Misplaced Pages

China Airlines Flight 611: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:38, 22 June 2005 editTaiwanBot (talk | contribs)21 editsm (Robot-assisted disambiguation: China)← Previous edit Latest revision as of 20:10, 19 January 2025 edit undoCRussG (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users19,451 editsNo edit summary 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|2002 passenger plane disintegration above the Taiwan Strait}}
'''] Flight 611''' (CAL611, CI611) flew from ] in ] to ] in ], ]. The flight crashed, killing all aboard on ] ].
{{Use dmy dates|date=September 2019}}
{{Use Hong Kong English|date=January 2025}}
{{Infobox aircraft occurrence
| occurrence_type = Accident
| name = China Airlines Flight 611
| image = Boeing 747-209B - China Airlines B-18255 0239713.jpg
| image_upright = 1.15
| caption = B-18255, the aircraft involved in the accident, in 2000
| date = {{start date|2002|05|25|df=y}}
| type = ]
| site = ], {{cvt|45|km|nmi}} NE of ], Taiwan
| coordinates = {{coord|23|59|23|N|119|40|45|E|type:event|display=inline,title}}
| occupants = 225
| passengers = 206
| crew = 19
| fatalities = 225
| survivors = 0
| aircraft_type = ]
| origin = ], ], Taiwan
| destination = ], Hong Kong
| operator = ]
| IATA = CI611
| ICAO = CAL611
| callsign = DYNASTY 611
| tail_number = B-18255
}}


'''China Airlines Flight 611''' was a regularly scheduled passenger flight from Chiang Kai-shek International Airport (now ]) in ] to ] in ].
On May 25, the flight took off at 2:50pm local time for the 1 hour 20 minutes flight to Hong Kong.


On 25 May 2002, the ] operating the route disintegrated midair and crashed into the ], {{convert|23|nmi|km mi|abbr=}} northeast of the ], 20 minutes after takeoff, killing all 225 people on board. The in-flight break-up was caused by ] cracks resulting from improper repairs after a ] to the aircraft 22 years earlier. This accident is similar to ] which killed 520 people.
About 20 minutes after takeoff, the aircraft disappeared from radar screens, suggesting the aircraft
had experienced an in flight breakup at FL350, near the ] at Taiwan Strait, killing all 19 crew members and 206 passengers. 190 of the deceased are Chinese from ], 14 Chinese from ], 1 ]an, 9 Chinese from ], and 1 ]. 3 were infants. 114 were in a group tour organized by five travel agencies to Hong Kong or the Mainland. The plane was expected to arrive at 4:28 PM.


The crash remains the deadliest in Taiwan, as well as the most recent accident with fatalities involving China Airlines, and the second-deadliest accident in ] history, behind ] with 264 fatalities.
At 5:05 P.M., a military C130 aircraft spotted a crashed airliner 20 nautical miles northeast of ]. Oil slicks were also spotted at 5:05 PM. The first body was found at 6:10 PM.


== Aircraft ==
B-18255, the ] that had crashed on May 25, was 22 years old, and this was to have been its last flight before being sold to a small ] carrier for $US1.45 million.
The aircraft involved, ] as {{Airreg|B|18255}}, (originally registered as B-1866), ] 21843, was the only Boeing 747-200 passenger aircraft left in China Airlines's fleet at the time. The plane was delivered to the airline on 2 August 1979. The aircraft had logged more than 64,800 hours of flight time at the time of the accident. The plane was equipped with 4 ] engines and had a 355-seat configuration.<ref name="asc" /><ref>{{cite web |title=NEWS UPDATE OF CHINA AIRLINES CI611 FLIGHT |url=http://www.china-airlines.com/us/e_news/2002/20020525a.htm |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20020804151531/http://www.china-airlines.com/us/e_news/2002/20020525a.htm |archive-date=4 August 2002 |access-date=22 April 2010 |website=China Airlines}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last1=Marshall|first1=Tyler|last2=Tsai|first2=Ting-I|title=Jet Crashes Off Taiwan With 225 People Aboard|url=https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2002-may-26-fg-taicrash26-story.html|access-date=11 November 2014|work=]|date=26 May 2002}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=B-18255 Seat Plan|url=http://www.iasa.com.au/folders/Safety_Issues/others/images/seatplan747.bmp|access-date=8 July 2020|website=www.iasa.com.au|publisher=International Aviation Safety Association|archive-date=11 May 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190511051933/http://www.iasa.com.au/folders/Safety_Issues/others/images/seatplan747.bmp|url-status=dead}}</ref>{{Bsn|reason=There needs to be a source that "states" B-18255's seat configuration|date=July 2024}} Prior to the crash, China Airlines had sold B-18255 to ] for US$1.45 million. The accident flight was to be the aircraft's penultimate flight for China Airlines, as it was scheduled to be delivered to Orient Thai Airlines after its return flight from Hong Kong to Taipei. After the crash, the contract to sell the aircraft was voided and Orient Thai replaced it with another 747.<ref name="TimesofIndiaCataHow" />
Only four passenger 747-200s were delivered to China Airlines, all from 1979 to 1980. The other three had been in full passenger service until 1999 when they were converted to freighters. They were immediately grounded by the ]'s ] (CAA) after the crash for maintenance checks.<ref name="ASN">{{cite web |last=Ranter |first=Harro |title=ASN Aircraft accident Boeing 747-209B B-18255 |url=http://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=20020525-0 |access-date=3 November 2014 |website=Aviation Safety Network |publisher=Flight Safety Foundation}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last1=Bradsher|first1=Keith|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2002/05/27/world/taiwan-airliner-broke-apart-in-midair-investigators-say.html|title=Taiwan Airliner Broke Apart in Midair, Investigators Say|date=27 May 2002|work=]|access-date=3 November 2014|issn=0362-4331}}</ref>


