Revision as of 05:00, 3 August 2007 editDHeyward (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers18,753 edits Template_talk:Party shading#Rfc for republican shading← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 23:01, 22 January 2025 edit undoLegobot (talk | contribs)Bots1,671,932 edits Added: Misplaced Pages:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<noinclude> | |||
{{shortcut|]<br>]}} | |||
{{rfclistintro}} | |||
{{RFCheader|Politics}} | |||
</noinclude> | |||
<!--<nowiki>Add new items at the TOP. Use ~~~~~ (five tildes) to sign </nowiki>--> | |||
''']''' | |||
*] an external person affiliated with the republican party has expressed concern over a non-neutral color choice for party shading used in wikipedia. it's silly but a reasonable request that can be accomodated without harming the encyclopedia. --] 05:00, 3 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
{{rfcquote|text= | |||
*] -- dispute about whether the use of ] is justified when there is no discussion about the image and its role in the political scandal that the article covers. ], specifically criterion 8, is relevant here. <span style="font-family:Verdana; ">''']''' <small>{]}</small></span> 19:27, 2 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
The (used to have its own article but it was apparently PRODed) is cited in several hundreds of articles, mostly pertaining to Russian military hardware and South Asian issues, but not exclusively. It was mentioned ] ] ] on this noticeboard but only on a surface level. | |||
*] and ] dispute over capitalization of the word ''realm'' in ''Commonwealth R/realm''. Needs input from people with knowledge of Misplaced Pages style and insight into the nature of the term ''Commonwealth R/realm''. 00:32, 2 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
*] -- NPOV check. Does ] require a discussion of an eight-year Congressional career to include more than a couple of gaffes? 04:17, 1 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
*] - dispute over inclusion in ] of fact that Moore was on CNN for 3 hours and 10 minutes in response to Moore's claim that CNN was biased against him. 23:44, 31 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
*] - the organization in question has been divided into two, and anonymous editors sympathizing with either faction conducts proxy war on the page. Clarifications from someone with knowledge and a outside viewpoint would be appreciated. --] 06:19, 31 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
*] - Requesting a review of the biography of Eliot Spitzer. The ongoing controversy has been tagged with NPOV. I've tried to edit it as neutrally as possible. There is no explination for why it was tagged, and I am hoping for some input as to how I could make it more neutral. Thank you. 23:29, 28 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
*] – Is it lead's claim that "critics of this use of the term view it as an epithet" an ] extrapolation?05:51, 24 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
*] - Dispute over the inclusion and interpretation of sources suggesting a genocide of Kurds in Turkey. 09:37, 22 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
*] — Whether or not Israeli communities established in the Golan Heights should be considered "Israeli settlements" within the context of this article.07:01, 22 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
*] Dispute regarding the population figures for cities in the UK. I have cited sources from a Government department providing accurate population figures for cities in the UK rather than administrative boundaries. I can find no official source stating that local authority boundaries are the population of a city, whereas my cited sources specifically state otherwise. This is being reverted with no source citation, in violation of ] and ]. 15:06, 21 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
