''. ] (]) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) | |||
| <blockquote><nowiki>''']''' <sup></nowiki></font>]]</nowiki></font>]]</sup></blockquote> | |||
| |Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52 bot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52_bot/spamlist/20&oldid=750580135 --> | |||
| == Hozhó listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Hozhó'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] if you have not already done so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> - ''']''' <sup>(]) (]) (]) </sup> 02:07, 23 November 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| There's a few errors because of the nowiki things but just go into edit mode if you want to look at the actual code, leave out the blockquotes of course. If you want me to explain any of those functions I will do so but it pretty much speaks for itself. <nowiki><sup></nowiki> is used for superscripst. ''']''' <sup></nowiki></font>]]</nowiki></font>]]</sup> 03:34, 6 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| {{ygm}} ] (]) 15:34, 9 April 2020 (UTC) | |||
| You wrote "I have secured by gracious Serendipity a complete digital copy of the Tattvasamgraha in romanized Sanskrit and in addition it is grammatically parsed and intent to make it available in Wikisource or in Wikibooks with an English translation. If anybody would like to work with me on this project contact me directly. B9 hummingbird hovering (talk • contribs) 12:52, 12 October 2009 (UTC)". I might really be interested. ] (]) 15:34, 9 April 2020 (UTC) | |||
| :{{ping|NoychoH}} Please not that this user has been blocked for nearly ten years, and last posted anything five years ago. It's unlikely they are still monitoring anything here. ] (]) 00:18, 10 April 2020 (UTC) | |||
| :: {{ping|Beeblebrox}}. Thanks for your remark, yet I was aware of that while writing on their user talk page. It is not completely impossible however, so there is a chance I will get an answer one day, and I am REALLY interested in the topic, that's why I took a chance. When you buy a national lottery ticket it is also unlikely that you win, yet some people are desperate to buy. I am patient to wait. ] (]) 17:26, 17 April 2020 (UTC) | |||
| == "Canarese script" listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| A discussion is taking place to address the redirect ]. The discussion will occur at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 12:36, 10 May 2020 (UTC) | |||
| I am not familiar with the issue at hand but as I have finally been able to login and reset my password and you brought this to my attention, I will apprise myself and contribute to discussion if I may. Thank you B9HH ]<sup> (] • ])</sup> 01:11, 11 May 2020 (UTC) | |||
| ==Big Bang== | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| You know, I think I do have a copy somewhere, but it might be the original Ellipse boxed set of cassettes. I'd have to look around. It's hardly Micky Hart's Big Bang, though; he's just one of the artists appearing on it. I think I have off-the-board copies of Micky's live performance at Nelson's Ledges's Rhythmfest (2002) under the name Bembe Orishas, where I got a chance to meet him, Airto, Sikiru and Badal Roy though. I've been lucky enough to have been able to play with some of the Planet Drum folks at times, though never with Micky himself. It's been a dream for many years to have Micky Hart appear at Starwood, but Olatunji and Airto are as close as they've gotten so far. Zakir Hussein would be great, too. ] 17:18, 7 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| == ] == | |||
| <blockquote>'''This article has no notability. It's been like that for seven years. An attempt to make a reference into a citation gets turned into a note by a "master" editor. Bots have done more work on this article in the last three years, than anybody else. Instead of beating it, it's time to bury this dead horse.'''</blockquote> | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
| Hi, in responding to which you left at ], please be advised that an article ] already exists. You are welcome to improve it. Variations in spelling ought to redirect to the same article. Variations in topic, for example a person or place with the ] Saccidananda, should be in a separate article. Sincerely, --] <font color = "blue"><sup>]</sup></font> 17:31, 7 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| :Hi, to make a redirect page follow these steps. | |||
| # create a link to the page which you wish to be a redirect, such as ]. The link will appear red, because it doesn't exist yet. Such a link is called a red-link. | |||
| # click on the link, and you should get an edit window. If you don't get an edit window, your account may be too new to create pages. Wait a few days. | |||
| # in the edit window type: | |||
| #: #REDIRECT <nowiki>]</nowiki> | |||
| # click on the save page button. | |||
| Hope that helps/works for you. Sincerely, --] <font color = "blue"><sup>]</sup></font> 18:17, 7 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 20:23, 2 May 2021 (UTC) | |||
| == Already exists == | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="afd-notice"> | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Actually, an article already exists at ]. ] (]) 19:31, 7 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. | |||
| == That Namkhai Norbu business == | |||
| <!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</sub> 10:03, 28 June 2022 (UTC) | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| ]. :-) ] 14:21, 8 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| <blockquote>'''Does not appear to contain anything not already comfortably covered by ].'''</blockquote> | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