== Accident ==
Searchers recovered 162 bodies and 15 percent of the wreckage, including part of the cockpit, and found no signs of burns, explosives or gunshots.
]
The flight took off at 15:08 local time (07:08 ]), and was scheduled to arrive at Hong Kong at 16:28 Hong Kong Time (08:28 ]). The flight crew consisted of 51-year-old Captain Yi Ching-Fong,{{#tag:ref|''Yi Ching-Fong'': {{zh|t=易清豐|p=Yì Qīngfēng|tp=I Cingfong|first=t|labels=no}}|group=note}} 52-year-old First Officer Shieh Yea Shyong,{{#tag:ref|''Shieh Yea Shyong'': {{zh|t=謝亞雄|p=Xiè Yàxióng|tp=Syieh Yasyong |first=t|labels=no}}|group=note}} and 54-year-old Flight Engineer Chao Sen Kuo.{{#tag:ref|''Chao Sen Kuo'': {{zh|t=趙盛國|p=Zhào Shèngguó|tp=Jhao Shengkuo|first=t|labels=no}}|group=note}}<ref>{{Cite web |date=25 May 2002 |title=News update of China Airlines CI611 Flight |url=http://www.china-airlines.com/us/e_news/2002/20020525b.htm |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20020806133556/http://www.china-airlines.com/us/e_news/2002/20020525b.htm |archive-date=6 August 2002 |access-date=3 May 2009 |website=]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=28 May 2002 |title=Version time: 2002/05/28 PM 02:00 CI 611 / 25 May |url=http://www.china-airlines.com/tw/crew.htm |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20020806075338/http://www.china-airlines.com/tw/crew.htm |archive-date=6 August 2002 |access-date=3 May 2009 |website=]}}</ref> All three pilots were highly experienced&nbsp;– both pilots had more than 10,100 hours of flying time and the flight engineer had logged more than 19,100 flight hours.<ref name="asc2">{{Cite journal|date=25 February 2005|title=In-Flight Breakup Over the Taiwan Strait Northeast of Makung, Penghu Island, China Airlines Flight CI611, Boeing 747-200, B-18255, May 25, 2002|url=https://www.ttsb.gov.tw/media/3091/ci611_report_english_vol_2.pdf|journal=Aviation Occurrence Report|location=Taipei, Taiwan|publisher=Aviation Safety Council|volume=2|id=ASC-AOR-05-02-001|access-date=2020-09-09}}</ref>{{Reference page|page=3}}


At 15:16 local time, the flight was cleared to climb to ] 350—about {{convert|35000|ft}}. At 15:33, contact with the plane was lost.<ref name="TimesofIndiaCataHow">{{Cite news |last1=Bhandari |first1=Amit |last2=Ananthanarayanan |first2=Ravi |date=26 May 2002 |title=Catastrophic failure, but how? |url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Catastrophic-failure-but-how/articleshow/14080745.cms |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160816083056/http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/Catastrophic-failure-but-how/articleshow/14080745.cms |archive-date=16 August 2016 |access-date=3 May 2009 |work=] |issn=0971-8257 |quote=All but one of the 225 persons on board the plane were Chinese. Most were from Taiwan, while others came from China, Hong Kong, Macau, or Singapore. The only non-Chinese foreigner was Swiss, identified by "The Taipei Times" as a Mr Luigi Heer.}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last1=Bradsher|first1=Keith|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2002/05/26/world/taiwanese-airliner-with-225-aboard-crashes-in-sea.html|title=Taiwanese Airliner With 225 Aboard Crashes in Sea|date=25 May 2002|work=The New York Times|access-date=3 November 2014|issn=0362-4331}}</ref> ], the Taiwanese ] at that time, said that two ] aircraft in the area received B-18255's ] signals.<ref name="CAL747">{{Cite news|last1=Low|first1=Stephanie|last2=Yu-jung|first2=Chang|date=26 May 2002|title=CAL 747 crashes with 225 aboard|work=]|url=http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2002/05/26/137638|quote=All 19 crew members, as well as 190 passengers on board, were Taiwanese, including two ''United Daily News'' reporters and a former legislator. In addition to 14 Hong Kong, Macau, and Chinese residents, foreign passengers also included one Singaporean, identified as Sim Yong-joo, and one Swiss, identified as Luigi Heer.}}</ref> All 206 passengers and 19 crew members on board the aircraft were killed.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Chinoy |first1=Mike |date=25 May 2002 |title=All 225 feared dead in Taiwan air crash |url=http://edition.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/asiapcf/east/05/25/taiwan.crash/index.html?related |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20030502150455/https://edition.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/asiapcf/east/05/25/taiwan.crash/index.html?related |archive-date=2 May 2003 |access-date=11 November 2014 |work=CNN}}</ref>
There was no distress signal or communication sent out prior to the crash. Radar data suggests that the aircraft broke into four pieces while at FL350. This theory is supported by the fact that articles which would have been found inside the aircraft (magazines, etc.) were found up to 80 miles from the crash site. The weather and climate were normal. The ] showed that the pilot did not detect any anomaly and was humming the famous oldie tune "]" by ].