*] Dispute for political events and neutrality. Totally disputed tag on an article tagged under construction.10:49, 21 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
*] Editors disagree strongly on whether waterboarding is torture, and what constitutes a source in this case, we would greatly welcome outside views, and of course contributors. 23:29, 22 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
*] Is it a problem under ] and ] that the majority of the article consists of Michale Moore's attack on Gupta with no recounting of Gupta's self-defense? Is it appropriate for an anonymous editor to remove the NPOV tag because he disagrees with the multiple editors who find a NPOV violation? 13:44, 17 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
*] - Does ] apply to non-fiction films? Is a 15K recounting of the plot, including extensive quotes from dialogue and the closing credits, appropriate for Misplaced Pages? 11:19, 15 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
*] Title change to a neutral title which will drastically reduce edit warring. When the ] page when the name was changed to ] the edit warring was reduced dramatically. 11:16, 13 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
*] There is a dispute about whether to include examples of use of flying checkpoints by Israel, the U.S., and Lebanese militias or to rely only on a general overview of checkpoints.03:33, 13 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
*] ] requires mention of significant controversies in the lead paragraphs; ] requires fair presentation of significant points of view. Does it violate ] when there is no mention of right-wing criticism of the movie in the article at all? Should the NPOV tag be removed when there is a significant debate about the neutrality and factual accuracy of the article on the talk page? 19:22, 9 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
In light of all this, how would you rate the EurAsian Times? | |||
*] Does the lead of this article sattisfy ]? 19:09, 9 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
* '''Option 1: ]''' | |||
*] – The main dispute is whether to include in city articles if that city has either permanently or temporarily blocked ] dispensaries. 20:54, 8 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
* '''Option 2: ]''' | |||
* '''Option 3: ]''' | |||
* '''Option 4: ]''' | |||
Thank you. '''''<span style="color:#503680">] ] ]</span>''''' 22:55, 22 January 2025 (UTC)}} | |||
*] Dispute about use of quotes - whether too extensive or not, whether we should weed out "American sponsored" quotes and sources or not etc and what exactly constities NPOV 00:48, 7 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
''']''' | |||
{{rfcquote|text= | |||
So, can we say "Musk received widespread criticism for what some perceived as a Nazi salute (An accusation he denied)" | |||
{{ordered list |list-style-type=upper-alpha |Yes | |||
*'''http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Barack_Obama#Rezko_house'''. Dispute about whether placing a real estate dealing with Tony Rezko in the footnotes is giving it enough weight. 19:03, 4 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
|No | |||
<!--<nowiki>Add new items at the TOP, NOT HERE. Use ~~~~~ (five tildes) to sign </nowiki>--> | |||
|other text? | |||
}} ] (]) 11:51, 22 January 2025 (UTC)}} | |||
''']''' | |||
{{rfcquote|text= | |||
Should Gulf of America should be in the LEAD section? | |||
I am requesting that all other discussions about the Gulf of America be closed and have a formal RfC to resolve this issue. Consensus has shown AGAINST changing the entire title to the Gulf of America. But there is still debate on whether or not it should be included in the article, particularly in the LEAD section. ] (]) 03:48, 22 January 2025 (UTC)}} | |||
''']''' | |||
{{rfcquote|text= | |||