| == Thanks == | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| ] Thanks for all your work on ]. Appreciated. ॐ <small><i><strong><font color="orange">]</font></strong> <sup><font color="red">]</font></sup></i></small> 23:40, 10 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> — ] (]) 14:44, 18 April 2023 (UTC) | |||
| : Hiya. To change your sig. Go to ] and check the raw signature box. Then paste your new sig text into the signature field. Try something like: | |||
| == "]" listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| <font color="Green">]</font><sup> (] • ])</sup> | |||
| The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 12#Neural circuitry}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 03:27, 12 January 2024 (UTC) | |||
| : Edit this page to copy the html code for the above into the clipboard and paste it into the sig field if you like. Then sign your name as usual using four tildas and it should all work. Also see ]. You can edit any page on Misplaced Pages to preview another users signature or get ideas, or even mimic their sig. Take care. ॐ <small><i><strong><font color="orange">]</font></strong> <sup><font color="red">]</font></sup></i></small> 23:28, 14 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Simone Weil == | |||
| Hey B9, | |||
| Thanks for working to clean up the ] article, especially with the language concerning references to God. I want to warn you, however, to be cautious with your linking. Many of the blue links now go to disambig pages, and are only peripherally related to Weil's project or life, e.g. ], ], ], ], ], ], ] etc. | |||
| If you don't mind, I would like to go through and weed out some of them - in special cases, interwiki linking a term to wiktionary - to bring it more in line with other biographical articles of philosophers. Let me know, perhaps we can collaborate? I've been real busy as of late, but I'm hoping to get some constructive editing done somewhere on Wiki before February rolls around. Thanks, and keep up the good work. - ] 17:38, 12 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Usage of Wikilinks. == | |||
| Just so you know, I see that you've added quite a few wikilinks to some pages. For the ] disambiguation page, this is not generally appropriate- disambiguation pages want to make it very clear the senses of the word that can be linked to and then get you to the "real" article. Extra wikilinks are considered distracting there. It's over at ]. | |||
| As for other pages, I've noticed that you've added them at a similar rate. I think that this is a bit overkill- we don't want to have a gigantic sea of blue being the article, but rather to highlight only ''relevant'' wikilinks. Plus, once you've linked a word, you typically don't need to link it again immediately afterward. As an example from your edit to the Akhasic Records article, look at | |||
| :"A ] ] named ] was reported to need only the first name of anyone to ] the Akasha and describe their life history. Another ] ] ..." | |||
| Does Chinese really need to be highlighted twice, or even once? Is it that relevant? Same with "gentleman" and "access," as I highly doubt anyone would be looking those up. Sujujin and possibly "seer" are the only ones that need linking here, in my opinion at least. I'd recommend checking out ] for some more on that. ] 17:59, 15 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Please stop over-wikilinking articles. Before continuing, please read ]. Thanks. ] 22:56, 15 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Overlinking redux == | |||
| Please clean up the overlinking you did to ] or I will simply revert it to the last non-overlinked version. Several users have pointed out the appropriate section in the Manual of Style. You can't expect other editors to clean up your overlinking. I hate to see your other good work reverted, but that is what is likely to happen if you don't moderate your linking. ] 15:31, 17 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Regarding God's eye == | |||
| Wow. You did populate that article. How'd you know so much about God's eyes? Once the article gets a picture or two it will be great. ] 16:27, 30 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Nice to see that you're trying to add something about historical perceptions of cicadas. However, you're going about it the wrong way. What you do is a minimal paraphrase of external sources. That is still a copyright violation. Even if do still more rewriting, beware of ]: taking someone else's ideas and presenting them in new phrasing is just as bad. You'll need to summarize much more (offline!) and give the sources you used as references. The current stuff of Plato and the other Greeks is still way too close to the original text. Also, if you want to treat this topic in so much detail, you should move it to its own article and only leave a summary and a link to the new article at ]. See ]. ] 22:51, 1 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Hi, B9, I'm another admin on Misplaced Pages, and I've also noticed your several rewrites. It is important to only contribute original material to Misplaced Pages. Changing a few words or sentences, while preserving the structure and outline of a copyrighted text, is (unfortunately) still a copyright violation. You'll need to substantially rewrite information in your own words in order for it to be acceptable here. I know that you're only trying to contribute, and I appreciate your efforts -- I certainly don't want to discourage you! But we're pretty strict about copyright infringements around here. Basically, as a rule of thumb, if the original author would look at your contribution and say "Hey! That's my text, but with a few words changed!", then it's not something you should submit. All the best, – ] <sup>(]) (])</sup> 13:50, 16 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Three Series of Dzogchen == | |||