== Passengers ==
The flight data recorder from Flight 611 shows that the plane began gaining altitude at a significantly faster rate in the 27 seconds before the plane broke apart, although the extra gain in altitude was well within the plane's design limits. The plane was supposed to be leveling off then as it approached its cruising altitude of 35,000 feet. Shortly before the breakup, one of the aircraft's four engines began providing slightly less thrust. By coincidence, the same engine is the only one that has been recovered so far from the sea floor.
The passengers included Taiwanese politician ].<ref>{{Cite news|date=2002-05-26|title=前立委游日正改行程 搭上死亡班機|language=zh|trans-title=Former legislator changes his itinerary during a trip to Japan to catch the death flight|work=]|url=http://old.ltn.com.tw/2002/new/may/26/today-air9.htm|access-date=2019-04-12}}</ref> and two reporters from the '']''.<ref name="CAL747" /> Most of the passengers, 114 people, were members of a Taiwanese group tour to China organised by four travel agencies.<ref>{{cite news |date=26 May 2002 |title=Taiwan's Tragic Air Crash Kills 225 People |url=http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/200205/26/eng20020526_96472.shtml |access-date=3 November 2014 |work=People's Daily}}</ref>
{| class="sortable wikitable" style="font-size:85%; margin:0 0 0.5em 1em; float:right;"
!Nationality
!Passengers
!Crew
!Total
|-
|{{Flagicon|Taiwan}}Taiwan||190||19||209
|-
|{{Flagicon|China}}China||9||0||9
|-
|{{Flagicon|Hong Kong}}Hong Kong||5||0||5
|-
|{{Flagicon|Singapore}}Singapore||1||0||1
|-
|{{Flagicon|Switzerland}}Switzerland||1||0||1
|-
!Total
!206!!19!!225
|}


Of the 225 passengers and crew on board, remains of 175 were recovered and identified. The first 82 bodies were found floating on the ocean surface of the Taiwan Strait, and were recovered by fishing boats and military vessels. Contracted recovery vessels were subsequently used for the recovery of the aircraft wreckage and the remaining bodies.<ref name="asc" />{{Reference page|page=69}}
The final investigation report found that the accident was the result of ] due to inadequate maintenance after a previous incident. The report finds that on February 7 1980, the accident aircraft suffered a tail strike occurrence in Hong Kong. The aircraft was then ferried back to Taiwan on the same day un-pressurized and a temporary repair was conducted the day after. A permanent repair was conducted on May 23 through 26, 1980. However, the permanent repair of the tail strike was not accomplished in accordance with the Boeing SRM, in that the area of damaged skin in Section 46 was not removed (trimmed) and the repair doubler did not extend sufficiently beyond the entire damaged area to restore the structural strength. Consequently, after repeating cycles of depressurization and pressurization during flights, the weakened hull started to crack gradually and finally broke open in flight on that flight, exactly 22 years after the faulty repair has been applied to the damaged tail. An explosive depressurization of the aircraft occurred once the crack was broken, causing the complete disintegration of the aircraft mid-air.


The victims were identified by visual identification, personal effects, fingerprints, dental examinations, and through DNA testing. Only the three recovered flight crew member bodies were autopsied. The victims' bodies were photographed and their clothing and possessions were catalogued and returned to the victims' families. The victims' records, including body diagrams, injury protocols, photographs, and other documents related to the recovery and identification of the individuals were then correlated for each identified victim.<ref name="asc" />{{Reference page|page=69}}
This accident is deemed similar to the ] accident in Tokyo in ], which also involved a Boeing 747 aircraft with faulty repair work done after a tail strike many years before the final demise of the aircraft. That Japan Airlines accident remains now as the most serious single aircraft accident in aviation history, with more than 500 passengers killed.


Most of the victims had extensive injuries consistent with head trauma, ] and ] fractures, significant back abrasions, and pelvic injuries. Most of the bodies were nearly intact except, in some cases, for fractured bones. Some of the victims had expansion of lung tissue, subcutaneous ], and bleeding of the nose and mouth.<ref name="asc" />{{Reference page|page=70}} No carbon remains were found on any of the recovered bodies or their clothes, and no sign of fire, burning, or blast damage was found.<ref name="asc" />{{Reference page|pages=70, 72}}
Many family members of victims blamed the maintenance inregularities on the supposed "profit first, last and only" corporate philosophy of the airline. China Airlines has however steadfastly denied these charges.


== Search, recovery and investigation ==
==What Happened to the Flight Number?==
]
]
At 17:05 local time, a military ] aircraft spotted a crashed airliner {{convert|23|nmi|km mi|abbr=}} northeast of ], ]. Oil slicks were also spotted at 17:05; the first body was found at 18:10.{{Citation needed|date=October 2024}}


No distress signal or communication was sent out prior to the crash.<ref>{{Cite news |date=27 May 2002 |title=China missile ruled out in Taiwan crash |url=http://edition.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/asiapcf/east/05/27/taiwan.crash.0900/index.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081204025913/https://edition.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/asiapcf/east/05/27/taiwan.crash.0900/index.html |archive-date=4 December 2008 |work=CNN}} – Version with full pictures: </ref> Radar data suggest that the aircraft broke into four pieces whilst at ] 350. This theory is supported by the fact that some lighter articles that would have been found inside the aircraft were found up to {{convert|130|km|nmi mi|abbr=}} from the crash site at villages in central Taiwan. The items included magazines, documents, luggage, photographs, New Taiwan dollars, ]s<ref name="Mayday">{{cite episode |title=Scratching The Surface |series=Mayday |series-link=Mayday (Canadian TV series) |season=7 |number=1 |publisher=Cineflix Productions}}</ref> and a China Airlines-embossed, blood-stained pillow case.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.namibian.com.na/2002/july/world/026EF92867.html|title=Military aviation expert says flaws in Taiwan plane crash theory: report|date=8 July 2002|work=]|access-date=3 May 2009|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20030419024932/http://www.namibian.com.na/2002/july/world/026EF92867.html|archive-date=19 April 2003}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-13310158.html |title=78 Bodies From Crashed Taiwanese Plane Retrieved |publisher=Xinhua News Agency |date=26 May 2002 |access-date=3 May 2009}}{{dead link|date=February 2019|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}</ref>
Flight 611 no longer exists. Shortly after the accident, China Airlines changed the flight number to 619, which now serves the Taipei - Hong Kong route along with existing flights 601, 603, 605, 607, 609, 613, 615, and 617.