Does ] meet the community's criteria ({{xt|"mentioned as potential 2028 presidential candidates in at least two reliable media sources in the last six months"}}) for inclusion in the list of potential Democratic candidates? ] (]) 03:47, 22 January 2025 (UTC)}} | |||
''']''' | |||
{{rfcquote|text= | |||
This request for comments concerns the following question: In the first sentence of the article, does the term "Department of Government Efficiency" require a definite article before it, i.e. "the Department of Government Efficiency"? | |||
The sentence in question: '''Department of Government Efficiency''' ('''DOGE'''), officially the '''U.S. DOGE Service Temporary Organization''', is a temporary organization under the United States DOGE Service. | |||
Proposed change: The '''Department of Government Efficiency''' ('''DOGE'''), officially the '''U.S. DOGE Service Temporary Organization''', is a temporary organization under the United States DOGE Service. | |||
] (]) 17:09, 21 January 2025 (UTC)}} | |||
''']''' | |||
{{rfcquote|text= | |||
Which of the following images should be the portrait in the infobox? ] (]) 09:07, 21 January 2025 (UTC)}} | |||
''']''' | |||
{{rfcquote|text= | |||
Should the page describe Musk as a supporter of international far-right political parties, activists, and causes? ] (]) 01:36, 21 January 2025 (UTC)}} | |||
''']''' | |||
{{rfcquote|text= | |||
The last RfCs on the topic were over two years ago: | |||
Question: <u>Should countries be added as supporters of Ukraine to the infobox?</u> | |||
'''Option A:''' No. | |||
'''Option B:''' Yes, add United States, United Kingdom, EU and NATO. | |||
'''Option C:''' Yes, add United States, United Kingdom and individual countries as merited. | |||
'''Option D:''' Something else. (please explain in the comments) ] (]) 13:52, 17 January 2025 (UTC)}} | |||
''']''' | |||
{{rfcquote|text= | |||
Which of the following best describes the reliability of '']''? | |||
* Option 1: ] | |||
* Option 2: ] | |||
* Option 3: ] | |||
* Option 4: ] | |||
— ] <sub>]</sub> 16:28, 16 January 2025 (UTC)}} | |||
''']''' | |||
{{rfcquote|text= | |||
How should Ritter's sexual offences be described in the lead section? | |||
*1. {{tq|he is a convicted child sex offender}} (or variants) | |||
*2. {{tq|In 2011, Ritter was convicted of several criminal offenses after engaging in sexually explicit online activity with a police officer posing as a 15 year-old girl}} (or some variation thereof). | |||
Where in the lead should this sentence be placed? | |||
*A. In the first few sentences of the lead | |||
*B. At the end of the lead | |||
*C. Omitted from the lead entirely | |||
] (]) 15:59, 16 January 2025 (UTC)}} | |||
''']''' | |||
{{rfcquote|text= | |||
Should infoboxes on parliamentary elections which will be held in the future continue to contain information on current political party makeup? Or should the infoboxes be removed/heavily trimmed down until the election has occurred? ] <sup>(], ])</sup> 03:02, 16 January 2025 (UTC)}} | |||
''']''' | |||
{{rfcquote|text= | |||
Should the ] be included in the infobox in some manner? ] (]) 05:45, 12 January 2025 (UTC)}} | |||
''']''' | |||
{{rfcquote|text= | |||
Should the ] be included in the tables of the ''political parties standings'' section & the ''transposed 2021 results'' sub-section? ] (]) 21:44, 11 January 2025 (UTC)}} | |||
''']''' | |||
{{rfcquote|text= | |||
The current single sentence on Gaza in the lede is as follows: {{green|During the Israel–Hamas war, Biden condemned the actions of Hamas as terrorism and sent military aid to Israel, as well as humanitarian aid to the Gaza Strip.}} The sentence is regularly modified, including the word "limited" which keeps being added/removed in front of "humanitarian aid". I started ] on this topic a while ago; it didn't get a lot of input and didn't lead to a consensus. I thought this RfC could generate a larger discussion and settle a few related questions at once: | |||
* Should the "military aid" and "humanitarian aid" be mentioned side by side as is? | |||