| I would appreciate a reaction to my remark in ]. Also, can you provide a source for associating Semde with clarity, Longde with emptiness? Thank you. And beware of what you present in a public space. ] 16:45, 11 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Tapihritsa == | |||
| Reply at ]. ] 09:12, 16 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Tonpa Sherab in the Dzogchen article == | |||
| I tend to favor 'quasi-historical' in lieu of 'mythical' which (as you observed) does carry a value judgement. It acknowledges that the individual may not be attested to as thoroughly as a historian might like, while not placing them | |||
| in the realm of 'mythology' altogether. Just a thought -- thank you for your edits! ] 19:56, 21 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Thank you for experimenting with {{#if:Left-handed issues|the page ] on}} Misplaced Pages{{#if:{{{diff|}}}| as you did with }}. Your test worked, and it has been ] or removed. Please use ] for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the ] to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.<!-- Template:Test (first level warning) --> ''''<span style="background:#000">]]]</span>'''''<sup>] ] ] ] </sup> 23:15, 21 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == sic == | |||
| I have reverted your changes again. For sic to be used, the term has to be archaic or spelled incorrectly, neither which is true of ''mankind'' or ''chairman''. That you believe the terms are inappropriate has nothing to do with it, and is your POV. -- ] 15:53, 25 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I'll revert again, and note that you will pass ] more quickly than I, so I will report you to admins. ] 16:02, 25 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Note, one more revert and you pass ]. -- ] 16:04, 25 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::I will note again that for sic to be used the term has to be archaic or spelled incorrectly, neither which is true of ''mankind'' or ''chairman''. They are in common use and to the general populace do not portray any negative light, and until they fall out of use, the use of sic is misplaced. -- ] 16:14, 25 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :There has been some evolution of language but to disrupt quotes with a because of word use is far beyond anything in my experience. And that evolution of language hasn't reached the point that such terms are unusual. At the very least you've got the attention of two people who disagree with you B9 hummingbird hovering, even though we may agree with the overall aim and changes in norms to be advanced with the equality of women and men. The terms you keep amending just aren't that unusual even in Baha'i circles let alone the norm in[REDACTED] or in the world. These articles should not be leaps leading the way in change - they are to express the best understanding of the way things are and using language in novel ways will only lead to confusion for most people which would manifestly not be the best understanding. A more substantial way to contribute might be to extend the articles that deal with the equality of women and men. --] 18:29, 25 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| I know that your edits are well-intentioned, but they're also very idiosyncratic. I believe that as an introduction to the subject, they're more inclined to raise questions for readers than to answer them. ] 15:56, 26 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| In response to your comments on my talk page: | |||
| :*Idiosyncratic: While I thought that word was clear enough, I will attempt to clarify further. Your recent edits use words and concepts that I have never heard used in reference to poi, Maori culture, etc, and seem to reflect what poi means ''to you'' rather than what it might mean to other people. | |||
| :*''"Where is it set in stone that Misplaced Pages is just to be an introduction to a subject?"'' This is Misplaced Pages. Nothing is set in stone. There are, however, ], such as "Make your article accessible and understandable for as many readers as possible. Assume readers are reading the article to learn. It is possible the reader knows nothing about the subject: the article needs to fully explain the subject," "Use clear, precise and accurate terms." And lots more. I recommend you look at the linked help text. | |||
| :*''"It is my considered opinion that this article requires some scholarly-sexing-up"'' It is my considered opinion that even if this were so, your edits do not provide it. | |||
| :*''"The mind processes and forges new neural connectivity when it is confused which is why Zen Masters use koans amongst other methods. Are you familiar with NLP, hypnotherapy, trance~forms and meditation"'' I feel confident in saying that whatever a good Misplaced Pages article should be, it should not be a koan or be designed to deliberately confuse its reader in order to evoke some altered mental state. If that is your goal, I say again, your edits are idiosyncratic. NLP? Don't start with me on NLP. | |||