The plane was supposed to be leveling off then, as it approached its cruising altitude of {{convert|35,000|ft|m|abbr=on}}. Shortly before the breakup, two of the aircraft's four engines began providing slightly higher thrust, which was later found to have been within the normal ranges of deviation. All four engines were recovered from the sea and found not to have suffered any malfunction prior to the crash. Pieces of the aircraft were found in the ocean and on Taiwan, including in the city of ].<ref>{{cite news |date=26 May 2002 |title=Relatives fly to Taiwan crash site |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/low/asia-pacific/2008566.stm |work=BBC News}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last1=Gittings|first1=John|date=25 May 2002|title=225 dead in mystery Taiwan crash|work=The Guardian|publisher=The Observer|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2002/may/26/johngittings.theobserver|access-date=11 November 2014|issn=0261-3077}}</ref>
See also: ]


The governments of Taiwan and the People's Republic of China co-operated in the recovery of the aircraft; the Chinese allowed personnel from Taiwan to search for bodies and aircraft fragments in those parts of the ] controlled by the People's Republic of China.<ref name="TimesofIndiaCataHow" /><ref name="PRCROCTogether">{{cite news|last=Lam|first=Willy Wo-Lap|url=http://archives.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/asiapcf/east/05/27/taiwan.talks/index.html|title=Crash brings Taiwan, China together|date=27 May 2002|work=CNN|access-date=27 May 2009|archive-date=4 December 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081204024704/http://archives.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/asiapcf/east/05/27/taiwan.talks/index.html|url-status=dead}}</ref>
]

]
China Airlines requested relatives to submit blood samples for ] at the Criminal Investigation Bureau of National Police Administration (now ]) and two other locations.<ref>{{Cite web |date=26 May 2002 |title=NEWS UPDATE OF B18255 INCIDENT (6) |url=http://www.china-airlines.com/us/e_news/2002/20020526c.htm |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20020804152402/http://www.china-airlines.com/us/e_news/2002/20020526c.htm |archive-date=4 August 2002 |access-date= |website=China Airlines}}</ref>
]

The ''United Daily News'' stated that some relatives of passengers described the existence of this flight to Hong Kong as being "unnecessary". Most of the passengers intended to arrive in ], but because of a lack of direct air links between Taiwan and mainland China, the travellers had to fly via Hong Kong; the relatives advocated the opening of direct air links between Taiwan and mainland China,<ref name="PRCROCTogether" /> which was eventually ].

== Cause ==

The final investigation report found that the accident was the result of ] caused by inadequate maintenance after a much earlier ] incident. On 7 February 1980, the aircraft was flying from ] to ] via ] and ] as China Airlines Flight 009 (Callsign CAL009, pronounced Dynasty 009). While landing in Hong Kong, part of the plane's tail had scraped along the runway.<ref name="asc" />{{Reference page|page=10}} The aircraft was depressurised, ferried back to Taiwan on the same day, and a temporary repair done the day after.<ref name="asc" />{{Reference page|page=11}} A more permanent repair was conducted by a team from China Airlines from 23-26 May 1980.<ref name="asc" />{{Reference page|page=12}}

The permanent repair of the tailstrike was not carried out in accordance with the Boeing Structural Repair Manual (SRM).<ref name="asc" />{{Reference page|pages=157–158}} According to the SRM, repairs could be made by replacing the entire affected skin or by cutting out the damaged portion and installing a reinforcing doubler plate to restore the structural strength.<ref name="asc" />{{Reference page|pages=60–61}} Rather than following the SRM, the China Airlines team installed a doubler over the damaged skin.<ref name="asc" />{{Reference page|page=160}}

Though the kind of damage inflicted on the tail was far beyond the damage that a doubler plate is meant to fix, this accident probably would not have occurred had the doubler been installed properly. This would mean that all of the scratches would be completely contained by the innermost row of fasteners, and the fasteners themselves would be strong enough to stop the propagation of any new and existing fatigue cracks. However, the doubler that was installed on the aircraft was too small, so it failed to completely and effectively cover the damaged area, as scratches were found at, and outside, the outermost row of fasteners securing the doubler.<ref name="asc" />{{rp|pages=74–80}} Installing the doubler with scratches remaining outside the rivets provided no protection against the propagation of any concealed cracks beneath the doubler, or worse, in the area between its perimeter and the rows of rivets.<ref name="asc">{{cite journal|date=25 February 2005|title=In-Flight Breakup Over the Taiwan Strait Northeast of Makung, Penghu Island, China Airlines Flight CI611, Boeing 747-200, B-18255, May 25, 2002|url=https://www.ttsb.gov.tw/media/3090/ci611_report_english_vol_1.pdf|journal=Aviation Occurrence Report|location=Taipei, Taiwan|publisher=Aviation Safety Council|volume=1|issue=ASC-AOR-05-02-001|access-date=11 February 2017}}</ref>{{Reference page|page=159}}

Consequently, after repeated cycles of pressurisation and depressurisation during flight, cracks began to form around the exposed scratches until finally, on 25 May 2002, coincidentally 22 years to the day after the faulty repair was made on the damaged tail, the hull broke open in midair. A ] occurred once the crack opened up, causing the separation of the aircraft's fuselage at section 46 (aft of the main wingbox).<ref name="asc" />{{Reference page|page=156}}<ref>{{Cite news|date=25 February 2005|title=Cracks blamed for 2002 China Airlines crash|work=CBC News|publisher=Canadian Broadcasting Corporation|url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/cracks-blamed-for-2002-china-airlines-crash-1.528391|access-date=8 July 2020}}</ref> The remainder of the aircraft forward of section 46 entered an abrupt descent, causing all four engines to separate from the wings near-simultaneously, as the engine fuse pins failed at about {{convert|29000|ft||abbr=}}. After this point, the wings and fuselage forward of the initial breakpoint remained connected until impact with the sea.