* Should we mention that the amount of military aid sent to Israel is ? | |||
* Next to the mention of military aid, should there be a mention of allegations of war crimes against Israel? | |||
Feel free to expand the discussion to other questions. My hope is that we can workshop a sentence that has a consensus behind it. Thanks! ] (]) 13:58, 11 January 2025 (UTC)}} | |||
''']''' | |||
{{rfcquote|text= | |||
Should "far-right" be included as a faction ideology in the sidebar? ] 11:52, 11 January 2025 (UTC)}} | |||
''']''' | |||
{{rfcquote|text= | |||
What is the reliability of ] and should it be blacklisted? ] (]) 15:28, 9 January 2025 (UTC)}} | |||
''']''' | |||
{{rfcquote|text= | |||
I'm opening a new RfC in an attempt to permanently solve this dispute. Should the Estado Novo regime be considered fascist? -- ] (]) 00:06, 8 January 2025 (UTC)}} | |||
''']''' | |||
{{rfcquote|text= | |||
I suggest that we change the lead from <u>The Huddersfield child sex abuse ring was a group of British Asians who were convicted of sexual offences against girls in Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom.</u> | |||
to | |||
<u>The Huddersfield child sex abuse ring was a group of British Asian men's mostly from ], who were convicted of sexual offences against girls in Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom. </u> | |||
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-45918845 | |||
https://www.business-standard.com/article/news-ians/uk-court-jails-20-men-mostly-pakistanis-for-sexual-abuse-of-teenage-girls-118102000080_1.html | |||
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-leeds-45618067 | |||
https://www.arabnews.com/node/1390781/amp | |||
https://www.dw.com/en/uk-grooming-gang-jailed-for-sexual-abuse-of-young-girls/a-45964194 ] (]) 10:33, 6 January 2025 (UTC)}} | |||
''']''' | |||
{{rfcquote|text= | |||
Should the Yom Kippur War be characterized in any of the following ways in the infobox ]: | |||
# Do not characterize the war in the infobox, but write "See aftermath." | |||
# Israeli victory | |||
# Stalemate | |||
# Egyptian victory | |||
''']'''<span style="border:2px solid #073642;background:rgb(255,156,0);background:linear-gradient(90deg, rgba(255,156,0,1) 0%, rgba(147,0,255,1) 45%, rgba(4,123,134,1) 87%);">]</span> 23:01, 4 January 2025 (UTC)}} | |||
''']''' | |||
{{rfcquote|text= | |||
Should the first sentence in the lead be rewritten: (red to be removed; green to add) "Ronald Wilson Reagan (February 6, 1911 – June 5, 2004) was <del style="color: #8B0000;">an American politician and actor who served as</del> the 40th president of the United States<ins style="color: #008560;">, serving</ins> from 1981 to 1989"? ] (]) 17:31, 4 January 2025 (UTC)}} | |||
''']''' | |||
{{rfcquote|text= | |||
{{User:ClueBot III/DoNotArchiveUntil|1738882871}} | |||
Should the word “unaccredited” appear in the first sentence of the lead? | |||
* Yes | |||
* No | |||
* No, but it should be included elsewhere in the lead | |||
] (]) 20:34, 2 January 2025 (UTC)}} | |||
''']''' | |||
{{rfcquote|text= | |||
Should we principally refer to Azerbaijan Airlines Flight 8243 as a "crash" or an "accident"? ] (]) 23:14, 1 January 2025 (UTC)}} | |||
''']''' | |||
{{rfcquote|text= | |||
Should this article include a top level section about violations of human rights by the state of Israel? ] (]) 17:36, 31 December 2024 (UTC)}} | |||
''']''' | |||
{{rfcquote|text= | |||
How should ] describe the current for-profit/non-profit status of Grand Canyon University? | |||
*'''Option 1''': Do not describe GCU as presently "for-profit" or "non-profit" in Misplaced Pages's voice (such as in ]); or | |||
*'''Option 2''': Describe GCU in ] as presently a "for-profit" institution (such as in ]); | |||
*'''Option 3''': Describe GCU in Misplaced Pages's voice as presently a "non-profit" institution. | |||
— ] <sub>]</sub> 19:14, 29 December 2024 (UTC)}} | |||
''']''' | |||
{{rfcquote|text= | |||