| :*''"Juggling is a study in the resolution of bodymind confusion into an 'Artful Grace'."'' Well gosh, you'd better get started fixing the ] article, because it doesn't say anything like that. ] 16:48, 26 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Where's the confusion? You start off defining one thing (poi) by introducing a new, obscure, and (to my mind) tendentious concept ("impartial art"). That is not clear writing. Crystal clarity shines like a torched fire poi hidden away in the inky depths of your imagination. Just because it makes sense to you doesn't mean it makes sense to anyone else. As I said, idiosyncratic. But you know, I don't have the time or desire to get into a revert-war with you, so I'll just take the poi article off my watchlist and you can have your way with it. Go to town. ] 17:19, 26 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Thoughtform == | |||
| Hi, I have reverted this article as you have done a huge amount of original research and made numerous substantial edits calling them all "minor"! ] 19:11, 10 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Hi, I note that all, or most, of your edits are marked as minor. Please see the page ]: note in particular that marking a major change as a minor one is considered poor etiquette. ] 19:00, 13 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Tulpa == | |||
| I applaud your efforts, but ripping an entire page’s material and pasting it into another is something that should be discussed in advance. (] 09:14, 13 March 2007 (UTC)) | |||
| == Christopher Hansard == | |||
| Please stop adding information about Christopher Hansard to various articles as you did to ]. Continuing to add negative information about this gentleman may result in a temporary block from editing. ] <sup>]</sup> 09:36, 21 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Your creation featured on DYK == | |||
| {| class="messagebox {{#ifeq:{{{small|}}}|yes|small|standard}}-talk" | |||
| |- | |||
| |] | |||
| |On ], ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ]. | |||
| |} <!-- ], ] --> - - ]|] 10:16, 21 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Minor edits at ] == | |||
| Please go look at the help page about ]. Your additions of information to the green man article were not minor, because they constitute an addition of new information, all of which was, by the way, ].--] 13:26, 30 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| I've just looked at your contributions, and you mark most of your edits as minor. Please stop. It's not vandalism, per se, but has, in past content disputes, been seen as a dishonest way of pushing unsourced POV material into article so it won't be noticed.--] 13:30, 30 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I don't care WHAT your background is. I don't care how long you have been working in what field. QUIT marking edits as minor that do not meet the minor standards.--] 13:41, 30 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Your continued minor edits have been noted, as have your personal attacks. I was polite and tactful in my initial comment to you. Your response was accusatory.--] 13:48, 30 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Have you read ]? Misplaced Pages is not a reliable source. You put information into an article, source it in that article. Looks like you just don't understand the policies and guidelines around here, do you?--] 13:57, 30 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Whoooooooooooaaa Vidkin cool it! Don't bite so. To B9 hummingbird hovering please do me a favor and click on the link above marked " my preferences" go to the edit tab and uncheck the box " Mark all edits minor by default" problem solved. ] | ] 14:20, 30 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Minor edits== | |||
| This is '''not''' a minor edit. These are not even minor edits. This is a minor edit. If you do virtually anything other than correct spelling or punctuation, assume it is not a minor edit - that will prevent mis-use of the "minor edit" flag by accident or through misunderstanding. Please let me know if you have any questions. ]<sup>]</sup> 14:19, 30 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I was using the minor edits incorrectly. I was of the understanding that a major edit was restructuring information or rewriting prior information in an article, not for the inclusion of new material. I have noted your advice which is essentially "to err on the side of caution" and when actioning other than minor punctuation and spelling edits that an edit is '''not minor'''. Thank you for your clarity and tact. | |||
| <font color="Green">]</font><sup> (] • ])</sup> 14:32, 30 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Yup, that's it in a nutshell. Hope it helped!! If you run into any kind of dispute or problem in the future, let me know and I'll do my best to assist. ]<sup>]</sup> 14:34, 30 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::Thanks, KC, and thank you, B9. I hope you understand, I'm not saying your edits are worthless, vary much the opposite. But how they showed up made tracking exact changes difficult. I appreciate you adding Beer as a reference, but I would also ask that, if possible, cite a specific page, so that anyone looking for the information you are supporting with that citation doesn't have to read the entire book.