This was not the first time that a 747 had crashed because of a faulty repair following a tailstrike. On 12 August 1985, 17 years before Flight 611's crash and 7 years after the accident aircraft's repair, ] from Tokyo to Osaka with 524 people on board had crashed when the vertical stabiliser was torn off and the ] systems severed by explosive decompression, leaving only four survivors. That crash had been attributed to a faulty repair to the rear pressure bulkhead, which had been damaged in 1978 in a tail strike incident.<ref>{{cite news|title=Boeing admits bad work on ill-fated Japanese Boeing 747|url=https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1454&dat=19850908&id=dgEzAAAAIBAJ&pg=6428,1987822|access-date=1 June 2012|newspaper=Star-News|date=8 September 1985}}</ref> In both crashes, a doubler plate was not installed according to Boeing standards at the time.

China Airlines disputed much of the report, stating that investigators did not find the pieces of the aircraft that would prove the contents of the investigation report.<ref>{{cite press release |url=http://www.china-airlines.com/en/newsen/newsen000170.htm |title=China Airlines Statement on CI 611 Accident Investigation Report |publisher=] |date=25 February 2005 |access-date=16 January 2015 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050301072116/http://www.china-airlines.com/en/newsen/newsen000170.htm |archive-date=1 March 2005 }}</ref> One piece of evidence during the investigation that came up was the discolouration on the damaged section of the tail from photographs from maintenance records. The discolouration was determined to be tar stains from the historic use of cigarettes and cigars. Smoking was permitted onboard China Airlines' flights until 1995. Had the stains been investigated, the cracks in the fuselage would have been determined, and the plane may have avoided the fateful flight.<ref>{{Cite web|url= https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sGZM800M77M|title= Taiwan's Deadliest Plane Crash China Airlines Flight 611 Disintegrates - Mayday|website= ]|date= 6 January 2022}}</ref>

== Dramatisation==
The accident was featured in a Season 7 episode of the Canadian documentary '']'', entitled "Scratching the Surface".<ref name="Mayday" />

== See also ==
* ]
* ], another aviation accident, also caused by a faulty tailstrike repair seven years before the accident
* ], another aviation accident involving metal fatigue which caused the aircraft to disintegrate in mid-flight
* ], another aviation accident caused by similar improper maintenance, which caused the aircraft to lose control during mid-flight

==Notes==
===Transliterations===
{{reflist|group=note}}

== References ==
{{reflist|30em}}

== External links ==
{{external links|section|date=April 2019}}
<!-- {{No more links}}

Please be cautious adding more external links.
Misplaced Pages is not a collection of links and should not be used for advertising.
Excessive or inappropriate links will be removed. See ] and ] for details.

If there are already suitable links, propose additions or replacements on the article's talk page.
-->
{{Commons category|China Airlines Flight 611}}

''']'''

*, the official ASC documents.
** () –
** () –
**
*, official ASC documents in Chinese – Chinese is the original version and the language of reference
** () –
** () –
**
* ()
* Yang, Minghao (楊明浩), Li Baokang (李寶康), Su Shuikao (蘇水灶), and Guan Wenlin (官文霖). "" {{in lang|zh-tw}} (). – Includes English abstract

'''China Airlines'''
*
*

'''Media'''
* "," '']''
*
*

'''Other'''
* {{cite web|url=https://lessonslearned.faa.gov/ll_main.cfm?TabID=1&LLID=6&LLTypeID=0|title=China Airlines 747 Near Taipei|publisher=]|website=Lessons Learned}}
*
*

{{China Airlines}}
{{Aviation accidents and incidents in Taiwan}}
{{Aviation incidents and accidents in 2002}}
{{Cross-Strait relations}}
{{Portal bar|Aviation|Taiwan|China|Hong Kong}}
{{authority control}}

]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 20:10, 19 January 2025

2002 passenger plane disintegration above the Taiwan Strait

China Airlines Flight 611
B-18255, the aircraft involved in the accident, in 2000
Accident
Date25 May 2002 (2002-05-25)
SummaryIn-flight breakup
SiteTaiwan Strait, 45 km (24 nmi) NE of Penghu islands, Taiwan
23°59′23″N 119°40′45″E / 23.98972°N 119.67917°E / 23.98972; 119.67917
Aircraft
Aircraft typeBoeing 747-209B
OperatorChina Airlines
IATA flight No.CI611
ICAO flight No.CAL611
Call signDYNASTY 611
RegistrationB-18255
Flight originChiang Kai-shek International Airport, Taoyuan, Taiwan
DestinationHong Kong International Airport, Hong Kong
Occupants225
Passengers206
Crew19
Fatalities225
Survivors0

China Airlines Flight 611 was a regularly scheduled passenger flight from Chiang Kai-shek International Airport (now Taoyuan International Airport) in Taiwan to Hong Kong International Airport in Hong Kong.

On 25 May 2002, the Boeing 747-209B operating the route disintegrated midair and crashed into the Taiwan Strait, 23 nautical miles (43 km; 26 mi) northeast of the Penghu Islands, 20 minutes after takeoff, killing all 225 people on board. The in-flight break-up was caused by metal fatigue cracks resulting from improper repairs after a tailstrike to the aircraft 22 years earlier. This accident is similar to Japan Air Lines Flight 123 which killed 520 people.

The crash remains the deadliest in Taiwan, as well as the most recent accident with fatalities involving China Airlines, and the second-deadliest accident in China Airlines history, behind China Airlines Flight 140 with 264 fatalities.