The opening to the ] article read: | |||
'''Abdel Fattah Saeed Hussein Khalil El-Sisi'''{{Efn|{{langx|ar|عبد الفتاح سعيد حسين خليل السيسي}}}} (born 19 November 1954) is an Egyptian politician, ],<ref name="dictator"> | |||
Sources that categorize Sisi as a dictator: | |||
{{bulleted list|{{Cite news |title=Egypt’s rushed election shows Abdel-Fattah al-Sisi is nervous |url=https://www.economist.com/middle-east-and-africa/2023/10/03/egypts-rushed-election-shows-abdel-fattah-al-sisi-is-nervous |access-date=2024-12-27 |work=The Economist |issn=0013-0613 |quote="Last month Abdel-Fattah al-Sisi, Egypt’s military dictator..."}}|{{Cite web |last=Dunne |first=Michele |date=2019-04-08 |title=Why Is Trump Helping Egypt’s Dictator Entrench His Power? |url=https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/04/08/donald-trump-abdel-fattah-al-sisi-egypt-226579/ |access-date=2024-12-27 |website=POLITICO Magazine |language=en}} | |||
|{{Cite web |title=President Trump, Condemn This Sham Egyptian Election {{!}} The Washington Institute |url=https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/president-trump-condemn-sham-egyptian-election |access-date=2024-12-27 |website=www.washingtoninstitute.org |language=en |quote="...issued a statement praising the Egyptian dictator's magnificent work for the country"}} | |||
|{{Cite news |title=A Blank Check for Egypt's Dictator |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014-06-26/u-dot-s-dot-gives-egypts-dictator-a-blank-check?embedded-checkout=false |access-date=2024-12-27 |work=Bloomberg.com |language=en}} | |||
|{{Cite web |last=Toosi |first=Nahal |date=2021-07-12 |title=In D.C. visit, Egypt spy boss claims U.S. agreed — in writing — to jail American activist |url=https://www.politico.com/news/2021/07/12/egypt-spy-boss-jail-american-498983 |access-date=2024-12-27 |website=POLITICO |language=en |quote="...Abdel Fattah El-Sisi, the Egyptian dictator who has imprisoned tens of thousands of dissidents."}}{{Cite web |last=Lawler |first=Dave |date=2019-04-23 |title=Egypt's President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi could rule until 2030 after winning referendum |url=https://www.axios.com/2019/04/23/sisi-referendum-rule-egypt-2030-constitution |access-date=2024-12-27 |website=Axios |language=en |quote="He has now cemented his status as Egypt's dictator without losing his position as a U.S. ally."}} | |||
|{{Cite web |last=Greenwald |first=Glenn |date=2015-03-31 |title=Obama Personally Tells the Egyptian Dictator That U.S. Will Again Send Weapons (and Cash) to His Regime |url=https://theintercept.com/2015/03/31/obama-lifts-freeze-weapons-transfer-egyptian-dictator/ |access-date=2024-12-27 |website=The Intercept |language=en-US}} | |||
|{{Cite web |last=Williams |first=Jennifer |date=2017-04-03 |title=Egypt’s president is a bloodthirsty dictator. Trump thinks he’s done a “fantastic job.” |url=https://www.vox.com/world/2017/4/3/15160358/trump-egypt-abdel-fattah-el-sisi-white-house |access-date=2024-12-27 |website=Vox |language=en-US}}|{{Cite news |date=2020-12-01 |title=Egypt President Abdul Fattah al-Sisi: Ruler with an iron grip |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-19256730 |access-date=2024-11-22 |work=BBC News |language=en-GB}}|{{Cite news |title=Egypt is again under military rule, but Sisi lacks Nasser's appeal |url=https://www.economist.com/special-report/2021/08/24/egypt-is-again-under-military-rule-but-sisi-lacks-nassers-appeal |access-date=2024-11-25 |url-access=subscription|work=The Economist |issn=0013-0613|archive-url=https://archive.today/2021.08.26-144020/https://www.economist.com/special-report/2021/08/24/egypt-is-again-under-military-rule-but-sisi-lacks-nassers-appeal|archive-date=2021-08-26|url-status=live}}|{{Citation |last=Grewal |first=Sharan |title=Egypt: A Coup against Democracy |date=2023-07-25 |work=Soldiers of Democracy? |pages=136–176 |url=https://academic.oup.com/book/46755/chapter-abstract/414394851?redirectedFrom=fulltext |access-date=2024-11-25 |publisher=Oxford University PressOxford |doi=10.1093/oso/9780192873910.003.0007 |isbn=0-19-287391-1}}|{{Cite web |date=2024-03-15 |title=EU Deal with Egypt Rewards Authoritarianism, Betrays 'EU Values' {{!