--] 14:49, 30 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :::You're both very welcome - it may help to understand why we at Misplaced Pages limit "minor" to teeny-tiny-minor edits. On a Watchlist or Recent Changes, an editor can choose to ''not'' see the "minor" edits - this keeps them from checking what changed only to find out "jane fonda" has been corrected to "Jane Fonda", for example - but if anything has been added, removed, rephrased, or in any other way actually ''changed'', they want to know about it. Hence, reserve minor edits for those edits no one will ever, ever care about. ]<sup>]</sup> 14:51, 30 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| I have added a "{{]}}" template to the article ], suggesting that it be deleted according to the ] process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "]" and ]). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the <code><nowiki>{{dated prod}}</nowiki></code> notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on ]. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the ], the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the ] or it can be sent to ], where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. ] 15:52, 19 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Songline vs. leylines== | |||
| While I respect your views which you have expressed in the article on songlines, and I'm sure you put them in in good faith, I don't think they are a NPOV. Can we discuss it on the songlines discussion page? Cheers, Ray ] 10:53, 16 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Hi hummingbird | |||
| Yes I'm happy to discuss this. I'm happy with the current arrangement in the ] article, but if you'd like to discuss it then that's fine. I guess you and I have different viewpoints - I'm sceptical of lines of energy, ley-lines, and any reference to magnetism that I can't detect with a compass or magnetometer! So I guess we'll need to agree to disagree on these things. But equally, I respect the fact that others have a different view from mine, and the need for[REDACTED] to have a NPOV. So fire away! | |||
| Cheers | |||
| ] 00:03, 7 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Japa mala == | |||
| Thank you for your interest in the ] article. Currently the article is poorly sourced. When making changes to content, it would be helpful if you would cite ] if possible so that the article can be improved in quality. If you feel that a change is needed but don't have a source available to quote, you can raise the issue on the talk page for the article and see if any other editors may be able to assist in locating sources. By working together we can reduce the amount of unsourced material in the article. ] 18:58, 29 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==I nominated ] for deletion.== | |||
| Regards,] 06:58, 30 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Invitation == | |||
| Would you be interested in joining a team effort to bring the ] article to ] status. | |||
| If so, please see ] | |||
| ] (]) 16:49, 18 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Ganachakra == | |||
| Well yab-yum is essentially method and wisdom, method being bodhichitta and wisdom being the realisation of emptiness so how does that relate to coitus? It could be argued that the representation is sexual and therefore it can be considered 'symbolic coitus' but wouldn't it be better to say that it is the union of method and wisdom? I was simply changing the information that was related to Vajrayana as I cannnot speak for other traditions. | |||
| ] 08:17, 22 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Unsourced additions of content == | |||
| ] Welcome to Misplaced Pages. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, adding content without ] a ]{{{{{subst|}}}#if:Mudra|, as you did to ],}} is not consistent with our policy of ]. Take a look at the ] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-unsourced1 --> ] 22:50, 1 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| {| align="center" class="notice noprint" style="background: none; border: 1px solid #aaa; padding: 0.5em; margin: 0.5em auto;" | |||
| |- | |||
| | valign="top" style="padding: 0.1em" | {{tick|40}} | |||
| | style="padding: 0.1em" | | |||
| '''Your request to be unblocked''' has been '''granted''' for the following reason(s): | |||
| <br><br>] of ] lifted or expired. | |||
| ''Request handled by:'' <small><span style="border: 1px solid">]]</span></small> 06:54, 2 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Request accepted (after-block request) --> | |||
| |} | |||
| ==Bandha== | |||
| A "{{]}}" template has been added to the article ], suggesting that it be deleted according to the ] process. All contributions are appreciated, but yours may not satisfy Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "]" and ]). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the <code><nowiki>{{dated prod}}</nowiki></code> notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on ]. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the ], the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the ] or it can be sent to ], where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. ] 07:16, 8 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Please provide sources == | |||
| Regarding this edit: , according to ], "Articles should only contain material that has been published by reliable sources. Editors adding or restoring material that has been challenged or is likely to be challenged, or quotations, must provide a reliable published source, or the material may be removed." If you do not agree that sources are needed, would you please take the matter up on the talk page for the article on ] so other editors can discuss the matter? ] 06:28, 20 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Hello == | |||