Aircraft

The aircraft involved, registered as B-18255, (originally registered as B-1866), MSN 21843, was the only Boeing 747-200 passenger aircraft left in China Airlines's fleet at the time. The plane was delivered to the airline on 2 August 1979. The aircraft had logged more than 64,800 hours of flight time at the time of the accident. The plane was equipped with 4 Pratt and Whitney JT9D-7AW engines and had a 355-seat configuration. Prior to the crash, China Airlines had sold B-18255 to Orient Thai Airlines for US$1.45 million. The accident flight was to be the aircraft's penultimate flight for China Airlines, as it was scheduled to be delivered to Orient Thai Airlines after its return flight from Hong Kong to Taipei. After the crash, the contract to sell the aircraft was voided and Orient Thai replaced it with another 747. Only four passenger 747-200s were delivered to China Airlines, all from 1979 to 1980. The other three had been in full passenger service until 1999 when they were converted to freighters. They were immediately grounded by the ROC's Civil Aviation Administration (CAA) after the crash for maintenance checks.

Accident

B-18255 in a previous livery and registration in 1995 and when the 1980 tailstrike incident happened.

The flight took off at 15:08 local time (07:08 UTC), and was scheduled to arrive at Hong Kong at 16:28 Hong Kong Time (08:28 UTC). The flight crew consisted of 51-year-old Captain Yi Ching-Fong, 52-year-old First Officer Shieh Yea Shyong, and 54-year-old Flight Engineer Chao Sen Kuo. All three pilots were highly experienced – both pilots had more than 10,100 hours of flying time and the flight engineer had logged more than 19,100 flight hours.

At 15:16 local time, the flight was cleared to climb to flight level 350—about 35,000 feet (11,000 m). At 15:33, contact with the plane was lost. Chang Chia-juch, the Taiwanese Vice Minister of Transportation and Communications at that time, said that two Cathay Pacific aircraft in the area received B-18255's emergency location-indicator signals. All 206 passengers and 19 crew members on board the aircraft were killed.

Passengers

The passengers included Taiwanese politician You Jih-cheng. and two reporters from the United Daily News. Most of the passengers, 114 people, were members of a Taiwanese group tour to China organised by four travel agencies.

Nationality Passengers Crew Total
TaiwanTaiwan 190 19 209
ChinaChina 9 0 9
Hong KongHong Kong 5 0 5
SingaporeSingapore 1 0 1
SwitzerlandSwitzerland 1 0 1
Total 206 19 225

Of the 225 passengers and crew on board, remains of 175 were recovered and identified. The first 82 bodies were found floating on the ocean surface of the Taiwan Strait, and were recovered by fishing boats and military vessels. Contracted recovery vessels were subsequently used for the recovery of the aircraft wreckage and the remaining bodies.

The victims were identified by visual identification, personal effects, fingerprints, dental examinations, and through DNA testing. Only the three recovered flight crew member bodies were autopsied. The victims' bodies were photographed and their clothing and possessions were catalogued and returned to the victims' families. The victims' records, including body diagrams, injury protocols, photographs, and other documents related to the recovery and identification of the individuals were then correlated for each identified victim.

Most of the victims had extensive injuries consistent with head trauma, tibia and fibula fractures, significant back abrasions, and pelvic injuries. Most of the bodies were nearly intact except, in some cases, for fractured bones. Some of the victims had expansion of lung tissue, subcutaneous emphysema, and bleeding of the nose and mouth. No carbon remains were found on any of the recovered bodies or their clothes, and no sign of fire, burning, or blast damage was found.

Search, recovery and investigation

B-18255 seat-plan:  Empty seat  Not recovered  Recovered
Around 1995, China Airlines started to ban smoking on board. Cabin pressurisation forced the smoke out through the cracks. Over time, the smoke left the tar stains outside the plane. These stains were an indication of possible hidden cracks beneath the doubler plate, which means that the cracks had been there long before 1995.

At 17:05 local time, a military Lockheed C-130 Hercules aircraft spotted a crashed airliner 23 nautical miles (43 km; 26 mi) northeast of Makung, Penghu Islands. Oil slicks were also spotted at 17:05; the first body was found at 18:10.

No distress signal or communication was sent out prior to the crash. Radar data suggest that the aircraft broke into four pieces whilst at FL 350. This theory is supported by the fact that some lighter articles that would have been found inside the aircraft were found up to 130 kilometres (70 nmi; 81 mi) from the crash site at villages in central Taiwan. The items included magazines, documents, luggage, photographs, New Taiwan dollars, aircraft safety cards and a China Airlines-embossed, blood-stained pillow case.

The plane was supposed to be leveling off then, as it approached its cruising altitude of 35,000 ft (11,000 m). Shortly before the breakup, two of the aircraft's four engines began providing slightly higher thrust, which was later found to have been within the normal ranges of deviation. All four engines were recovered from the sea and found not to have suffered any malfunction prior to the crash. Pieces of the aircraft were found in the ocean and on Taiwan, including in the city of Changhua.

The governments of Taiwan and the People's Republic of China co-operated in the recovery of the aircraft; the Chinese allowed personnel from Taiwan to search for bodies and aircraft fragments in those parts of the Taiwan Strait controlled by the People's Republic of China.

China Airlines requested relatives to submit blood samples for DNA testing at the Criminal Investigation Bureau of National Police Administration (now National Police Agency) and two other locations.

The United Daily News stated that some relatives of passengers described the existence of this flight to Hong Kong as being "unnecessary". Most of the passengers intended to arrive in mainland China, but because of a lack of direct air links between Taiwan and mainland China, the travellers had to fly via Hong Kong; the relatives advocated the opening of direct air links between Taiwan and mainland China, which was eventually realised.