}} Human Rights Watch |url=https://www.hrw.org/news/2024/03/15/eu-deal-egypt-rewards-authoritarianism-betrays-eu-values |access-date=2024-12-14 |language=en}}}}</ref> and retired military officer who has been serving as the ] and current ] since 2014.<ref name=":5">{{Cite web |date=2024-03-15 |title=EU Deal with Egypt Rewards Authoritarianism, Betrays 'EU Values' {{!}} Human Rights Watch |url=https://www.hrw.org/news/2024/03/15/eu-deal-egypt-rewards-authoritarianism-betrays-eu-values |access-date=2024-12-14 |language=en}}</ref> | |||
(The word dictator been been removed for now while the RfC discussion takes place) | |||
Should Sisi be referred to as a dictator? Some of these options are not mutually exclusive, so more than one can be selected: | |||
*'''A.''' Yes he should be, in a similar way as described above or found in the the leads of ], ], ], ] | |||
*'''B.''' No he should not be, but he should be described as an authoritarian ruler, leader of an authoritarian regime, or leader of a military dictatorship somewhere in the lead, similar to the leads of ], ], ], ] | |||
*'''C.''' No he should not be, but some variation of "Many observers see Sisi as a dictator" should be included in the lead. | |||
*'''D. ''' No he should not be, and he should '''not''' be described as an authoritarian ruler. Instead, different arguments regarding his form of rule should be summarized in the body. | |||
*'''E.''' Other (please elaborate) | |||
] (]) 16:55, 27 December 2024 (UTC)}} | |||
''']''' | |||
{{rfcquote|text= | |||
Should the bottom of the infobox in this election and all elections that follow it, which use the mixed-member proportional system, show the Prime Minister and their party alone (similarly to other Westminster systems, such as ], ], and ]), or the Cabinet and its member parties (similarly to other systems that have coalition governments, such as ], ], and ])? ] (]) 13:37, 26 December 2024 (UTC)}} | |||
{{RFC list footer|pol|hide_instructions={{{hide_instructions}}} }} |
Latest revision as of 23:01, 22 January 2025
The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention:
Misplaced Pages:Reliable sources/Noticeboard
The EurAsian Times (used to have its own article but it was apparently PRODed) is cited in several hundreds of articles, mostly pertaining to Russian military hardware and South Asian issues, but not exclusively. It was mentioned a few times on this noticeboard but only on a surface level.
In light of all this, how would you rate the EurAsian Times?
Thank you. Choucas Bleu 🐦⬛ 22:55, 22 January 2025 (UTC) |
So, can we say "Musk received widespread criticism for what some perceived as a Nazi salute (An accusation he denied)"
|
Should Gulf of America should be in the LEAD section?
I am requesting that all other discussions about the Gulf of America be closed and have a formal RfC to resolve this issue. Consensus has shown AGAINST changing the entire title to the Gulf of America. But there is still debate on whether or not it should be included in the article, particularly in the LEAD section. Rc2barrington (talk) 03:48, 22 January 2025 (UTC) |
Talk:2028 United States presidential election
Does Michelle Obama meet the community's criteria ("mentioned as potential 2028 presidential candidates in at least two reliable media sources in the last six months") for inclusion in the list of potential Democratic candidates? Chetsford (talk) 03:47, 22 January 2025 (UTC) |
Talk:Department of Government Efficiency
This request for comments concerns the following question: In the first sentence of the article, does the term "Department of Government Efficiency" require a definite article before it, i.e. "the Department of Government Efficiency"?