| Hi there. I noticed that you placed some quotes on the Tantra article. Since you seem familiar with both authors, do you remember where you read them? Basically the Tantra article is a "start" class article right now, since it has so many unsourced statements. To get it beyond this level, we will need to resolve the issues with sources. References also really enhance an article, in that they give a casual reader, such as myself, access to more resources. If you really can't dig up the sources and wish to put the material back in, can you place a {{tl|fact}} tag next to it, to alert other editors that those statements need a source? In that way, someone else might be able to extend the article. Thanks.] (]) 14:55, 20 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Thanks for your reply on my talk page. I noticed that you mentioned print sources. Web sources are perfectly acceptable also. The criteria for sources is "reliability". Of course, there are going to be differing opinions about reliability. In my view, regarding sources for tantra, we want to make sure that we are not using sources that "just made things up". I recognize the inherent problems in reliability in regards to a tradition that is as fluid and varied as Tantra. The article really needs to represent all different viewpoints without giving undue weight to any possible fringe varieties of tantra. Thanks for bringing up the quotes. To me, the material was not clear as to whether or not they were direct quotes or a synthesis of things said by the sources. Take care.] (]) 15:27, 20 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Please review ] == | |||
| You have been making similar edits to several articles such as this one, which has been reverted twice by another editor: . You appear to be engaged in ] and making speculative interpreations of sources rather than citing sources. Please also read ] which says that "Articles should only contain material that has been published by reliable sources. Editors adding or restoring material that has been challenged or is likely to be challenged, or quotations, must provide a reliable published source, or the material may be removed." Rather than engaging in an edit war on articles such as that one, please take your issues to the talk pages for the articles involved to see if you can build agreement for your views. ] 09:53, 9 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Strange Edits== | |||
| Dear B9 - please could you take some time to consider your edits in regards to ]. I agree with creating a disambiguation page, but you then replaced that with information already in existance on ]. It might be an idea to discuss bold changes on talk pages first, before moving articles around in such drastic ways? Regards, ] 10:17, 9 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Smile == | |||
| <div style="float:center; border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">] | |||
| {{{1|]}}} has smiled at you! Smiles promote ] and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! {{{2|}}} <br /> Smile at others by adding {{tls|Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message. | |||
| </div><!-- Template:smile --> | |||
| == August 2007 == | |||
| ] Adding content without ] a ]{{{{{subst|}}}#if:Nāga|, as you did to ],}} is not consistent with our policy of ]. You have been told several times that you sometimes engage in ]. You often add content to articles without citing any sources, which is inconsistent with ]. I am concerned that when I have asked for sourcing on articles, you sometime simply revert my requests for sourcing rather than complying with ]. I am sure that you are doing these things because you think they are the right thing to do. However I am having difficulty understanding your postition. Would you be willing to enter into mediation to attempt to resolve this ongoing conflict over source quality and general referencing needs? According to the graduated response mechanisms for conflict resolution, another step preliminary to mediation would be to involve third parties: . I feel that involving third parties in this matter would be helpful to try to promote dialog on the issues. Are there any thoughts you have on that? ] 08:07, 1 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 03:27, 12 January 2024
Note
Hi, you left me a message quite a long time ago. I'm not really active and haven't logged in for a long time, but I had a go at making a response in case this issue still concerns you. Cheers, Factchecker atyourservice (talk) 23:35, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
Removal of the section Tulpas as explanation for unverified creatures
Hi, I saw that you had removed a section I had written in the article Tulpa. Why did you do that? You left no explanation. Personally, I saw no reason why you should removed it, and I think it deserves to be there, so I restored it again (this time a little reduced from last time). If you remove a complete section again like you did in this article, please motivate why you are doing so. --Ediug (talk) 00:11, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
- Ediug, I don't remember the particular edit to which you make reference. It would have been if I found the content uncited or considered it invaluable in the sense of fanciful and ungrounded. Which would have been very unusual if I had as I am quite a conservative editor and preserve content in articles rather than delete it as a matter of course. I will give it a read I haven't read it for a very long time. Thanks for your contribution B9 hummingbird hovering 12:53, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Buddhafield
The article Buddhafield has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No third-party sources to establish notability of the article's subject.