Cause

The final investigation report found that the accident was the result of fatigue cracking caused by inadequate maintenance after a much earlier tailstrike incident. On 7 February 1980, the aircraft was flying from Stockholm Arlanda Airport to Taoyuan International Airport via King Abdulaziz International Airport and Kai Tak International Airport as China Airlines Flight 009 (Callsign CAL009, pronounced Dynasty 009). While landing in Hong Kong, part of the plane's tail had scraped along the runway. The aircraft was depressurised, ferried back to Taiwan on the same day, and a temporary repair done the day after. A more permanent repair was conducted by a team from China Airlines from 23-26 May 1980.

The permanent repair of the tailstrike was not carried out in accordance with the Boeing Structural Repair Manual (SRM). According to the SRM, repairs could be made by replacing the entire affected skin or by cutting out the damaged portion and installing a reinforcing doubler plate to restore the structural strength. Rather than following the SRM, the China Airlines team installed a doubler over the damaged skin.

Though the kind of damage inflicted on the tail was far beyond the damage that a doubler plate is meant to fix, this accident probably would not have occurred had the doubler been installed properly. This would mean that all of the scratches would be completely contained by the innermost row of fasteners, and the fasteners themselves would be strong enough to stop the propagation of any new and existing fatigue cracks. However, the doubler that was installed on the aircraft was too small, so it failed to completely and effectively cover the damaged area, as scratches were found at, and outside, the outermost row of fasteners securing the doubler. Installing the doubler with scratches remaining outside the rivets provided no protection against the propagation of any concealed cracks beneath the doubler, or worse, in the area between its perimeter and the rows of rivets.

Consequently, after repeated cycles of pressurisation and depressurisation during flight, cracks began to form around the exposed scratches until finally, on 25 May 2002, coincidentally 22 years to the day after the faulty repair was made on the damaged tail, the hull broke open in midair. A rapid decompression occurred once the crack opened up, causing the separation of the aircraft's fuselage at section 46 (aft of the main wingbox). The remainder of the aircraft forward of section 46 entered an abrupt descent, causing all four engines to separate from the wings near-simultaneously, as the engine fuse pins failed at about 29,000 feet (8,800 m). After this point, the wings and fuselage forward of the initial breakpoint remained connected until impact with the sea.

This was not the first time that a 747 had crashed because of a faulty repair following a tailstrike. On 12 August 1985, 17 years before Flight 611's crash and 7 years after the accident aircraft's repair, Japan Air Lines Flight 123 from Tokyo to Osaka with 524 people on board had crashed when the vertical stabiliser was torn off and the hydraulic systems severed by explosive decompression, leaving only four survivors. That crash had been attributed to a faulty repair to the rear pressure bulkhead, which had been damaged in 1978 in a tail strike incident. In both crashes, a doubler plate was not installed according to Boeing standards at the time.

China Airlines disputed much of the report, stating that investigators did not find the pieces of the aircraft that would prove the contents of the investigation report. One piece of evidence during the investigation that came up was the discolouration on the damaged section of the tail from photographs from maintenance records. The discolouration was determined to be tar stains from the historic use of cigarettes and cigars. Smoking was permitted onboard China Airlines' flights until 1995. Had the stains been investigated, the cracks in the fuselage would have been determined, and the plane may have avoided the fateful flight.

Dramatisation

The accident was featured in a Season 7 episode of the Canadian documentary Mayday, entitled "Scratching the Surface".

See also

Notes

Transliterations

  1. Yi Ching-Fong: 易清豐; Yì Qīngfēng; I Cingfong
  2. Shieh Yea Shyong: 謝亞雄; Xiè Yàxióng; Syieh Yasyong
  3. Chao Sen Kuo: 趙盛國; Zhào Shèngguó; Jhao Shengkuo