The sentence in question: Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), officially the U.S. DOGE Service Temporary Organization, is a temporary organization under the United States DOGE Service. Proposed change: The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), officially the U.S. DOGE Service Temporary Organization, is a temporary organization under the United States DOGE Service. |
Which of the following images should be the portrait in the infobox? EarthDude (talk) 09:07, 21 January 2025 (UTC) |
Should the page describe Musk as a supporter of international far-right political parties, activists, and causes? BootsED (talk) 01:36, 21 January 2025 (UTC) |
Talk:Russian invasion of Ukraine
The last RfCs on the topic were over two years ago:
Question: Should countries be added as supporters of Ukraine to the infobox? Option A: No. Option B: Yes, add United States, United Kingdom, EU and NATO. Option C: Yes, add United States, United Kingdom and individual countries as merited. Option D: Something else. (please explain in the comments) TurboSuperA+ (talk) 13:52, 17 January 2025 (UTC) |
Misplaced Pages:Reliable sources/Noticeboard
Which of the following best describes the reliability of Jacobin (magazine)?
|
How should Ritter's sexual offences be described in the lead section?
Where in the lead should this sentence be placed?
|
Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Elections and Referendums
Should infoboxes on parliamentary elections which will be held in the future continue to contain information on current political party makeup? Or should the infoboxes be removed/heavily trimmed down until the election has occurred? Chessrat 03:02, 16 January 2025 (UTC) |
Should the Executive Council of New Hampshire be included in the infobox in some manner? 207.96.32.81 (talk) 05:45, 12 January 2025 (UTC) |
Talk:2025 Canadian federal election
Should the People's Party of Canada be included in the tables of the political parties standings section & the transposed 2021 results sub-section? GoodDay (talk) 21:44, 11 January 2025 (UTC) |
The current single sentence on Gaza in the lede is as follows: During the Israel–Hamas war, Biden condemned the actions of Hamas as terrorism and sent military aid to Israel, as well as humanitarian aid to the Gaza Strip. The sentence is regularly modified, including the word "limited" which keeps being added/removed in front of "humanitarian aid". I started a discussion on this topic a while ago; it didn't get a lot of input and didn't lead to a consensus. I thought this RfC could generate a larger discussion and settle a few related questions at once:
Feel free to expand the discussion to other questions. My hope is that we can workshop a sentence that has a consensus behind it. Thanks! WikiFouf (talk) 13:58, 11 January 2025 (UTC) |
Talk:Republican Party (United States)
Should "far-right" be included as a faction ideology in the sidebar? Warrenᚋᚐᚊᚔ 11:52, 11 January 2025 (UTC) |
Misplaced Pages:Reliable sources/Noticeboard
What is the reliability of The Heritage Foundation and should it be blacklisted? Bluethricecreamman (talk) 15:28, 9 January 2025 (UTC) |
I'm opening a new RfC in an attempt to permanently solve this dispute. Should the Estado Novo regime be considered fascist? -- 2804:29B8:5183:100C:7163:1F92:A81A:7841 (talk) 00:06, 8 January 2025 (UTC) |
Talk:Huddersfield sex abuse ring
I suggest that we change the lead from The Huddersfield child sex abuse ring was a group of British Asians who were convicted of sexual offences against girls in Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom.
to The Huddersfield child sex abuse ring was a group of British Asian men's mostly from Pakistani heritage, who were convicted of sexual offences against girls in Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom.
|
Should the Yom Kippur War be characterized in any of the following ways in the infobox WP:RESULT:
|
Should the first sentence in the lead be rewritten: (red to be removed; green to add) "Ronald Wilson Reagan (February 6, 1911 – June 5, 2004) was |
Should the word “unaccredited” appear in the first sentence of the lead?
|
Talk:Azerbaijan Airlines Flight 8243
Should we principally refer to Azerbaijan Airlines Flight 8243 as a "crash" or an "accident"? guninvalid (talk) 23:14, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
Should this article include a top level section about violations of human rights by the state of Israel? DMH223344 (talk) 17:36, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
How should Misplaced Pages's voice describe the current for-profit/non-profit status of Grand Canyon University?