While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SudoGhost 04:23, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
Merge discussion for Thoughtform
An article that you have been involved in editing, Thoughtform , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Andrewaskew (talk) 01:22, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Thigle
The article Thigle has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No sources, no evidence that this is a valid definition, and only a dictionary definition in any case.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 17:48, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Thigle
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Thigle requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Misplaced Pages:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Uberaccount (talk) 03:20, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
draconian cyber-bullying
I washed my hands of editing Misplaced Pages with the draconian cyber-bullying I experienced. If anyone wishes to dialogue with me you can pursue me via: https://twitter.com/B9Joker108 B9 hummingbird hovering 08:40, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
MfD nomination of User:B9 hummingbird hovering/Thoughtform
User:B9 hummingbird hovering/Thoughtform, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/User:B9 hummingbird hovering/Thoughtform and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:B9 hummingbird hovering/Thoughtform during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Magioladitis (talk) 07:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
I would note that despite all the melodramatic promises that they are done here and don't care anymore, this user used an IP to evade their block and edit the above-referenced MFD . Beeblebrox (talk) 19:07, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
MfD nomination of User:B9 hummingbird hovering/Dzogchen Stuff
User:B9 hummingbird hovering/Dzogchen Stuff, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/User:B9 hummingbird hovering/Dzogchen Stuff and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:B9 hummingbird hovering/Dzogchen Stuff during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:11, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Purba listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Purba. Since you had some involvement with the Purba redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Sitush (talk) 10:34, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
- thank you very much I will have a look... It might be of value to separate the Kila / Phurba Misplaced Pages articles/pages as they are related but different & distinct traditions as well as conflated but they are also of one family. It is actually very complex. I championed the same distinction with Chatushkoti (Sanskrit) / Tetralemma (Greek): they are related and iterated each other but also culturally distinct: keep apples with apples. B9 hummingbird hovering 03:50, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
assistance required
Hi.I am not a regular editor.I was reading the article "astra' and found many factual inaccuracies,particularly the one where it says sudarshan chakra can be stopped by lord shiva.I tried to edit it,but some editor is reverting it,and i found in history that other editors have found this inaccurate too.I have found supporting links in google books,but don't know how to substantiate it.can you please look into it? 117.201.99.241 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 11:27, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, B9 hummingbird hovering. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hozhó listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hozhó. Since you had some involvement with the Hozhó redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION 02:07, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Tattvasamgraha
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
noychoH (talk) 15:34, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
You wrote "I have secured by gracious Serendipity a complete digital copy of the Tattvasamgraha in romanized Sanskrit and in addition it is grammatically parsed and intent to make it available in Wikisource or in Wikibooks with an English translation. If anybody would like to work with me on this project contact me directly. B9 hummingbird hovering (talk • contribs) 12:52, 12 October 2009 (UTC)". I might really be interested. noychoH (talk) 15:34, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
- @NoychoH: Please not that this user has been blocked for nearly ten years, and last posted anything five years ago. It's unlikely they are still monitoring anything here. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:18, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Beeblebrox:. Thanks for your remark, yet I was aware of that while writing on their user talk page. It is not completely impossible however, so there is a chance I will get an answer one day, and I am REALLY interested in the topic, that's why I took a chance. When you buy a national lottery ticket it is also unlikely that you win, yet some people are desperate to buy. I am patient to wait. noychoH (talk) 17:26, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
"Canarese script" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Canarese script. The discussion will occur at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 10#Canarese script until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 🌸 1.Ayana 🌸 (talk) 12:36, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
I am not familiar with the issue at hand but as I have finally been able to login and reset my password and you brought this to my attention, I will apprise myself and contribute to discussion if I may. Thank you B9HH B9 hummingbird hovering 01:11, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Tapihritsa
The article Tapihritsa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
This article has no notability. It's been like that for seven years. An attempt to make a reference into a citation gets turned into a note by a "master" editor. Bots have done more work on this article in the last three years, than anybody else. Instead of beating it, it's time to bury this dead horse.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pibal373 (talk) 20:23, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Tagzig Olmo Lung Ring for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tagzig Olmo Lung Ring is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Tagzig Olmo Lung Ring until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:03, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Blazing Lamp
The article Blazing Lamp has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Does not appear to contain anything not already comfortably covered by Seventeen tantras.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Moriwen (talk) 14:44, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
"Neural circuitry" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Neural circuitry has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 12 § Neural circuitry until a consensus is reached. too_much curiosity (talk) 03:27, 12 January 2024 (UTC)