References

  1. ^ "In-Flight Breakup Over the Taiwan Strait Northeast of Makung, Penghu Island, China Airlines Flight CI611, Boeing 747-200, B-18255, May 25, 2002" (PDF). Aviation Occurrence Report. 1 (ASC-AOR-05-02-001). Taipei, Taiwan: Aviation Safety Council. 25 February 2005. Retrieved 11 February 2017.
  2. "NEWS UPDATE OF CHINA AIRLINES CI611 FLIGHT". China Airlines. Archived from the original on 4 August 2002. Retrieved 22 April 2010.
  3. Marshall, Tyler; Tsai, Ting-I (26 May 2002). "Jet Crashes Off Taiwan With 225 People Aboard". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 11 November 2014.
  4. "B-18255 Seat Plan". www.iasa.com.au. International Aviation Safety Association. Archived from the original on 11 May 2019. Retrieved 8 July 2020.
  5. ^ Bhandari, Amit; Ananthanarayanan, Ravi (26 May 2002). "Catastrophic failure, but how?". The Times of India. ISSN 0971-8257. Archived from the original on 16 August 2016. Retrieved 3 May 2009. All but one of the 225 persons on board the plane were Chinese. Most were from Taiwan, while others came from China, Hong Kong, Macau, or Singapore. The only non-Chinese foreigner was Swiss, identified by "The Taipei Times" as a Mr Luigi Heer.
  6. Ranter, Harro. "ASN Aircraft accident Boeing 747-209B B-18255". Aviation Safety Network. Flight Safety Foundation. Retrieved 3 November 2014.
  7. Bradsher, Keith (27 May 2002). "Taiwan Airliner Broke Apart in Midair, Investigators Say". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 3 November 2014.
  8. "News update of China Airlines CI611 Flight". China Airlines. 25 May 2002. Archived from the original on 6 August 2002. Retrieved 3 May 2009.
  9. "Version time: 2002/05/28 PM 02:00 CI 611 / 25 May". China Airlines. 28 May 2002. Archived from the original on 6 August 2002. Retrieved 3 May 2009.
  10. "In-Flight Breakup Over the Taiwan Strait Northeast of Makung, Penghu Island, China Airlines Flight CI611, Boeing 747-200, B-18255, May 25, 2002" (PDF). Aviation Occurrence Report. 2. Taipei, Taiwan: Aviation Safety Council. 25 February 2005. ASC-AOR-05-02-001. Retrieved 9 September 2020.
  11. Bradsher, Keith (25 May 2002). "Taiwanese Airliner With 225 Aboard Crashes in Sea". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 3 November 2014.
  12. ^ Low, Stephanie; Yu-jung, Chang (26 May 2002). "CAL 747 crashes with 225 aboard". Taipei Times. All 19 crew members, as well as 190 passengers on board, were Taiwanese, including two United Daily News reporters and a former legislator. In addition to 14 Hong Kong, Macau, and Chinese residents, foreign passengers also included one Singaporean, identified as Sim Yong-joo, and one Swiss, identified as Luigi Heer.
  13. Chinoy, Mike (25 May 2002). "All 225 feared dead in Taiwan air crash". CNN. Archived from the original on 2 May 2003. Retrieved 11 November 2014.
  14. "前立委游日正改行程 搭上死亡班機" [Former legislator changes his itinerary during a trip to Japan to catch the death flight]. Liberty Times (in Chinese). 26 May 2002. Retrieved 12 April 2019.
  15. "Taiwan's Tragic Air Crash Kills 225 People". People's Daily. 26 May 2002. Retrieved 3 November 2014.
  16. "China missile ruled out in Taiwan crash". CNN. 27 May 2002. Archived from the original on 4 December 2008. – Version with full pictures:
  17. ^ "Scratching The Surface". Mayday. Season 7. Episode 1. Cineflix Productions.
  18. "Military aviation expert says flaws in Taiwan plane crash theory: report". The Namibian. 8 July 2002. Archived from the original on 19 April 2003. Retrieved 3 May 2009.
  19. "78 Bodies From Crashed Taiwanese Plane Retrieved". Xinhua News Agency. 26 May 2002. Retrieved 3 May 2009.
  20. "Relatives fly to Taiwan crash site". BBC News. 26 May 2002.
  21. Gittings, John (25 May 2002). "225 dead in mystery Taiwan crash". The Guardian. The Observer. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 11 November 2014.
  22. ^ Lam, Willy Wo-Lap (27 May 2002). "Crash brings Taiwan, China together". CNN. Archived from the original on 4 December 2008. Retrieved 27 May 2009.
  23. "NEWS UPDATE OF B18255 INCIDENT (6)". China Airlines. 26 May 2002. Archived from the original on 4 August 2002.
  24. "Cracks blamed for 2002 China Airlines crash". CBC News. Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. 25 February 2005. Retrieved 8 July 2020.
  25. "Boeing admits bad work on ill-fated Japanese Boeing 747". Star-News. 8 September 1985. Retrieved 1 June 2012.
  26. "China Airlines Statement on CI 611 Accident Investigation Report" (Press release). China Airlines. 25 February 2005. Archived from the original on 1 March 2005. Retrieved 16 January 2015.
  27. "Taiwan's Deadliest Plane Crash China Airlines Flight 611 Disintegrates - Mayday". YouTube. 6 January 2022.

External links

This section's use of external links may not follow Misplaced Pages's policies or guidelines. Please improve this article by removing excessive or inappropriate external links, and converting useful links where appropriate into footnote references. (April 2019) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Aviation Safety Council

China Airlines

Media

Other

China Airlines Group
Airlines
Conventional airlines
Regional airlines
Low-cost carriers
Destinations
Airport services
Hotels
Headquarters
History
Accidents and incidents
Aviation accidents and incidents in Taiwan (Republic of China) post-1949
1960s
1970s
1980s
1990s
2000s
2010s
2020s
For accidents and incidents in the Republic of China pre-1949, see Template:Aviation accidents and incidents in China
Aviation accidents and incidents in 2002 (2002)
Jan 5 Tampa Cessna 172 crashJan 14 Siberia Airlines Flight 852Jan 16 Garuda Indonesia Flight 421Jan 27 Shelkovskaya Mi-8 crashJan 28 TAME Flight 120Feb 12 Iran Air Tours Flight 956Apr 15 Air China Flight 129Apr 18 Pirelli Tower airplane crashMay 3 Jalandhar MiG-21 crashMay 4 EAS Airlines Flight 4226May 7 China Northern Airlines Flight 6136May 7 EgyptAir Flight 843May 25 China Airlines Flight 611Jun 17 C-130 Hercules airtanker crashJul 1 Überlingen mid-air collisionJul 1 America West Airlines Flight 556Jul 4 Prestige Airlines Boeing 707 crashJul 10 Swiss International Air Lines Flight 850Jul 16 Bristow Helicopters Sikorsky S-76A crashJul 18 PB4Y-2 Privateer airtanker crashJul 26 FedEx Express Flight 1478Jul 27 Sknyliv air show disasterJul 28 Pulkovo Aviation Enterprise Flight 9560Aug 19 Khankala Mi-26 crashAug 22 Shangri-La Air Twin Otter crashAug 30 Rico Linhas Aéreas Flight 4823Sep 14 Total Linhas Aéreas Flight 5561Oct 9 Northwest Airlines Flight 85Nov 6 Luxair Flight 9642Nov 11 Laoag International Airlines Flight 585Dec 21 TransAsia Airways Flight 791Dec 23 Aeromist-Kharkiv Flight 2137
2001   ◄    ►   2003
China Cross-strait relations Taiwan
Diplomatic posts
Diplomacy
Conflicts
Incidents
Legislation
Organizations
Concepts
Related
Portals: Categories:
China Airlines Flight 611: Difference between revisions Add topic