|
The opening to the Abdel Fattah el-Sisi article read:
Abdel Fattah Saeed Hussein Khalil El-Sisi (born 19 November 1954) is an Egyptian politician, dictator, and retired military officer who has been serving as the sixth and current president of Egypt since 2014. (The word dictator been been removed for now while the RfC discussion takes place) Should Sisi be referred to as a dictator? Some of these options are not mutually exclusive, so more than one can be selected:
|
Talk:1996 New Zealand general election
Should the bottom of the infobox in this election and all elections that follow it, which use the mixed-member proportional system, show the Prime Minister and their party alone (similarly to other Westminster systems, such as the UK, Australia, and Canada), or the Cabinet and its member parties (similarly to other systems that have coalition governments, such as Germany, the Netherlands, and Poland)? Glide08 (talk) 13:37, 26 December 2024 (UTC) |
- Arabic: عبد الفتاح سعيد حسين خليل السيسي
-
Sources that categorize Sisi as a dictator:
- "Egypt's rushed election shows Abdel-Fattah al-Sisi is nervous". The Economist. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved 2024-12-27.
Last month Abdel-Fattah al-Sisi, Egypt's military dictator...
- Dunne, Michele (2019-04-08). "Why Is Trump Helping Egypt's Dictator Entrench His Power?". POLITICO Magazine. Retrieved 2024-12-27.
- "President Trump, Condemn This Sham Egyptian Election | The Washington Institute". www.washingtoninstitute.org. Retrieved 2024-12-27.
...issued a statement praising the Egyptian dictator's magnificent work for the country
- "A Blank Check for Egypt's Dictator". Bloomberg.com. Retrieved 2024-12-27.
- Toosi, Nahal (2021-07-12). "In D.C. visit, Egypt spy boss claims U.S. agreed — in writing — to jail American activist". POLITICO. Retrieved 2024-12-27.
...Abdel Fattah El-Sisi, the Egyptian dictator who has imprisoned tens of thousands of dissidents.
Lawler, Dave (2019-04-23). "Egypt's President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi could rule until 2030 after winning referendum". Axios. Retrieved 2024-12-27.He has now cemented his status as Egypt's dictator without losing his position as a U.S. ally.
- Greenwald, Glenn (2015-03-31). "Obama Personally Tells the Egyptian Dictator That U.S. Will Again Send Weapons (and Cash) to His Regime". The Intercept. Retrieved 2024-12-27.
- Williams, Jennifer (2017-04-03). "Egypt's president is a bloodthirsty dictator. Trump thinks he's done a "fantastic job."". Vox. Retrieved 2024-12-27.
- "Egypt President Abdul Fattah al-Sisi: Ruler with an iron grip". BBC News. 2020-12-01. Retrieved 2024-11-22.
- "Egypt is again under military rule, but Sisi lacks Nasser's appeal". The Economist. ISSN 0013-0613. Archived from the original on 2021-08-26. Retrieved 2024-11-25.
- Grewal, Sharan (2023-07-25), "Egypt: A Coup against Democracy", Soldiers of Democracy?, Oxford University PressOxford, pp. 136–176, doi:10.1093/oso/9780192873910.003.0007, ISBN 0-19-287391-1, retrieved 2024-11-25
- "EU Deal with Egypt Rewards Authoritarianism, Betrays 'EU Values' | Human Rights Watch". 2024-03-15. Retrieved 2024-12-14.
- "Egypt's rushed election shows Abdel-Fattah al-Sisi is nervous". The Economist. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved 2024-12-27.
- "EU Deal with Egypt Rewards Authoritarianism, Betrays 'EU Values' | Human Rights Watch". 2024-03-15. Retrieved 2024-12-14.
Requests for comment (All) | |
---|---|
Articles (All) |
|
Non-articles (All) | |
Instructions | To add a discussion to this list:
|
For more information, see Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment. Report problems to Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for comment. Lists are updated every hour by Legobot. |